No.
The specious crap is:
Scheduled phenomena = shape of earth.
No. The specious crap is you bitching about the meaning of words.
The meaningful argument is that the RE model is capable of accurately predicting something while the FE model has no explanatory power, indicating that the RE model is likely true.
That isn't specious at all.
Again, it is starting to get more dark out for one, therefore you will be able to see more.
No. It isn't getting more dark.
Mid night isn't magically darker than earlier on in the night.
Honestly, you guys arguments are getting weak.
No, that would be your arguments, right from the start.
It progressively gets darker until it gets darkest right before dawn.
No. It doesn't.
If you wish to assert such crap you will need to back it up.
Why?
Less overall radiation in the area from the sun interfering with the upper atmoplane, thus also able to reveal more of these objects at that time, not signifying an increase in intensity, just an increase in the ability to detect.
No. It is the radiation that is there that lets them extend their range.
The sun doesn't interfere with radar detection of objects anyway.
It is not necessary for the shape of the Earth to be taken into account to predict these things.
If it was, then ancient cultures would not have made accurate calendars.
Quit drawing false conclusions.
Their model was effectively a tiny portion of the RE model.
They had the stars on a celestial sphere which rotated about Earth, such that the sun went below Earth.
Stop acting like the FE model of the ancients is anything like the FE model of today.