Scepti - Nuclear Power Stations

Quote from: Scintific Method on April 25, 2014, 05:21:13 AM

I read that as: you don't want to tell me because you made it up and know I'll prove you undeniably wrong like I have before with the hose and the generator.

That's fair enough. You're entitled to think what you want. I know what I did and I know what it proved. It's a very easy experiment and simply requires a few gadgets, your ears and eyes, plus a chamber for evacuating air pressure.

It totally wipes out Nixons call and totally wipes out ANY communication in what we are told, is space.

I can already tell the level of stupidity in this "experiment" since you use your "eyes and ears", when they used radio...

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:22:06 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:20:07 AM

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 05:14:49 AM

Hah! Envy! Well I can't help it if you're just an uneducated fool that fails even basic physics and chemistry.
You also seem to be envious of the fact that I actually read books, unlike you xD
It's really sad when even your FE peers think you're a complete whack job LOL!

A little tip for you. Start thinking for yourself. Your books are based on a lot of bogus science. You are extremely naive. You can't even debate without getting frustrated. Chill out, kid and stick in. You never know, you may become enlightened if you can wean yourself off the crap they feed you. There's always hope.

You talk a big storm so when are you going to visit the nuclear power plane near by?

Oh, so they have nuclear powered planes now, do they? Starman, I can't trust you. You appear to just make anything up. Nuclear powered planes for crying out loud.

Clinging on a typo, that's the way to do it! That act reeks of desperation xD

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:21:48 AM

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 05:18:02 AM

And I've probably done more scientific experiments that you have in your whole life. I'm currently working on corrosion inhibitors and catalysts in different atmospheres, concentrations and metals. Oh wait, I've said too many beefy sounds per sentence, you won't understand it and go on a fantasy bullshit claiming spree again xD

Ok, so you're a car spray painter. There's nothing wrong with that. It's quite a skilled job. Good on you, kid. I thought you were still at school. Are you an apprentice or a bit further on?

lol typical idiotic reply, of course you couldn't differentiate a chemistry experiment from a "car spray painter" xD
Do you even know what a corrosion inhibitor is? Because paint isn't an inhibitor, an inhibitor slows down corrosion, pain stops it by removing the surface contact between the metal and the corrosive medium.

I know. I was talking to a spray painter the other week. He told me they use a rust inhibitor before undercoating and spraying. He's good at his job too, like you are, probably.
I'm actually giving you a compliment, so calm down.

Quote from: Scintific Method on April 25, 2014, 05:21:13 AM

I read that as: you don't want to tell me because you made it up and know I'll prove you undeniably wrong like I have before with the hose and the generator.

That's fair enough. You're entitled to think what you want. I know what I did and I know what it proved. It's a very easy experiment and simply requires a few gadgets, your ears and eyes, plus a chamber for evacuating air pressure.

It totally wipes out Nixons call and totally wipes out ANY communication in what we are told, is space.

Lets say the Apollo landing did happened.  How do you think NASA got all the data from the command module ?

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:25:51 AM

Quote from: Scintific Method on April 25, 2014, 05:21:13 AM

I read that as: you don't want to tell me because you made it up and know I'll prove you undeniably wrong like I have before with the hose and the generator.

That's fair enough. You're entitled to think what you want. I know what I did and I know what it proved. It's a very easy experiment and simply requires a few gadgets, your ears and eyes, plus a chamber for evacuating air pressure.

It totally wipes out Nixons call and totally wipes out ANY communication in what we are told, is space.

I can already tell the level of stupidity in this "experiment" since you use your "eyes and ears", when they used radio...

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:27:19 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:22:06 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:20:07 AM

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 05:14:49 AM

Hah! Envy! Well I can't help it if you're just an uneducated fool that fails even basic physics and chemistry.
You also seem to be envious of the fact that I actually read books, unlike you xD
It's really sad when even your FE peers think you're a complete whack job LOL!

A little tip for you. Start thinking for yourself. Your books are based on a lot of bogus science. You are extremely naive. You can't even debate without getting frustrated. Chill out, kid and stick in. You never know, you may become enlightened if you can wean yourself off the crap they feed you. There's always hope.

