Poll

What is the truth about the 911 attack on the World Trade Center?

Hijacked Planes were flown into the two towers.  Resulting fires caused the collapse.
14 (60.9%)
The planes were CGI and it was controlled demolition
2 (8.7%)
Something other than planes were flown into the twin towers,  missiles drones etc.
2 (8.7%)
The planes were holographic projections from a special satellite, and it was a directed energy weapon
1 (4.3%)
Something else.
3 (13%)
Denspressure
1 (4.3%)

Total Members Voted: 23

Voting closed: March 06, 2017, 10:56:40 PM

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 182 183 [184] 185 186 ... 229   Go Down

911 What is the truth?

  • 6864 Replies
  • 1198719 Views
*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5490 on: September 21, 2017, 11:29:34 AM »
As far as I am concerned 911 was an inside job. I explain why at http://heiwaco.com/nist.htm .

The 2001 911 attacks are a 100% US terrorist job on it self in order to blame others. It happens all the time.
Logged
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5491 on: September 21, 2017, 03:22:32 PM »
Quote from: sokarul on September 21, 2017, 09:23:13 AM
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 09:33:25 PM
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM

Are you a sockpuppet or a sheep? I don't mean any unnecessary disrespect but I think its pretty clear I have a strong point here.

Would you like to try and debunk it?
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 07:26:59 PM

Edit.
Put less politely here.

Quote from: disputeone on February 13, 2017, 10:49:57 PM
Quote from: Rayzor on February 13, 2017, 10:36:59 PM
What real evidence is there for a conspiracy about 911?

Fall acceleration of building 7.

You are going to end this a jibbering mess of failed insults and logic.

But you asked for it.
Alright I got it. You couldn't answer any of my questions so you tried to go off topic.

I didn't think you could.

This isn't off topic. As shown wtc 7 was always our smoking gun. You are trying to debunk physics with Incredulity sock.

Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 11:58:39 PM
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 11:51:27 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 11:47:18 PM
Are either of you capable of a rebuttal?

You mean like the one I gave you 5300 post ago?   

Ok,  while you think about that, can you tell me the rate at which an unsupported object falls.     ( Hint it's a trick question )

An unsupported object falls at g. The issue is why was wtc 7 completely unsupported for 2.25 seconds if the collapse was caused by fire and progressive like claimed by NIST in the official report. I would say there was only two stages, it is a real stretch to say progressive.

Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 11:25:50 PM
Rayzor this is where we left our discussion.

Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 10:37:22 PM
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 09:49:19 PM
We already debunked that free-fall argument.

You haven't debunked it.

Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 09:49:19 PM
But just to recap,  how is it possible for the rooftop of a building to fall?   Doesn't the fact that it collapsed at all mean that the building structure supporting the roof is collapsing,    why would you be surprised that it fell at a free fall rate.   At least until it hit ground and other debris piled up,   The graph in the NIST shows it quite clearly.   

Correct check it out.
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 07:59:43 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 07:57:45 PM
How fid the west penthouse stay intact after the failure of the "supporting structure"

[Youtube][/youtube]

The answer is when the west penthouse collapsed the entire core failed simultaneously causing a 2.25 second symmetrical free-fall.



The only way this is possible is a controlled demolition.

Q.E.D.



We do not abide victims here. Victims are weak, victims are useless. You are not a victim.
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5492 on: September 21, 2017, 03:59:07 PM »
Quote from: User324 on September 21, 2017, 09:23:48 AM
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 08:15:02 AM
It's not childish. It's just that you don't understand it. Anyway I'm off to bed.
Then explain it.
Good night anyway.

I really like your new attitude. A lot of it is a dramatis personae online. It's hard to change the world alone,  You cant gaslight an idea, you can't call it a pedophile to try and get it to stop talking about wtc 7. It's just an idea and ideas are bulletproof.

