SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018

  • 49 Replies
  • 10003 Views
*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-66
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #30 on: February 28, 2017, 04:28:05 PM »
If they were serious, they would have called me first rather than making it random. Let's watch the media blitz about the space race again. Instead, lets center it around capitalism. It would be fitting to our President.

We know how capitalism acts. It acts like a nation at war - all the time. Yes, those chicken nuggets are chicken; yes, we are really sending random folks to space. Yes, let us kill babies.

Yes Willy Wonka wasn't a creep slave driver with a PR kick and the worry of death on his shoulders...

Be careful.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2017, 04:30:05 PM by John Davis »
If you can't argue both ides, you understand neither

*

Crouton

  • Flat Earth Inspector General of High Fashion Crimes and Misdemeanors
  • 17037
  • +5/-4
  • He who walks away from Omelas
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #31 on: February 28, 2017, 07:27:34 PM »

Yes Willy Wonka wasn't a creep slave driver with a PR kick and the worry of death on his shoulders...


That's debatable.  The Oompaloompas seem like slaves to me. And that tunnel ride?  That smacks of some dark intentions.
Intelligentia et magnanimitas vincvnt violentiam et desperationem.
The truth behind NASA's budget

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #32 on: February 28, 2017, 08:18:49 PM »
Yeah, promised by Cheerios though. I'm not sure that counts...

It shows the historical establishment imposed mass assumption of impending space travel, and activity, including colonization and long term habitats in space.

Wow! How low can you go? You claim "the historical establishment imposed mass assumption of impending space travel"!

How is NASA supposedly responsible for advertising gimics of an independent company?

Maybe The Flat Earth Society can be held responsible for all the stupid claims made by flat earthers on YouTube?
That seems a lot more relevant than blaming NASA for that space-travel claim.

Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #33 on: March 01, 2017, 12:49:56 AM »
Yeah, promised by Cheerios though. I'm not sure that counts...

It shows the historical establishment imposed mass assumption of impending space travel, and activity, including colonization and long term habitats in space.

Wow! How low can you go? You claim "the historical establishment imposed mass assumption of impending space travel"!

How is NASA supposedly responsible for advertising gimics of an independent company?

Maybe The Flat Earth Society can be held responsible for all the stupid claims made by flat earthers on YouTube?
That seems a lot more relevant than blaming NASA for that space-travel claim.

Do you struggle with long sentences with long words? You then produce a sentence only two word shorter, but lacking punctuation, sense and meaning....
Do you know what the establishment is, or means? NASA is a product of the same establishment, a insipid gimic, nothing more.
You mention it, not me. I'd suggest getting off NASA's dick, but suction is a powerful force.
It is like a finger pointing away to the moon.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #34 on: March 01, 2017, 02:09:52 AM »
Yeah, promised by Cheerios though. I'm not sure that counts...

It shows the historical establishment imposed mass assumption of impending space travel, and activity, including colonization and long term habitats in space.

Wow! How low can you go? You claim "the historical establishment imposed mass assumption of impending space travel"!

How is NASA supposedly responsible for advertising gimics of an independent company?

Maybe The Flat Earth Society can be held responsible for all the stupid claims made by flat earthers on YouTube?
That seems a lot more relevant than blaming NASA for that space-travel claim.

Do you struggle with long sentences with long words? You then produce a sentence only two word shorter, but lacking punctuation, sense and meaning....
Do you know what the establishment is, or means? NASA is a product of the same establishment, a insipid gimic, nothing more.
You mention it, not me. I'd suggest getting off NASA's dick, but suction is a powerful force.
So sorry for taxing your powers of complehension,
but just where would you punctuate, "How is NASA supposedly responsible for advertising gimics of an independent company?"

Or where would you, with your massive wisdom punctuate, "Maybe The Flat Earth Society can be held responsible for all the stupid claims made by flat earthers on YouTube?"

But poor NASA seems to get blamed for the globe and everything else that was decided hundreds of years before NASA came on the scene,.

