Physics Student here- Can you explain these flaws in the FE theory?

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 09, 2015, 09:32:36 AM

Still no answer, have I falsified the flat earth theory? Yay! Not going to stop asking untill I get an answer from a FET believer.
P.S. This is directed at FET, not DET.

DET is a specific FE model. If you don't falsify DET, you haven't falsified FET.

MET is THE flat earth theory, I advise you all to read it!
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=65033.0#.Vmh4EXYvfIU

I meant my argument is directed at the single disk universal accerlerator model. I already know that the gravity measurments are consistant with DET. Its the UA model I want an answer from.

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on December 09, 2015, 10:15:53 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 09, 2015, 09:32:36 AM

Still no answer, have I falsified the flat earth theory? Yay! Not going to stop asking untill I get an answer from a FET believer.
P.S. This is directed at FET, not DET.

DET is a specific FE model. If you don't falsify DET, you haven't falsified FET.

MET is THE flat earth theory, I advise you all to read it!
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=65033.0#.Vmh4EXYvfIU

Why are you torlling? Is it that hard for you to actually mount a logical argument, that you need to resort to spamming a straw man? pathetic.

Quote from: sircool on December 09, 2015, 10:50:18 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on December 09, 2015, 10:15:53 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 09, 2015, 09:32:36 AM

Still no answer, have I falsified the flat earth theory? Yay! Not going to stop asking untill I get an answer from a FET believer.
P.S. This is directed at FET, not DET.

DET is a specific FE model. If you don't falsify DET, you haven't falsified FET.

MET is THE flat earth theory, I advise you all to read it!
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=65033.0#.Vmh4EXYvfIU

Why are you torlling? Is it that hard for you to actually mount a logical argument, that you need to resort to spamming a straw man? pathetic.

He's simply mirroring you. Maybe you should take a look at yourself before calling people pathetic. Maybe you're the one who's pathetic here.

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on December 09, 2015, 11:31:13 AM

Quote from: sircool on December 09, 2015, 10:50:18 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on December 09, 2015, 10:15:53 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 09, 2015, 09:32:36 AM

Still no answer, have I falsified the flat earth theory? Yay! Not going to stop asking untill I get an answer from a FET believer.
P.S. This is directed at FET, not DET.

DET is a specific FE model. If you don't falsify DET, you haven't falsified FET.

MET is THE flat earth theory, I advise you all to read it!
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=65033.0#.Vmh4EXYvfIU

Why are you torlling? Is it that hard for you to actually mount a logical argument, that you need to resort to spamming a straw man? pathetic.

He's simply mirroring you. Maybe you should take a look at yourself before calling people pathetic. Maybe you're the one who's pathetic here.

And you know that's not true. I reference a working model described in detail with evidence presented and logic backing it up. He references a pathetic attempt at parody with next to nothing in common.
Get a fucking life. How about you try an honest discussion rather than the typical circlejerk of REers?

Quote from: TheEarthIsRound. on December 09, 2015, 11:34:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on December 09, 2015, 11:31:13 AM

Quote from: sircool on December 09, 2015, 10:50:18 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on December 09, 2015, 10:15:53 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 09, 2015, 09:32:36 AM

Still no answer, have I falsified the flat earth theory? Yay! Not going to stop asking untill I get an answer from a FET believer.
P.S. This is directed at FET, not DET.

DET is a specific FE model. If you don't falsify DET, you haven't falsified FET.

MET is THE flat earth theory, I advise you all to read it!
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=65033.0#.Vmh4EXYvfIU

Why are you torlling? Is it that hard for you to actually mount a logical argument, that you need to resort to spamming a straw man? pathetic.

He's simply mirroring you. Maybe you should take a look at yourself before calling people pathetic. Maybe you're the one who's pathetic here.

And you know that's not true. I reference a working model described in detail with evidence presented and logic backing it up. He references a pathetic attempt at parody with next to nothing in common.
Get a fucking life. How about you try an honest discussion rather than the typical circlejerk of REers?

Really? So you "totally" don't go around and advertise your model whenever someone presents a flaw in the flat Earth model, and you "totally" don't advertise it everywhere else.

Maybe you're just incapable of reading.

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on December 09, 2015, 11:44:25 AM

Quote from: TheEarthIsRound. on December 09, 2015, 11:34:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on December 09, 2015, 11:31:13 AM

Quote from: sircool on December 09, 2015, 10:50:18 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on December 09, 2015, 10:15:53 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 09, 2015, 09:32:36 AM

Still no answer, have I falsified the flat earth theory? Yay! Not going to stop asking untill I get an answer from a FET believer.
P.S. This is directed at FET, not DET.

DET is a specific FE model. If you don't falsify DET, you haven't falsified FET.

MET is THE flat earth theory, I advise you all to read it!
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=65033.0#.Vmh4EXYvfIU

Why are you torlling? Is it that hard for you to actually mount a logical argument, that you need to resort to spamming a straw man? pathetic.

He's simply mirroring you. Maybe you should take a look at yourself before calling people pathetic. Maybe you're the one who's pathetic here.

