What globe "model" do you believe in Rab? I mean not all globularists can even agree on the shape of the Earth, why are you so pushy about getting every last detail about my view of the world? Why not STAY ON TOPIC? Hhmmmm? You deceiving derailing troll! And at the moment the topic is the very scary, very real threat of governments abusing their power, and how to stop them.
I have no interest in your silly Blue Beam rubbish, but I am very interested in your persistent claim that "The Earth is Flat" and calling all who honestly disagree liars.
You ask "What globe 'model' do you believe in Rab?" That is easy I believe in the
"Heliocentric Globe".It is you claiming that "not all globularists can even agree on the shape of the Earth". Some justification would help.
There is absolutely no
disagreement about basic shape.
The earth is approximately a perfect sphere, with the deviation in polar and equatorial diameters only ±0.16% about the mean value of 12,728 km - big deal!
In many calculations, the spherical approximation is quite close enough.
For example using the spherical approximation the distance from Brisbane to Dubai (yes, I've flown it non-stop) is
11,980 km,
when the accurate distance is
11,978 km (Google Earth) - a whole 2 km difference.
To be fair the difference is more in some cases, but usually within a few kilometres.
But the earth has been known to have a larger equatorial diameter than polar diameter since Isaac Newton's time, the exact difference being refined since then.
So a better approximation to the shape is a "Prolate Spheroid" or an "Ellipsoid" with the equatorial diameters a little larger than the polar diameter.
This is the basis now used for global mapping
World Geodetic System (WGS84)
The World Geodetic System (WGS84) is the reference coordinate system used by the Global Positioning System. It comprises of a reference ellipsoid, a standard coordinate system, altitude data and a geoid.
Much more in: GISGeography, World Geodetic System (WGS84)
Now, satellite mapping has shown that the shape deviates very slightly from the "WGS84 Reference Ellipsoid", but only in the order of a hundred metres or so. This might be neither here nor there for you and me, but it is significant in GPS calculations.
But, it is untrue to say that "not all globularists can even agree on the shape of the Earth". It is not disagreement as to shape, but simply a question of the precision required for measurements. In most cases calling the earth a sphere is quite close enough.
If you disagree, show me the evidence for "globularists" not agreeing "on the shape of the Earth"
Now, I have answered your question, what about answering mine? Fair's fair!Nah man, youre wrong! I did prove it and the flat earth model is constantly being improved. Ide point out errors with the ball earth model, but youde just call them rubbish! And then claim i never bring up any valid points! Lol
Just give me a link to where you proved the earth flat!
And please show me one coherent flat earth model, the one you subscribe to!
I do realise that you can't, because:
(1) You have
no proof of the flat earth, only things you
claim are wrong with the globe - that is not proof of a flat earth.
(2) You have no coherent flat earth model that explains our observations - hardly your fault, no flat earther has.
It is so laughable! The Babylonians had a flat earth "cosmology" that worked fairly well.
They even had the sun, moon and stars rising from and setting behind the horizon, as we observe. You can't even get that right.