[youtube][/youtube]
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

Bom Tishop

  • 11247
  • +12/-7
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5493 on: September 21, 2017, 04:20:21 PM »
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 07:16:06 PM
Quote from: Babyhighspeed on September 20, 2017, 11:40:25 AM
I myself am a simplicity and functionality person....I am the person that only has one spoon/knife/bowl/cup/fork etc and rewash every sitting

Wow, mealtime must be pretty lonely at your place.  Do you never have visitors?

Mealtimes around here are can be a bit chaotic,  but it's always fun to have family and friends together for a meal.  We take turns cooking and everyone has a specialty.   Tonight is a birthday party and since I'm cooking, I'm going to cook Mexican.  Lots of wine, fajitas and hot chilli.

I have visitors, though typically alcohol is the wanted party favor....I do have plenty of shot glasses and rocks glasses. If someone is so fancy they require a glass for their beer then they can bring their own..

However, now that I broke down after years of purposefully staying single and actually with someone, perhaps I may add a second set of utensils and cups....

Low blow on the family thing though... expected from you, but still a low blow. You know damn well I lost my family a while back, I have even complimented you on having a close family... Classy  ::)

Quote from: Symptom on September 20, 2017, 10:51:50 PM
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 07:16:06 PM

Wow, mealtime must be pretty lonely at your place.  Do you never have visitors?

He owns a Lamborghini and a (questionable) Porsche (mostly driven by surgically enhanced trophy wife soccer moms), and he knows the 9/11 truth. So why would he need to form relationships with actual human beings?

Duh.

I love it when the bottom of the gene pool attempts to be clever...it's about as entertaining as a monkey trying to hump a football...at least the monkey will eventually get wise to the charade...

The foul smell of do nothing blow hards is quite a repugnant odor that permeates a distance of no limit.

Also, since you are trying to insult me, I would like to clear up a few things so perhaps you can do better next time. Rich soccer mom's do not drive turbo Panameras, they drive g wagons, s550s and range rovers...trophy wives drive Bentley gts and sl63s....also...it would be Lamborghinis, you forgot the s pumpkin  ;) ::)

Try harder...
Logged
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5494 on: September 21, 2017, 04:28:56 PM »
Quote from: Babyhighspeed on September 21, 2017, 04:20:21 PM
Low blow on the family thing though... expected from you, but still a low blow. You know damn well I lost my family a while back, I have even complimented you on having a close family... Classy  ::)

Quote from: Martin Luther King, Jr.
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Is this the content of your character Rayzor?
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5495 on: September 21, 2017, 05:17:15 PM »
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 03:22:32 PM

This isn't off topic. As shown wtc 7 was always our smoking gun. You are trying to debunk physics with Incredulity sock.
If you showed that, why is it so hard to answer such easy questions? The off topic part was this "Are you a sockpuppet or a sheep? I don't mean any unnecessary disrespect but I think its pretty clear I have a strong point here." You didn't answer the simple questions and instead shouted shill. Which is of course funny since only something like 4 people know I go by sock else where. Who's alt are you?

I'll ask again, when and were was the explosion video take?
Logged
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

Quote from: Shifter on July 05, 2020, 09:53:30 AM
It's no slur if it's fact.
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5496 on: September 21, 2017, 05:25:42 PM »
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 06:37:12 PM
Quote from: sockarul on September 20, 2017, 06:23:30 PM
Remember when you claimed people were at ground zero making payphone calls 7 hours after the twin towers collapsed? And they heard the explosion that took down wtc 7?  Remember that?

I do, yes. You should research what "ground zero" was used to describe exclusively before september 11th 2001.

This one, this explosion the firefighters testified to hearing.

