REs Please Explain

Why can you not explain the south facing satellite tv dishes I see?

Probably because the transmitters are to the south of the dishes? 

Quote from: sceptimatic on February 15, 2014, 08:13:07 AM

Certainly. What would you like? Be specific in what you would like me to show you

OK, I'd like one single shred of physical evidence that an ice dome exists above the earth.

If you can think of one possible way for me to directly prove this then tell me, because I can't figure out a way to do it without dying on attempt.

Quote from: JimmyTheCrab on February 15, 2014, 08:25:46 AM

OK, I'd like one single shred of physical evidence that an ice dome exists above the earth.

JimmyTheCrab, please do not try to deliberately derail threads.  Thanks.

It wasn't deliberate.  The OP was about axial tilt, as far as I can see this didn't get discussed past page 1.  The other 7 pages are about all sorts of stuff, so how am I derailing it?

Quote from: JimmyTheCrab on February 15, 2014, 08:25:46 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on February 15, 2014, 08:13:07 AM

Certainly. What would you like? Be specific in what you would like me to show you

OK, I'd like one single shred of physical evidence that an ice dome exists above the earth.

If you can think of one possible way for me to directly prove this then tell me, because I can't figure out a way to do it without dying on attempt.

Oh, sorry, it's just you seem convinced that such a dome exists - I didn't realise that it was a faith based position.

Anyway, how about looking at it through a large telescope?  Maybe bounce a signal off it?  Do you own thinking, I'm not here to spoon feed you.

It wasn't deliberate.  The OP was about axial tilt, as far as I can see this didn't get discussed past page 1.  The other 7 pages are about all sorts of stuff, so how am I derailing it?

JimmyTheCrab, please do not further derail a thread by arguing about moderation in the same thread that the warning was given.  This is also against the rules.  You can argue/complain about warnings all you want in the Suggestions and Concerns section. 

When you calm down, Geoff, we can get back to normality. Until you stop the frenzy, I can't be bothered to show you anything.

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by "calm down", or we can get back to "normality".  I wasn't actually aware I was in a "frenzy" either.  If you saw any parts of my response as any of those things, I can only apologise.

Now, can you address some of the questions I asked you, and also post a few of the images you claim are bogus?
 

JimmyTheCrab, please do not further derail a thread by arguing about moderation in the same thread that the warning was given.  This is also against the rules.  You can argue/complain about warnings all you want in the Suggestions and Concerns section.

I am honestly not trying to do this on purpose: I've no idea what derailment in this context means.

What subject should I post on that won't constitute derailment?

If you don't moderate with some guidance, then I don't know how to change my behavior appropriately.

As has already been requested repeatedly - i believe Geoff wanted evidence to back your claim that millions were involved with d-day and i have requested just one photo or video you believe proves a flat earth OR just one video or photo you claim proves the space programme is fake...

Yep.  That was all I originally asked sceptimatic for.  One single piece of evidence supporting his claim that millions of people were involved with D-Day.  I don't understand why he hasn't addressed that—basically simple—question?

And if he were to post even one genuine photographic image or some video footage showing a flat earth in real time, then he'd embarrass a lot of REs on this forum in one fell swoop.

So... why no images of any type at all from sceptimatic?
 
 

Quote from: sceptimatic on February 15, 2014, 07:52:31 AM

When you calm down, Geoff, we can get back to normality. Until you stop the frenzy, I can't be bothered to show you anything.

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by "calm down", or we can get back to "normality".  I wasn't actually aware I was in a "frenzy" either.  If you saw any parts of my response as any of those things, I can only apologise.

Now, can you address some of the questions I asked you, and also post a few of the images you claim are bogus?

Make a topic about what you specifically require and I'll see what I can do for you. Do not put up the topic if your sole intention is to go into frenzy mode and immediately dismiss the evidence presented. If you put up the topic, I expect you to look at it all as a neutral and not as an indoctrinated full on debunker of anything that goes against that grain.
If I've made myself clear, then you may carry on.

Quote from: ausGeoff on February 15, 2014, 08:55:13 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on February 15, 2014, 07:52:31 AM

When you calm down, Geoff, we can get back to normality. Until you stop the frenzy, I can't be bothered to show you anything.

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by "calm down", or we can get back to "normality".  I wasn't actually aware I was in a "frenzy" either.  If you saw any parts of my response as any of those things, I can only apologise.

Now, can you address some of the questions I asked you, and also post a few of the images you claim are bogus?

Make a topic about what you specifically require and I'll see what I can do for you. Do not put up the topic if your sole intention is to go into frenzy mode and immediately dismiss the evidence presented. If you put up the topic, I expect you to look at it all as a neutral and not as an indoctrinated full on debunker of anything that goes against that grain.
If I've made myself clear, then you may carry on.

done http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=61007.0

This video shows to what extent a country new to the space charade goes through to prove they are a technologically strong country.

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">China's Space Walk Was FAKE (part 1)

HA!  That's gold

Communism.. it never ceases to amaze me.

Quote from: jroa on February 15, 2014, 07:35:33 AM

This video shows to what extent a country new to the space charade goes through to prove they are a technologically strong country.

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">China's Space Walk Was FAKE (part 1)

HA!  That's gold

Communism.. it never ceases to amaze me.

