Spherical Earth disproved for once and for all!!!

Quote from: telsarbg on July 22, 2017, 09:39:59 AM

Again, not making any sense... You were talking about a ball in a plane, that would get back to your hand as long as the plane stayed on its course. The same applies for Earth. Of course if the plane moves abruptly, the ball will not get back in your hand, and then the comparison with Earth ends because it does not move abruptly.

Also, this 3D video of the solar system sporting a vortex has been flagged as wrong many times.

The planets do not drag behind the sun. They sometimes pass in front of it (relatively to its own motion around the center of the galaxy). That is because the solar system (direction of the ecliptic) makes an angle with the direction of the Sun. So planets are sometimes in front of the Sun, sometimes behind.

If all you want to remember is that planets in orbit make fancy helicoids when their star moves, then yes that is true.

But in reality it looks more like this :
http://i.imgur.com/rLr8Swh.mp4

Join the planets with a line to draw the ecliptic, you can see the angle I was talking about.

Hey, finally a RE-tard that claims to have the CGI of the Solar System in motion through the Universe!!!

Do you have the math that was utilized to render this CGI and can you verify it is legitimate, sourcing Keplar, et.al.?

Excellent question.

The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None.

Don't come on here spouting off about being some genius of a fucking airline pilot and then try to pull some fucking shit out your ass comparison between a tennis ball and the earth, claiming if the tennis ball moves at one revolution per day no water would fly off...

The tennis ball IS SMALLER and the rotational speed would by necessity be FASTER you tremendous fucking dick.

GTFO with your stupidity.

Go back to the fucking lounge in the airport,cop a couple of more drinks, and never post such ignorance again.

The real question isn`t if the earth is flat or round, the real question is...is the sun flat or round?

Quote from: savagepilot on July 23, 2017, 02:31:46 AM

The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None.

Don't come on here spouting off about being some genius of a fucking airline pilot and then try to pull some fucking shit out your ass comparison between a tennis ball and the earth, claiming if the tennis ball move at one revolution per day no water would fly off...

The tennis ball IS SMALLER and the rotational speed would by necessity be FASTER you tremendous fucking dick.

GTFO with your stupidity.

Go back to the fucking lounge in the airport,cop a couple of more drinks, and never post such ignorance again.

How about the Convection Heat Transfer model of the spinning earth with its boundary layers to prove if the atmosphere moves with the earth!!!!

Quote from: totallackey on July 23, 2017, 12:18:46 PM

Quote from: savagepilot on July 23, 2017, 02:31:46 AM

The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None.

Don't come on here spouting off about being some genius of a fucking airline pilot and then try to pull some fucking shit out your ass comparison between a tennis ball and the earth, claiming if the tennis ball move at one revolution per day no water would fly off...

The tennis ball IS SMALLER and the rotational speed would by necessity be FASTER you tremendous fucking dick.

GTFO with your stupidity.

Go back to the fucking lounge in the airport,cop a couple of more drinks, and never post such ignorance again.

How about the Convection Heat Transfer model of the spinning earth with its boundary layers to prove if the atmosphere moves with the earth!!!!

How about you provide those calculations you claimed were so easy?  Show us the size of the sun and it's distance.  What are you afraid of?

Can you please tell us, the coordinates where the Big Bang happened. (x, y, z)

or is this too hard for you...

That would be the origin of the Universe.

Without an axis, I can't do anything. How would I label my positive side

Can you please tell us, the coordinates where the Big Bang happened. (x, y, z)

or is this too hard for you...

That would be the origin of the Universe.

I never claimed I could.  You, on the other hand said it was a simple thing to calculate the size of the sun.
Admit it, called your bluff and you have not been able dodge and weave your way out of it.
Just admit you can't do it and move on.

Quote from: savagepilot on July 23, 2017, 02:31:46 AM

The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None.

Don't come on here spouting off about being some genius of a fucking airline pilot and then try to pull some fucking shit out your ass comparison between a tennis ball and the earth, claiming if the tennis ball move at one revolution per day no water would fly off...

