If 0=1, then the earth is flat.

 

Close but:

1 +1 = 1

This has been confirmed true. Search for it if you have any doubts.   

The closing statement of your OP is correct.

FYI, look through the rules to see the description of low content posting.

Except that to prove this, you must divide by 0.   a-b=0 whenever a=b
If you kept reading, you would have found this to be confirmed.

http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/57110.html

Except that to prove this, you must divide by 0.   a-b=0 whenever a=b
If you kept reading, you would have found this to be confirmed.

http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/57110.html

Incorrect. Look for the history of math and special exception with raindrops.  Division is not in the equation. 

It is one of the noted examples of math failing.

Close but:

1 +1 = 1

This has been confirmed true. Search for it if you have any doubts.   

The closing statement of your OP is correct.

FYI, look through the rules to see the description of low content posting.

explain retrograde motion flat earther

Quote from: BJ1234 on December 22, 2013, 06:44:36 PM

Except that to prove this, you must divide by 0.   a-b=0 whenever a=b
If you kept reading, you would have found this to be confirmed.

http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/57110.html

Incorrect. Look for the history of math and special exception with raindrops.  Division is not in the equation. 

It is one of the noted examples of math failing.

a=b

a²-b²=0

(a-b)(a+b)=0

(a-b)(a+b)/(a-b)=0/(a-b)

a+b=0

a=1, b=1

2=0

2/2=0/2

1=0

1+1=1

except here is the problem, a=b, therefore a-b=0, (a+b)/0 is actually ∞ and 0/0 is actually ∞

the true answer in the end would be ∞=∞ which is true

so 1+1=1 only for people who don't know math well. Math did not fail, you failed to learn math.

Quote from: BJ1234 on December 22, 2013, 06:44:36 PM

Except that to prove this, you must divide by 0.   a-b=0 whenever a=b
If you kept reading, you would have found this to be confirmed.

http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/57110.html

Incorrect. Look for the history of math and special exception with raindrops.  Division is not in the equation. 

It is one of the noted examples of math failing.

No it is a failing of understanding of what units are assigned to a number.

1 rain drop + 1 rain drop = 1 rain drop twice the size of the previous rain drops.  How is that a failing of math?  It is a failing of understanding what is going on.

What do mathematical fallacies have to do with the shape of the earth? 

I think it is to try and discredit the math that works so well in proving a RE?

I think it is to try and discredit the math that works so well in proving a RE?

Why would a REer want to do that? 

I took the OP as sarcasm.  I am replying to gotham's inaccurate portrayal of addition.

I don't think that x/0=∞.  That is not how the concept of infinity is defined.

I don't think that x/0=∞.  That is not how the concept of infinity is defined.

true x/0 is technically undefined, but let me show you something.

1/.1=10
1/.01=100
1/.001=1000
1/.0001=10000
1/.000000000001=1000000000000
do you see what is going on here? as the number in the denominator gets smaller the answer gets larger. ∞ is arbitrary it can never be reached. therefore the LIMIT of x/0 is ∞, but also -∞

because 1/-.00001=-10000
so the limit of x/0 is ∞ and -∞ this is why it is undefined.

then it would be undefined=undefined, still the point to this post is I found this in an old Logic textbook as an example.

if 1=0 then earth is flat
earth is round
so 1=/=0

What do mathematical fallacies have to do with the shape of the earth? 

Actually a mathematical fallacy might have been why some believe it is flat.

I took the OP as sarcasm.

Yeah, probably.  And he's been warned about this kind of thing.

I thought about moving the thread but decided against it since it seems to have prompted a legitimate discussion relating to FE.

0=0
1=1
1 1 = 2
1 10 = 3
1 0 1 = 4
1 10 0 = 5
1 1 0 1 = 6
1 0 1 10 = 7

So on so forth no number can validly exceed 6 digits or it multiplies into multiples.

Math begins with the ONES place.  And there is no such thing as NOTHING = zero.  Zero technically means OFF (in reference to electricity).  Everything is electrically created.  Everything.  We truly live in the matrix.
#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Egyptian Maths

Math begins with the ONES place.  And there is no such thing as NOTHING = zero.  Zero technically means OFF (in reference to electricity).  Everything is electrically created.  Everything.  We truly live in the matrix.
#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Egyptian Maths

Good video. However your correct in Zero = Off but because it's a deactivated Ion it still exist but is not energized so to speak so yes zero does not exist as nothing = zero but zero simply means deactivated so I suppose I agree with you. So 10 to us means 1 1 1 010. So essentially our numbers are not exact representations of reality but abbreviations of the subsurface reality.