Maybe you can explain how you drag all this
"It shows the historical establishment imposed mass assumption of impending space travel, and activity, including colonization and long term habitats in space."
out of a give-away on a Cheerios pack.

Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #35 on: March 01, 2017, 04:03:46 PM »
Yeah, promised by Cheerios though. I'm not sure that counts...

It shows the historical establishment imposed mass assumption of impending space travel, and activity, including colonization and long term habitats in space.

Wow! How low can you go? You claim "the historical establishment imposed mass assumption of impending space travel"!

How is NASA supposedly responsible for advertising gimics of an independent company?

Maybe The Flat Earth Society can be held responsible for all the stupid claims made by flat earthers on YouTube?
That seems a lot more relevant than blaming NASA for that space-travel claim.

Do you struggle with long sentences with long words? You then produce a sentence only two word shorter, but lacking punctuation, sense and meaning....
Do you know what the establishment is, or means? NASA is a product of the same establishment, a insipid gimic, nothing more.
You mention it, not me. I'd suggest getting off NASA's dick, but suction is a powerful force.
So sorry for taxing your powers of complehension,
but just where would you punctuate, "How is NASA supposedly responsible for advertising gimics of an independent company?"

Or where would you, with your massive wisdom punctuate, "Maybe The Flat Earth Society can be held responsible for all the stupid claims made by flat earthers on YouTube?"

But poor NASA seems to get blamed for the globe and everything else that was decided hundreds of years before NASA came on the scene,.

Maybe you can explain how you drag all this
"It shows the historical establishment imposed mass assumption of impending space travel, and activity, including colonization and long term habitats in space."
out of a give-away on a Cheerios pack.
You could place punctuation in those sentences, poorly constructed sentences such as they are.
My opinion on the establishments historical imposition of false beliefs was formed prior to my seeing said Cheerios pack photo.
No punctuation, punk.
It is like a finger pointing away to the moon.

*

Val Strasser

  • 69
  • +0/-0
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #36 on: March 01, 2017, 05:10:25 PM »
Yeah, promised by Cheerios though. I'm not sure that counts...

It shows the historical establishment imposed mass assumption of impending space travel, and activity, including colonization and long term habitats in space.

Wow! How low can you go? You claim "the historical establishment imposed mass assumption of impending space travel"!

How is NASA supposedly responsible for advertising gimics of an independent company?

Maybe The Flat Earth Society can be held responsible for all the stupid claims made by flat earthers on YouTube?
That seems a lot more relevant than blaming NASA for that space-travel claim.

Do you struggle with long sentences with long words? You then produce a sentence only two word shorter, but lacking punctuation, sense and meaning....
Do you know what the establishment is, or means? NASA is a product of the same establishment, a insipid gimic, nothing more.
You mention it, not me. I'd suggest getting off NASA's dick, but suction is a powerful force.
So sorry for taxing your powers of complehension,
but just where would you punctuate, "How is NASA supposedly responsible for advertising gimics of an independent company?"

Or where would you, with your massive wisdom punctuate, "Maybe The Flat Earth Society can be held responsible for all the stupid claims made by flat earthers on YouTube?"

But poor NASA seems to get blamed for the globe and everything else that was decided hundreds of years before NASA came on the scene,.

Maybe you can explain how you drag all this
"It shows the historical establishment imposed mass assumption of impending space travel, and activity, including colonization and long term habitats in space."
out of a give-away on a Cheerios pack.
You could place punctuation in those sentences, poorly constructed sentences such as they are.
My opinion on the establishments historical imposition of false beliefs was formed prior to my seeing said Cheerios pack photo.
No punctuation, punk.

He could place punctuation in those sentences.  However, he would be wrong to do so.

Your sentences, on the other hand, place punctuation where none is needed, and omits that which is.

For example: "establishments" is possessive and requires an apostrophe.

Another example: "NASA is a product of the same establishment, a insipid gimic, nothing more."  The commas should, by right, be either colons or semi-colons.  And "a" should be "an".  As for "gimic"... Oh dear.