The tennis ball IS SMALLER and the rotational speed would by necessity be FASTER you tremendous fucking dick.

GTFO with your stupidity.

Go back to the fucking lounge in the airport,cop a couple of more drinks, and never post such ignorance again.

If a tennis ball is spinning at 1 revolution per day, and the Earth is spinning at 1 revolution per day, how fast are they both spinning?

If the tennis ball is the size of a tennis ball, and the Earth is the size of a fucking great big planet, which one do you think is moving the fastest on its surface when spinning at 1 revolution per day?

Quote from: savagepilot on July 23, 2017, 02:31:46 AM

The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None.

Don't come on here spouting off about being some genius of a fucking airline pilot and then try to pull some fucking shit out your ass comparison between a tennis ball and the earth, claiming if the tennis ball move at one revolution per day no water would fly off...

The tennis ball IS SMALLER and the rotational speed would by necessity be FASTER you tremendous fucking dick.

GTFO with your stupidity.

Go back to the fucking lounge in the airport,cop a couple of more drinks, and never post such ignorance again.

You mad, bro?

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 23, 2017, 12:27:48 PM

Can you please tell us, the coordinates where the Big Bang happened. (x, y, z)

or is this too hard for you...

That would be the origin of the Universe.

I never claimed I could.  You, on the other hand said it was a simple thing to calculate the size of the sun.
Admit it, called your bluff and you have not been able dodge and weave your way out of it.
Just admit you can't do it and move on.

I never said the sun, but the moon!!!

I need to by an accurate ruler which I will go into town on Tuesday. In Greece, I live in the mountains and we go shopping in town. It's not like I can go to staples and by it...

Quote from: Badxtoss on July 23, 2017, 12:31:03 PM

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 23, 2017, 12:27:48 PM

Can you please tell us, the coordinates where the Big Bang happened. (x, y, z)

or is this too hard for you...

That would be the origin of the Universe.

I never claimed I could.  You, on the other hand said it was a simple thing to calculate the size of the sun.
Admit it, called your bluff and you have not been able dodge and weave your way out of it.
Just admit you can't do it and move on.

I never said the sun, but the moon!!!

I need to by an accurate ruler which I will go into town on Tuesday. In Greece, I live in the mountains and we go shopping in town. It's not like I can go to staples and by it...

I'm pretty sure it was the sun we were talking about but ok, let's start with the moon.
Was that so hard?  Why did you have to jump through all those hoops and dodges?  Not to mention the insults.  You could have just said, I'll work on it tomorrow.

Quote from: savagepilot on July 23, 2017, 02:31:46 AM

The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None.

Don't come on here spouting off about being some genius of a fucking airline pilot and then try to pull some fucking shit out your ass comparison between a tennis ball and the earth, claiming if the tennis ball move at one revolution per day no water would fly off...

The tennis ball IS SMALLER and the rotational speed would by necessity be FASTER you tremendous fucking dick.

GTFO with your stupidity.

Go back to the fucking lounge in the airport,cop a couple of more drinks, and never post such ignorance again.

The rotational speed will be 15 degrees an hour. Still very very gentle turning (oh  - and the water molecules will be vastly smaller if comparatively scaled).

I - and I suspect many others with a degree of intelligence - will lean towards the opinions of a highly trained and experienced professional vs a stupid and angry little turd.

Quote from: totallackey on July 23, 2017, 12:18:46 PM

Quote from: savagepilot on July 23, 2017, 02:31:46 AM

The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None.

Don't come on here spouting off about being some genius of a fucking airline pilot and then try to pull some fucking shit out your ass comparison between a tennis ball and the earth, claiming if the tennis ball move at one revolution per day no water would fly off...

The tennis ball IS SMALLER and the rotational speed would by necessity be FASTER you tremendous fucking dick.

GTFO with your stupidity.

Go back to the fucking lounge in the airport,cop a couple of more drinks, and never post such ignorance again.

If a tennis ball is spinning at 1 revolution per day, and the Earth is spinning at 1 revolution per day, how fast are they both spinning?

