Air Pressure vs Gravity

  • 1933 Replies
  • 345286 Views
?

inquisitive

  • 5108
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #690 on: January 08, 2017, 10:59:37 AM »

But without atmosphere in the chamber there is nothing to offer resistance.  That's why the feather doesn't flutter.  Is your only response then that it must be a fake because it doesn't fit your opinion?
I've just explained in my post, earlier.
I'm just not following you.  Are you saying that the few remaining air molecules have expanded to fill the space ?  With virtually no air in the chamber, why do the objects fall at all?  No pressure left to push them down.
Virtually no air?
There's plenty of air in the chamber, it's just more expanded.
It's just a lower pressure that's all.
Meanwhile... the rate of fall of an object is not related to the pressure of the air surrounding it otherwise a bag of sugar would weigh a different amount each day.

*

Mainframes

  • 2088
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #691 on: January 08, 2017, 11:25:07 AM »

But without atmosphere in the chamber there is nothing to offer resistance.  That's why the feather doesn't flutter.  Is your only response then that it must be a fake because it doesn't fit your opinion?
I've just explained in my post, earlier.

No you haven't explained you just made up crap.

The chamber is in a state of vacuum and therefore no air pressure or resistance will affect the falling objects.
LITTLE resistance affects the objects. Get this bit correct because if you don't get this bit correct, it means you believe a true vacuum can be made, which means the absence of ALL matter and that would mean there would be an absence of ALL matter, meaning there would be nothing at all happening, as there would not be anything that exists.
Do you understand?

Cute. The vacuum generated in a vacuum chamber is very good but not a true vacuum. It is also possible to have solid objects within a vacuum.
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance or stupidity.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #692 on: January 08, 2017, 01:31:33 PM »
Nothing can strike the dome.

Then why did you use an analogy involving a foolish man who cannot see a sliding glass door (much like a bad 90s sitcom) to illustrate the fact that "Nothing can strike the dome"

You only get dome hydricals and helicals and nitricals, etc.
They're what you would view as meteors and comets and what not.
They're the dome fallers that you see in friction burn ups in the sky.

Icicles made of hydrogen, helium, and nitrogen would not explain fragments of meteorites that have been found all over the world.

Oh, right. Those are ALL fakes, according to nobody except you.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2017, 01:35:22 PM by TheRealBillNye »

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #693 on: January 08, 2017, 01:32:56 PM »
Show me your set up and we can get going. I'm sure you want to try out some stuff, right?

You said you had "several experiements" requiring "very little equipment"

I would hardly call the evacuation chamber you are describing "very little equipment"

Do you have another experiment that ALL of us are able to do ourselves?
You disappoint me Bill. The equipment you must have and you're backing out.
Show me that you can think for yourself, Bill.

If you think I'm actually Bill Nye, then you are a bigger fool than I took you for. Congratulations, you just lowered the bar even further.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #694 on: January 08, 2017, 01:34:15 PM »
Virtually no air?
There's plenty of air in the chamber, it's just more expanded.
It's just a lower pressure that's all.

Barometers inside evacuation chambers read zero when the chamber is evacuated. Any air pressure present in the system would be negligable. Stop being obtuse.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #695 on: January 08, 2017, 01:37:40 PM »
If you were a true Zeteticist, you would be able to describe an experiment that could verify your thinking that any normal man would be able to perform. You sir are a charlatan and a fraud.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #696 on: January 08, 2017, 02:11:49 PM »

But without atmosphere in the chamber there is nothing to offer resistance.  That's why the feather doesn't flutter.  Is your only response then that it must be a fake because it doesn't fit your opinion?
I've just explained in my post, earlier.
I'm just not following you.  Are you saying that the few remaining air molecules have expanded to fill the space ?  With virtually no air in the chamber, why do the objects fall at all?  No pressure left to push them down.
Virtually no air?
There's plenty of air in the chamber, it's just more expanded.
It's just a lower pressure that's all.
Meanwhile... the rate of fall of an object is not related to the pressure of the air surrounding it otherwise a bag of sugar would weigh a different amount each day.
The rate of fall is determined by push against resistance to that push, or squeeze if you want to grasp it.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #697 on: January 08, 2017, 02:13:41 PM »

But without atmosphere in the chamber there is nothing to offer resistance.  That's why the feather doesn't flutter.  Is your only response then that it must be a fake because it doesn't fit your opinion?
I've just explained in my post, earlier.

No you haven't explained you just made up crap.

The chamber is in a state of vacuum and therefore no air pressure or resistance will affect the falling objects.
LITTLE resistance affects the objects. Get this bit correct because if you don't get this bit correct, it means you believe a true vacuum can be made, which means the absence of ALL matter and that would mean there would be an absence of ALL matter, meaning there would be nothing at all happening, as there would not be anything that exists.
Do you understand?

