« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 20   Go Down

Empirical evidence for moon shrimp

  • 593 Replies
  • 132723 Views
*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #210 on: January 24, 2011, 05:21:31 PM »
In closing and in all fairness it has been shown that FE has proven the case and is awarded the victory mentioned above. 

Even if the thread went out double to 22 pages the evidence would not be diminished and clearly the FE argument has been made. 

It can not be disputed that quality evidence has been presented. Enough to even sway those that do not believe in the theory to at least start considering it.

Logged
?

Nolhekh

  • 1669
  • +0/-0
  • Animator
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #211 on: January 24, 2011, 05:30:23 PM »
I have seen evidence this morning that the light from the moon is reflected sunlight.
Logged
*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #212 on: January 24, 2011, 05:31:01 PM »
Quote from: Nolhekh on January 24, 2011, 05:30:23 PM
I have seen evidence this morning that the light from the moon is reflected sunlight.
I disagree. I have seen evidence every night for years that the light from the moon is actually a telepathic ability of mine to illuminate celestial objects. You can all thank for me bringing light to the heavens.
Logged
*

berny_74

  • 1785
  • +0/-0
  • The IceWall! Beat that
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #213 on: January 24, 2011, 05:46:15 PM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 24, 2011, 04:02:08 PM
I saw 2/3 of the evidence for moon shrimp lighting up the entire moon last night..

Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 24, 2011, 10:07:07 AM
Clocktower was banned because he continued to waste Ski's time with low content posts and attempting to play semantic games

You can waste ours though?

Berny
Quote from: General Disarray on January 24, 2011, 04:21:00 PM
Please stop posting here.

Logged
Quote from: markjo on August 18, 2011, 10:31:34 AM
To be fair, sometimes what FE'ers say makes so little sense that it's hard to come up with a rebuttal.
Moonlight is good for you.
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45161
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #214 on: January 24, 2011, 06:10:54 PM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 24, 2011, 04:36:31 PM
Quote from: Thork on January 24, 2011, 04:30:29 PM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 24, 2011, 04:02:08 PM
I saw 2/3 of the evidence for moon shrimp lighting up the entire moon last night..
An eyewitness account. It doesn't get any more conclusive than that. Open and shut case. I'm glad we got the whole moon shrimp thing sorted out finally.

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR FLAT EARTH!!!
Except for the part where you provided no evidence whatsoever that the "evidence" that you witnessed came from moon shrimp as opposed to any other sort of bioluminescent lunar material.  I would hardly call that a win.  That is unless you count low content posting a win.
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #215 on: January 24, 2011, 07:30:24 PM »
Quote from: Thork on January 24, 2011, 04:52:47 PM
To be honest I think this thread should have finished around here
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=45200.msg1123310#msg1123310

Couple of posts after maybe. The OP admitted this thread was demanding the unreasonable from the start. I will now bow out unless someone posts something of unexpected brilliance. Moon shrimp has been done to death (again) for me, for another month.

*I will not be swayed from my firm belief they are the cause of the moon's brightness, but can't be bothered to argue this any more for a while.

So you *believe* in something you have no empirical evidence for?

I don't believe that the request was unreasonable, James said he had empirical evidence, and I asked for it. It was never provided, and descended into trolling by EG and Gotham. It just shows me that whenever someone asks the right question and it can't be twisted like EG loves to do, it just gets trolled. What's the point of this forum if all the good questions just get trolled?
« Last Edit: January 24, 2011, 07:59:49 PM by General Disarray »
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #216 on: January 24, 2011, 07:31:18 PM »
Quote from: gotham on January 24, 2011, 05:21:31 PM
It can not be disputed that quality evidence has been presented.

Where? I must have missed the post you are referring to, could you point it out to me please?
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #217 on: January 24, 2011, 07:33:19 PM »
Could the moderators please remove EG's troll posts?
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
?