If the tennis ball is the size of a tennis ball, and the Earth is the size of a fucking great big planet, which one do you think is moving the fastest on its surface when spinning at 1 revolution per day?

Monkey, do not be an idiot.

Everyone knows that if you trying to represent the Earth at the size of the tennis ball for modeling purposes, any claimed rotational speed for the Earth would be represented as FASTER as the size of the model DECREASES.

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 23, 2017, 12:34:39 PM

Quote from: Badxtoss on July 23, 2017, 12:31:03 PM

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 23, 2017, 12:27:48 PM

Can you please tell us, the coordinates where the Big Bang happened. (x, y, z)

or is this too hard for you...

That would be the origin of the Universe.

I never claimed I could.  You, on the other hand said it was a simple thing to calculate the size of the sun.
Admit it, called your bluff and you have not been able dodge and weave your way out of it.
Just admit you can't do it and move on.

I never said the sun, but the moon!!!

I need to by an accurate ruler which I will go into town on Tuesday. In Greece, I live in the mountains and we go shopping in town. It's not like I can go to staples and by it...

I'm pretty sure it was the sun we were talking about but ok, let's start with the moon.
Was that so hard?  Why did you have to jump through all those hoops and dodges?  Not to mention the insults.  You could have just said, I'll work on it tomorrow.

This was exactly what he said...

Quote

Just remember that according the this Flat Earth Society the sun and moon are each about 50 km in diameter and about 5000 km high.

Have I ever stated this in a post?

Just because some people think this is true, does not mean that I believe it., Actually it could be very easily calculated using the standard that ophthalmology have for 20/ 20 vision.

Quote from: totallackey on July 23, 2017, 12:18:46 PM

Quote from: savagepilot on July 23, 2017, 02:31:46 AM

The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None.

Don't come on here spouting off about being some genius of a fucking airline pilot and then try to pull some fucking shit out your ass comparison between a tennis ball and the earth, claiming if the tennis ball move at one revolution per day no water would fly off...

The tennis ball IS SMALLER and the rotational speed would by necessity be FASTER you tremendous fucking dick.

GTFO with your stupidity.

Go back to the fucking lounge in the airport,cop a couple of more drinks, and never post such ignorance again.

The rotational speed will be 15 degrees an hour. Still very very gentle turning (oh  - and the water molecules will be vastly smaller if comparatively scaled).

I - and I suspect many others with a degree of intelligence - will lean towards the opinions of a highly trained and experienced professional vs a stupid and angry little turd.

Water is fucking water, you moran.

Quote from: kennykirklan on July 23, 2017, 12:50:50 PM

Quote from: totallackey on July 23, 2017, 12:18:46 PM

Quote from: savagepilot on July 23, 2017, 02:31:46 AM

The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None.

Don't come on here spouting off about being some genius of a fucking airline pilot and then try to pull some fucking shit out your ass comparison between a tennis ball and the earth, claiming if the tennis ball move at one revolution per day no water would fly off...

The tennis ball IS SMALLER and the rotational speed would by necessity be FASTER you tremendous fucking dick.

GTFO with your stupidity.

Go back to the fucking lounge in the airport,cop a couple of more drinks, and never post such ignorance again.

The rotational speed will be 15 degrees an hour. Still very very gentle turning (oh  - and the water molecules will be vastly smaller if comparatively scaled).

I - and I suspect many others with a degree of intelligence - will lean towards the opinions of a highly trained and experienced professional vs a stupid and angry little turd.

Water is fucking water, you moran.

...and the earth is not a tennis ball, fuckwad!

Quote from: kennykirklan on July 23, 2017, 12:50:50 PM

Quote from: totallackey on July 23, 2017, 12:18:46 PM

Quote from: savagepilot on July 23, 2017, 02:31:46 AM

The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None.

Don't come on here spouting off about being some genius of a fucking airline pilot and then try to pull some fucking shit out your ass comparison between a tennis ball and the earth, claiming if the tennis ball move at one revolution per day no water would fly off...

