HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?

  • 293 Replies
  • 61422 Views
*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #120 on: September 12, 2017, 02:54:20 AM »
We deserve to know the entire truth. Do you disagree?
Sez who?  What makes you so special that you should know the entire truth?
Why do you always ask stupid questions?
Because you're so good at giving stupid answers.
Well, topic is if the hurricane Harvey was created not by nature as expectd but by humans (a CT!), and I thought Harvey looked pretty natural and added, if gutters had been fitted, Houston would not have been flooded. Plenty stupid guttersnipes then thought that gutters only collect rain water from roofs and forgot that gutters, i.e. channels, are also installed around houses and roads to evacuate rain water away from them to inhabited areas, e.g. the sea.

And it seems local building regulations in Texas do not require gutters.

So you can only blame the local government. I remember when GWB was governor and I asked him how he trained the state servants acting as executioners of all people sentenced to death in Texas. I never got an answer. And I forgot to ask about the gutters.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45141
  • +92/-136
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #121 on: September 12, 2017, 05:29:20 AM »
We deserve to know the entire truth. Do you disagree?
Sez who?  What makes you so special that you should know the entire truth?
Why do you always ask stupid questions?
Because you're so good at giving stupid answers.
Well, topic is if the hurricane Harvey was created not by nature as expectd but by humans (a CT!), and I thought Harvey looked pretty natural and added, if gutters had been fitted, Houston would not have been flooded. Plenty stupid guttersnipes then thought that gutters only collect rain water from roofs and forgot that gutters, i.e. channels, are also installed around houses and roads to evacuate rain water away from them to inhabited areas, e.g. the sea.

And it seems local building regulations in Texas do not require gutters.

So you can only blame the local government. I remember when GWB was governor and I asked him how he trained the state servants acting as executioners of all people sentenced to death in Texas. I never got an answer. And I forgot to ask about the gutters.
Thank you for another excellent stupid answer.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #122 on: September 12, 2017, 10:57:40 AM »
We deserve to know the entire truth. Do you disagree?
Sez who?  What makes you so special that you should know the entire truth?
Why do you always ask stupid questions?
Because you're so good at giving stupid answers.
Well, topic is if the hurricane Harvey was created not by nature as expectd but by humans (a CT!), and I thought Harvey looked pretty natural and added, if gutters had been fitted, Houston would not have been flooded. Plenty stupid guttersnipes then thought that gutters only collect rain water from roofs and forgot that gutters, i.e. channels, are also installed around houses and roads to evacuate rain water away from them to inhabited areas, e.g. the sea.

And it seems local building regulations in Texas do not require gutters.

So you can only blame the local government. I remember when GWB was governor and I asked him how he trained the state servants acting as executioners of all people sentenced to death in Texas. I never got an answer. And I forgot to ask about the gutters.
Thank you for another excellent stupid answer.

Well, I am sorry if you consider it stupid. Hurricane Harvey was not an engineered storm, IMO, but the flooding of Houston was caused by lack of civil engineering regulations, e.g. gutters not fitted to allow rainwater to escape from inhabited areas.

To prevent another flooding incident Houston really have to fit a proper drainage system, incl. gutters.

Hurricane Harvey being an engineered storm is just a stupid conspiracy theory of flat earthers like you.

*

Pezevenk

  • 15953
  • +80/-58
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #123 on: September 12, 2017, 11:44:20 AM »
Heiwa has probably forgotten everything that was explained to him by now.
Member of the BOTD for Anti Fascism and Racism

It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from
-Intikam (again)

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45141
  • +92/-136
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #124 on: September 12, 2017, 11:58:28 AM »
Well, I am sorry if you consider it stupid. Hurricane Harvey was not an engineered storm...
Nope, that isn't what I was talking about.

... IMO, but the flooding of Houston was caused by lack of civil engineering regulations, e.g. gutters not fitted to allow rainwater to escape from inhabited areas.
This is the stupid part that I was talking about.

To prevent another flooding incident Houston really have to fit a proper drainage system, incl. gutters.
Maybe Houston just couldn't afford to install sufficient drainage for a flood event that's only supposed to hit once every thousand years or so.

