No, what's happening is you either don't understand the explaination s, in which case you ignore them, or they debunk your nonsense, in which case you ignore them.
Just saying something doesn't look right or you don't understand it is not supporting evidence.
Of course in this particular case ''it doesn't look good'' is proof.
But because you are either such a lazy person, lacking basic intelligence or just trolling whenever i post proof, i will explain it once again !
And Quora says this :
So the rocket launchers instead decide to have some kind of tradeoff between aerodynamic and gravity drag;
where the rocket goes vertically up through the denser parts of the atmosphere to minimise aerodynamic drag and where the air density thins out at higher altitudes, a lateral turn is done to minimise losses due to gravity drag.
But when you watch the video of the Indian rocket supposedly carrying 104 satellites, it goes sideways through the denser parts of the atmosphere....
And if you see the above images and try to wrap your head around how small a human and a camera is in that image...the Indian rocket simply could not have been launched as shown in the video to even reach the lowest of lowest orbits !!
But your basic understanding of eyesight, scale and proportion is off by a considerable margin !!
Therefor NASA & co can sell whatever they want to.....because the likes of you accept everything as genuine......you will simply accept EVERYTHING because when the words
''space'', ''rocket'', ''NASA'', ''satellite'' are used it is solid proof for you !
As long as any of the above
''words'' are used...Badxtoss is convinced...totally convinced that is.....
Can you imagine what happens when Badxtoss reads something like : ''
NASA has launched their latest
rocket carying a new type of comminucation
satelite into
space........