The tennis ball IS SMALLER and the rotational speed would by necessity be FASTER you tremendous fucking dick.

GTFO with your stupidity.

Go back to the fucking lounge in the airport,cop a couple of more drinks, and never post such ignorance again.

The rotational speed will be 15 degrees an hour. Still very very gentle turning (oh  - and the water molecules will be vastly smaller if comparatively scaled).

I - and I suspect many others with a degree of intelligence - will lean towards the opinions of a highly trained and experienced professional vs a stupid and angry little turd.

Water is fucking water, you moran.

It's spelt "moron".

Why do we even discuss? Earth is flat, that is proven. Just look at this pic:

https://9gag.com/gag/awQnxm4

Can you please tell us, the coordinates where the Big Bang happened. (x, y, z)

or is this too hard for you...

That would be the origin of the Universe.

Could you please provide the spacial co-ordinates of your brain..

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/abifulldiscindex.jpg

NASA footage

Quote from: totallackey on July 23, 2017, 12:58:07 PM

Quote from: kennykirklan on July 23, 2017, 12:50:50 PM

Quote from: totallackey on July 23, 2017, 12:18:46 PM

Quote from: savagepilot on July 23, 2017, 02:31:46 AM

The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None.

Don't come on here spouting off about being some genius of a fucking airline pilot and then try to pull some fucking shit out your ass comparison between a tennis ball and the earth, claiming if the tennis ball move at one revolution per day no water would fly off...

The tennis ball IS SMALLER and the rotational speed would by necessity be FASTER you tremendous fucking dick.

GTFO with your stupidity.

Go back to the fucking lounge in the airport,cop a couple of more drinks, and never post such ignorance again.

The rotational speed will be 15 degrees an hour. Still very very gentle turning (oh  - and the water molecules will be vastly smaller if comparatively scaled).

I - and I suspect many others with a degree of intelligence - will lean towards the opinions of a highly trained and experienced professional vs a stupid and angry little turd.

Water is fucking water, you moran.

...and the earth is not a tennis ball, fuckwad!

...then head to the same airport lounge as your dimwitted pilot friend and explain it to him, shit for brains...

Meanwhile, this question will still be here:

Quote from: telsarbg on July 22, 2017, 09:39:59 AM

Again, not making any sense... You were talking about a ball in a plane, that would get back to your hand as long as the plane stayed on its course. The same applies for Earth. Of course if the plane moves abruptly, the ball will not get back in your hand, and then the comparison with Earth ends because it does not move abruptly.

Also, this 3D video of the solar system sporting a vortex has been flagged as wrong many times.

The planets do not drag behind the sun. They sometimes pass in front of it (relatively to its own motion around the center of the galaxy). That is because the solar system (direction of the ecliptic) makes an angle with the direction of the Sun. So planets are sometimes in front of the Sun, sometimes behind.

If all you want to remember is that planets in orbit make fancy helicoids when their star moves, then yes that is true.

But in reality it looks more like this :
http://i.imgur.com/rLr8Swh.mp4

Join the planets with a line to draw the ecliptic, you can see the angle I was talking about.

Hey, finally a RE-tard that claims to have the CGI of the Solar System in motion through the Universe!!!

Do you have the math that was utilized to render this CGI and can you verify it is legitimate, sourcing Keplar, et.al.?

Quote from: kennykirklan on July 23, 2017, 12:50:50 PM

Quote from: totallackey on July 23, 2017, 12:18:46 PM

Quote from: savagepilot on July 23, 2017, 02:31:46 AM

The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None.

Don't come on here spouting off about being some genius of a fucking airline pilot and then try to pull some fucking shit out your ass comparison between a tennis ball and the earth, claiming if the tennis ball move at one revolution per day no water would fly off...

The tennis ball IS SMALLER and the rotational speed would by necessity be FASTER you tremendous fucking dick.

GTFO with your stupidity.

Go back to the fucking lounge in the airport,cop a couple of more drinks, and never post such ignorance again.