But other than that, good post.  Constructive.  Well, not really...

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #37 on: March 01, 2017, 05:23:23 PM »
You could place punctuation in those sentences, poorly constructed sentences such as they are.
My opinion on the establishments historical imposition of false beliefs was formed prior to my seeing said Cheerios pack photo.
No punctuation, punk.
You are starting to sound just like that creep "Sexmaniac warrior" in the other place. He tries to put people down like that.

I did ask your Royal Punkish Highness where they (the Royal they) would punctuate those sentences - no answer?
We can't all be grammatical perfectionists like yourself.

So your false ideas were not planted by that terrible "Cheerios pack photo". I guess you got your Flat Earth indoctrination elsewhere.

It is such a pity that there is as yet no coherent flat earth model. It would be really good if you had something to fall back on before you demolish this 3rd rock from the sun.

I do think, however, that the Heliocentric Globe is safe from your predations. The Globe has lasted 2500 years and the Heliocentric Globe over 400 years.

Maybe you could turn your brilliance towards finding a "coherent flat earth model" that explains all we see around us - there is none yet!
Flat Earthers can't decide which of about four continental layouts to choose from or which of around four explanations of gravity to use.

None of the flat earth "maps" (for want of a better term) have anything like the correct distances even between continents.
If you tried to push your flat earth hypothesis onto any intercontinental airline or shipping route planners, you would be laughed out of the shop.

There smart aleck, go fix all those poorly structured and poorly punctuated sentences.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +2/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #38 on: March 01, 2017, 07:41:27 PM »

Your sentences, on the other hand, place punctuation where none is needed, and omits that which is.



. . . . . . . . . . . . is what?

Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #39 on: March 01, 2017, 11:53:14 PM »
You could place punctuation in those sentences, poorly constructed sentences such as they are.
My opinion on the establishments historical imposition of false beliefs was formed prior to my seeing said Cheerios pack photo.
No punctuation, punk.
You are starting to sound just like that creep "Sexmaniac warrior" in the other place. He tries to put people down like that.

I did ask your Royal Punkish Highness where they (the Royal they) would punctuate those sentences - no answer?
We can't all be grammatical perfectionists like yourself.

So your false ideas were not planted by that terrible "Cheerios pack photo". I guess you got your Flat Earth indoctrination elsewhere.

It is such a pity that there is as yet no coherent flat earth model. It would be really good if you had something to fall back on before you demolish this 3rd rock from the sun.

I do think, however, that the Heliocentric Globe is safe from your predations. The Globe has lasted 2500 years and the Heliocentric Globe over 400 years.

Maybe you could turn your brilliance towards finding a "coherent flat earth model" that explains all we see around us - there is none yet!
Flat Earthers can't decide which of about four continental layouts to choose from or which of around four explanations of gravity to use.

None of the flat earth "maps" (for want of a better term) have anything like the correct distances even between continents.
If you tried to push your flat earth hypothesis onto any intercontinental airline or shipping route planners, you would be laughed out of the shop.

There smart aleck, go fix all those poorly structured and poorly punctuated sentences.

You don't understand, do you?

Your knowledge of what happened 400 or 2500 years ago is like your knowledge of what exists in any realm outside of your experience.
Like space. It's not knowledge, it's belief. Own the past, own the present and future.
Own the past and own the world, up to and including rights of ownership such as determining it's shape and location.
You're history. Not your history.
It is like a finger pointing away to the moon.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #40 on: March 02, 2017, 12:46:39 AM »
You don't understand, do you?

Your knowledge of what happened 400 or 2500 years ago is like your knowledge of what exists in any realm outside of your experience.
Like space. It's not knowledge, it's belief. Own the past, own the present and future.
Own the past and own the world, up to and including rights of ownership such as determining it's shape and location.
You're history. Not your history.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Really?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

If the earth had been known to be flat for all this time you would have a model that worked by now, but you don't, there are numerous grossly imperfect models..

