Hurricane tracks

  • 133 Replies
  • 26164 Views
*

Rama Set

  • 6875
  • +1/-0
  • I am also an engineer
Re: Hurricane tracks
« Reply #120 on: September 25, 2013, 09:00:25 PM »
Cartesian, I have yet to see any credible evidence that hurricanes spin at all, let alone the way you are describing.

Just saying that even someone who does not believe in satellites has ample sources of meteorological data to be convinced of hurricane rotation in the various hemispheres.

I know you don't believe in satellites and all but do you realize that meteorologists depend on the imagery provided by those so called satellites? Where ever they are from they are an extremely valuable tool. The imagery from hurricanes in north hemisphere compared to the south shows some obvious differences.

Doppler radar can be ground based can't it?

Absolutely but thats a completely different kind of product compared to a VIS, IR, Microwave, or water vapor image that we get from satellites. The product is overlayed onto a map, showing reflected returns of the radial component of a targets velocity relative to a radar. on the other hand, satellite images (besides microwave satellites, which are like radars) are literally snapshots.
Aether is the  characteristic of action or inaction of charged  & noncharged particals.

Re: Hurricane tracks
« Reply #121 on: September 26, 2013, 07:36:02 AM »
Rama,
Why did you repost Rotting's post?  Did you forget to type your comment?  You creating a longer thread.

*

Rama Set

  • 6875
  • +1/-0
  • I am also an engineer
Re: Hurricane tracks
« Reply #122 on: September 26, 2013, 07:59:34 AM »
My post was cut off.   I was saying that ground based Doppler radar is a good source of data for people who do not believe in satellites.
Aether is the  characteristic of action or inaction of charged  & noncharged particals.

*

Cartesian

  • 1965
  • +0/-0
Re: Hurricane tracks
« Reply #123 on: September 27, 2013, 04:11:04 AM »
Cartesian, I have yet to see any credible evidence that hurricanes spin at all, let alone the way you are describing.

You doubt that hurricanes rotate?

They might rotate, but I am not convinced that they rotate in the manner that RET says they do.

Are you not interested to find out the truth?
I think, therefore I am

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Hurricane tracks
« Reply #124 on: September 28, 2013, 12:52:39 AM »
Cartesian, I have yet to see any credible evidence that hurricanes spin at all, let alone the way you are describing.

You doubt that hurricanes rotate?

They might rotate, but I am not convinced that they rotate in the manner that RET says they do.

Are you not interested to find out the truth?

Of course I am.  I just have not seen credible proof one way or the other. 

*

Cartesian

  • 1965
  • +0/-0
Re: Hurricane tracks
« Reply #125 on: September 28, 2013, 02:23:06 AM »
There is abundant proof. Whether you accept it or not is a different matter.
I think, therefore I am

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • +0/-0
  • Around the world.
Re: Hurricane tracks
« Reply #126 on: September 28, 2013, 09:00:38 AM »
Here is a Quikscat weather product showing wind barbs. Each wind barb represents a velocity showing both direction and speed of the wind in a given area. This is hurricane Rita as it went through the gulf of Mexico. This is an unmistakably counter-clockwise rotation.




« Last Edit: October 10, 2013, 09:19:01 AM by EarthIsASpaceship »

*

Cartesian

  • 1965
  • +0/-0
Re: Hurricane tracks
« Reply #128 on: October 10, 2013, 09:11:52 AM »
This is why they spin in opposite directions:
#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Experiment showing how electrons are deflected in a magnetic field

Can you prove that the air is attracted by magnet in one direction in the northern hemisphere and in another direction in the southern hemisphere?
I think, therefore I am

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • +0/-0
  • Around the world.
Re: Hurricane tracks
« Reply #129 on: October 10, 2013, 09:25:01 AM »
This is why they spin in opposite directions:

#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Experiment showing how electrons are deflected in a magnetic field

This is nonsense. The magnetic field is farthest away from the Earth at the Equator.

Re: Hurricane tracks
« Reply #130 on: October 10, 2013, 09:31:42 AM »
Scroll down to see the drawing of the electric current of Earth:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_electricity

Keep in mind that on the FE model, the current flows outward to the SP and inward to the NP....opposite directions.

*

Cartesian

  • 1965
  • +0/-0
Re: Hurricane tracks
« Reply #131 on: October 10, 2013, 09:33:54 AM »
Scroll down to see the drawing of the electric current of Earth:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_electricity

Keep in mind that on the FE model, the current flows outward to the SP and inward to the NP....opposite directions.
Can you prove that the air is attracted by magnet in one direction in the northern hemisphere and in another direction in the southern hemisphere?
I think, therefore I am

?

rottingroom

  • 4785
  • +0/-0
  • Around the world.
Re: Hurricane tracks
« Reply #132 on: October 10, 2013, 09:37:21 AM »
Take a guess as to why Earth has a magnetic field.

*

Cartesian

  • 1965
  • +0/-0
Re: Hurricane tracks
« Reply #133 on: October 10, 2013, 09:39:26 AM »
Don't worry. He just talked BS. He cannot even prove that the air is attracted by magnet at all, let alone deflected in different direction depending on the hemisphere.
I think, therefore I am