The rotational speed will be 15 degrees an hour. Still very very gentle turning (oh  - and the water molecules will be vastly smaller if comparatively scaled).

I - and I suspect many others with a degree of intelligence - will lean towards the opinions of a highly trained and experienced professional vs a stupid and angry little turd.

Water is fucking water, you moran.

Assuming the weight of a water drop to be 0.05 gramms the rotational force upon it at the equator of the Earth with the angular velocity of 0.00007292115 rad/s (or rotational velocity of 465 m/s) would be as much as 0.000001789 N. To break it down to a tennis ball with the diameter of roughly 6.7 cm and the same force applied to the water drop we get 0.8389 rad/s, 0.0281 m/s, 0.1335 rev/s or just a bit over 8 rev/min.
Dunno about you guys but in my book that's not even remotely sufficient to throw the water drop off the tennis ball. 

Quote from: Badxtoss on July 23, 2017, 12:39:52 PM

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 23, 2017, 12:34:39 PM

Quote from: Badxtoss on July 23, 2017, 12:31:03 PM

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 23, 2017, 12:27:48 PM

Can you please tell us, the coordinates where the Big Bang happened. (x, y, z)

or is this too hard for you...

That would be the origin of the Universe.

I never claimed I could.  You, on the other hand said it was a simple thing to calculate the size of the sun.
Admit it, called your bluff and you have not been able dodge and weave your way out of it.
Just admit you can't do it and move on.

I never said the sun, but the moon!!!

I need to by an accurate ruler which I will go into town on Tuesday. In Greece, I live in the mountains and we go shopping in town. It's not like I can go to staples and by it...

I'm pretty sure it was the sun we were talking about but ok, let's start with the moon.
Was that so hard?  Why did you have to jump through all those hoops and dodges?  Not to mention the insults.  You could have just said, I'll work on it tomorrow.

This was exactly what he said...

Quote from: InFlatEarth on July 23, 2017, 12:02:06 PM

Quote

Just remember that according the this Flat Earth Society the sun and moon are each about 50 km in diameter and about 5000 km high.

Have I ever stated this in a post?

Just because some people think this is true, does not mean that I believe it., Actually it could be very easily calculated using the standard that ophthalmology have for 20/ 20 vision.

Thank you for digging that up! 

Assuming the weight of a water drop to be 0.05 gramms...

Do not assume anything...what is the fucking weight of a water drop...it weighs what it weighs...

the rotational force upon it...

Rotational force upon what?

...at the equator of the Earth with the angular velocity of 0.00007292115 rad/s (or rotational velocity of 465 m/s) would be as much as 0.000001789 N. To break it down to a tennis ball with the diameter of roughly 6.7 cm and the same force applied to the water drop we get 0.8389 rad/s, 0.0281 m/s, 0.1335 rev/s or just a bit over 8 rev/min.
Dunno about you guys but in my book that's not even remotely sufficient to throw the water drop off the tennis ball. 

Oh...I see...you are now trying to fucking claim a scaled down representation of the amount of water on the Earth as to a tennis ball is one fucking drop of water is to a tennis ball as the oceans/lakes/rivers, etc., is to the Earth...

Are you dense?

71 percent of the tennis ball would be covered by water at the same relative depth.

One fucking drop of water will not cut the mustard, you hayseed.

Quote from: totallackey on July 23, 2017, 12:58:07 PM

Quote from: kennykirklan on July 23, 2017, 12:50:50 PM

Quote from: totallackey on July 23, 2017, 12:18:46 PM

Quote from: savagepilot on July 23, 2017, 02:31:46 AM

The Earth is a big place, and what seems like insurmountable forces are actually quite weak when given the scale.  Take, for example, the FE meme of a wet spinning tennis ball, trying to estimate it moving at 1000 mph and watching the water go flying in all directions.  But that’s not an equivalent model.  The Earth rotates once per day.  So spin the tennis ball at one revolution per day, and see how much water goes flying off.  None.