Hurricane Harvey being an engineered storm is just a stupid conspiracy theory of flat earthers like you.
If you think that I'm a flat earther, then you're even more stupid than I thought.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #125 on: September 12, 2017, 01:24:26 PM »

... IMO, but the flooding of Houston was caused by lack of civil engineering regulations, e.g. gutters not fitted to allow rainwater to escape from inhabited areas.
This is the stupid part that I was talking about.

What is stupid about it?

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45141
  • +92/-136
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #126 on: September 12, 2017, 01:51:29 PM »

... IMO, but the flooding of Houston was caused by lack of civil engineering regulations, e.g. gutters not fitted to allow rainwater to escape from inhabited areas.
This is the stupid part that I was talking about.

What is stupid about it?
The part where you think that gutters could keep up with more than a meter of rain over 4 days.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #127 on: September 12, 2017, 06:45:00 PM »

... IMO, but the flooding of Houston was caused by lack of civil engineering regulations, e.g. gutters not fitted to allow rainwater to escape from inhabited areas.
This is the stupid part that I was talking about.

What is stupid about it?
The part where you think that gutters could keep up with more than a meter of rain over 4 days.

If the gutters were designed to remove a feet of rain per day, then there would have been no flooding of inhabited areas.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45141
  • +92/-136
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #128 on: September 12, 2017, 07:24:06 PM »

... IMO, but the flooding of Houston was caused by lack of civil engineering regulations, e.g. gutters not fitted to allow rainwater to escape from inhabited areas.
This is the stupid part that I was talking about.

What is stupid about it?
The part where you think that gutters could keep up with more than a meter of rain over 4 days.

If the gutters were designed to remove a feet of rain per day, then there would have been no flooding of inhabited areas.
Have you ever tried to design a drainage system that can handle a foot of water a day for several days in a row for a city the size of Houston?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #129 on: September 13, 2017, 05:04:24 AM »

... IMO, but the flooding of Houston was caused by lack of civil engineering regulations, e.g. gutters not fitted to allow rainwater to escape from inhabited areas.
This is the stupid part that I was talking about.

What is stupid about it?
The part where you think that gutters could keep up with more than a meter of rain over 4 days.

If the gutters were designed to remove a feet of rain per day, then there would have been no flooding of inhabited areas.
Have you ever tried to design a drainage system that can handle a foot of water a day for several days in a row for a city the size of Houston?
No, you should know that my biz is safety at sea - http://heiwaco.com . Safety on land is not my biz. But whereever there is water you have to control it. But not at Houston, Texas, USA. They forgot to install gutters.

?

Noblerabbit

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #130 on: September 13, 2017, 05:16:15 AM »

... IMO, but the flooding of Houston was caused by lack of civil engineering regulations, e.g. gutters not fitted to allow rainwater to escape from inhabited areas.
This is the stupid part that I was talking about.

What is stupid about it?
The part where you think that gutters could keep up with more than a meter of rain over 4 days.

If the gutters were designed to remove a feet of rain per day, then there would have been no flooding of inhabited areas.
Have you ever tried to design a drainage system that can handle a foot of water a day for several days in a row for a city the size of Houston?
No, you should know that my biz is safety at sea - http://heiwaco.com . Safety on land is not my biz. But whereever there is water you have to control it. But not at Houston, Texas, USA. They forgot to install gutters.


*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45141
  • +92/-136
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #131 on: September 13, 2017, 05:49:12 AM »

... IMO, but the flooding of Houston was caused by lack of civil engineering regulations, e.g. gutters not fitted to allow rainwater to escape from inhabited areas.
This is the stupid part that I was talking about.

What is stupid about it?
The part where you think that gutters could keep up with more than a meter of rain over 4 days.

If the gutters were designed to remove a feet of rain per day, then there would have been no flooding of inhabited areas.
Have you ever tried to design a drainage system that can handle a foot of water a day for several days in a row for a city the size of Houston?
No, you should know that my biz is safety at sea - http://heiwaco.com .
Well, obviously you aren't very good at your job because ships still sink.

Safety on land is not my biz.
Then why do you feel qualified to comment on it?

