Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:39:43 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:16:00 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 08:34:09 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 08:21:15 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 07:38:32 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 07:33:02 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AMQuote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PMfrenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity. I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever. In fact we're going to the next image. What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? So no pictures of a full moon at noon?None (so far). I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will doStrange, I thought all full moons would make it over 20 degrees.During the daytime?No. You didn't say anything about time of day.Now I see why you asked me that. Apparently the image in question was taken at 12:00PM on 8/11/2014One would think you learned your lesson about lying. Guess not.
Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:16:00 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 08:34:09 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 08:21:15 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 07:38:32 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 07:33:02 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AMQuote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PMfrenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity. I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever. In fact we're going to the next image. What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? So no pictures of a full moon at noon?None (so far). I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will doStrange, I thought all full moons would make it over 20 degrees.During the daytime?No. You didn't say anything about time of day.Now I see why you asked me that. Apparently the image in question was taken at 12:00PM on 8/11/2014
Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 08:34:09 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 08:21:15 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 07:38:32 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 07:33:02 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AMQuote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PMfrenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity. I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever. In fact we're going to the next image. What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? So no pictures of a full moon at noon?None (so far). I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will doStrange, I thought all full moons would make it over 20 degrees.During the daytime?No. You didn't say anything about time of day.
Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 08:21:15 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 07:38:32 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 07:33:02 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AMQuote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PMfrenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity. I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever. In fact we're going to the next image. What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? So no pictures of a full moon at noon?None (so far). I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will doStrange, I thought all full moons would make it over 20 degrees.During the daytime?
Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 07:38:32 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 07:33:02 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AMQuote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PMfrenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity. I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever. In fact we're going to the next image. What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? So no pictures of a full moon at noon?None (so far). I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will doStrange, I thought all full moons would make it over 20 degrees.
Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 07:33:02 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AMQuote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PMfrenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity. I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever. In fact we're going to the next image. What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? So no pictures of a full moon at noon?None (so far). I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will do
Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AMQuote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PMfrenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity. I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever. In fact we're going to the next image. What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? So no pictures of a full moon at noon?
Quote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PMfrenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity. I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever. In fact we're going to the next image. What is your excuse for this full moon during the day?
frenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.
Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:43:56 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:39:43 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:16:00 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 08:34:09 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 08:21:15 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 07:38:32 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 07:33:02 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AMQuote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PMfrenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity. I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever. In fact we're going to the next image. What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? So no pictures of a full moon at noon?None (so far). I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will doStrange, I thought all full moons would make it over 20 degrees.During the daytime?No. You didn't say anything about time of day.Now I see why you asked me that. Apparently the image in question was taken at 12:00PM on 8/11/2014One would think you learned your lesson about lying. Guess not.What does this have to do with lying?
It's no slur if it's fact.
@Jroa I showed that it is no fake so I insist on a fake picture. You have promised a fake picture.
Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:45:08 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:43:56 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:39:43 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:16:00 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 08:34:09 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 08:21:15 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 07:38:32 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 07:33:02 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AMQuote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PMfrenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity. I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever. In fact we're going to the next image. What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? So no pictures of a full moon at noon?None (so far). I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will doStrange, I thought all full moons would make it over 20 degrees.During the daytime?No. You didn't say anything about time of day.Now I see why you asked me that. Apparently the image in question was taken at 12:00PM on 8/11/2014One would think you learned your lesson about lying. Guess not.What does this have to do with lying?The picture you posted of the moon was not taken at noon.
Quote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 09:40:41 AM@Jroa I showed that it is no fake so I insist on a fake picture. You have promised a fake picture.Your people are the ones claiming that photo manipulation = faking. Perhaps you should all huddle together and get your stories straight?
You have received a warning for breaking the laws of mathematics.
Silicon, you said the picture in question was taken at 12pm.
Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 09:46:43 AMQuote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 09:40:41 AM@Jroa I showed that it is no fake so I insist on a fake picture. You have promised a fake picture.Your people are the ones claiming that photo manipulation = faking. Perhaps you should all huddle together and get your stories straight? The photo has not been faked, it's a compositon of different wavelenght photographs. It has never been claimed it wasn't post-processed.Next photo, please.
Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:49:45 AMSilicon, you said the picture in question was taken at 12pm.I said apparently since that's what the image data shows.
Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:51:01 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:49:45 AMSilicon, you said the picture in question was taken at 12pm.I said apparently since that's what the image data shows.Let me guess if you click properties that's when it says it was created? Learn how operating systems and software works and report back.
Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 09:46:43 AMQuote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 09:40:41 AM@Jroa I showed that it is no fake so I insist on a fake picture. You have promised a fake picture.Your people are the ones claiming that photo manipulation = faking. Perhaps you should all huddle together and get your stories straight? Moving the goal post much?And a straw man argument.That little dweeb altered his picture to prove his point. He faked evidence. Altering a picture to make it look better is not faking evidence.
Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:52:35 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:51:01 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:49:45 AMSilicon, you said the picture in question was taken at 12pm.I said apparently since that's what the image data shows.Let me guess if you click properties that's when it says it was created? Learn how operating systems and software works and report back.I do not dispute the time could be wrong, but that does not detract from the full moon being at that height during the daytime.
