« Reply #61 on: April 17, 2017, 03:47:53 PM »
There is no chemtrails between dates from 12 april to 16 april. Because of why? Because of Social sensitivity. If we act sensitive, They dare not do that.
... snip irrelevance ...
Or the real reason that the conditions at that time were not conducive to persistent contrail formation.
Or you are a member same shit aims to destroy human life.
Nope. Not a member of any such organization, nor am I aware of any that exists. I do not get paid to post here or anywhere else. Just have yet to see ANY actual evidence of "chemtrails". Appears to be an internet myth.
"The Nope" can't be "nope" by said by you. You prove that there is no difference between the others. There is no use for anyone. Either say useful things, or shut up. Or do not talk to me at all. Communicating with me in this way does not earn you anything. Just you are devaluating youself. If your value decreases lot, someone lay outs you.
Denying that I'm a member of "same shit aims to destroy human life" is of no value and no useful? Hilarious. You can't support your internet myth so you try to attack those that don't agree with you.
False.
I'm aiming to save to human life by social sensivity.
But you are just trying to defend what learned you to defend but that such things aim to desttoy human life. Even leave to defend it, or you are one of that killers. It is not easy to accept. But be sure of it, no one called "this is bad" is not bad for himself. Evil always has an excuse. Find an excuse, give up evil! Or you are one of that evilness.
In this regard, be sure you are in the side of evilness what aim to desttory human life. Accept or not. If you aren't, leave to defend that evils.
You've not proven the existence of anything aiming to destroy human life. From what I can see you're angry about clouds.
Proof is not always a laboratory experiment. Sometimes statistics is a proof.
Statistically these "chemtrails" only show up when the conditions are right for persistent contrail formation.
But you do not want to see it and if you reject it from the beginning you are a part of evil. Because you are just objecting. You have not brought a suggestion yet.Before you prove that you have nothing to offer and that it is neutral, you just say "prove". I can prove it statistically.
Yet you haven't.
Places where drug companies sell drugs and places where chemtrails are attacked are directly proportional. You can say "prove" to it. But if I do it, we know that you will deny it. Because the goal is not to reveal the truth, but to appeal. If not so, you should to came with a reasonable proposition.
So you're not going to show these supposed statistics then. Got it. 
Here's some real facts. The idea that ANYTHING would be sprayed on a populous from 30,000+ feet is ludicrous. Not only is it impossible to aim as it can be days if not weeks before it can reach the ground but by the time it does it will have dissipated to nothing AND been rendered inert by UV exposure.
It is the difference of contrails and chemtrails. You are talking about contrails.
Existance of contrails aren't destroy existing of chemtrails. Don't try to confuse.
Those that claim contrails can't persist are also effectively claiming cirrus clouds can't exist. There is no proof of the existence of "chemtrails". Interestingly, every shot in your videos that show supposed "chemtrails" also shows cirrus clouds in the sky proving the conditions were right for persistent contrail formation.
And there STILL is no point in spraying ANYTHING from 30,000+ feet.
These are definitive proofs. Accept or not, I don't care.
the only thing definitive is that they LIE about the persistence of contrails. That the claim that a contrail can't persist is equal to a claim that cirrus clouds don't exist. And yes, we are all aware that you don't care about the facts.
You are defending the killers makes you an evil. So I'm ignoring you. You were already in my ignore list in past. Now you are repeating it. Ok.
You haven't proven ANYBODY is being killed. You haven't proven ANYTHING about the content. Ignoring me only proves you have no argument.