As it is you don't even know the continental layout of your flat earth, at least three seem be seriously proposed, none that explain known distances or shapes.
.
You have no idea of what causes "gravity", again one reasonable theory and at least three or four unworkable hypotheses.

You have no idea of a path or height of the sun and moon to explain what we observe with so many observations.
You can't explain lunar phases and eclipses nkr the so obvious ones of sunrise and sunset times and directions.

Instead of wasting your time trying to pull the globe to bits (you can't anyway) you really need to run off and patch up your only leaking ship.

And on and on.
If you are the one with the answers to all these problems for the flat earth, why haven't you been posting on the relavent threads telling us.

The whole idea of the flat earth model(s) as proposed on this site here is laughable and
you and a few others try to prop it up by distorting history and pretending some conspiracy is fooling everybody.

You really need to turn into a FlatEarthTheorist and try to get a Flat Earth Model that works, because I certainly have never seen one.
 :P :P Maybe you can start a thread describing this perfect model.  :P :P

Such a pity for you that the Heliocentric Globe explains all these things.

And don't bother threatening! I've been threatened with shooting numerous times by İntikam, and various dire consequences.
Maybe I'm striking a raw nerve somewhere!

*

disputeone

  • 27998
  • +110/-92
  • Or should I?
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #41 on: March 02, 2017, 01:52:43 AM »

Yes Willy Wonka wasn't a creep slave driver with a PR kick and the worry of death on his shoulders...


That's debatable.  The Oompaloompas seem like slaves to me. And that tunnel ride?  That smacks of some dark intentions.

Now that boydster has left, crutonius is 100% the most hilarious poster, no competition.



Edit.


Rab.


Just breathe.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #42 on: March 02, 2017, 02:04:08 AM »

Edit.

Rab.

Just breathe.
:P :P Still breathing  :P :P
And still amused at the lack of any sensible flat earth model.

Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #43 on: March 02, 2017, 03:22:27 PM »
You don't understand, do you?

Your knowledge of what happened 400 or 2500 years ago is like your knowledge of what exists in any realm outside of your experience.
Like space. It's not knowledge, it's belief. Own the past, own the present and future.
Own the past and own the world, up to and including rights of ownership such as determining it's shape and location.
You're history. Not your history.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Really?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

If the earth had been known to be flat for all this time you would have a model that worked by now, but you don't, there are numerous grossly imperfect models..

As it is you don't even know the continental layout of your flat earth, at least three seem be seriously proposed, none that explain known distances or shapes.
.
You have no idea of what causes "gravity", again one reasonable theory and at least three or four unworkable hypotheses.

You have no idea of a path or height of the sun and moon to explain what we observe with so many observations.
You can't explain lunar phases and eclipses nkr the so obvious ones of sunrise and sunset times and directions.

Instead of wasting your time trying to pull the globe to bits (you can't anyway) you really need to run off and patch up your only leaking ship.

And on and on.
If you are the one with the answers to all these problems for the flat earth, why haven't you been posting on the relavent threads telling us.

The whole idea of the flat earth model(s) as proposed on this site here is laughable and
you and a few others try to prop it up by distorting history and pretending some conspiracy is fooling everybody.

You really need to turn into a FlatEarthTheorist and try to get a Flat Earth Model that works, because I certainly have never seen one.
 :P :P Maybe you can start a thread describing this perfect model.  :P :P

Such a pity for you that the Heliocentric Globe explains all these things.

And don't bother threatening! I've been threatened with shooting numerous times by İntikam, and various dire consequences.
Maybe I'm striking a raw nerve somewhere!

I don't like emoticons. If there was one for bemused pity, I might employ it nonetheless.
I didn't realise how effortless unhinging you could be.....
It is like a finger pointing away to the moon.

?

IonSpen

  • 1209
  • +0/-0
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #44 on: March 02, 2017, 05:35:55 PM »
You don't understand, do you?

