Timezones?

  • 40 Replies
  • 11379 Views
*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Planar Moderator
  • 52325
  • +97/-80
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Timezones?
« Reply #30 on: June 28, 2016, 03:22:28 PM »
We can see the light of the moon.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

?

MouseWalker

  • 934
  • +0/-0
Re: Timezones?
« Reply #31 on: June 28, 2016, 04:59:38 PM »
The moon makes its own light.

Except we've ben there and it doesn't.

No we haven't and yes it does.
Ok what evidence do you have to support this theory?  How does it make its own light?  I have known people involved in the space program, and there are many scientists, mostly retired, in my neighborhood, they have some pretty compelling evidence.

Did they bring some moon pigeons home with them?
Uhm, no, because, there aren't any.  But I asked if you had any evidence to support your theory.  So, do you?

There are moon pigeons! Look it up.
LOL and did you, no life forms were indicated, just unknown debris.
http://www.jamesoberg.com/moonpigeons.html
It's a Very interesting read, on how the pictures were taken and operation of the craft.
After reading it I thank you for the link. LOL

The the universe has no obligation to makes sense to you.
The earth is a globe.

?

Badxtoss

  • 3268
  • +0/-0
Re: Timezones?
« Reply #32 on: June 28, 2016, 09:07:36 PM »
We can see the light of the moon.
We see light reflected off the moon.  We know this because we know the distance to the moon and its position relative to both the sun and earth.  We know the distance because we can bounce radio waves, and after Apollo missions, lasers off the moon.  We can measure the time it takes for radio waves to get there and come back and calculate the distance.
We have tons of evidence to explain how moon light is a reflection of sun light.
What evidence do you have that it produces its own light?

*

boydster

  • Assistant to the Regional Manager
  • 17774
  • +6/-4
Re: Timezones?
« Reply #33 on: June 28, 2016, 09:12:36 PM »
We have tons of evidence to explain how moon light is a reflection of sun light.
What evidence do you have that it produces its own light?

Moonshramp have telepathically communicated with a member of the FES before.









...those words just sound so ridiculous when they are put together in a sentence like that...

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Timezones?
« Reply #34 on: June 29, 2016, 01:57:59 AM »
Where do find "Mt. Everest?" in "Mt. McKinley from near Fairbanks, Alaska"?
Guess you lost your specs on that trip! These fit?

::)  Perhaps your dementia is trying to poke through again?

Also, then why can't i see Mt. Everest if the earth is flat and can see every point from a high building?

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: Timezones?
« Reply #35 on: June 29, 2016, 03:26:43 AM »
SCG is correct.  You can hardly see a mountain that is just 30 miles from you because it fades away with distance.  Why would you expect to see a mountain on the other side of the Earth?  You roundies have no original thoughts at all.

On a good clear day you can see Mt. McKinley from near Fairbanks, Alaska. A distance of more than 100 miles.

You live 100 miles away from Mt. Everest?  I think your little anecdote may have just been slightly more irrelevant than usual.  ::)
Jesus Christ jroa, please try to sober up a little bit before posting here, this shit is embarrasing.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

johnnyorbital

  • 867
  • +0/-0
Re: Timezones?
« Reply #36 on: June 29, 2016, 05:31:59 AM »
There's probably just rocks under the earth. Do you think there are hamsters down there or something?

There is no edge, the earth is an infinite plane.

that's totally against the flat earth model that dictates Antarctica is the edge and the dome above reaches from one end to the other

where's your explanation/proof/evidence/anything for the living creatures on the moon theory?

you're terrible at this, you did the same on my thread, you seem to just say whatever pops in your head..
having a theory is great, but you can't tell anyone to believe anything without presenting your reasoning and your findings

like I did on my thread, and you ignored, twice

you don't agree with much of the flat earth theory and I'm sure that the flat earth society must be embarrassed by your methods of debating

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: Timezones?
« Reply #37 on: June 29, 2016, 07:28:59 AM »
Light bouncing off the Moon...

For the high and low tech people reading this post, here is a setup for finding the distance to the Moon:


Although you may laugh at this, the question remains... If you shoot lasers at the Moon, anywhere and nothing happens, then shoot them where Apollo put reflectors and get something back (that takes > 2 seconds - repeatable), how is that possible?

Those Moonshramps know how to use lasers?
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Planar Moderator
  • 52325
  • +97/-80
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Timezones?
« Reply #38 on: June 29, 2016, 08:38:51 AM »
There's probably just rocks under the earth. Do you think there are hamsters down there or something?