But whereever there is water you have to control it. But not at Houston, Texas, USA. They forgot to install gutters.
Have you been to Houston to inspect their gutters?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Noblerabbit

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #132 on: September 13, 2017, 05:51:25 AM »

... IMO, but the flooding of Houston was caused by lack of civil engineering regulations, e.g. gutters not fitted to allow rainwater to escape from inhabited areas.
This is the stupid part that I was talking about.

What is stupid about it?
The part where you think that gutters could keep up with more than a meter of rain over 4 days.

If the gutters were designed to remove a feet of rain per day, then there would have been no flooding of inhabited areas.
Have you ever tried to design a drainage system that can handle a foot of water a day for several days in a row for a city the size of Houston?
No, you should know that my biz is safety at sea - http://heiwaco.com .
Well, obviously you aren't very good at your job because ships still sink.

Well that's like saying there aren't good aviation engineers because sometimes planes crash.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45141
  • +92/-136
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #133 on: September 13, 2017, 06:33:13 AM »

... IMO, but the flooding of Houston was caused by lack of civil engineering regulations, e.g. gutters not fitted to allow rainwater to escape from inhabited areas.
This is the stupid part that I was talking about.

What is stupid about it?
The part where you think that gutters could keep up with more than a meter of rain over 4 days.

If the gutters were designed to remove a feet of rain per day, then there would have been no flooding of inhabited areas.
Have you ever tried to design a drainage system that can handle a foot of water a day for several days in a row for a city the size of Houston?
No, you should know that my biz is safety at sea - http://heiwaco.com .
Well, obviously you aren't very good at your job because ships still sink.

Well that's like saying there aren't good aviation engineers because sometimes planes crash.
Or like saying that Houston civil engineers aren't very good because they didn't install enough gutters for a 1000 year flood event.
« Last Edit: September 13, 2017, 06:40:17 AM by markjo »
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Noblerabbit

  • 42
  • +0/-0
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #134 on: September 13, 2017, 06:44:55 AM »
Yeah that's why I posted the captain hindsight video.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #135 on: September 13, 2017, 07:48:19 AM »
Well, it seems Texas has no rules to prevent flooding of areas of new habitation. You can build wherever you like and gutters are not really required anywhere, as the place is mostly a desert anyway. It is a free country and people are stupid. So when it rains and great, newly inhabitated areas with cheap housings are flooded due to lack of drainage systems, it is a surprise, blah, blah, blah. 1000 years storms. LOL! And GWB was governor of the place for many years and executed 100's of people to keep the order. It explains it all.

*

MicroBeta

  • 2490
  • +1/-0
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #136 on: September 13, 2017, 08:46:19 AM »
Well, it seems Texas has no rules to prevent flooding of areas of new habitation. You can build wherever you like and gutters are not really required anywhere, as the place is mostly a desert anyway. It is a free country and people are stupid. So when it rains and great, newly inhabitated areas with cheap housings are flooded due to lack of drainage systems, it is a surprise, blah, blah, blah. 1000 years storms. LOL! And GWB was governor of the place for many years and executed 100's of people to keep the order. It explains it all.
Whet do you get this information because it's wrong. Houston in particular has very stringent regulations about flooding control.

Either you're just making shit up again or its you usual shoddy research.  Which is it?

Mike
Since it costs 2.72¢ to produce a penny, putting in your 2¢ if really worth 5.44¢.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #137 on: September 13, 2017, 10:23:48 AM »
Well, it seems Texas has no rules to prevent flooding of areas of new habitation. You can build wherever you like and gutters are not really required anywhere, as the place is mostly a desert anyway. It is a free country and people are stupid. So when it rains and great, newly inhabitated areas with cheap housings are flooded due to lack of drainage systems, it is a surprise, blah, blah, blah. 1000 years storms. LOL! And GWB was governor of the place for many years and executed 100's of people to keep the order. It explains it all.
Whet do you get this information because it's wrong. Houston in particular has very stringent regulations about flooding control.

Either you're just making shit up again or its you usual shoddy research.  Which is it?