You talk a big storm so when are you going to visit the nuclear power plane near by?

Oh, so they have nuclear powered planes now, do they? Starman, I can't trust you. You appear to just make anything up. Nuclear powered planes for crying out loud.

Clinging on a typo, that's the way to do it! That act reeks of desperation xD

Eyes and ears are an excellent set of human tools to figure out experiments. Try it sometime.

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:25:51 AM

Quote from: Scintific Method on April 25, 2014, 05:21:13 AM

I read that as: you don't want to tell me because you made it up and know I'll prove you undeniably wrong like I have before with the hose and the generator.

That's fair enough. You're entitled to think what you want. I know what I did and I know what it proved. It's a very easy experiment and simply requires a few gadgets, your ears and eyes, plus a chamber for evacuating air pressure.

It totally wipes out Nixons call and totally wipes out ANY communication in what we are told, is space.

Lets say the Apollo landing did happened.  How do you think NASA got all the data from the command module ?

If we pretend it did happen, then we could say that NASA got all the data from a space dragon that flew down at the speed of atomic light and dropped it on a desk, then waited for a reply and flew back up and stood in front of the spacemen's visors so they could read the replies.

It didn't happen, starman, I've proved it conclusively.

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:30:18 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:25:51 AM

Quote from: Scintific Method on April 25, 2014, 05:21:13 AM

I read that as: you don't want to tell me because you made it up and know I'll prove you undeniably wrong like I have before with the hose and the generator.

That's fair enough. You're entitled to think what you want. I know what I did and I know what it proved. It's a very easy experiment and simply requires a few gadgets, your ears and eyes, plus a chamber for evacuating air pressure.

It totally wipes out Nixons call and totally wipes out ANY communication in what we are told, is space.

Lets say the Apollo landing did happened.  How do you think NASA got all the data from the command module ?

If we pretend it did happen, then we could say that NASA got all the data from a space dragon that flew down at the speed of atomic light and dropped it on a desk, then waited for a reply and flew back up and sstood in front of the spacemens visors so they could read the replies.

It didn;t happen, starman, I've proved it conclusively.

Now you are being stupid. Be serious. How did they get information(data, voice) to the command module and back?

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:36:01 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:30:18 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:25:51 AM

Quote from: Scintific Method on April 25, 2014, 05:21:13 AM

I read that as: you don't want to tell me because you made it up and know I'll prove you undeniably wrong like I have before with the hose and the generator.

That's fair enough. You're entitled to think what you want. I know what I did and I know what it proved. It's a very easy experiment and simply requires a few gadgets, your ears and eyes, plus a chamber for evacuating air pressure.

It totally wipes out Nixons call and totally wipes out ANY communication in what we are told, is space.

Lets say the Apollo landing did happened.  How do you think NASA got all the data from the command module ?

If we pretend it did happen, then we could say that NASA got all the data from a space dragon that flew down at the speed of atomic light and dropped it on a desk, then waited for a reply and flew back up and sstood in front of the spacemens visors so they could read the replies.

It didn;t happen, starman, I've proved it conclusively.

Now you are being stupid. Be serious. How did they get information(data, voice) to the command module and back?

Because it was all done on EARTH. They had a medium in order for that to happen and it worked fine.

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:38:08 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:36:01 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:30:18 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:25:51 AM

Quote from: Scintific Method on April 25, 2014, 05:21:13 AM

I read that as: you don't want to tell me because you made it up and know I'll prove you undeniably wrong like I have before with the hose and the generator.

That's fair enough. You're entitled to think what you want. I know what I did and I know what it proved. It's a very easy experiment and simply requires a few gadgets, your ears and eyes, plus a chamber for evacuating air pressure.

It totally wipes out Nixons call and totally wipes out ANY communication in what we are told, is space.

Lets say the Apollo landing did happened.  How do you think NASA got all the data from the command module ?

If we pretend it did happen, then we could say that NASA got all the data from a space dragon that flew down at the speed of atomic light and dropped it on a desk, then waited for a reply and flew back up and sstood in front of the spacemens visors so they could read the replies.

It didn;t happen, starman, I've proved it conclusively.

Now you are being stupid. Be serious. How did they get information(data, voice) to the command module and back?