0=0
1=1
1 1 = 2
1 10 = 3
1 0 1 = 4
1 10 0 = 5
1 1 0 1 = 6
1 0 1 10 = 7

So on so forth no number can validly exceed 6 digits or it multiplies into multiples.

Is this some sort of attempt at a binary system?  If so, you are way off.

Quote from: Sculelos on December 23, 2013, 09:07:23 AM

0=0
1=1
1 1 = 2
1 10 = 3
1 0 1 = 4
1 10 0 = 5
1 1 0 1 = 6
1 0 1 10 = 7

So on so forth no number can validly exceed 6 digits or it multiplies into multiples.

Is this some sort of attempt at a binary system?  If so, you are way off.

It's not a binary system but it shows how energy signatures stack. this is the standard binary system although it's completely arbitrary and not coded to match the energy symbols Corrected Binary (in Parenthesis) could also look like this but remember that there is more then one way to write a number in binary but it's rather amusing that binary itself is arbitrated in computing based in reality on a ternary system with the electricity itself acting as a means of communication. There is no 2 in the physical reality as everything is built out of three pairings.

0   0 (10 00 01)
1   1 (00 00 01)
2   10 (00 01 00)
3   11 (00 01 01)
4   100 (01 00 00)
5   101 (11 01 00)
6   110 (11 10 00)
7   111 (11 11 01)
8   1000 (10 00 00)
9   1001 (10 01 00) 

How can 4 and 8 be represented by the same number?

10 00 00

Oh wait you said it is completely arbitrary... does that mean you are just randomly choosing what represents what?

How can 4 and 8 be represented by the same number?

10 00 00

Oh wait you said it is completely arbitrary... does that mean you are just randomly choosing what represents what?

Ah my mistake and no it's not really random at all but Binary is a shortened form of Ternary.

4- 01 00 00
8- 10 00 00

Ah my mistake and no it's not really random at all but Binary is a shortened form of Ternary.

Nope.  As its name implies, ternary uses a base 3, or the three non-negative digits 0, 1, and 2.

For example, decimal 365 corresponds to binary 101101101 (9 digits) and to ternary 111112 (6 digits).

Quote from: Sculelos on December 25, 2013, 07:37:16 AM

Ah my mistake and no it's not really random at all but Binary is a shortened form of Ternary.

Nope.  As its name implies, ternary uses a base 3, or the three non-negative digits 0, 1, and 2.

For example, decimal 365 corresponds to binary 101101101 (9 digits) and to ternary 111112 (6 digits).

Decimals get rather confusing for me as they don't follow the standard flow. I'm not really talking about the number systems itself but the number sequence.

For my purposes in my energy code readings anything built like this is Binary (2D)

00 00

And anything built like this is ternary (3D).

00 00 00

Quote from: ausGeoff on December 25, 2013, 02:08:23 PM

Quote from: Sculelos on December 25, 2013, 07:37:16 AM

Ah my mistake and no it's not really random at all but Binary is a shortened form of Ternary.

Nope.  As its name implies, ternary uses a base 3, or the three non-negative digits 0, 1, and 2.

For example, decimal 365 corresponds to binary 101101101 (9 digits) and to ternary 111112 (6 digits).

Decimals get rather confusing for me as they don't follow the standard flow. I'm not really talking about the number systems itself but the number sequence.

For my purposes in my energy code readings anything built like this is Binary (2D)

00 00

And anything built like this is ternary (3D).

00 00 00

So basically you are redefining what things mean to suit your theory and expect everyone else to understand what you are talking about.

Decimals get rather confusing for me as they don't follow the standard flow. I'm not really talking about the number systems itself but the number sequence.

For MY purposes in MY energy code readings anything built like this is Binary (2D)

00 00

And anything built like this is ternary (3D).

00 00 00

Could you please explain what you mean by the "standard flow"?

And as BJ1234 has already said, you can't simply make up your own mathematical theories on the spot.  Your example of ternary 000000 = decimal 0₁₀  but I'm sure that's not your understanding.  You're confusing base 3 with 3 groups (and base 2 with 2 groups).

What is this ridiculous 1+1=1 crap?

Because two rain drops can become 1? Seriously?

That is beyond dumb.