Wtc 7.
[youtube][/youtube]
Where was the video taken?
Near a pay phone in New York close to the wtc complex.
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
When was the video taken?
09/11/2001. After the twin towers fell just before wtc 7 fell.
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
Why is there only one explosion?
The core was nearly simultaneously destroyed by explosives. Only one explosion was heard.
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
Why can't the building be heard?
I'm not quite sure what sound a building makes.
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
Why did no other camera pick up the explosion?
They did.
[youtube][/youtube]
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
Why aren't you asking any questions?
I am asking lots of questions. I haven't got many answers yet.
Quote

Quote
Wtc 1 and 2.
[youtube][/youtube]
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
Nothing else has ever exploded?
Things explode all the time.

Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
Quote
Please honour these brave heros.

Also, can you help Rayzor debunk Newton and save the 9/11 official story? It's looking bleak currently.
I don't need to. You are just too blind to see the truth.

I think now it's time now to address the issues with the physics of wtc 7s collapse and the official story.
« Last Edit: September 21, 2017, 05:32:30 PM by disputeone »
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5497 on: September 21, 2017, 05:27:51 PM »
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 11:58:39 PM
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 11:51:27 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 11:47:18 PM
Are either of you capable of a rebuttal?

You mean like the one I gave you 5300 post ago?   

Ok,  while you think about that, can you tell me the rate at which an unsupported object falls.     ( Hint it's a trick question )

An unsupported object falls at g. The issue is why was wtc 7 completely unsupported for 2.25 seconds if the collapse was caused by fire and progressive like claimed by NIST in the official report. I would say there was only two stages, it is a real stretch to say progressive.

Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 11:25:50 PM
Rayzor this is where we left our discussion.

Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 10:37:22 PM
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 09:49:19 PM
We already debunked that free-fall argument.

You haven't debunked it.

Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 09:49:19 PM
But just to recap,  how is it possible for the rooftop of a building to fall?   Doesn't the fact that it collapsed at all mean that the building structure supporting the roof is collapsing,    why would you be surprised that it fell at a free fall rate.   At least until it hit ground and other debris piled up,   The graph in the NIST shows it quite clearly.   

Correct check it out.
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 07:59:43 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 07:57:45 PM
How fid the west penthouse stay intact after the failure of the "supporting structure"

[Youtube][/youtube]

The answer is when the west penthouse collapsed the entire core failed simultaneously causing a 2.25 second symmetrical free-fall.



The only way this is possible is a controlled demolition.

Q.E.D.



We do not abide victims here. Victims are weak, victims are useless. You are not a victim.
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5498 on: September 21, 2017, 05:43:02 PM »
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 05:25:42 PM
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 06:37:12 PM
Quote from: sockarul on September 20, 2017, 06:23:30 PM
Remember when you claimed people were at ground zero making payphone calls 7 hours after the twin towers collapsed? And they heard the explosion that took down wtc 7?  Remember that?

I do, yes. You should research what "ground zero" was used to describe exclusively before september 11th 2001.

This one, this explosion the firefighters testified to hearing.

Wtc 7.
[youtube][/youtube]
Where was the video taken?
Near a pay phone in newyork close to the wtc complex.
Ok, now closer, what street?
Quote
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
When was the video taken?
09/11/2001. After the twin towers fell just before wtc 7 fell.
None of that is in the video, so how do you know. And an actual time is important, so what time was the video take?

Quote
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
Why is there only one explosion?
The core was nearly simultaneously destroyed by explosives. Only one explosion was heard.
So why in the video you posted below says multiple explosions were heard? In many videos of buildings being taken down with explosives multiple explosions are heard.But not minutes or hours apart, seconds at the most.
 
Quote
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
Why can't the building be heard?
I'm not quite sure what sound a building makes.
Feel free to watch other videos to find out.

Quote
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
Why did no other camera pick up the explosion?
They did.
[youtube][/youtube]
That is the same video and then a guy says he heard explosions. Anyone with have a brain can see explosions minutes or long apart is not how they bring buildings down. You still need a location too. I didn't hear that guy saying the explosions were coming from WTC 7, did you?

Quote
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
Why aren't you asking any questions?
I am asking lots of questions. I haven't got many answers yet.
But you blindly  believed a simple youtube video. You couldn't think for yourself.
Quote
Wtc 1 and 2.
Quote
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
[youtube][/youtube]
Nothing else has ever exploded?
Things explode all the time.

Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
Quote
Please honour these brave heros.

Also, can you help Rayzor debunk Newton and save the 9/11 official story? It's looking bleak currently.
I don't need to. You are just too blind to see the truth.

I think now it's time now to address the issues with the physics of wtc 7s collapse and the official story.
It's already been covered. The inside collapsed first. It's all in how the building was designed. The video of the actual collapse showed this.

Logged
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

Quote from: Shifter on July 05, 2020, 09:53:30 AM
It's no slur if it's fact.
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5499 on: September 21, 2017, 05:46:15 PM »
Quote from: sokarul on September 20, 2017, 09:16:12 PM
It's already been covered. The inside collapsed first. It's all in how the building was designed. The video of the actual collapse showed this.



No the video of the collapse shows the failure of columns 79, 80, and 81, causing a partial building collapse. (The collapse of the east penthouse.

None of these were core columns and then after a few seconds, the entire core failed nearly simultaneously causing a 2.25 second symmetrical free-fall of the entire bulding. Remeber the "outer facade" had 18 structural support columns making any natural free-fall impossible.

It is interesting that you also leave two spaces under each of your posts sock.(edited out.)

@Rayzor.
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 04:05:20 AM
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 03:59:31 AM
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 03:54:44 AM
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 03:33:41 AM
You still haven't addressed your post trying to debunk Newton. Do you stand by it?

You seriously think I'm trying to debunk Newton?

I do, yes.

See.
Quote from: disputeone on September 19, 2017, 10:00:14 PM
Quote from: Rayzor on September 19, 2017, 09:51:48 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 19, 2017, 09:50:33 PM
We'll soon see about that.

Yes,  Hulsey's  simultaneous collapse theory.   What a joke.

In order for the building to collapse at free-fall the entire core had to fail nearly simultaneously. Structural resistance slows fall acceleration. If you don't like it take it up with Newton, not me.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Newt.html

Ah, I see where you went wrong,  you forgot that the center had already collapsed / was collapsing BEFORE the facade came down.  I really can't keep holding you hand while you work through these things, you have to start to think for yourself if you are going to be a good anon campaigner.

Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 04:10:35 AM
Thats not true that's the conclusions of the fraudulent NIST report. That is merely the lie we were sold.

Furthermore, even if the entire inner core collapsed leaving the entire "facade" intact (which is impossible because of the cross bracing) there were still 18 support columns around the exterior.



A free fall collapse even under your fairytale conditions is still impossible without a controlled demolition. You are trying to debunk Newton.

Q.E.D.
« Last Edit: September 21, 2017, 05:54:23 PM by disputeone »
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5500 on: September 21, 2017, 05:52:08 PM »
If it makes you feel better I will retract that video as evidence and we can just focus on the collapse of wtc 7, the physics involved and Newtons laws.

Would you prefer that?
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +3/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5501 on: September 21, 2017, 05:52:14 PM »
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 05:27:51 PM

We do not abide victims here. Victims are weak, victims are useless. You are not a victim.



10 inches?
Logged
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5502 on: September 21, 2017, 05:53:16 PM »
Quote from: Bullwinkle on September 21, 2017, 05:52:14 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 05:27:51 PM

We do not abide victims here. Victims are weak, victims are useless. You are not a victim.



10 inches?

Can you help Rayzor and Sock debunk Newton and save the 9/11 official story bullwinkle?

Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 05:52:08 PM
If it makes you feel better I will retract that video as evidence and we can just focus on the collapse of wtc 7, the physics involved and Newtons laws.

Would you prefer that?
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +3/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5503 on: September 21, 2017, 05:56:06 PM »
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 05:53:16 PM

Can you help Rayzor and Sock debunk Newton and save the 9/11 official story bullwinkle?