Because it was all done on EARTH. They had a medium in order for that to happen and it worked fine.

Ok lets say they had a medium to talk to the astronaut. Would you say there was a communication from the control center in Huston for the whole mission?

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 05:28:51 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:25:51 AM

Quote from: Scintific Method on April 25, 2014, 05:21:13 AM

I read that as: you don't want to tell me because you made it up and know I'll prove you undeniably wrong like I have before with the hose and the generator.

That's fair enough. You're entitled to think what you want. I know what I did and I know what it proved. It's a very easy experiment and simply requires a few gadgets, your ears and eyes, plus a chamber for evacuating air pressure.

It totally wipes out Nixons call and totally wipes out ANY communication in what we are told, is space.

I can already tell the level of stupidity in this "experiment" since you use your "eyes and ears", when they used radio...

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:27:19 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:22:06 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:20:07 AM

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 05:14:49 AM

Hah! Envy! Well I can't help it if you're just an uneducated fool that fails even basic physics and chemistry.
You also seem to be envious of the fact that I actually read books, unlike you xD
It's really sad when even your FE peers think you're a complete whack job LOL!

A little tip for you. Start thinking for yourself. Your books are based on a lot of bogus science. You are extremely naive. You can't even debate without getting frustrated. Chill out, kid and stick in. You never know, you may become enlightened if you can wean yourself off the crap they feed you. There's always hope.

You talk a big storm so when are you going to visit the nuclear power plane near by?

Oh, so they have nuclear powered planes now, do they? Starman, I can't trust you. You appear to just make anything up. Nuclear powered planes for crying out loud.

Clinging on a typo, that's the way to do it! That act reeks of desperation xD

Eyes and ears are an excellent set of human tools to figure out experiments. Try it sometime.

Of course, because you can detect radiowaves with your eyes and ears, right? 
The stupidity of some of your posts is astonishing! xD

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 05:25:01 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:21:48 AM

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 05:18:02 AM

And I've probably done more scientific experiments that you have in your whole life. I'm currently working on corrosion inhibitors and catalysts in different atmospheres, concentrations and metals. Oh wait, I've said too many beefy sounds per sentence, you won't understand it and go on a fantasy bullshit claiming spree again xD

Ok, so you're a car spray painter. There's nothing wrong with that. It's quite a skilled job. Good on you, kid. I thought you were still at school. Are you an apprentice or a bit further on?

lol typical idiotic reply, of course you couldn't differentiate a chemistry experiment from a "car spray painter" xD
Do you even know what a corrosion inhibitor is? Because paint isn't an inhibitor, an inhibitor slows down corrosion, pain stops it by removing the surface contact between the metal and the corrosive medium.

I know. I was talking to a spray painter the other week. He told me they use a rust inhibitor before undercoating and spraying. He's good at his job too, like you are, probably.
I'm actually giving you a compliment, so calm down.

So I suppose he also did ~30 experiments for one single metal for varying concentrations and volumes of inhibitors at varying pressures and in different atmospheres, all at a function of time, right? And he did it in front of your, right? He also made charts explaining the difference and the effects of said parameters on the corrosion, right? He also showed you some electrochemical corrosion protective methods, right?
Nah, you wouldn't understand this, it takes somebody with at least a 3 digit IQ to understand them. He probably knew more chemistry than you anyway xD

Ok lets say they had a medium to talk to the astronaut. Would you say there was a communication from the control center in Huston for the whole mission?

I honestly don;t know where the communications were coming from. All I can tell you is that it was all done on Earth. I've 100% concusively proved it could not happen in what they tell us, space is.

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:44:23 AM

Ok lets say they had a medium to talk to the astronaut. Would you say there was a communication from the control center in Huston for the whole mission?

I honestly don;t know where the communications were coming from. All I can tell you is that it was all done on Earth. I've 100% concusively proved it could not happen in what they tell us, space is.

I am telling you it was all done from a communication network from Huston. Either way if it was all done from earth do you think it would be difficult for Nixon to call the com center and have patch call to the astronauts?