Mike

It is neither. I just read about it in some European newspapers suggesting all these new Houston subburbs were built in old marschlands disregarding rain drainage systems and the risk of flooding.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +3/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #138 on: September 13, 2017, 11:16:15 AM »
Well, it seems Texas has no rules to prevent flooding of areas of new habitation.
You can build wherever you like and gutters are not really required anywhere,
as the place is mostly a desert anyway.


It is neither. I just read about it in some European newspapers suggesting all these new Houston subburbs
were built in old marschlands disregarding rain drainage systems and the risk of flooding.


I'm not getting a plane ticket, am I?

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45141
  • +92/-136
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #139 on: September 13, 2017, 11:36:03 AM »
Well, it seems Texas has no rules to prevent flooding of areas of new habitation. You can build wherever you like and gutters are not really required anywhere, as the place is mostly a desert anyway.

Hmm...  Maybe you should read the FAQ.
What is a floodplain?

FEMA defines a floodplain as "any land area that is susceptible to being inundated by water from any source." In Harris County, a floodplain is generally defined as an area susceptible to being flooded due to either a channel's capacity being exceeded or due to a tidal storm surge. See the Flash interactive overview for more information.

What is meant by the term 1% (100-year) Floodplain?

Also known as the Base Flood, it is an area of land that has a 1% chance of being inundated by floodwaters from a bayou or creek in a given year. The 1% (100-year) flood event is a regulatory standard used to administer floodplain management programs and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and to set building requirements for new construction. Statistically, the 1% (100-year) flood has a 26% chance of occurring during a 30-year period of time – the length of many mortgages. See the Flash interactive overview for more information.

Is construction permitted within the 1% (100-year) floodplain?

Restricted development is permitted in the 1% (100-year) floodplain. The floodplain administrators at each municipality within Harris County are responsible for enforcing floodplain management rules and regulations that govern construction in the floodplain.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #140 on: September 13, 2017, 11:00:51 PM »
Well, it seems Texas has no rules to prevent flooding of areas of new habitation. You can build wherever you like and gutters are not really required anywhere, as the place is mostly a desert anyway.

Hmm...  Maybe you should read the FAQ.
What is a floodplain?

FEMA defines a floodplain as "any land area that is susceptible to being inundated by water from any source." In Harris County, a floodplain is generally defined as an area susceptible to being flooded due to either a channel's capacity being exceeded or due to a tidal storm surge. See the Flash interactive overview for more information.

What is meant by the term 1% (100-year) Floodplain?

Also known as the Base Flood, it is an area of land that has a 1% chance of being inundated by floodwaters from a bayou or creek in a given year. The 1% (100-year) flood event is a regulatory standard used to administer floodplain management programs and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and to set building requirements for new construction. Statistically, the 1% (100-year) flood has a 26% chance of occurring during a 30-year period of time – the length of many mortgages. See the Flash interactive overview for more information.

Is construction permitted within the 1% (100-year) floodplain?

Restricted development is permitted in the 1% (100-year) floodplain. The floodplain administrators at each municipality within Harris County are responsible for enforcing floodplain management rules and regulations that govern construction in the floodplain.

Thanks, so restricted development is permitted in the 1% floodplain, if your mortage is <30 years, but that development was destroyed at Houston due to lack of gutter channels a few years after construction. Yes, FEMA is a joke. Just look at its top brass.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2017, 12:12:36 AM by Heiwa »

*

MicroBeta

  • 2490
  • +1/-0
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #141 on: September 14, 2017, 07:35:29 AM »
Well, it seems Texas has no rules to prevent flooding of areas of new habitation. You can build wherever you like and gutters are not really required anywhere, as the place is mostly a desert anyway.

Hmm...  Maybe you should read the FAQ.
What is a floodplain?

FEMA defines a floodplain as "any land area that is susceptible to being inundated by water from any source." In Harris County, a floodplain is generally defined as an area susceptible to being flooded due to either a channel's capacity being exceeded or due to a tidal storm surge. See the Flash interactive overview for more information.

What is meant by the term 1% (100-year) Floodplain?