12 inches?
Logged
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5504 on: September 21, 2017, 05:57:51 PM »
Can you debunk this post? If it's as stupid and I'm as stupid as you all claim surely a smart guy like you can debunk it.

Just over 8 if you are interested for whatever reason.

Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 05:46:15 PM
No the video of the collapse shows the failure of columns 79, 80, and 81, causing a partial building collapse. (The collapse of the east penthouse.

None of these were core columns and then after a few seconds, the entire core failed nearly simultaneously causing a 2.25 second symmetrical free-fall of the entire bulding. Remeber the "outer facade" had 18 structural support columns making any natural free-fall impossible.

@Rayzor.
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 04:05:20 AM
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 03:59:31 AM
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 03:54:44 AM
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 03:33:41 AM
You still haven't addressed your post trying to debunk Newton. Do you stand by it?

You seriously think I'm trying to debunk Newton?

I do, yes.

See.
Quote from: disputeone on September 19, 2017, 10:00:14 PM
Quote from: Rayzor on September 19, 2017, 09:51:48 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 19, 2017, 09:50:33 PM
We'll soon see about that.

Yes,  Hulsey's  simultaneous collapse theory.   What a joke.

In order for the building to collapse at free-fall the entire core had to fail nearly simultaneously. Structural resistance slows fall acceleration. If you don't like it take it up with Newton, not me.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Newt.html

Ah, I see where you went wrong,  you forgot that the center had already collapsed / was collapsing BEFORE the facade came down.  I really can't keep holding you hand while you work through these things, you have to start to think for yourself if you are going to be a good anon campaigner.

Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 04:10:35 AM
Thats not true that's the conclusions of the fraudulent NIST report. That is merely the lie we were sold.

Furthermore, even if the entire inner core collapsed leaving the entire "facade" intact (which is impossible because of the cross bracing) there were still 18 support columns around the exterior.



A free fall collapse even under your fairytale conditions is still impossible without a controlled demolition. You are trying to debunk Newton.

Q.E.D.

Edit.
Video evidence.
[Youtube][/youtube]
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

Rayzor

  • 12195
  • +0/-6
  • Looking for Occam
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5505 on: September 21, 2017, 06:19:49 PM »
Quote from: Babyhighspeed on September 21, 2017, 04:20:21 PM
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 07:16:06 PM
Quote from: Babyhighspeed on September 20, 2017, 11:40:25 AM
I myself am a simplicity and functionality person....I am the person that only has one spoon/knife/bowl/cup/fork etc and rewash every sitting

Wow, mealtime must be pretty lonely at your place.  Do you never have visitors?

Mealtimes around here are can be a bit chaotic,  but it's always fun to have family and friends together for a meal.  We take turns cooking and everyone has a specialty.   Tonight is a birthday party and since I'm cooking, I'm going to cook Mexican.  Lots of wine, fajitas and hot chilli.

I have visitors, though typically alcohol is the wanted party favor....I do have plenty of shot glasses and rocks glasses. If someone is so fancy they require a glass for their beer then they can bring their own..

However, now that I broke down after years of purposefully staying single and actually with someone, perhaps I may add a second set of utensils and cups....

Low blow on the family thing though... expected from you, but still a low blow. You know damn well I lost my family a while back, I have even complimented you on having a close family... Classy  ::)

Quote from: Symptom on September 20, 2017, 10:51:50 PM
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 07:16:06 PM

Wow, mealtime must be pretty lonely at your place.  Do you never have visitors?

He owns a Lamborghini and a (questionable) Porsche (mostly driven by surgically enhanced trophy wife soccer moms), and he knows the 9/11 truth. So why would he need to form relationships with actual human beings?

Duh.

I love it when the bottom of the gene pool attempts to be clever...it's about as entertaining as a monkey trying to hump a football...at least the monkey will eventually get wise to the charade...

The foul smell of do nothing blow hards is quite a repugnant odor that permeates a distance of no limit.