So I suppose he also did ~30 experiments for one single metal for varying concentrations and volumes of inhibitors at varying pressures and in different atmospheres, all at a function of time, right? And he did it in front of your, right? He also made charts explaining the difference and the effects of said parameters on the corrosion, right? He also showed you some electrochemical corrosion protective methods, right?
Nah, you wouldn't understand this, it takes somebody with at least a 3 digit IQ to understand them. He probably knew more chemistry than you anyway xD

He could have done this but I was only talking to him for 5 minutes while he was on his tea break. I never thought to ask him all about the rest of what goes into the spraying.
Thanks for telling me though how you do it. Obviously you can't be an apprentice; you must have a few years experience as a sprayer. Well done, you do seem farly skilled.
I bet it's expensive to have your car sprayed this way though. You know; with all the different stages.

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:46:26 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:44:23 AM

Ok lets say they had a medium to talk to the astronaut. Would you say there was a communication from the control center in Huston for the whole mission?

I honestly don;t know where the communications were coming from. All I can tell you is that it was all done on Earth. I've 100% concusively proved it could not happen in what they tell us, space is.

I am telling you it was all done from a communication network from Huston. Either way if it was all done from earth do you think it would be difficult for Nixon to call the com center and have patch call to the astronauts?

Quite easy. What happens is, Nixon calls the actornauts at the hangar and they pretend they're answering him from the moon. Easy peasy.

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:39:18 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:38:08 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:36:01 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:30:18 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:25:51 AM

Quote from: Scintific Method on April 25, 2014, 05:21:13 AM

I read that as: you don't want to tell me because you made it up and know I'll prove you undeniably wrong like I have before with the hose and the generator.

That's fair enough. You're entitled to think what you want. I know what I did and I know what it proved. It's a very easy experiment and simply requires a few gadgets, your ears and eyes, plus a chamber for evacuating air pressure.

It totally wipes out Nixons call and totally wipes out ANY communication in what we are told, is space.

Lets say the Apollo landing did happened.  How do you think NASA got all the data from the command module ?

If we pretend it did happen, then we could say that NASA got all the data from a space dragon that flew down at the speed of atomic light and dropped it on a desk, then waited for a reply and flew back up and sstood in front of the spacemens visors so they could read the replies.

It didn;t happen, starman, I've proved it conclusively.

Now you are being stupid. Be serious. How did they get information(data, voice) to the command module and back?

Because it was all done on EARTH. They had a medium in order for that to happen and it worked fine.

Ok lets say they had a medium to talk to the astronaut. Would you say there was a communication from the control center in Huston for the whole mission?

LOL I THINK I FOUND OUT WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS!!! IT'S HILARIOUS!!! XD
So this is basically what goes on in his mind:
"Derp herp herp, they talk in radio but they hear sound so it mean they no talk with radio but with sound. I DEBUNKED IT DERP!" xD

He's most probably too stupid to know how they code/decode information in radio waves xD

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:50:18 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:46:26 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:44:23 AM

Ok lets say they had a medium to talk to the astronaut. Would you say there was a communication from the control center in Huston for the whole mission?

I honestly don;t know where the communications were coming from. All I can tell you is that it was all done on Earth. I've 100% concusively proved it could not happen in what they tell us, space is.

I am telling you it was all done from a communication network from Huston. Either way if it was all done from earth do you think it would be difficult for Nixon to call the com center and have patch call to the astronauts?

Quite easy. What happens is, Nixon calls the actornauts at the hangar and they pretend they're answering him from the moon. Easy peasy.

Either way the call is not hard to do. To say HE did not talk to them is not the issue. The issue is did they that really go the moon. It has nothing to do with Nixon. Your argument about Nixon is not proof the moon mission does not exist.

LOL I THINK I FOUND OUT WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS!!! IT'S HILARIOUS!!! XD
So this is basically what goes on in his mind:
"Derp herp herp, they talk in radio but they hear sound so it mean they no talk with radio but with sound. I DEBUNKED IT DERP!" xD

He's most probably too stupid to know how they code/decode information in radio waves xD

Decode? Oops, have I messed up. I didn't realise they were communicating in morse code. 

Either way the call is not hard to do. To say HE did not talk to them is not the issue. The issue is did they that really go the moon. It has nothing to do with Nixon. Your argument about Nixon is not proof the moon mission does not exist.