Cute. The vacuum generated in a vacuum chamber is very good but not a true vacuum. It is also possible to have solid objects within a vacuum.
You are going places that you are unsure about and trying to somehow make a point.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #698 on: January 08, 2017, 02:20:15 PM »
Then why did you use an analogy involving a foolish man who cannot see a sliding glass door (much like a bad 90s sitcom) to illustrate the fact that "Nothing can strike the dome"
I didn't. You just chose to pretend I did, when I actually used the analogy to show you that I cannot see if there was a window from 10 feet away and walked into it, so how do you expect to SEE a dome.

There's a big difference and twisting it will get you nowhere.



Icicles made of hydrogen, helium, and nitrogen would not explain fragments of meteorites that have been found all over the world.
Oh, right. Those are ALL fakes, according to nobody except you.
They can be Earth spew or merely bullshit in many instances. You're only told they come from the sky, you don't know it.



*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #699 on: January 08, 2017, 02:22:16 PM »
Show me your set up and we can get going. I'm sure you want to try out some stuff, right?

You said you had "several experiements" requiring "very little equipment"

I would hardly call the evacuation chamber you are describing "very little equipment"

Do you have another experiment that ALL of us are able to do ourselves?
You disappoint me Bill. The equipment you must have and you're backing out.
Show me that you can think for yourself, Bill.

If you think I'm actually Bill Nye, then you are a bigger fool than I took you for. Congratulations, you just lowered the bar even further.
You are claiming to be the Real Bill Nye, so I take it as you being Bill Nye.
You could be a reasonably intelligent lab chimp for all I know but I'll simply take you as your name suggests.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #700 on: January 08, 2017, 02:27:46 PM »
If you were a true Zeteticist, you would be able to describe an experiment that could verify your thinking that any normal man would be able to perform. You sir are a charlatan and a fraud.
A fraud for what?
I'm not the one that's telling the world to follow lies after lies that are supposedly backed up by experimentation that cannot be shown due to secrecy or simply cannot be explained as to what they are.

I merely question and have my own theories which I'm comfortable with in my own mind as to how much of a better theory they are compared to the many Earth theories told by mainstream so called scientists.
You cannot prove anything and you are Bill Nye who's supposed to be a skinny genius.

*

Mainframes

  • 2088
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #701 on: January 08, 2017, 03:02:25 PM »
If you were a true Zeteticist, you would be able to describe an experiment that could verify your thinking that any normal man would be able to perform. You sir are a charlatan and a fraud.
A fraud for what?
I'm not the one that's telling the world to follow lies after lies that are supposedly backed up by experimentation that cannot be shown due to secrecy or simply cannot be explained as to what they are.

I merely question and have my own theories which I'm comfortable with in my own mind as to how much of a better theory they are compared to the many Earth theories told by mainstream so called scientists.
You cannot prove anything and you are Bill Nye who's supposed to be a skinny genius.

I think you may be mistaking things that cannot be explained for things that you are too stupid too understand. The fact that you can't or won't even grasp the most basic concept such as inertia is telling.
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance or stupidity.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #702 on: January 08, 2017, 03:06:20 PM »
If you were a true Zeteticist, you would be able to describe an experiment that could verify your thinking that any normal man would be able to perform. You sir are a charlatan and a fraud.
A fraud for what?
I'm not the one that's telling the world to follow lies after lies that are supposedly backed up by experimentation that cannot be shown due to secrecy or simply cannot be explained as to what they are.

I merely question and have my own theories which I'm comfortable with in my own mind as to how much of a better theory they are compared to the many Earth theories told by mainstream so called scientists.
You cannot prove anything and you are Bill Nye who's supposed to be a skinny genius.

I think you may be mistaking things that cannot be explained for things that you are too stupid too understand. The fact that you can't or won't even grasp the most basic concept such as inertia is telling.
Basic concept?
I've asked you to explain inertia and you can't.
You just keep telling me that it's a property of mass.

How about explaining what it is and while you're at it, explain what gravity is, also.
So am I really too stupid to understand or is it that you use this to hide the fact that you cannot explain?

I think it's the latter.

?