Also, since you are trying to insult me, I would like to clear up a few things so perhaps you can do better next time. Rich soccer mom's do not drive turbo Panameras, they drive g wagons, s550s and range rovers...trophy wives drive Bentley gts and sl63s....also...it would be Lamborghinis, you forgot the s pumpkin  ;) ::)

Try harder...

Yeah,  sorry,  I didn't mean to make you feel bad,  it's just that you are always after me to tell you something about myself,  but when I do, it magically turns into being more about you.

Not everything is all about you.   I don't judge people by the type of car they drive,  I try to deal with people how I find them,  my point is that you should stop trying to prove yourself, you don't need to prove anything to me. 

It's clear to everyone that your friend dipstick is having some kind of a self destructive episode,  you are well placed to help, but you choose not to.  Why not?
Logged
Quote from: Space Cowgirl on March 01, 2018, 01:35:42 PM
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5506 on: September 21, 2017, 06:21:49 PM »
There's so many gifted and very intelligent people on this site.

Surely someone can debunk my post. Maybe they are off proving the earth is in fact spherical????

Rayzor, Strong willed individuals are not susceptible to your psychological manipulations. You are trying to swim up a waterfall. Remember that. Your tactics only work on the weak.

On that note.
Please address my post.

Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 05:57:51 PM
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

Rayzor

  • 12195
  • +0/-6
  • Looking for Occam
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5507 on: September 21, 2017, 06:25:25 PM »
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 06:21:49 PM
There's so many gifted and very intelligent people on this site.

Surely someone can debunk my post. Maybe they are off proving the earth is in fact spherical????

Rayzor, Strong willed individuals are not susceptible to your psychological manipulations. You are trying to swim up a waterfall. Remember that. Your tactics only work on the weak.

On that note.
Please address my post.


Hello post.
Logged
Quote from: Space Cowgirl on March 01, 2018, 01:35:42 PM
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5508 on: September 21, 2017, 06:26:07 PM »
Can you debunk it or not? It's fine if you cant.

Stick to the script.

Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 12:34:57 AM
Quote from: disputeone on March 28, 2017, 03:26:42 AM
Wow you follow the script...

Quote from: disputeone on March 26, 2017, 08:40:16 PM
Rayzor I have summarised your debate tactics as a reference and guide for you.

*Encourage group shaming and group think as a first priority.

*Always quote and support the official story, if any evidence doesn't support the OS, then deny it and re-quote the official story.

*Deny any and all facts that go against the official story.

*Discredit anyone that goes against the official story.

*Push controlled opposition conspiracy theories e.g aliens, holographic planes, death rays from space.

*Speak from a position of authority on all subjects, never provide proof of authority.

*Give absolutely no quarter, if you can't answer a question honestly descredit the poster and distract the debate.

*Offer the official story as the only explanation, keep trying to exaggerate your opponents position and twist their words out of meaning.

*Attack only the weakest points of your opponent's argument, if there are no weak enough points, create a strawman and tear it to shreds.

This is a free reference if you get stuck.

I am sure you can air your issues during peer review. Hulsey is giving us this option.

Isn't science great.

Consider this list open source. Please feel free to add to it or edit it.
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

Rayzor

  • 12195
  • +0/-6
  • Looking for Occam
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5509 on: September 21, 2017, 06:28:58 PM »
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 06:26:07 PM
Can you debunk it or not? It's fine if you cant.

Go back about 5000 or so posts,  in any case I'm not allowed to interact with you Penguin shills anymore,  the upper level shill management committee has declared you off limits. 

You are to be dealt with by the special anti-penguin task force.      May god have mercy on your soul.

Logged
Quote from: Space Cowgirl on March 01, 2018, 01:35:42 PM
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5510 on: September 21, 2017, 06:30:41 PM »
Come on Rayzor..
This post has not been debunked.

Saying:
""Believe what you are told on the News!""

Doesn't debunk it.
Please address it if you are able.