What about the actornauts talking to each other on the moon? Is that not evidence either. Hahahahaha.
Not evidence, lol. I think it damning evidence that they didn't go. If you can't communicate, then the mission is dead, don't you think. 

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 05:54:22 AM

LOL I THINK I FOUND OUT WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS!!! IT'S HILARIOUS!!! XD
So this is basically what goes on in his mind:
"Derp herp herp, they talk in radio but they hear sound so it mean they no talk with radio but with sound. I DEBUNKED IT DERP!" xD

He's most probably too stupid to know how they code/decode information in radio waves xD

Decode? Oops, have I messed up. I didn't realise they were communicating in morse code. 

Actually today's communication is a form of morse code. It is called digital encoding.

lol the idiot doesn't know that radiowaves are decoded in order to actually get the message xD
How do you think the internet works? How do you think you can voice call somebody on skype? You think your soundwaves propagate to the person mechanically? LOL IDIOCY! xD

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:58:41 AM

Either way the call is not hard to do. To say HE did not talk to them is not the issue. The issue is did they that really go the moon. It has nothing to do with Nixon. Your argument about Nixon is not proof the moon mission does not exist.

What about the actornauts talking to each other on the moon? Is that not evidence either. Hahahahaha.
Not evidence, lol. I think it damning evidence that they didn't go. If you can't communicate, then the mission is dead, don't you think. 

They used radio brainiac, radio propagates in vacuum because it's EM xD

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:58:41 AM

Either way the call is not hard to do. To say HE did not talk to them is not the issue. The issue is did they that really go the moon. It has nothing to do with Nixon. Your argument about Nixon is not proof the moon mission does not exist.

What about the actornauts talking to each other on the moon? Is that not evidence either. Hahahahaha.
Not evidence, lol. I think it damning evidence that they didn't go. If you can't communicate, then the mission is dead, don't you think. 

Have you ever used a walkie talkie when you were young?

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:59:21 AM

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 05:54:22 AM

LOL I THINK I FOUND OUT WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS!!! IT'S HILARIOUS!!! XD
So this is basically what goes on in his mind:
"Derp herp herp, they talk in radio but they hear sound so it mean they no talk with radio but with sound. I DEBUNKED IT DERP!" xD

He's most probably too stupid to know how they code/decode information in radio waves xD

Decode? Oops, have I messed up. I didn't realise they were communicating in morse code. 

Actually today's communication is a form of morse code. It is called digital encoding.

What about 1969 from an old dial up ph9one from the whitehouse? Is that the same?

Decode or no decode, it still has to get to it's destination and it can't. There is no medium. I've proved it and you know it. You can do it yourself and so can anyone with a few gadgets and an evacuation chamber.

lol the idiot doesn't know that radiowaves are decoded in order to actually get the message xD
How do you think the internet works? How do you think you can voice call somebody on skype? You think your soundwaves propagate to the person mechanically? LOL IDIOCY! xD

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 06:01:47 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:58:41 AM

Either way the call is not hard to do. To say HE did not talk to them is not the issue. The issue is did they that really go the moon. It has nothing to do with Nixon. Your argument about Nixon is not proof the moon mission does not exist.

What about the actornauts talking to each other on the moon? Is that not evidence either. Hahahahaha.
Not evidence, lol. I think it damning evidence that they didn't go. If you can't communicate, then the mission is dead, don't you think. 

They used radio brainiac, radio propagates in vacuum because it's EM xD

And I've just told you I have rendered it useless. Pat attention. It can't be done and you can apply whatever you want to it, spraygirl.

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 06:01:47 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:58:41 AM

Either way the call is not hard to do. To say HE did not talk to them is not the issue. The issue is did they that really go the moon. It has nothing to do with Nixon. Your argument about Nixon is not proof the moon mission does not exist.

What about the actornauts talking to each other on the moon? Is that not evidence either. Hahahahaha.
Not evidence, lol. I think it damning evidence that they didn't go. If you can't communicate, then the mission is dead, don't you think. 

Have you ever used a walkie talkie when you were young?

Yep, I sure have.