There is no edge, the earth is an infinite plane.

that's totally against the flat earth model that dictates Antarctica is the edge and the dome above reaches from one end to the other

where's your explanation/proof/evidence/anything for the living creatures on the moon theory?

you're terrible at this, you did the same on my thread, you seem to just say whatever pops in your head..
having a theory is great, but you can't tell anyone to believe anything without presenting your reasoning and your findings

like I did on my thread, and you ignored, twice

you don't agree with much of the flat earth theory and I'm sure that the flat earth society must be embarrassed by your methods of debating

Wow, you have just discovered there's more than one FE theory! Good for you. Perhaps if you lurked a bit before making demands and crying to the mods you wouldn't seem like such silly baby.

James communicated with the lunar life forms. There are many threads on this site discussing them. This isn't something that just popped into my head.

You made assertions on your thread, and then claimed they were evidence.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Timezones?
« Reply #39 on: June 30, 2016, 10:16:51 PM »
Light bouncing off the Moon...

For the high and low tech people reading this post, here is a setup for finding the distance to the Moon:


Although you may laugh at this, the question remains... If you shoot lasers at the Moon, anywhere and nothing happens, then shoot them where Apollo put reflectors and get something back (that takes > 2 seconds - repeatable), how is that possible?

Those Moonshramps know how to use lasers?

Did you know that by the time the laser beam gets to the moon, it is supposedly bigger than the moon?  How can you point the laser at the moon without hitting the retroreflectors if they are in deed there?  Also, we were allegedly doing laser moon bounce experiments in the early 60's; way before any retroreflectors were supposedly planted on the moon.  What was the point of your post?  Perhaps you are simply ignorant about science? 

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Timezones?
« Reply #40 on: July 01, 2016, 12:22:30 AM »
Light bouncing off the Moon...

For the high and low tech people reading this post, here is a setup for finding the distance to the Moon:

Although you may laugh at this, the question remains... If you shoot lasers at the Moon, anywhere and nothing happens, then shoot them where Apollo put reflectors and get something back (that takes > 2 seconds - repeatable), how is that possible?

Those Moonshramps know how to use lasers?

Did you know that by the time the laser beam gets to the moon, it is supposedly bigger than the moon?  How can you point the laser at the moon without hitting the retroreflectors if they are in deed there?  Also, we were allegedly doing laser moon bounce experiments in the early 60's; way before any retroreflectors were supposedly planted on the moon.  What was the point of your post?  Perhaps you are simply ignorant about science?

Sure "Perhaps you are simply ignorant about science?"

Yes, the first laser pulse reflected from the moon was in 1962, but if you look into it you will find a dramatic improvement in accuracy since the corner reflectors were installed.

You can read a bit about it in:
Reminescenses of Early Work at MIT and ESRIN 1963-1974
But these early experiments needed very high power and comparatively long pulse lengths (around 1 ms in the 1962 MIT case), so could not achieve very high accuracy. I could not find much of the accuracy of this one, bit a later one (still without corner reflectors) described in
Quote
3 .1. Accuracy of Distance Measurement
This accuracy is limited by several factors:
(a) The duration of the pulse emitted by the laser, that is, about 50 nsec. This time interval corresponds to an uncertainty of 15 m in the distance.

Where did you get this bit from?
"Did you know that by the time the laser beam gets to the moon, it is supposedly bigger than the moon? "
  ;D Not even as big as the toy flat earth moon.  ;D Because you're a long way out! Have a look at:
Quote from: Wikipedia
May 9, 1962: Laser beam first used to measure distance to the moon
In 1962, laser technology was a new and exciting science. Lasers produce a light that is intense, coherent, and monochromatic. The beam of light emitted by a laser is also extremely narrow. It would be impossible to bounce a flashlight beam off the moon, as the light disperses too much to travel any distance. But a laser beam is so narrow that it can make the roughly 239,000 mile journey to the moon and still be detected back on Earth. The first time this was done, MIT scientists using a ruby laser to bounce a light beam off the moon in a series of pulses, estimated that its area on the moon's surface was just four miles in diameter. Later they were able to reduce this to under 2 1/2 miles.
From Cosmeo View Today In History Events

The measurements with the corner reflectors has achieved millimeter accuracy, enough to determine that the Moon is spiraling away from Earth at a rate of 3.8 cm per year - a figure unexpectedly high.

You should really be careful about who you claim is [/b]"simply ignorant about science"[/b] it might rebound!
Finally how do you reconcile the 239,000 miles or so measured by a number of methods with FE "a bit over 3,000 miles" purely guessed?


<< Swapped a ref, fixed a bit >>
« Last Edit: July 01, 2016, 01:03:20 AM by rabinoz »