Is That a Solid Dome in the Background?

This photo from Museums Victoria collections, supposedly taken in Antarctica, Circa in 1920’s by George W. Rayner - a British photographer and biologist based at the research station at Grytviken in the Falkland Islands from around 1928 to 1939, showing what looks like a solid dome in the background!

In 1929 the Australian explorer Hubert Wilkins and American publisher William Randolph Hearst organized an expedition to Antarctica. The Discovery Committee of the British Colonial Office agreed to assist this expedition with its research vessel the William Scoresby. As a result Rayner accompanied Hubert Wilkins as a photographer on this expedition.



https://collections.museumvictoria.com.au/items/393656
https://collections.museumvictoria.com.au/articles/2669


The attached video talks about the same thing!




What do you think?

Ha!  Nice one.

This photo from Museums Victoria collections, supposedly taken in Antarctica, Circa in 1920’s by George W. Rayner - a British photographer and biologist based at the research station at Grytviken in the Falkland Islands from around 1928 to 1939, showing what looks like a solid dome in the background!

In 1929 the Australian explorer Hubert Wilkins and American publisher William Randolph Hearst organized an expedition to Antarctica. The Discovery Committee of the British Colonial Office agreed to assist this expedition with its research vessel the William Scoresby. As a result Rayner accompanied Hubert Wilkins as a photographer on this expedition.



https://collections.museumvictoria.com.au/items/393656
https://collections.museumvictoria.com.au/articles/2669

What do you think?

I think that's a (photo of) a painting. What do you think?

The photograph described in the link is the one of the boat:



Why the painting is associated with it, it doesn't say.

There are two photos in the link, taken by Rayner.

Go to the article section and you shall find many other photos for him, but that particular one clearly shows something unusual in the background!

There are two photos in the link, taken by Rayner.

Go to the article section and you shall find many other photos for him, but that particular one clearly shows something unusual in the background!

There are two photos in the link, but only the one of the steam ship is described at all.

It's not clear what the other one is or what it has to do with Rayner. It looks like a painting, wouldn't you agree?

Does this mean photos are admissible as evidence now?

Does this mean photos are admissible as evidence now?

Only if it supports FE theories. All other photos are faked.

Does this mean photos are admissible as evidence now?

No, only paintings.

Photopaper texture reflection

This one doesn't look like a painting, and still have a similar background!

This photo from Museums Victoria collections, supposedly taken in Antarctica, Circa in 1920’s by George W. Rayner - a British photographer and biologist based at the research station at Grytviken in the Falkland Islands from around 1928 to 1939, showing what looks like a solid dome in the background!

In 1929 the Australian explorer Hubert Wilkins and American publisher William Randolph Hearst organized an expedition to Antarctica. The Discovery Committee of the British Colonial Office agreed to assist this expedition with its research vessel the William Scoresby. As a result Rayner accompanied Hubert Wilkins as a photographer on this expedition.



https://collections.museumvictoria.com.au/items/393656
https://collections.museumvictoria.com.au/articles/2669


The attached video talks about the same thing!




What do you think?

What I think is why are you ready to gobble up any old guff like the above but throw your hands up in horror over really exciting news articles like this?

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/apr/04/nasa-cassini-spacecraft-end-20-year-mission-saturn-moons

This is the same with the alien photos! As long as there were only shitty cameras many photos of weird glares and blurry figures appeared. Now everyone has a decent camera in his/her pocked. Suddenly, no more photos. Weird.

We can only know the whole truth when we turn all the cards, and only then the truth can reveal itself.

I did mention somewhere in this forum that I used to be a big fan of space exploration, before this whole conspiracy thing came to my attention - in fact, I reached further than Nasa in my dreams, and I had a wider vision than Hubble itself! 

I decided to look into everything connected to this coin theory of earth (round or flat), look into all the possibilities and theories from different angles, until I re-establish my trust in what we've been taught and dreamed of reaching!

So, until that day comes, I'm gonna keep on digging and eliminating false theories one after another, until the truth rise from behind the clouds and shines again!

This is the same with the alien photos! As long as there were only shitty cameras many photos of weird glares and blurry figures appeared. Now everyone has a decent camera in his/her pocked. Suddenly, no more photos. Weird.

That could be true too!

This one doesn't look like a painting, and still have a similar background!

Cameras and film were quite primitive at those times.

Fake pic. Has to be.
Like outer space photos, no need to even look at them, they're fake.
Unicorn pics, Bigfoot pics, three titted women pics. All fake.

Because the things they purportedly show don't exist.

We can only know the whole truth when we turn all the cards, and only then the truth can reveal itself.

I did mention somewhere in this forum that I used to be a big fan of space exploration, before this whole conspiracy thing came to my attention - in fact, I reached further than Nasa in my dreams, and I had a wider vision than Hubble itself! 