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 06:02:08 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:59:21 AM

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 05:54:22 AM

LOL I THINK I FOUND OUT WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS!!! IT'S HILARIOUS!!! XD
So this is basically what goes on in his mind:
"Derp herp herp, they talk in radio but they hear sound so it mean they no talk with radio but with sound. I DEBUNKED IT DERP!" xD

He's most probably too stupid to know how they code/decode information in radio waves xD

Decode? Oops, have I messed up. I didn't realise they were communicating in morse code. 

Actually today's communication is a form of morse code. It is called digital encoding.

What about 1969 from an old dial up ph9one from the whitehouse? Is that the same?

Decode or no decode, it still has to get to it's destination and it can't. There is no medium. I've proved it and you know it. You can do it yourself and so can anyone with a few gadgets and an evacuation chamber.

I said today's communication. In 1969 it was not a problem to use the phone and call all over the world. Were you alive in 1969?

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 06:04:15 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 06:01:47 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:58:41 AM

Either way the call is not hard to do. To say HE did not talk to them is not the issue. The issue is did they that really go the moon. It has nothing to do with Nixon. Your argument about Nixon is not proof the moon mission does not exist.

What about the actornauts talking to each other on the moon? Is that not evidence either. Hahahahaha.
Not evidence, lol. I think it damning evidence that they didn't go. If you can't communicate, then the mission is dead, don't you think. 

Have you ever used a walkie talkie when you were young?

Yep, I sure have.

you real question is was there a medium on the moon?

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 06:02:54 AM

lol the idiot doesn't know that radiowaves are decoded in order to actually get the message xD
How do you think the internet works? How do you think you can voice call somebody on skype? You think your soundwaves propagate to the person mechanically? LOL IDIOCY! xD

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 06:01:47 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:58:41 AM

Either way the call is not hard to do. To say HE did not talk to them is not the issue. The issue is did they that really go the moon. It has nothing to do with Nixon. Your argument about Nixon is not proof the moon mission does not exist.

What about the actornauts talking to each other on the moon? Is that not evidence either. Hahahahaha.
Not evidence, lol. I think it damning evidence that they didn't go. If you can't communicate, then the mission is dead, don't you think. 

They used radio brainiac, radio propagates in vacuum because it's EM xD

And I've just told you I have rendered it useless. Pat attention. It can't be done and you can apply whatever you want to it, spraygirl.

Nope, you haven't. If you did, PROVE IT!

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 06:05:19 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 06:02:08 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:59:21 AM

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 05:54:22 AM

LOL I THINK I FOUND OUT WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS!!! IT'S HILARIOUS!!! XD
So this is basically what goes on in his mind:
"Derp herp herp, they talk in radio but they hear sound so it mean they no talk with radio but with sound. I DEBUNKED IT DERP!" xD

He's most probably too stupid to know how they code/decode information in radio waves xD

Decode? Oops, have I messed up. I didn't realise they were communicating in morse code. 

Actually today's communication is a form of morse code. It is called digital encoding.

What about 1969 from an old dial up ph9one from the whitehouse? Is that the same?

Decode or no decode, it still has to get to it's destination and it can't. There is no medium. I've proved it and you know it. You can do it yourself and so can anyone with a few gadgets and an evacuation chamber.

I said today's communication. In 1969 it was not a problem to use the phone and call all over the world. Were you alive in 1969?

Hey, Mr side stepper. I'm not talking about calling all over the WORLD, am I?

I'm talking about calling the men on the moon from the whitehouse and men talking to each other on the moon, plus NASA talking to the men on the moon.
Attention to all those rational people viewing. Please search your minds and realise that no communication was possible from Earth to the moon or from the moon to Earth, or from one astronaut on the moon to another on the moon. There is no medium, as we are told, which means....no communication.

I've proved it doesn't work, so stay tuned for details which will be coming soon. Get your evacuation chambers ready.

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 06:08:12 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 06:05:19 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 06:02:08 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:59:21 AM

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 05:54:22 AM

LOL I THINK I FOUND OUT WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS!!! IT'S HILARIOUS!!! XD
So this is basically what goes on in his mind:
"Derp herp herp, they talk in radio but they hear sound so it mean they no talk with radio but with sound. I DEBUNKED IT DERP!" xD

He's most probably too stupid to know how they code/decode information in radio waves xD

Decode? Oops, have I messed up. I didn't realise they were communicating in morse code. 