Also known as the Base Flood, it is an area of land that has a 1% chance of being inundated by floodwaters from a bayou or creek in a given year. The 1% (100-year) flood event is a regulatory standard used to administer floodplain management programs and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and to set building requirements for new construction. Statistically, the 1% (100-year) flood has a 26% chance of occurring during a 30-year period of time – the length of many mortgages. See the Flash interactive overview for more information.

Is construction permitted within the 1% (100-year) floodplain?

Restricted development is permitted in the 1% (100-year) floodplain. The floodplain administrators at each municipality within Harris County are responsible for enforcing floodplain management rules and regulations that govern construction in the floodplain.

Thanks, so restricted development is permitted in the 1% floodplain, if your mortage is <30 years, but that development was destroyed at Houston due to lack of gutter channels a few years after construction. Yes, FEMA is a joke. Just look at its top brass.

You are just plain lying again. You can't make the claim that gutters have anything to do with it.  You don't the slightest clue what the total capacity of those gutters you keep talking about.

You show us a single example of a major coastal city anywhere in the world that could handle 1.25 meters of rain in four days. Let me help you...you can't so stop making shit up and do some real research.

Mike
Since it costs 2.72¢ to produce a penny, putting in your 2¢ if really worth 5.44¢.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #142 on: September 14, 2017, 07:48:10 AM »
The storm surge also played a major part in the flooding. I don't really see any mention of that.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #143 on: September 14, 2017, 08:00:36 AM »
Well, it seems Texas has no rules to prevent flooding of areas of new habitation. You can build wherever you like and gutters are not really required anywhere, as the place is mostly a desert anyway.

Hmm...  Maybe you should read the FAQ.
What is a floodplain?

FEMA defines a floodplain as "any land area that is susceptible to being inundated by water from any source." In Harris County, a floodplain is generally defined as an area susceptible to being flooded due to either a channel's capacity being exceeded or due to a tidal storm surge. See the Flash interactive overview for more information.

What is meant by the term 1% (100-year) Floodplain?

Also known as the Base Flood, it is an area of land that has a 1% chance of being inundated by floodwaters from a bayou or creek in a given year. The 1% (100-year) flood event is a regulatory standard used to administer floodplain management programs and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and to set building requirements for new construction. Statistically, the 1% (100-year) flood has a 26% chance of occurring during a 30-year period of time – the length of many mortgages. See the Flash interactive overview for more information.

Is construction permitted within the 1% (100-year) floodplain?

Restricted development is permitted in the 1% (100-year) floodplain. The floodplain administrators at each municipality within Harris County are responsible for enforcing floodplain management rules and regulations that govern construction in the floodplain.

Thanks, so restricted development is permitted in the 1% floodplain, if your mortage is <30 years, but that development was destroyed at Houston due to lack of gutter channels a few years after construction. Yes, FEMA is a joke. Just look at its top brass.

You are just plain lying again. You can't make the claim that gutters have anything to do with it.  You don't the slightest clue what the total capacity of those gutters you keep talking about.

You show us a single example of a major coastal city anywhere in the world that could handle 1.25 meters of rain in four days. Let me help you...you can't so stop making shit up and do some real research.

Mike

Well, it was just bad luck! A 1% (100-year) flood or rain fall (make your choice) with a 26% chance of occurring during a 30-year period of time just happened, when they had filled the wet lowlands with cheap buildings.

Mike, why do you always support all nonsense you learn somewhere - in the gutters?

*

RocketSauce

  • 1441
  • +0/-0
  • I kill penguins for fun
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #144 on: September 14, 2017, 12:11:20 PM »
Not to beat a dead horse here...

But I'm still trying to figure out why a weather photo taken from a satellite is being used to reference anything on a flat earth site that fundamentally doesn't believe in satellites...


So could you please provide another source for your speculation of the Engineering of Hurricane Harvey, because again... Round Earth Technology should not be sourced by Flat Earthers to help their arguments, such as weather radar maps obtained from satellites.



On a side note... this is a fantastic make believe story that couldn't have happened on a flat earth...

http://gothamist.com/2017/09/07/pilot_flight_hurricane_irma_radar.php
Quote from: Every FE'r

Please don't mention Himawari 8
Quote from: sceptimatic
Impossible to have the same volume and different density.