Here.
Can you debunk this post? If it's as stupid and I'm as stupid as you all claim surely a smart guy like you can debunk it.

Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 05:46:15 PM
No the video of the collapse shows the failure of columns 79, 80, and 81, causing a partial building collapse. (The collapse of the east penthouse.

None of these were core columns and then after a few seconds, the entire core failed nearly simultaneously causing a 2.25 second symmetrical free-fall of the entire bulding. Remeber the "outer facade" had 18 structural support columns making any natural free-fall impossible.

@Rayzor.
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 04:05:20 AM
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 03:59:31 AM
Quote from: Rayzor on September 20, 2017, 03:54:44 AM
Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 03:33:41 AM
You still haven't addressed your post trying to debunk Newton. Do you stand by it?

You seriously think I'm trying to debunk Newton?

I do, yes.

See.
Quote from: disputeone on September 19, 2017, 10:00:14 PM
Quote from: Rayzor on September 19, 2017, 09:51:48 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 19, 2017, 09:50:33 PM
We'll soon see about that.

Yes,  Hulsey's  simultaneous collapse theory.   What a joke.

In order for the building to collapse at free-fall the entire core had to fail nearly simultaneously. Structural resistance slows fall acceleration. If you don't like it take it up with Newton, not me.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Newt.html

Ah, I see where you went wrong,  you forgot that the center had already collapsed / was collapsing BEFORE the facade came down.  I really can't keep holding you hand while you work through these things, you have to start to think for yourself if you are going to be a good anon campaigner.

Quote from: disputeone on September 20, 2017, 04:10:35 AM
Thats not true that's the conclusions of the fraudulent NIST report. That is merely the lie we were sold.

Furthermore, even if the entire inner core collapsed leaving the entire "facade" intact (which is impossible because of the cross bracing) there were still 18 support columns around the exterior.



A free fall collapse even under your fairytale conditions is still impossible without a controlled demolition. You are trying to debunk Newton.

Q.E.D.

Edit.
Video evidence.
[Youtube][/youtube]
« Last Edit: September 21, 2017, 07:06:37 PM by disputeone »
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

Rayzor

  • 12195
  • +0/-6
  • Looking for Occam
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5511 on: September 21, 2017, 06:33:10 PM »
Quote from: Bullwinkle on September 21, 2017, 05:56:06 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 05:53:16 PM

Can you help Rayzor and Sock debunk Newton and save the 9/11 official story bullwinkle?


12 inches?

LOL. 
Logged
Quote from: Space Cowgirl on March 01, 2018, 01:35:42 PM
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5512 on: September 21, 2017, 06:34:47 PM »
Why are you still dodging my post?
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +3/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5513 on: September 21, 2017, 06:39:06 PM »
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 06:21:49 PM

There's so many gifted and very intelligent people on this site.



One less than you think.
Logged
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5514 on: September 21, 2017, 06:39:45 PM »
Quote from: Bullwinkle on September 21, 2017, 06:39:06 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 06:21:49 PM

There's so many gifted and very intelligent people on this site.
One less than you think.

It's your right to call me what you like, however. Why are you still dodging my post?

I honestly believe I have made you hit your intellectual limit. You can break past this limit. Don't hold yourself back. Believe in yourself.

Debunk my post. Show me why I am wrong.
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

Rayzor

  • 12195
  • +0/-6
  • Looking for Occam
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5515 on: September 21, 2017, 06:47:17 PM »
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 06:39:45 PM
Debunk my post. Show me why I am wrong.

You've been outed as a penguin shill,  why should anyone care what you think or do?
Logged
Quote from: Space Cowgirl on March 01, 2018, 01:35:42 PM
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5516 on: September 21, 2017, 06:49:12 PM »
Quote from: Rayzor on September 21, 2017, 06:47:17 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 06:39:45 PM
Debunk my post. Show me why I am wrong.

You've been outed as a penguin shill,  why should anyone care what you think or do?