Actually today's communication is a form of morse code. It is called digital encoding.

What about 1969 from an old dial up ph9one from the whitehouse? Is that the same?

Decode or no decode, it still has to get to it's destination and it can't. There is no medium. I've proved it and you know it. You can do it yourself and so can anyone with a few gadgets and an evacuation chamber.

I said today's communication. In 1969 it was not a problem to use the phone and call all over the world. Were you alive in 1969?

Hey, Mr side stepper. I'm not talking about calling all over the WORLD, am I?

I'm talking about calling the men on the moon from the whitehouse and men talking to each other on the moon, plus NASA talking to the men on the moon.
Attention to all those rational people viewing. Please search your minds and realise that no communication was possible from Earth to the moon or from the moon to Earth, or from one astronaut on the moon to another on the moon. There is no medium, as we are told, which means....no communication.

I've proved it doesn't work, so stay tuned for details which will be coming soon. Get your evacuation chambers ready.

The whole argument boils down for if radio waves can travel in a vacuum. Sound like a new topic.

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 06:07:49 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 06:04:15 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 06:01:47 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 05:58:41 AM

Either way the call is not hard to do. To say HE did not talk to them is not the issue. The issue is did they that really go the moon. It has nothing to do with Nixon. Your argument about Nixon is not proof the moon mission does not exist.

What about the actornauts talking to each other on the moon? Is that not evidence either. Hahahahaha.
Not evidence, lol. I think it damning evidence that they didn't go. If you can't communicate, then the mission is dead, don't you think. 

Have you ever used a walkie talkie when you were young?

Yep, I sure have.

you real question is was there a medium on the moon?

No, it isn't just that. It's all communication from Earth to moon, to Earth and on the moon between astronauts supposedly walking upon it.

Think about this, folks. Apart from communication being rendered pathetic in a vacuum, picture this scenario.

The astronauts had a back pack with a small aerial on it. Nixon was supposedly talking to them on the moon and they recieved his call through thos aerial on their back packs, then communicated back.
Has anyone ever seen a solider in a field, communicating back to base and losing signal?
Out of range, yet these goons are talking to Nixon with their little aerials and radios, all the while the Earth is spinning at over 1000 mph, with no loss of signal, even if they were in fresh air on the frigging moon. Hahahahaha.

Can people not see how ridiculous this all is?

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 06:08:12 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 06:05:19 AM

Quote from: Starman on April 25, 2014, 06:02:08 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on April 25, 2014, 05:59:21 AM

Quote from: Donk3y on April 25, 2014, 05:54:22 AM

LOL I THINK I FOUND OUT WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS!!! IT'S HILARIOUS!!! XD
So this is basically what goes on in his mind:
"Derp herp herp, they talk in radio but they hear sound so it mean they no talk with radio but with sound. I DEBUNKED IT DERP!" xD

He's most probably too stupid to know how they code/decode information in radio waves xD

Decode? Oops, have I messed up. I didn't realise they were communicating in morse code. 

Actually today's communication is a form of morse code. It is called digital encoding.

What about 1969 from an old dial up ph9one from the whitehouse? Is that the same?

Decode or no decode, it still has to get to it's destination and it can't. There is no medium. I've proved it and you know it. You can do it yourself and so can anyone with a few gadgets and an evacuation chamber.

I said today's communication. In 1969 it was not a problem to use the phone and call all over the world. Were you alive in 1969?

Hey, Mr side stepper. I'm not talking about calling all over the WORLD, am I?

I'm talking about calling the men on the moon from the whitehouse and men talking to each other on the moon, plus NASA talking to the men on the moon.
Attention to all those rational people viewing. Please search your minds and realise that no communication was possible from Earth to the moon or from the moon to Earth, or from one astronaut on the moon to another on the moon. There is no medium, as we are told, which means....no communication.

I've proved it doesn't work, so stay tuned for details which will be coming soon. Get your evacuation chambers ready.

Just like your proof of the laser over the frozen lake?  That data is still yet to show up.