*fact*
Extra Virgin Penguin Blood is a natural aphrodisiac

*

MicroBeta

  • 2490
  • +1/-0
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #145 on: September 14, 2017, 12:12:04 PM »
Well, it seems Texas has no rules to prevent flooding of areas of new habitation. You can build wherever you like and gutters are not really required anywhere, as the place is mostly a desert anyway.

Hmm...  Maybe you should read the FAQ.
What is a floodplain?

FEMA defines a floodplain as "any land area that is susceptible to being inundated by water from any source." In Harris County, a floodplain is generally defined as an area susceptible to being flooded due to either a channel's capacity being exceeded or due to a tidal storm surge. See the Flash interactive overview for more information.

What is meant by the term 1% (100-year) Floodplain?

Also known as the Base Flood, it is an area of land that has a 1% chance of being inundated by floodwaters from a bayou or creek in a given year. The 1% (100-year) flood event is a regulatory standard used to administer floodplain management programs and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and to set building requirements for new construction. Statistically, the 1% (100-year) flood has a 26% chance of occurring during a 30-year period of time – the length of many mortgages. See the Flash interactive overview for more information.

Is construction permitted within the 1% (100-year) floodplain?

Restricted development is permitted in the 1% (100-year) floodplain. The floodplain administrators at each municipality within Harris County are responsible for enforcing floodplain management rules and regulations that govern construction in the floodplain.

Thanks, so restricted development is permitted in the 1% floodplain, if your mortage is <30 years, but that development was destroyed at Houston due to lack of gutter channels a few years after construction. Yes, FEMA is a joke. Just look at its top brass.

You are just plain lying again. You can't make the claim that gutters have anything to do with it.  You don't the slightest clue what the total capacity of those gutters you keep talking about.

You show us a single example of a major coastal city anywhere in the world that could handle 1.25 meters of rain in four days. Let me help you...you can't so stop making shit up and do some real research.

Mike

Well, it was just bad luck! A 1% (100-year) flood or rain fall (make your choice) with a 26% chance of occurring during a 30-year period of time just happened, when they had filled the wet lowlands with cheap buildings.

Mike, why do you always support all nonsense you learn somewhere - in the gutters?
You're the one making shit up with all that nonsense about gutters.

As if gutters would have helped over a meter of rain and a 10+ foot storm surge.

Mike
Since it costs 2.72¢ to produce a penny, putting in your 2¢ if really worth 5.44¢.

*

RocketSauce

  • 1441
  • +0/-0
  • I kill penguins for fun
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #146 on: September 14, 2017, 12:21:47 PM »
how about... had they not developed the land in the first place... any one consider that?
Quote from: Every FE'r

Please don't mention Himawari 8
Quote from: sceptimatic
Impossible to have the same volume and different density.

*fact*
Extra Virgin Penguin Blood is a natural aphrodisiac

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45141
  • +92/-136
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #147 on: September 14, 2017, 12:54:41 PM »
Exactly.  Who is stupid enough to build on a hurricane prone flood plain in the first place?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

RocketSauce

  • 1441
  • +0/-0
  • I kill penguins for fun
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #148 on: September 14, 2017, 01:00:48 PM »
but hey... it might be because people had clogged gutters... I mean... I wasn't there...
Quote from: Every FE'r

Please don't mention Himawari 8
Quote from: sceptimatic
Impossible to have the same volume and different density.

*fact*
Extra Virgin Penguin Blood is a natural aphrodisiac

*

MicroBeta

  • 2490
  • +1/-0
Re: HURRICANE HARVEY, ENGINEERED STORM?
« Reply #149 on: September 14, 2017, 01:23:48 PM »
how about... had they not developed the land in the first place... any one consider that?
Exactly.  Who is stupid enough to build on a hurricane prone flood plain in the first place?
I'm pretty sure when they settled Houston in 1836 nobody had a clue of the environmental consequences. 

Houston is coastal city which is usually where the settling begins...trade and commerce and stuff.

20/20 hindsight is easy.  Knowing what's going to happen before hand...that's hard.
Since it costs 2.72¢ to produce a penny, putting in your 2¢ if really worth 5.44¢.