Don't come on here spouting off about being some genius of a fucking airline pilot and then try to pull some fucking shit out your ass comparison between a tennis ball and the earth, claiming if the tennis ball move at one revolution per day no water would fly off...

The tennis ball IS SMALLER and the rotational speed would by necessity be FASTER you tremendous fucking dick.

GTFO with your stupidity.

Go back to the fucking lounge in the airport,cop a couple of more drinks, and never post such ignorance again.

The rotational speed will be 15 degrees an hour. Still very very gentle turning (oh  - and the water molecules will be vastly smaller if comparatively scaled).

I - and I suspect many others with a degree of intelligence - will lean towards the opinions of a highly trained and experienced professional vs a stupid and angry little turd.

Water is fucking water, you moran.

Assuming the weight of a water drop to be 0.05 gramms the rotational force upon it at the equator of the Earth with the angular velocity of 0.00007292115 rad/s (or rotational velocity of 465 m/s) would be as much as 0.000001789 N. To break it down to a tennis ball with the diameter of roughly 6.7 cm and the same force applied to the water drop we get 0.8389 rad/s, 0.0281 m/s, 0.1335 rev/s or just a bit over 8 rev/min.
Dunno about you guys but in my book that's not even remotely sufficient to throw the water drop off the tennis ball. 

Plus the tennis ball has no gravity. It's utter nonsense what these people come up with - I wonder how they function in day to day life.

Plus the tennis ball has no gravity. It's utter nonsense what these people come up with - I wonder how they function in day to day life.

You do of course realize your own science to which you appeal states you are a - - - - - - -liar when you make the claim the tennis ball has no gravity.

That's okay though.

Knew you were a liar coming in...

Quote from: kennykirklan on July 23, 2017, 02:31:20 PM

Plus the tennis ball has no gravity. It's utter nonsense what these people come up with - I wonder how they function in day to day life.

You do of course realize your own science to which you appeal states you are a fucking liar when you make the claim the tennis ball has no gravity.

That's okay though.

Knew you were liar coming in...

Adjective problem?

Quote from: kennykirklan on July 23, 2017, 02:31:20 PM

Plus the tennis ball has no gravity. It's utter nonsense what these people come up with - I wonder how they function in day to day life.

You do of course realize your own science to which you appeal states you are a fucking liar when you make the claim the tennis ball has no gravity.

That's okay though.

Knew you were a liar coming in...

you'll make yourself ill with all that anger

Quote from: Sentinel on July 23, 2017, 02:17:12 PM

Assuming the weight of a water drop to be 0.05 gramms...

Do not assume anything...what is the fucking weight of a water drop...it weighs what it weighs...

Quote from: Sentinel on July 23, 2017, 02:17:12 PM

the rotational force upon it...

Rotational force upon what?

Quote from: Sentinel on July 23, 2017, 02:17:12 PM

...at the equator of the Earth with the angular velocity of 0.00007292115 rad/s (or rotational velocity of 465 m/s) would be as much as 0.000001789 N. To break it down to a tennis ball with the diameter of roughly 6.7 cm and the same force applied to the water drop we get 0.8389 rad/s, 0.0281 m/s, 0.1335 rev/s or just a bit over 8 rev/min.
Dunno about you guys but in my book that's not even remotely sufficient to throw the water drop off the tennis ball. 

Oh...I see...you are now trying to fucking claim a scaled down representation of the amount of water on the Earth as to a tennis ball is one fucking drop of water is to a tennis ball as the oceans/lakes/rivers, etc., is to the Earth...

Are you dense?

71 percent of the tennis ball would be covered by water at the same relative depth.

One fucking drop of water will not cut the mustard, you hayseed.

0.05 gramms was a rough estimation, see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drop_(unit)

And it doesn't really matter if I calculated that example for one drop of water only, it would work the same way if the tennis ball was actually covered with water drops by 71 percent of it's surface or even a 100 percent.
And yes, any similar effect of gravity isn't even considered in my calculations, so the effective revolution speed would be even much higher to actually draw the water drops off the tennis ball.