Nolhekh

  • 1669
  • +0/-0
  • Animator
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #218 on: January 24, 2011, 07:47:15 PM »
Quote from: Nolhekh on January 24, 2011, 05:30:23 PM
I have seen evidence this morning that the light from the moon is reflected sunlight.
I have strengthened this evidence by holding up a tennis ball to the moon on a sunny day and noting that the lit portion of the ball is identical in shape and orientation to the visible portion of the moon.  Unless of course there were shrimp-like bacteria on my tennis ball favouring the side facing the sun. If that was the case, then it suggests that the moon-shrimp live on a spherical moon, and favour the side with sunlight.  This suggests that the direction of sunlight is ultimately responsible for the phases of the moon, whether shrimp-like bacteria are involved or not.
Logged
?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • +0/-0
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #219 on: January 25, 2011, 01:03:05 AM »
Quote from: Nolhekh on January 24, 2011, 07:47:15 PM
Quote from: Nolhekh on January 24, 2011, 05:30:23 PM
I have seen evidence this morning that the light from the moon is reflected sunlight.
I have strengthened this evidence by holding up a tennis ball to the moon on a sunny day and noting that the lit portion of the ball is identical in shape and orientation to the visible portion of the moon.  Unless of course there were shrimp-like bacteria on my tennis ball favouring the side facing the sun. If that was the case, then it suggests that the moon-shrimp live on a spherical moon, and favour the side with sunlight.  This suggests that the direction of sunlight is ultimately responsible for the phases of the moon, whether shrimp-like bacteria are involved or not.

Excuse me sir, we do not want experiments when we have circular reasoning and telepathic dreams, thanks.
Logged
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences
*

silver

  • 149
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #220 on: January 25, 2011, 02:23:18 AM »
Quote from: Kira-SY on January 25, 2011, 01:03:05 AM
Quote from: Nolhekh on January 24, 2011, 07:47:15 PM
Quote from: Nolhekh on January 24, 2011, 05:30:23 PM
-snip-
-snip-

Excuse me sir, we do not want experiments when we have circular reasoning and telepathic dreams, thanks.

That experiment contained neither  ???
Logged
?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • +0/-0
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #221 on: January 25, 2011, 03:40:53 AM »
I meant that experiments are not wanted (or needed), because we already have circular reasoning and telepathic dreams.
Logged
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences
*

silver

  • 149
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #222 on: January 25, 2011, 04:27:47 AM »
My apologies, I misunderstood your sarcasm  ;)
Logged
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #223 on: January 25, 2011, 07:43:17 AM »
Quote from: General Disarray on January 24, 2011, 07:30:24 PM
it can't be twisted like EG loves to do

What evidence do you have for this outlandish claim?
Logged
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #224 on: January 25, 2011, 08:04:41 AM »
Quote from: General Disarray on January 24, 2011, 07:33:19 PM
Could the moderators please remove EG's troll posts?
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #225 on: January 25, 2011, 08:31:02 AM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 25, 2011, 07:43:17 AM
Quote from: General Disarray on January 24, 2011, 07:30:24 PM
it can't be twisted like EG loves to do

What evidence do you have for this outlandish claim?

Irrelevant. The thread is about moon shrimp.

Quote from: IOA
Stop trolling
Logged
*

Beorn

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6521
  • +1/-0
  • If I can't trust my eyes, what can I trust?
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #226 on: January 25, 2011, 08:59:52 AM »
Logged
Quote
Only one thing can save our future. Give Thork a BanHammer for Th*rksakes!
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #227 on: January 25, 2011, 09:48:12 AM »
Quote from: IOA on January 25, 2011, 08:31:02 AM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 25, 2011, 07:43:17 AM
Quote from: General Disarray on January 24, 2011, 07:30:24 PM
it can't be twisted like EG loves to do

What evidence do you have for this outlandish claim?

Irrelevant. The thread is about moon shrimp.

Ah, so you made a claim, can't back it up, and now are trying to change the subject?

