Fair enough, Rottingroom, but I have no direct physical evidence to back up my Hypothesis, which I already stated in this topic.
I'm not "telling" anyone to believe I'm right and I'm not saying I am right. I am saying, that to "me" it makes more logical sense to channel my thoughts into the way they are going. Not by peer pressure and not by reading any books, but by sifting through the various hypotheses of every earth shape that has been proposed.
I decided to start at the very bottom and the very basics, which means I discount the equations and the hypotheses of mainstream science when it's equated to the earth and the supposed known part of the universe, which means, I discount relativity, light year stars and gravity, to name but a few of much of what we are told to embrace.
Starting from the bottom might appear pre-historic to many and it is, I suppose, but I wouldn't need to do that if those who pulled the rabbits out of the hat had been honest from the start and actually gave us the known facts about our lives and what our lives are on this earth.
Maybe they don't know it all, but I believe they know enough and buried it among a world of disinformation.
I'm still working on my thoughts and I'm still piecing it all together, with the help of a few other people and hopefully it will all come together that can explain most, if not all of what we are and what we are part of.
I work on very simple logical thought and that can be dressed up in any way a person wants to think it is. Whether they say it's crazy, retarded or any other set of words that they arrive at. It doesn't matter to me, because I follow my own thoughts and will only follow another persons, "if" I believe they are logical to me. So far, only a few people get the grasp and actually add to the probabilities of my thinking, because their thinking is on the same type of lines, so it's a case of bouncing off of each other.
You do the same and bounce off of a wider array of people of all descriptions in the main and you believe you have scientific fact to back up what you say, but the real truth is, you don't.
What you do have is a bigger field of people who nod their heads and say, "yep, that's correct, because we all agree."
You might believe that your equations match up with certain things, like a sun distance, but you only arrive a specific number, because you have been given the bullets to fire, in terms of theoretical sizes of this earth and moon and such like.
I know you will argue that you "know", I'm under no illusions about it, but all I'm saying is...you do not "know"...you merely accept the easier option, because it's easier and less problematic to go with well rehearsed scientific story of what earth is and what space is and all it contains, even right down to the big bang and black holes, etc, etc, etc.
I'm doing my thought experiments for myself, mainly, but also, it would be nice for people to see my thoughts in type, so the neutrals can say, "hmmm, maybe there's something in this, I'll try and add to it and see where this goes."
For me, gravity can be explained as merely atmospheric pressure and the earth must have a barrier to that, which it does, in an ice dome.
Outside this dome, space does not exist, but that doesn't mean that other earth type cells can't exist, except we will never know by sight, because we cannot see into space, we simply see what's reflected off of and inside of the dome as reflected light.
The very same species of us, could be doing similar things, like we are now, inside their own cell of their own earth and this could be infinite, as in the number of cells there are.
Do I know any of this for certain? No, I don't but it makes more logical sense to believe that this is closer to the truth than the nonsense we have been spun about the rotating globe and a vacuum filled with rotating planets spinning about at angles and a sun that sits there burning hydrogen and helium forever in a vacuum and stars that our primitive eyes can see as dots but we are seeing some of them as what they were like 1000 years ago, because that's how long it's took their light to reach out eyes, through a vacuum that contains "NOTHING."
Blinded by science is correct, because space scientists who make up this stuff, are merely fictional story tellers, who tell other wannabe space scientists the same story with all the made up pieces to fit that are accepted, because they cannot be directly tested or proven.
I never get daunted by the arrogance of mainstream scientists, because I simply brush aside their figures and ask them to explain in a child like manner.
They hate this, because their explanations show the space garbage up for what it is. Plus they don't like to talk in any other language than gibberish, whilst chalking up a set of equations that they think will impress and baffle the average person, yet not realising that it does not explain any direct physical proof.
When you watch how them clowns act who supposedly sent up the Mars rover, you will see what a sham all this stuff is, but that's another topic.
The sleight of hand of a magician, does not make that person magic.