Your knowledge of what happened 400 or 2500 years ago is like your knowledge of what exists in any realm outside of your experience.
Like space. It's not knowledge, it's belief. Own the past, own the present and future.
Own the past and own the world, up to and including rights of ownership such as determining it's shape and location.
You're history. Not your history.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Really?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

If the earth had been known to be flat for all this time you would have a model that worked by now, but you don't, there are numerous grossly imperfect models..

As it is you don't even know the continental layout of your flat earth, at least three seem be seriously proposed, none that explain known distances or shapes.
.
You have no idea of what causes "gravity", again one reasonable theory and at least three or four unworkable hypotheses.

You have no idea of a path or height of the sun and moon to explain what we observe with so many observations.
You can't explain lunar phases and eclipses nkr the so obvious ones of sunrise and sunset times and directions.

Instead of wasting your time trying to pull the globe to bits (you can't anyway) you really need to run off and patch up your only leaking ship.

And on and on.
If you are the one with the answers to all these problems for the flat earth, why haven't you been posting on the relavent threads telling us.

The whole idea of the flat earth model(s) as proposed on this site here is laughable and
you and a few others try to prop it up by distorting history and pretending some conspiracy is fooling everybody.

You really need to turn into a FlatEarthTheorist and try to get a Flat Earth Model that works, because I certainly have never seen one.
 :P :P Maybe you can start a thread describing this perfect model.  :P :P

Such a pity for you that the Heliocentric Globe explains all these things.

And don't bother threatening! I've been threatened with shooting numerous times by İntikam, and various dire consequences.
Maybe I'm striking a raw nerve somewhere!

I don't like emoticons. If there was one for bemused pity, I might employ it nonetheless.
I didn't realise how effortless unhinging you could be.....
::) :'(

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +2/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #45 on: March 02, 2017, 10:02:29 PM »

I don't like emoticons. If there was one for bemused pity, I might employ it nonetheless.


Here you go . . .

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #46 on: March 03, 2017, 02:51:03 AM »
I don't like emoticons. If there was one for bemused pity, I might employ it nonetheless.
I didn't realise how effortless unhinging you could be.....
In other words, you have no answers and no flat earth model that works.

All you can do is try to pull down the Globe. It's really quite pathetic.

Save you insincere pity for your Pathetic Pepperoni Pizza Planet, it needs all the propping up you can manage.

*

BillClinton

  • 50
  • +1/-0
  • im bill clinton
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #47 on: March 03, 2017, 09:34:37 AM »
SpaceX has announced that it will fly two private citizens on a trip around the moon in late 2018. The two people have paid a significant deposit and the cost is rumored to be around $35 million per person. The identities of the persons have not yet been revealed, although Musk says "nobody from Hollywood."

Bill Clinton here. You got it all wrong, Eelon Musk is really just ted cruz wearing a mask. Using project bluebeam and the moon hologram we created 30 years ago we will trick the two private citizens into thinking they are flying by the moon when in reality they will just be in a capsule hooked to the underside of one of our chemtrail airplanes.

I'm Bill Clinton
And I approve of this message.
what are you fucking retarded

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45084
  • +87/-110
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #48 on: March 03, 2017, 01:12:51 PM »
SpaceX has announced that it will fly two private citizens on a trip around the moon in late 2018. The two people have paid a significant deposit and the cost is rumored to be around $35 million per person. The identities of the persons have not yet been revealed, although Musk says "nobody from Hollywood."

Bill Clinton here. You got it all wrong, Eelon Musk is really just ted cruz wearing a mask. Using project bluebeam and the moon hologram we created 30 years ago we will trick the two private citizens into thinking they are flying by the moon when in reality they will just be in a capsule hooked to the underside of one of our chemtrail airplanes.

I'm Bill Clinton
And I approve of this message.
Please keep this nonsense out of the serious discussion forums,
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

IonSpen

  • 1209
  • +0/-0
Re: SpaceX to fly 2 private citizens around the moon in 2018
« Reply #49 on: March 04, 2017, 11:25:25 AM »
Like I said, he's getting to be nothing but a boring troll. Lame.