And you know that's not true. I reference a working model described in detail with evidence presented and logic backing it up. He references a pathetic attempt at parody with next to nothing in common.
Get a fucking life. How about you try an honest discussion rather than the typical circlejerk of REers?

Really? So you "totally" don't go around and advertise your model whenever someone presents a flaw in the flat Earth model, and you "totally" don't advertise it everywhere else.

Maybe you're just incapable of reading.

When did I claim I didn't? What are you on about?!
DET answers questions, what's your point?

Why don`t we just fly to the edge of the world and go over the cliff? Easy way to prove that the earth is flat....
Oh wait...

Why don`t we just fly to the edge of the world and go over the cliff? Easy way to prove that the earth is flat....
Oh wait...

If I had the resources, time, and interest, what's stopping me from going to the edge of the earth (and NOT go over the cliff)?

Quote from: Apokalypt on December 10, 2015, 05:45:31 AM

Why don`t we just fly to the edge of the world and go over the cliff? Easy way to prove that the earth is flat....
Oh wait...

If I had the resources, time, and interest, what's stopping me from going to the edge of the earth (and NOT go over the cliff)?

Oh, the flat Earthers are just going to come up with some bullshit excuse along the lines of this for what's "stopping you":

hurr durr their r NasA sniprs n gards alongg the  ic e wall hurr .

Why don`t we just fly to the edge of the world and go over the cliff? Easy way to prove that the earth is flat....
Oh wait...

It has been theorized that the farther you move south, or rimwards, the farther you get from the sun.  Eventually, you would reach a region in which the sun's light never touches.  At some point, moving rimwards, it would be so cold that the gases in the air would liquefy and precipitate out or the air.  No conventional air craft would be able to fly under these dark, atmoplaneless conditions.  I like your ambition, though. 

Quote from: Apokalypt on December 10, 2015, 05:45:31 AM

Why don`t we just fly to the edge of the world and go over the cliff? Easy way to prove that the earth is flat....
Oh wait...

It has been theorized that the farther you move south, or rimwards, the farther you get from the sun.  Eventually, you would reach a region in which the sun's light never touches.  At some point, moving rimwards, it would be so cold that the gases in the air would liquefy and precipitate out or the air.  No conventional air craft would be able to fly under these dark, atmoplaneless conditions.  I like your ambition, though.

So, you want to say, that absolutely no one amongst the FE believers has the resource or interest or time to go so far to the south to document even the slightest change in the atmosphere etc.?
On the other hand, there are countless people who went around the (round!) world, either in planes or over land and sea. And not the slightest bit of suspicious against the round earth was documented?

So, you want to say, that absolutely no one amongst the FE believers has the resource or interest or time to go so far to the south to document even the slightest change in the atmosphere etc.?

But, it has been documented.  The farther south (rimward) you travel in the southern hemiplane, the colder it gets.  Eventually, it gets so cold that the air can no longer support water.  The farther you go, the colder and drier the air gets.  I don't think anyone disagrees with this.  Why are you being disingenuous by claiming that there is no documentation on the changes in the "Atmosphere" when traveling rimward?

Okay, there is change in the atmosphere. There are seasons for example. And if you travel farther and farther, you come back to your staring point. That is because the earth is round. But of course I haven`t observed it myself. But I believe the millions of scientists that proved it over and over and over again and like everything speaks for a round earth.

if you travel farther and farther, you come back to your staring point. That is because the earth is round.

Sounds like this is a biased thought experiment.  Perhaps you should try to keep an open mind?

  At some point, moving rimwards, it would be so cold that the gases in the air would liquefy and precipitate out or the air. 

In theory, yes. But there is no proof that this is the case for the Earth. There is the opposite - vertical circumnagivation of the globe, which includes passing the Antarctica continent along meridians. There is also a station few thousands km inside the Antarctica land where people leave and work.

Also, should I remind you that talking about seasons has no point since the estimated 3000 miles value is flawed? Before providing an argument based on the Sun motion and its altitude, you should first solve that problem.

Quote from: jroa on December 10, 2015, 10:19:25 AM

  At some point, moving rimwards, it would be so cold that the gases in the air would liquefy and precipitate out or the air. 

In theory, yes. But there is no proof that this is the case for the Earth. There is the opposite - vertical circumnagivation of the globe, which includes passing the Antarctica continent along meridians. There is also a station few thousands km inside the Antarctica land where people leave and work.

Also, should I remind you that talking about seasons has no point since the estimated 3000 miles value is flawed? Before providing an argument based on the Sun motion and its altitude, you should first solve that problem.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but circumnavigation while staying on only one meridian has never happened.  It is just a fairy tale or myth that you people seem to think is a fact, but can never provide any evidence of. 

Sorry to burst your bubble, but circumnavigation while staying on only one meridian has never happened.

I have never stated that. Your reading between lines lead you to non-existing opinion that you made to discredit something.

Anyway, as stated earlier, you do not know how far is the Sun and do not know what is really far behind the wall (conditions etc), your comments can be described as follows:

It is just a fairy tale or myth that you people seem to think is a fact, but can never provide any evidence of.