Let's take it one step at a time.
1. Do you agree there is no direct physical evidence of demolition charges being used to bring down WTC1 and WTC2.
2. You seem to be asserting that WTC1 and WTC2 were not hit by Boeing 767's of AA11 and UA175, be clear in what you are asserting. You seem to be implying it's some kind of trick photography?
So far we have at least two very strong clear points.
1. The buildings shouldn't have fallen like they did given the circumstances we were told.
2. The planes shouldn't have cut through the buildings like they did given that they were supposedly perfectly intact before impact.
Pick one.
For your questions.
1. I accept there is no direct physical proof that we have access to, otherwise it wouldn't still be a conspiracy silly.
2. I think planes hit the buildings already prepped for demolition so the impact can make slightly more physical sense. As i said before this is irrelevant I do not want to debate fake planes. I am very open to debating the mechanics of the plane hitting the building.
As I have said...Despite whatever speculation, it is not speculation saying it did not happen as we saw, nor did that cause the free falls of 3 buildings
Beat me, was halfway through my post.
This.
This is confusion tactic dispute...Typical, he is trying to get me to trip up and say something he can use against me. While at the same time stalling with repetition in attempt to try and figure something to say. The problem is, as he stalls with basic information, I already have a comment for 200 post from now, then another 500 after that and so on. This is my wheel house Mr. Rayzor...Not only is it part of my degree, part of my business of almost a decade, part of a group a worked with for years, it is something I take very very personal.
Not only did people die senselessly (not 3000 people though) , people died all around the world because of this, caused a loss of many of our freedoms and allowed laws to be passed that would equal such a thing, it was the greatest lie ever told to the American public since my existence...And possibly ever.
So either up the game...Or let's end this early.
Now...
Back to your game...
Ok, I have to be pedantic, please be clearer, are you saying that no planes hit WTC 1 and WTC 2, in spite of all the evidence to the contrary.
Also please answer the first question, is there any direct physical evidence of demolition charges being used on any of the buildings?
I was very clear on what I meant...But I will play along with your slow playing for now since I am sick and nothing much better i feel like doing.
I don't know what hit the towers, I gave you my speculation on what could of happened. There is something incredibly wrong with the footage that is easily seen with examination. If it was just recording a plane wreck, there would be no reason for this.
As well as the dynamics of the actual wreck into the building is 100 percent impossible...you want my speculation of what hit the towers, I wrote that already. With help of explosives & pyrotechnics in the building itself. 1000s of testimonials was left out of the official report that said they saw something besides a commercial 767. A cohesion of reports from missle, to small plane, to jet tells me there is an issue. I don't know how many close proximity 767s you have been around...
But I can tell you from experience, you don't mistake the sound, feeling or look...They are intimidating close up. As for the first impact, I don't think there is anything needed, an explosion would be sufficient with no one expecting anything. There were many people that said they didn't hear a thing but an explosion.
My uncle is one of them, he still lives in Manhattan, but at the time he was in a hotel 11 blocks from the towers. View was horrible from there because of direction, he only heard an explosion first, then he heard a rocket ish sound and another explosion. He is ex Navy and actively served in his younger years, so his ears know the difference between fan jet and rocket.
So for demolition, yes their are plenty of clues....Particles found in the dust I confirmed myself. Shape charges in the I beams and other areas, dynamics in the buildings free fall rate and falling in its own foot print, Knowing the design of the building and how it would deal with stress in all situations, experiments I did in real world or simulation wise...I could keep going...But...
You are wanting me to speculate and so you can focus on my speculation and ignore what I am telling you as a cold hard fact. Yes demolition is the obvious option and easiest...However, it could have been a secret government death ray from space as some of the most out there theories go because of the isotopes found in the dust.
Poll