Because this is conclusive proof based purely on logic proving that the NIST report was fraudulent and wtc 7 was a controlled demolition. See my post

Also, as I said, your tricks only work on the weak willed. They are futile against some posters here.

Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 12:34:57 AM
Quote from: disputeone on March 28, 2017, 03:26:42 AM
Wow you follow the script...

Quote from: disputeone on March 26, 2017, 08:40:16 PM
Rayzor I have summarised your debate tactics as a reference and guide for you.

*Encourage group shaming and group think as a first priority.

*Always quote and support the official story, if any evidence doesn't support the OS, then deny it and re-quote the official story.

*Deny any and all facts that go against the official story.

*Discredit anyone that goes against the official story.

*Push controlled opposition conspiracy theories e.g aliens, holographic planes, death rays from space.

*Speak from a position of authority on all subjects, never provide proof of authority.

*Give absolutely no quarter, if you can't answer a question honestly descredit the poster and distract the debate.

*Offer the official story as the only explanation, keep trying to exaggerate your opponents position and twist their words out of meaning.

*Attack only the weakest points of your opponent's argument, if there are no weak enough points, create a strawman and tear it to shreds.

This is a free reference if you get stuck.

I am sure you can air your issues during peer review. Hulsey is giving us this option.

Isn't science great.

Consider this list open source. Please feel free to add to it or edit it.
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +3/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5517 on: September 21, 2017, 06:49:28 PM »
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 06:39:45 PM

I honestly believe I have made you hit your intellectual limit.



I honestly believe you believe that.
Logged
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5518 on: September 21, 2017, 06:51:02 PM »
Quote from: Bullwinkle on September 21, 2017, 06:49:28 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 06:39:45 PM

I honestly believe I have made you hit your intellectual limit.



I honestly believe you believe that.

Thanks. Call me delusional all you want but if you cant and won't even try to debunk my post it honestly looks like projection.
« Last Edit: September 21, 2017, 06:53:28 PM by disputeone »
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
*

disputeone

  • 28036
  • +112/-112
  • Or should I?
Re: 911 What is the truth?
« Reply #5519 on: September 21, 2017, 06:52:24 PM »
Quote from: Rayzor on September 21, 2017, 06:47:17 PM
Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 06:39:45 PM
Debunk my post. Show me why I am wrong.

You've been outed as a penguin shill,  why should anyone care what you think or do?

Because this is conclusive proof based purely on logic proving that the NIST report was fraudulent and wtc 7 was a controlled demolition. See my post. Scientific proof is coming soon.

Also, as I said, your tricks only work on the weak willed. They are futile against some posters here.

Quote from: disputeone on September 21, 2017, 12:34:57 AM
Quote from: disputeone on March 28, 2017, 03:26:42 AM
Wow you follow the script...

Quote from: disputeone on March 26, 2017, 08:40:16 PM
Rayzor I have summarised your debate tactics as a reference and guide for you.

*Encourage group shaming and group think as a first priority.

*Always quote and support the official story, if any evidence doesn't support the OS, then deny it and re-quote the official story.

*Deny any and all facts that go against the official story.

*Discredit anyone that goes against the official story.

*Push controlled opposition conspiracy theories e.g aliens, holographic planes, death rays from space.

*Speak from a position of authority on all subjects, never provide proof of authority.

*Give absolutely no quarter, if you can't answer a question honestly descredit the poster and distract the debate.

*Offer the official story as the only explanation, keep trying to exaggerate your opponents position and twist their words out of meaning.

*Attack only the weakest points of your opponent's argument, if there are no weak enough points, create a strawman and tear it to shreds.

This is a free reference if you get stuck.

I am sure you can air your issues during peer review. Hulsey is giving us this option.

Isn't science great.

Consider this list open source. Please feel free to add to it or edit it.
Logged
Quote from: Crouton on July 15, 2024, 05:37:14 AM
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.
Pages: 1 ... 182 183 [184] 185 186 ... 229   Go Up
« previous next »