I decided to look into everything connected to this coin theory of earth (round or flat), look into all the possibilities and theories from different angles, until I re-establish my trust in what we've been taught and dreamed of reaching!

So, until that day comes, I'm gonna keep on digging and eliminating false theories one after another, until the truth rise from behind the clouds and shines again!

What single piece of evidence against conventional wisdom did it for you? What was its source and how valid is it? If it was of the same quality as the one on your initial post, possibly you should think again.

This photo from Museums Victoria collections, supposedly taken in Antarctica, Circa in 1920’s by George W. Rayner - a British photographer and biologist based at the research station at Grytviken in the Falkland Islands from around 1928 to 1939, showing what looks like a solid dome in the background!

In 1929 the Australian explorer Hubert Wilkins and American publisher William Randolph Hearst organized an expedition to Antarctica. The Discovery Committee of the British Colonial Office agreed to assist this expedition with its research vessel the William Scoresby. As a result Rayner accompanied Hubert Wilkins as a photographer on this expedition.



https://collections.museumvictoria.com.au/items/393656
https://collections.museumvictoria.com.au/articles/2669


The attached video talks about the same thing!




What do you think?

It is possible a pixel problem.

I'm thinking this photo isin't fake because that time photoshop isin't discovered. On the other hand, the outside of the antarctica should be colder than this one and we can't see an ocean at there. Ocean should be frozen. So perhaps that photo taken by a place not so far from coastline  of the Antarctica. There is only one event remain as photograph pixel problem.

You can do an image search on Google for Antarctica and it will throw up thousands of images......however crazy flat earthers are quite prepared to dismiss them all in favour of a crummy black and white image of what looks like a model shot against a textured wall and claim it shows the dome!.....

I think this clearly demonstrates their incredible desperation to believe.

We can only know the whole truth when we turn all the cards, and only then the truth can reveal itself.

I did mention somewhere in this forum that I used to be a big fan of space exploration, before this whole conspiracy thing came to my attention - in fact, I reached further than Nasa in my dreams, and I had a wider vision than Hubble itself! 

I decided to look into everything connected to this coin theory of earth (round or flat), look into all the possibilities and theories from different angles, until I re-establish my trust in what we've been taught and dreamed of reaching!

So, until that day comes, I'm gonna keep on digging and eliminating false theories one after another, until the truth rise from behind the clouds and shines again!

How many times have you been proved wrong on Flat Earth material now?

Quote from: Hannibaal on April 04, 2017, 04:47:58 PM

We can only know the whole truth when we turn all the cards, and only then the truth can reveal itself.

I did mention somewhere in this forum that I used to be a big fan of space exploration, before this whole conspiracy thing came to my attention - in fact, I reached further than Nasa in my dreams, and I had a wider vision than Hubble itself! 

I decided to look into everything connected to this coin theory of earth (round or flat), look into all the possibilities and theories from different angles, until I re-establish my trust in what we've been taught and dreamed of reaching!

So, until that day comes, I'm gonna keep on digging and eliminating false theories one after another, until the truth rise from behind the clouds and shines again!

What single piece of evidence against conventional wisdom did it for you? What was its source and how valid is it? If it was of the same quality as the one on your initial post, possibly you should think again.

Not even one single evidence has convinced me so far that earth is flat! How about that?

It's just all the talk over the net that drew my attention to this theory! Add to that; what came in scripture and holy books about the story of creation and how it all started - in the midst of the waters (water below and water above)!

So, it was a necessity to me to question everything in order to re-establish my trust again in the "conventional wisdom" I used to follow and believe in!

Believing in God and believing in science that serves humanity at the same time had never bothered me before - in fact; I used to be very good in science, in high school & in college - I graduated with a 91% average from high school & B+ average from college (Georgia Tech - 1987)!
Now I have a company for solar energy with many partners in China and Europe!
I'm even thinking of investing with the Chinese in building solar power stations on the lunar surface!
My daughter likes that idea - she wants to be part of that project when she grows up!

In short; I love science very much - and what happened to me is the same when someone loves a girl so much, then he discovers that she'd cheated on him, or at least have doubts of so!

I hope I was wrong "about her"!

In short; I love science very much - and what happened to me is the same when someone loves a girl so much, then he discovers that she'd cheated on him, or at least have doubts of so!

I hope I was wrong "about her"!

Often when there are suspicions of cheating it's just down to disingenuous people spreading nasty lies.

It is water   

three titted women pics. All fake.

awww

Quote from: Antirockballtheorist on April 04, 2017, 10:52:02 PM

three titted women pics. All fake.

awww

Two hands, two boobies.

Divinity.

Fake pic. Has to be.
Like outer space photos, no need to even look at them, they're fake.
Unicorn pics, Bigfoot pics, three titted women pics. All fake.

Because the things they purportedly show don't exist.

I can show you my own photos that will show you that you are wrong as usual.