Putting together a bunch of video clips together doesn't necessarily prove something fake... I mean I could go on all day about how NASA faked the moon landings, except they didn't also air bubbles can often seen escaping from space suits in space so I'm not really sure what your problem with that is?

So, next question. Who guarded the Ice Wall before NASA started doing it about 64 yrs ago?

Nobody guards the ice wall.  Why would they need to?  It's really, really cold there. 

Of course, that's assuming there IS one. So far, FEers can't even agree on a map of the Earth. I've seen 2 discoid maps, 1 w/ a S. Pole & 1 w/o one. Both maps present difficulties. The unipolar map messes up travel time & distance the further South you go. The bipolar map messes up circumnavigation of the Earth @ the Equator. But in truth, neither map is accurate. So what's left? Not much. But there never was. The emperor never had clothes. Let's face it, folks. Flat Earth 'Theory' is no more a theory than pink unicorns on Mars. It just won't hold up to even casual cross-examination. If this were a legal issue, it would be laughed out of any courtroom in the land.

Nice commentary, but do you want to talk about the ice wall guards some more, or are you ready to move on?

Let's see...

The Ice Wall exists..

Heaven Exists...

How are these two statements linked?

They're 100% faith based, they have zero evidence to support them - and only true believers speak of them as if they are real.

Only one statement though can be 100% debunked.. both statements are delusional but at least the ones that believe in Heaven cannot prove or disprove the notion.. the others are just mental.

I'd rather talk about a simple inability of FE 'theorists' to even give me a decent map of the Earth. The guards are irrelevant if no ice wall exists (on the bipolar map).

I hear ya.. how long have these nutters been around in their current form?  you'd think by now they'd have agreed on at least one pretend map and call it their own...

and that was your 666'th post!    eek!

People go to the "ice wall" all the time and live to tell the tale.  Does the same thing happen with Heaven? 

Ah, that was completely random. Tell me: are there or are there not 2 poles on the flat Earth? Trying to compare which map if either is accurate for an FEer v. Heaven is like comparing apples & baseballs. I won't even use the usual 'oranges' because that's still a fruit. What the f--- does heaven have to do w/ a map of Earth? Heaven, if it exists, is a philosophical construct rather than a physical place. Earth exists. & yes. People go to a very icy place & come back. Its called Antarctica. It's very f---ing cold, @ the bottom of a spherical Earth.

Yaakov, you must have missed this post.

Let's see...

The Ice Wall exists..

Heaven Exists...

How are these two statements linked?

They're 100% faith based, they have zero evidence to support them - and only true believers speak of them as if they are real.

Only one statement though can be 100% debunked.. both statements are delusional but at least the ones that believe in Heaven cannot prove or disprove the notion.. the others are just mental.

I did miss it. But alpha's point is correct. There is no ice wall.

People go to the "ice wall" all the time and live to tell the tale.  Does the same thing happen with Heaven?

Why have you said so many times that no one goes there?

Some consistency please.. too much to ask?

Ah, that was completely random. Tell me: are there or are there not 2 poles on the flat Earth? Trying to compare which map if either is accurate for an FEer v. Heaven is like comparing apples & baseballs. I won't even use the usual 'oranges' because that's still a fruit. What the f--- does heaven have to do w/ a map of Earth? Heaven, if it exists, is a philosophical construct rather than a physical place. Earth exists. & yes. People go to a very icy place & come back. Its called Antarctica. It's very f---ing cold, @ the bottom of a spherical Earth.

You're right, heaven is a philosophical place.. earth is not, but the idea of a FLAT Earth is.

Both are constructs of faith.

Quote from: jroa on February 15, 2014, 09:05:40 PM

People go to the "ice wall" all the time and live to tell the tale.  Does the same thing happen with Heaven?

Why have you said so many times that no one goes there?

Some consistency please.. too much to ask?

You are confusing Antarctica with the edge of the Earth.  People have been to the "ice wall", they just have not been able to go far enough past the shore to reach the edge, if one exists. 

I did miss it. But alpha's point is correct. There is no ice wall.

Just a small thing..


My nick is Alfa   156 Melb... Alfa as in Alfa Romeo... not Alpha..

No biggy..

So which FETheorist do I believe? You, or the many who say Antarctica IS the Ice Wall? You see, this isn't theories of God, where you're allowed your own because no one can rationally or irrationally disagree w/ you. This is science. People have mapped the world, & know what it looks like. & it doesn't look flat. Scientists have gone beyond math, & have seen & surveyed the planet. Guess what? Its f---ing round! That is proven. Its like saying 'the Pope is Catholic.' No shit.

So which FETheorist do I believe? You, or the many who say Antarctica IS the Ice Wall? You see, this isn't theories of God, where you're allowed your own because no one can rationally or irrationally disagree w/ you. This is science. People have mapped the world, & know what it looks like. & it doesn't look flat. Scientists have gone beyond math, & have seen & surveyed the planet. Guess what? Its f---ing round! That is proven. Its like saying 'the Pope is Catholic.' No shit.

Earth is for sure round, but it's also for sure concave and for sure there is also a celestial dome rotating above all of our heads and yes there is an outer side of Earth but no we are not on it, we are on the inside of Earth!

Sculelos, you're an awfully nice guy & all. But I think you should seriously inquire as to the state of your rationality, @ least on this topic. I don't even have the proper words to reply to something so outside the realm of logical.