« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 20   Go Down

Empirical evidence for moon shrimp

  • 593 Replies
  • 132775 Views
*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #90 on: January 14, 2011, 09:08:49 PM »
So like I said, no moon shrimp on the moon.
Logged
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #91 on: January 14, 2011, 09:14:21 PM »
Quote from: kev on January 14, 2011, 04:42:44 PM
Quote from: Thork on January 14, 2011, 03:06:06 PM
Will you provide empirical evidence that they are not?
at present a dinosaur is running around outside the whitehouse, buts it's invisible, so you cant see it.

Dinosaurs are at the white house all the time.

Logged
*

Pongo

  • 6752
  • +1/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #92 on: January 14, 2011, 09:15:46 PM »
Quote from: digitalartist on January 14, 2011, 01:39:03 PM

funny thing, during a full moon some of those shadowed areas don't exist.  Guess the moon bats die out there for awhile.  No if there were moon bats preying on moon shrimp there would be shadow areas where there are none now.  It's funny though.  The population of an unsubstantiated species of moon shrimp being controlled by an unsubstantiated species of moon bat.  I can't wait till someone introduces moon cows.  :LOL

This is retarted, do you think that earth bats just die out when they aren't active?  
Logged
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #93 on: January 14, 2011, 09:44:47 PM »
Quote from: General Disarray on January 14, 2011, 02:39:38 PM
I will restate the question here for those of you who have not yet visited WWW.rif.org:

Will you provide empirical evidence that the creatures which allegedly produce light from the moon's surface are shrimp-like bacteria?
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #94 on: January 14, 2011, 09:47:23 PM »
Still no evidence. Still waiting.
Logged
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #95 on: January 14, 2011, 10:44:52 PM »
I will take any further derailment attempts or non-answers as a concession.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

Supertails

  • 4376
  • +0/-0
  • what do i put here
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #96 on: January 14, 2011, 11:21:12 PM »
The moon-shrimp thing is clearly just trolling.
Logged
Recently listened to:

?

kev

  • 13
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #97 on: January 15, 2011, 05:10:56 PM »
Quote from: Pongo on January 14, 2011, 01:22:31 PM
Quote from: digitalartist on January 14, 2011, 01:04:18 PM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on January 13, 2011, 08:56:51 PM
I see evidence of the moon shrimp right now as I look into the sky.

Actually you believe that the moons light is coming from moon shrimp, but, that is not evidence any more than those who see a face in the moon means there is a man in the moon looking down on the earth.  Modern, powerful telescopes have seen no indication of life on the moon and in fact, if there were moon shrimp, shadows of mountains and hills seen on the moon (in the exact same places each day) would not exist as the moving shrimp would fill in those places at times and the shadows would cease to exist.

The areas that you think of as shadows are really just environments that are uninhabitable to the moon shrimp at certain times of day.  Perhaps there are natural predators, like moon bats that hunt the moon shrimp in these "shadowed" areas at different times of day.  Naturally, a moon shrimp colony will avoid these moon bat hunting grounds at all costs.

lol pongo, golden
Logged
"Following the light of the sun, we left the old world"
*

IOA

  • 507
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #98 on: January 15, 2011, 05:17:00 PM »
Quote from: General Disarray on January 14, 2011, 10:44:52 PM
I will take any further derailment attempts or non-answers as a concession.
I think it's safe to say, this is a Round Earth win. Concession made.
Logged
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #99 on: January 15, 2011, 05:48:43 PM »
Quote from: Pongo on January 14, 2011, 09:15:46 PM
Quote from: digitalartist on January 14, 2011, 01:39:03 PM

funny thing, during a full moon some of those shadowed areas don't exist.  Guess the moon bats die out there for awhile.  No if there were moon bats preying on moon shrimp there would be shadow areas where there are none now.  It's funny though.  The population of an unsubstantiated species of moon shrimp being controlled by an unsubstantiated species of moon bat.  I can't wait till someone introduces moon cows.  :LOL

This is retarted, do you think that earth bats just die out when they aren't active? 