Badxtoss

  • 3268
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #703 on: January 08, 2017, 03:26:16 PM »

But without atmosphere in the chamber there is nothing to offer resistance.  That's why the feather doesn't flutter.  Is your only response then that it must be a fake because it doesn't fit your opinion?
I've just explained in my post, earlier.
I'm just not following you.  Are you saying that the few remaining air molecules have expanded to fill the space ?  With virtually no air in the chamber, why do the objects fall at all?  No pressure left to push them down.
Virtually no air?
There's plenty of air in the chamber, it's just more expanded.
It's just a lower pressure that's all.
I suppose plenty is a relative term.  Plenty for what?  It is a much lower pressure, approaching zero.  So what makes the bowling ball drop?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #704 on: January 08, 2017, 03:30:31 PM »

But without atmosphere in the chamber there is nothing to offer resistance.  That's why the feather doesn't flutter.  Is your only response then that it must be a fake because it doesn't fit your opinion?
I've just explained in my post, earlier.
I'm just not following you.  Are you saying that the few remaining air molecules have expanded to fill the space ?  With virtually no air in the chamber, why do the objects fall at all?  No pressure left to push them down.
Virtually no air?
There's plenty of air in the chamber, it's just more expanded.
It's just a lower pressure that's all.
I suppose plenty is a relative term.  Plenty for what?  It is a much lower pressure, approaching zero.  So what makes the bowling ball drop?
The release bolt on the crane beam, I suppose.

?

Twerp

  • Gutter Sniper
  • Flat Earth Almost Believer
  • 6540
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #705 on: January 08, 2017, 03:59:35 PM »
Why does water run downhill?
Because it was squeezed UP by atmospheric pressure upon expansion of the liquid. Once the expansion has squeezed back together due to force of number after the suns energy has waned, then the water is squeezed back down to the ground.

Why does the atmospheric pressure squeeze the water up upon expansion of the liquid then squeeze the water back down to the ground after the suns energy has waned?

Yes, but why does this happen?
How does what happen?
Ahh ok.
You've watched a kettle boil, right?
You know what happens.
That boiling water is expansion of molecules being pushed up and out of the kettle by the atmospheric pressure pushing down on the water from above as the element creates low pressure pockets at the bottom.
This then pushes out the expanded molecules which are squeezed up by the more dense (amount) of atmospheric molecules, until they become a part of the equally expanded molecules higher up.
They then push into each other which compresses them into each other  and cannot be pushed up any more due to the fact that they no longer expand but condense by mass compression and are pushed through the dense atmosphere which squeezes again and again and again until we feel it as rain or as in mountains...a water fall.

Why does pressure behave the way it does? Why?
“Heaven is being governed by Devil nowadays..” - Wise

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #706 on: January 08, 2017, 04:16:25 PM »
Why does pressure behave the way it does? Why?
Because it's stacked.

?

Twerp

  • Gutter Sniper
  • Flat Earth Almost Believer
  • 6540
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #707 on: January 08, 2017, 04:19:15 PM »
Why does pressure behave the way it does? Why?
Because it's stacked.

But what want to know is why it stacks. And why would stacking bring about that result anyway?
“Heaven is being governed by Devil nowadays..” - Wise

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #708 on: January 08, 2017, 04:21:15 PM »
Why does pressure behave the way it does? Why?
Because it's stacked.

But what want to know is why it stacks. And why would stacking bring about that result anyway?
I've already explained it and I have no intention of doing it again, so start reading and absorbing what's been said if you're interested.
If not then just keep asking the same question and be overlooked.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #709 on: January 08, 2017, 04:24:19 PM »
And inertia has already been explained to you. Not that you can read this since you blocked me because I destroyed you so many times.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

?

Twerp

  • Gutter Sniper
  • Flat Earth Almost Believer
  • 6540
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #710 on: January 08, 2017, 04:24:55 PM »
And inertia has already been explained to you. Not that you can read this since you blocked me because I destroyed you so many times.
“Heaven is being governed by Devil nowadays..” - Wise

?

Badxtoss

  • 3268
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #711 on: January 08, 2017, 04:27:02 PM »

But without atmosphere in the chamber there is nothing to offer resistance.  That's why the feather doesn't flutter.  Is your only response then that it must be a fake because it doesn't fit your opinion?
I've just explained in my post, earlier.
I'm just not following you.  Are you saying that the few remaining air molecules have expanded to fill the space ?  With virtually no air in the chamber, why do the objects fall at all?  No pressure left to push them down.
Virtually no air?
There's plenty of air in the chamber, it's just more expanded.
It's just a lower pressure that's all.
I suppose plenty is a relative term.  Plenty for what?  It is a much lower pressure, approaching zero.  So what makes the bowling ball drop?
The release bolt on the crane beam, I suppose.
No, that simply releases it.  With nearly no pressure in the room, what pulls the bowling ball, or pushes it, to the ground?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #712 on: January 08, 2017, 04:40:38 PM »

But without atmosphere in the chamber there is nothing to offer resistance.  That's why the feather doesn't flutter.  Is your only response then that it must be a fake because it doesn't fit your opinion?
I've just explained in my post, earlier.
I'm just not following you.  Are you saying that the few remaining air molecules have expanded to fill the space ?  With virtually no air in the chamber, why do the objects fall at all?  No pressure left to push them down.
Virtually no air?
There's plenty of air in the chamber, it's just more expanded.
It's just a lower pressure that's all.
I suppose plenty is a relative term.  Plenty for what?  It is a much lower pressure, approaching zero.  So what makes the bowling ball drop?
The release bolt on the crane beam, I suppose.
No, that simply releases it.  With nearly no pressure in the room, what pulls the bowling ball, or pushes it, to the ground?
Its own displacement of atmosphere with much less resistance.
Don't pretend a near vacuum in that big numb NASA building with it's shaky pipes.  ;D

?