Typical RE'er.
Logged
*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #228 on: January 25, 2011, 10:14:24 AM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 25, 2011, 09:48:12 AM
Quote from: IOA on January 25, 2011, 08:31:02 AM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 25, 2011, 07:43:17 AM
Quote from: General Disarray on January 24, 2011, 07:30:24 PM
it can't be twisted like EG loves to do

What evidence do you have for this outlandish claim?

Irrelevant. The thread is about moon shrimp.

Ah, so you made a claim, can't back it up, and now are trying to change the subject?

Typical RE'er.
Read again. That's exactly what you did.
Logged
*

silver

  • 149
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #229 on: January 25, 2011, 10:19:00 AM »
Logged
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45161
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #230 on: January 25, 2011, 12:49:07 PM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 25, 2011, 09:48:12 AM
Quote from: IOA on January 25, 2011, 08:31:02 AM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 25, 2011, 07:43:17 AM
Quote from: General Disarray on January 24, 2011, 07:30:24 PM
it can't be twisted like EG loves to do

What evidence do you have for this outlandish claim?

Irrelevant. The thread is about moon shrimp.

Ah, so you made a claim, can't back it up, and now are trying to change the subject?

Typical RE'er.

EG, you really need to work on your reading and comprehension skills.  GeneralDisarray made the claim, IOA tried to change the subject (back to the original topic).  ::)
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #231 on: January 25, 2011, 12:56:16 PM »
So you admit GeneralDysentery was derailing the thread?
Logged
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #232 on: January 25, 2011, 01:01:55 PM »
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45161
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #233 on: January 25, 2011, 01:02:00 PM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 25, 2011, 12:56:16 PM
So you admit GeneralDysentery was derailing the thread?
Discussing who derailed this thread is irrelevant and off topic.  Please limit your posts to empirical evidence supporting the existence of moon shrimp (and how to tell the difference between moon shrimp and any other form of bioluminescent lunar material).
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
?

Nolhekh

  • 1669
  • +0/-0
  • Animator
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #234 on: January 25, 2011, 01:03:03 PM »
Quote from: markjo on January 25, 2011, 01:02:00 PM
Discussing who derailed this thread is irrelevant and off topic.  Please limit your posts to empirical evidence supporting the existence of moon shrimp (and how to tell the difference between moon shrimp and any other form of bioluminescent lunar material or sunlight).
fixed
Logged
?

midwestsailor

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #235 on: January 26, 2011, 07:53:46 AM »
Lets pretend to agree that the light is organic in origin. How do you identify what the organism emitting the light is?
Logged
*

Hessy

  • 1184
  • +0/-0
  • My alts: Edgeworth, any/all spambots
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #236 on: January 26, 2011, 09:57:46 AM »
Quote from: midwestsailor on January 26, 2011, 07:53:46 AM
Lets pretend to agree that the light is organic in origin. How do you identify what the organism emitting the light is?

Baseless speculation in a vain attempt to withold FET.
Logged
*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #237 on: January 26, 2011, 04:30:57 PM »
The Earth is still flat if there are no shrimp on the Moon. There's nothing really riding on this, it's just true.
Logged
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901
?

Horatio

  • Official Member
  • 3998
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #238 on: January 26, 2011, 04:38:27 PM »
Quote from: James on January 26, 2011, 04:30:57 PM
The Earth is still flat if there are no shrimp on the Moon. There's nothing really riding on this, it's just true.

You use it to explain the phases of the Moon, though.
Logged
Quote from: James on March 07, 2011, 09:22:09 AM
How dare you have the audacity to demand my deposition. I've never even heard of you.
*

Beorn

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6521
  • +1/-0
  • If I can't trust my eyes, what can I trust?
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #239 on: January 26, 2011, 04:38:41 PM »
Quote from: James on January 26, 2011, 04:30:57 PM
The Earth is still flat if there are no shrimp on the Moon. There's nothing really riding on this, it's just true.

How is it just true? You have empirical evidence, show it. Or are you a liar?
Logged
Quote
Only one thing can save our future. Give Thork a BanHammer for Th*rksakes!
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 20   Go Up
« previous next »