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR FLAT EARTH!!!
Logged
*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #100 on: January 15, 2011, 06:07:45 PM »
Wow!  I must follow up and read the thread. The final banner posting is very welcome!
Logged
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #101 on: January 15, 2011, 06:13:10 PM »
So far no empirical evidence for the shape of these alleged moon creatures has been posted, I have no choice but to accept that James was in fact lying in his statement!
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
?

Thork

Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #102 on: January 15, 2011, 06:13:57 PM »
Yey! Good work brothers. :) Brother Pongo has been excelling himself as of late. FEB status soon I am sure.
Logged
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45162
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #103 on: January 15, 2011, 06:19:35 PM »
Quote from: Thork on January 15, 2011, 06:13:57 PM
Yey! Good work brothers. :) Brother Pongo has been excelling himself as of late. FEB status soon I am sure.

Flat Earth Bullsh*tter?  Sounds like it's in the bag.
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #104 on: January 15, 2011, 06:24:28 PM »
If (as I suspect) the requirements to become a Flat Earth Believer is to ignore anything except what can be twisted into evidence that the earth is flat, then he's all set! Although I can't help but wonder why Thork was removed...
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #105 on: January 15, 2011, 07:18:00 PM »
Quote from: Thork on January 15, 2011, 06:13:57 PM
Yey! Good work brothers. :) Brother Pongo has been excelling himself as of late. FEB status soon I am sure.

I agree. He has finally solved the Moon Bat crisis! I can't wait to see more of his work.

I think we should make a petition in S&C for Pongo to become a FEB.
Logged
*

Pongo

  • 6752
  • +1/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #106 on: January 16, 2011, 02:39:22 AM »
Thank you for your support for FEB status.  However, I do not agree with what it stands for.  The FEB status labels a poster and I believe that some of the readers will be tempted to dismiss what I say off hand because they so vehemently oppose The Flat Earth Society.  Rather, I would like all my posts to be read with an open mind and seen for the inherent truthatudes that they are.
Logged
?

vhu9644

  • 1011
  • +0/-0
  • Round earth supporter
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #107 on: January 16, 2011, 03:49:35 AM »
Quote from: Pongo on January 14, 2011, 09:15:46 PM
Quote from: digitalartist on January 14, 2011, 01:39:03 PM

funny thing, during a full moon some of those shadowed areas don't exist.  Guess the moon bats die out there for awhile.  No if there were moon bats preying on moon shrimp there would be shadow areas where there are none now.  It's funny though.  The population of an unsubstantiated species of moon shrimp being controlled by an unsubstantiated species of moon bat.  I can't wait till someone introduces moon cows.  :LOL

This is retarted, do you think that earth bats just die out when they aren't active?  

depends how long.  if they arent active long enough, they cant keep sustaining themselves

but using we round earthers say that the moon reflects the sun becuase, we have moon samples, which are reflective, and we can do simulations with processes such as ray tracing.  also, we can map the moon's trajectory to see how it will reflect the light from the sun.

also,whhy would moon bats always eat the moon shrimp in a cresent pattern then? and do the moon bats eat, then sleep during the new to full moon?
Logged
people i respect: Ski, Oracle, PizzaPlanet, Wendy
?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • +0/-0
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #108 on: January 16, 2011, 06:28:07 AM »
James, the telepatical speaker to moon shrimps assures those shrimps aren't eaten by humans, because there are no humans in the moon.
Throk, the RE'er pretending being a FE'er, shows that there are edible animals called in English "moon shrimps", which are eaten by humans.

I see several problems here:
- Does James think that shrimps can be eaten by human, BUT in earth?
- If not, there's a contradiction in FET, thanks to Thork and James, they should get an agreement before making assumptions.

- The name "moon shrimp", it's in English language, in other languages it is not the case, therefore, it's not a decissive thing to consider. Which is the scientifical name of those shrimps, Thork? Is this scientifical name identical in all languages, giving it relevancy? Please provide.

Logged
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45162
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #109 on: January 16, 2011, 08:52:58 AM »
Quote from: Pongo on January 16, 2011, 02:39:22 AM
Rather, I would like all my posts to be read with an open mind and seen for the inherent truthatudes that they are.