Badxtoss

  • 3268
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #713 on: January 08, 2017, 07:32:38 PM »

But without atmosphere in the chamber there is nothing to offer resistance.  That's why the feather doesn't flutter.  Is your only response then that it must be a fake because it doesn't fit your opinion?
I've just explained in my post, earlier.
I'm just not following you.  Are you saying that the few remaining air molecules have expanded to fill the space ?  With virtually no air in the chamber, why do the objects fall at all?  No pressure left to push them down.
Virtually no air?
There's plenty of air in the chamber, it's just more expanded.
It's just a lower pressure that's all.
I suppose plenty is a relative term.  Plenty for what?  It is a much lower pressure, approaching zero.  So what makes the bowling ball drop?
The release bolt on the crane beam, I suppose.
No, that simply releases it.  With nearly no pressure in the room, what pulls the bowling ball, or pushes it, to the ground?
Its own displacement of atmosphere with much less resistance.
Don't pretend a near vacuum in that big numb NASA building with it's shaky pipes.  ;D
Pretty close.  But why does it displace it downward? 

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #714 on: January 08, 2017, 08:52:21 PM »
A fraud for what?

You are a liar peddling unverifiable nonsense.

I have asked you literally dozens of times for a simple, repeatable experiment. You claim you have thought of many. Post one.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #715 on: January 08, 2017, 08:58:13 PM »
Don't pretend a near vacuum in that big numb NASA building with it's shaky pipes.  ;D

The barometer reads close to zero, just like in every single proper evacuation chamber. Stop being so intentionally obtuse!

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #716 on: January 08, 2017, 11:53:48 PM »

But without atmosphere in the chamber there is nothing to offer resistance.  That's why the feather doesn't flutter.  Is your only response then that it must be a fake because it doesn't fit your opinion?
I've just explained in my post, earlier.
I'm just not following you.  Are you saying that the few remaining air molecules have expanded to fill the space ?  With virtually no air in the chamber, why do the objects fall at all?  No pressure left to push them down.
Virtually no air?
There's plenty of air in the chamber, it's just more expanded.
It's just a lower pressure that's all.
I suppose plenty is a relative term.  Plenty for what?  It is a much lower pressure, approaching zero.  So what makes the bowling ball drop?
The release bolt on the crane beam, I suppose.
No, that simply releases it.  With nearly no pressure in the room, what pulls the bowling ball, or pushes it, to the ground?
Its own displacement of atmosphere with much less resistance.
Don't pretend a near vacuum in that big numb NASA building with it's shaky pipes.  ;D
Pretty close.  But why does it displace it downward?
Because energy was applied to elevate it and that displaced atmosphere by the object has just become a weaker resistance to it.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #717 on: January 09, 2017, 12:00:00 AM »
Don't pretend a near vacuum in that big numb NASA building with it's shaky pipes.  ;D

The barometer reads close to zero, just like in every single proper evacuation chamber. Stop being so intentionally obtuse!
What do you think that means?

?

Lonegranger

  • 4083
  • +0/-0
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #718 on: January 09, 2017, 12:27:07 AM »
Don't pretend a near vacuum in that big numb NASA building with it's shaky pipes.  ;D

The barometer reads close to zero, just like in every single proper evacuation chamber. Stop being so intentionally obtuse!
What do you think that means?

It all means that you are unable, unwilling or possibly not smart enough to accept the truth. Possibly the mental condition you appear to be suffering from predisposes you to believe in fairy stories, monsters under the bed and other conspiracy imagineerings, thus preventing you from accepting the truth.


*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Air Pressure vs Gravity
« Reply #719 on: January 09, 2017, 01:14:03 AM »
Don't pretend a near vacuum in that big numb NASA building with it's shaky pipes.  ;D

The barometer reads close to zero, just like in every single proper evacuation chamber. Stop being so intentionally obtuse!
What do you think that means?

It all means that you are unable, unwilling or possibly not smart enough to accept the truth. Possibly the mental condition you appear to be suffering from predisposes you to believe in fairy stories, monsters under the bed and other conspiracy imagineerings, thus preventing you from accepting the truth.
Ok but what do you suppose this means, posted by Billy Nye?
The barometer reads close to zero, just like in every single proper evacuation chamber.