Regarding the last two messages, perhaps, from REers Salviati and Brouwer.
Where did you read that I am REer?
This is one of the images from the Hubble space telescope
and
The radio telescopes on the Hubble platform clearly show optical images of the earth.
1. As explained before, the image was not made by the Hubble telescope.
2. Based on my knowledge, radio telescope cannot make optical image.
3. Whoever claimed that, was wrong (see point 2). You are making a pointless thread about someone's mistake and it seems that you enjoy this.
4. You should increase the size of the font so noone would miss your point.
"Where did you read that I am REer?"Well, who are you, then? REer or FEer?
"the image was not made by the Hubble telescope."With all my due respect, I can but humbly remark that the article you cited, this one:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1183808/Pass-monkey-wrench--Hubble-telescope-repair-halted-warped-bolt.html - does not say that.
By the way, it provides more and more yummy juicy details. Just a few examples. The article says:
Spacewalkers Michael Massimino and Michael Good ventured out as space shuttle Atlantis sailed 350 miles above Australia.Then the picture. The picture legend says:
Astronaut Andrew Feustel selects his next tool to use during the hands-on servicing of the Hubble Space Telescope
However, Andrew Feustel was not mentioned at all among those who "ventured out as space shuttle Atlantis sailed 350 miles above Australia". Where did he come from?
Please note, the article does not say a word who was taking the picture.
Then, the next picture. The legend says:
Astronaut Michael Good peers through a window toward Atlantis' crew cabin interior. Astronaut Mike Massimino can be seen in the background at work on the port side of the shuttle's cargo bayAll right, two guys mentioned as "ventured out", both in the picture. Wait a minute... WHO WAS TAKING THE PICTURE?
We also see strange structures in this picture, especially in the lower left corner:
What are they?
etc.etc.
"2. Based on my knowledge, radio telescope cannot make optical image."Well, that RE guy says not only it can, but
The radio telescopes on the Hubble platform clearly show optical images of the earth.
And none of REers said a single word denying that in almost 2 years! Isn't that amazing?
"You are making a pointless thread about someone's mistake and it seems that you enjoy this.
4. You should increase the size of the font so noone would miss your point."You surely seem to miss it. For I was asking the REers about the first image:
the image that "clearly shows the curvature of the earth" also clearly shows three or four bunches of who knows what flowing from "atmosphere" right into "the outer space", in RE terms. Or is that coming from the "outer space"? Could you please explain the nature of those phenomena? And now we have the second image with some mysterious formations. Interestingly, the both are marked: (c) NASA. Dear REers, what is going on? Just look at the second image, right above, at its lower left corner. What is that rectangular structure, apparently
beyond the Earth? (or, at least beyond a bunch of mysterious... traces? vapours? who know what? - from the Earth's atmosphere?