They will be tremendously disappointed by your lack of faith. Japan's lunar mission produced some of the best lunar surface imagery and surface models. You also forgot India, whose photographs are second only to the LRO in detail in places.
I gave them their fair chance, but studying the footage of the moonlanding artifacts and the end result was a waste of time and perfectly alligned in what one would expect from a cover up.
To little quality proof to make a real statement, enough blurs and dots to satisfy Apollo believers. I could have told them beforehand to go closer, or take a better pixel camera, because this way the result would not add anything at all. Of course believers were enthousiastic about the pixels that showed nothing. Like mental programs where people see their 'mummy' reflected in a blob of paint.
Japanese space exploration is in the pockets of the US , after this extremely obvious 'apollo artifacts' epos.
Your lack of belief in China, or Russia's space research is as poor an indicator of fakery as your distrust of NASA.
Russian and Chinese imagery on the moon is an exact match for every other image you can find regardless of its source. I know this because I've looked at them all and done a considerable amount of research with them. What have you done?
The colors, the ingredients of the moon soil are different in the Chinese 'findings'.
The Apollo moon does not reflect the Chang'e 3 moon. As if we are dealing with two entirely different places. And the same goes for Russian ouctures of earth from outerspace.
Please spare me the lame explainations, which i have read, because no repair job can make me believe that Chang'e 3 was at the same place as Apollo. I am happy to have my own eyes still......
Lack of primetime news coverage is no indicator that nothing is happening.
If it wasn't for the internet i wouldn't know much about Chinese space explorations.
I understand why tv news doesn't want to cover it, because the propaganda, fakery, indoctrinated cheering puppets are clear signs that something is wrong...... terribly wrong.
Therefore it has been ignored, while far less insignificant discoveries are receiving the spotlight...... from every corner around the world. Solar car races, polar exploration, but not the Chinese in space.....
The western media do not avoid China's space research - China doesn't tell everyone about it. Whenever they announce something it gets covered, otherwise how come you know so much about it?
Solely from the internet,.... heck i really didn't know about the first Chinese in orbit if it wasn't for the internet.
That is a deliberate misinterpretation of reality, and not what was said by the Russians. Quote the exact words used.
Of course the Russians gave hints as subtle as possible.... enough for the USA to take notice. The fact that hints were given in public says enough... and i gave you a translation of the message.
No, my views are backed up by a lot of research. Years of reading on the subject and putting in a lot of effort into looking at the material that is available and making my own judgement on it. Piles of books and research material, comparison of photo after photo, contemporaneous records and documents, all gone over with a fine toothed comb and every single piece of the puzzle matches without exception. What have you done?
I don't think i have done as much as you, but i think i have studied the spacerace for at least five years and to me the fakery becomes more obvious by the day.
The debunkers like Clavius and the mythbusters helped me a lot indrifting away from the official story . If you try to explain every detail ( from earth) without ever acknowledging any errors in the footage or the official story than it weakens your attempts in the very end.
Even those who believe in Apollo comment on clear aspects of fakery in the photography.
But the diehard amature NASA fans have defended each and every bit of the official story....
Thanks to them i can see through the fakery now..... because it's a religious way of dealing with outsidersand their critics.
Far more clever would be to acknowledge some obvious fakery with convinient explainations. But no, each and every bit of Apollo data was real, authentic and genuine, not updated in time, not changed, not deliberately destroyed, etc...
It is beyond absurd really....
Sorry typing quikly from an Ipad does my grammar no good...... i have to work now..