Quote from: Omega on September 01, 2016, 09:54:13 AMQuote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 09:46:43 AMQuote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 09:40:41 AM@Jroa I showed that it is no fake so I insist on a fake picture. You have promised a fake picture.Your people are the ones claiming that photo manipulation = faking. Perhaps you should all huddle together and get your stories straight? Moving the goal post much?And a straw man argument.That little dweeb altered his picture to prove his point. He faked evidence. Altering a picture to make it look better is not faking evidence. So, let me get the story straight. NASA photo manipulation = making it better. Anyone else photo manipulation = fake. Is this right?
Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:55:29 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:52:35 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:51:01 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:49:45 AMSilicon, you said the picture in question was taken at 12pm.I said apparently since that's what the image data shows.Let me guess if you click properties that's when it says it was created? Learn how operating systems and software works and report back.I do not dispute the time could be wrong, but that does not detract from the full moon being at that height during the daytime.What causes you to believe the sun is up in that picture?
Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:56:51 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:55:29 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:52:35 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:51:01 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:49:45 AMSilicon, you said the picture in question was taken at 12pm.I said apparently since that's what the image data shows.Let me guess if you click properties that's when it says it was created? Learn how operating systems and software works and report back.I do not dispute the time could be wrong, but that does not detract from the full moon being at that height during the daytime.What causes you to believe the sun is up in that picture?There are shadows in the mountains
Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 09:56:05 AMQuote from: Omega on September 01, 2016, 09:54:13 AMQuote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 09:46:43 AMQuote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 09:40:41 AM@Jroa I showed that it is no fake so I insist on a fake picture. You have promised a fake picture.Your people are the ones claiming that photo manipulation = faking. Perhaps you should all huddle together and get your stories straight? Moving the goal post much?And a straw man argument.That little dweeb altered his picture to prove his point. He faked evidence. Altering a picture to make it look better is not faking evidence. So, let me get the story straight. NASA photo manipulation = making it better. Anyone else photo manipulation = fake. Is this right? No. It's faking evidence if you, you know, fake evidence. If I have a great picture of the Earth and it would look even better on the cover of a magazine if I enhance the color, I am not tricking people in believing something that is not true.Altering a picture of the Moon to make it look like it is full when it really is not, to prove that the earth is flat, is faking evidence.But you known all this.
Well, it appears that you people will plug your ears and sing, "la la la, I can't hear you," to any photographic evidence. Why do you keep asking for it, then?
Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 10:05:09 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:56:51 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:55:29 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:52:35 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:51:01 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:49:45 AMSilicon, you said the picture in question was taken at 12pm.I said apparently since that's what the image data shows.Let me guess if you click properties that's when it says it was created? Learn how operating systems and software works and report back.I do not dispute the time could be wrong, but that does not detract from the full moon being at that height during the daytime.What causes you to believe the sun is up in that picture?There are shadows in the mountainsSo twilight, dusk, and camera settings don't exist?
Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 10:29:12 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 10:05:09 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:56:51 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:55:29 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:52:35 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:51:01 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:49:45 AMSilicon, you said the picture in question was taken at 12pm.I said apparently since that's what the image data shows.Let me guess if you click properties that's when it says it was created? Learn how operating systems and software works and report back.I do not dispute the time could be wrong, but that does not detract from the full moon being at that height during the daytime.What causes you to believe the sun is up in that picture?There are shadows in the mountainsSo twilight, dusk, and camera settings don't exist?I don't believe they could combine to form that image
Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 10:52:29 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 10:29:12 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 10:05:09 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:56:51 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:55:29 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:52:35 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:51:01 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:49:45 AMSilicon, you said the picture in question was taken at 12pm.I said apparently since that's what the image data shows.Let me guess if you click properties that's when it says it was created? Learn how operating systems and software works and report back.I do not dispute the time could be wrong, but that does not detract from the full moon being at that height during the daytime.What causes you to believe the sun is up in that picture?There are shadows in the mountainsSo twilight, dusk, and camera settings don't exist?I don't believe they could combine to form that imageThey all can but as already explained, the atmosphere already allows for the sun and full moon to be seen at same time. It's always either at sun rise or sun set. You will never see a full moon at noon. Try this video.
Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 11:42:21 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 10:52:29 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 10:29:12 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 10:05:09 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:56:51 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:55:29 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:52:35 AMQuote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 09:51:01 AMQuote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:49:45 AMSilicon, you said the picture in question was taken at 12pm.I said apparently since that's what the image data shows.Let me guess if you click properties that's when it says it was created? Learn how operating systems and software works and report back.I do not dispute the time could be wrong, but that does not detract from the full moon being at that height during the daytime.What causes you to believe the sun is up in that picture?There are shadows in the mountainsSo twilight, dusk, and camera settings don't exist?I don't believe they could combine to form that imageThey all can but as already explained, the atmosphere already allows for the sun and full moon to be seen at same time. It's always either at sun rise or sun set. You will never see a full moon at noon. Try this video. Haven't seen anything yet that resolves the following question: How can a full moon be above the horizon at an angle of 20 + degrees when the sun is also above the horizon after sunrise or before sunset?
Haven't seen anything yet that resolves the following question: How can a full moon be above the horizon at an angle of 20 + degrees when the sun is also above the horizon after sunrise or before sunset?