Truthatudes?  Is that anything like truthiness?
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #110 on: January 16, 2011, 09:52:13 AM »
Quote from: Kira-SY on January 16, 2011, 06:28:07 AM
James, the telepatical speaker to moon shrimps assures those shrimps aren't eaten by humans, because there are no humans in the moon.
Throk, the RE'er pretending being a FE'er, shows that there are edible animals called in English "moon shrimps", which are eaten by humans.

I see several problems here:
- Does James think that shrimps can be eaten by human, BUT in earth?
- If not, there's a contradiction in FET, thanks to Thork and James, they should get an agreement before making assumptions.

- The name "moon shrimp", it's in English language, in other languages it is not the case, therefore, it's not a decissive thing to consider. Which is the scientifical name of those shrimps, Thork? Is this scientifical name identical in all languages, giving it relevancy? Please provide.



Both are true.
Logged
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901
*

PizzaPlanet

  • 12204
  • +0/-2
  • Now available in stereo
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #111 on: January 16, 2011, 09:56:50 AM »
Shrimp currently present on the moon can't be eaten by humans, because our arms are not as long as to reach the moon.
Shrimp currently present on the Earth, on the other hand, can be eaten by humans, because they are within our species' reach.
One would think this concept is pretty simple...
Logged
hacking your precious forum as we speak 8) 8) 8)
?

iwanttobelieve

  • 5442
  • +0/-0
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #112 on: January 16, 2011, 10:29:31 AM »
my fear is if the communicate to James, maybe they can communicate to earth shrimp.
the earth shrimp may tell them all the atrociousness they suffer on earth.
the moon shrimp may be planning an invasion.
i think we must create a group, similar to green peace to stop this slaughter.

please James, speaker to moon shrimp, tell the shrimp that some people do care.
Logged
?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • +0/-0
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #113 on: January 16, 2011, 10:50:33 AM »
So ok, both statements are true. Then moon shrimps need to go down to the earth. When, and how? Thork posted about the animal rains, and those are true, but I saw no one of the "moon shrimp" type.
Is there any other way the shrimps can come down?
Do anyone has evidences of MOON SHRIMP RAINS?
What do they tell you about that, James?

Please, don't forget to tell me the scientific name of moon shrimps, Thork.
Logged
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences
?

Thork

Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #114 on: January 16, 2011, 12:12:56 PM »
Quote from: Kira-SY on January 16, 2011, 10:50:33 AM
Please, don't forget to tell me the scientific name of moon shrimps, Thork.
Penaeus Luna  8)
Logged
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45162
  • +98/-138
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #115 on: January 16, 2011, 12:20:46 PM »
Quote from: Thork on January 16, 2011, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: Kira-SY on January 16, 2011, 10:50:33 AM
Please, don't forget to tell me the scientific name of moon shrimps, Thork.
Penaeus Luna  8)
What sort of environment do they live in?  Do they need liquid water to survive and travel in like terrestrial shrimp do?
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • +0/-0
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #116 on: January 16, 2011, 12:36:30 PM »
Quote from: Thork on January 16, 2011, 12:12:56 PM
Quote from: Kira-SY on January 16, 2011, 10:50:33 AM
Please, don't forget to tell me the scientific name of moon shrimps, Thork.
Penaeus Luna  8)

One point for you.
Now, the rest of it.
Logged
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences
?

Thork

Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #117 on: January 16, 2011, 01:50:20 PM »
Well as I have shown you before animals fall from the sky.
http://www.prairieghosts.com/falls_sky.html

This is how the shrimp get here. And I have informed you Filipino shrimp collectors follow the moon as it travels above earth, filling baskets so they can sell the delicious moon shrimp. An example recipe below
http://www.raleys.com/www/apps/recipes/recipe.jsp?recipeid=1080613
As mentioned it is a mutli-million dollar business so it is in their interest to keep it quiet. The rewards are such, that they do not need to be paid by the conspiracy. They already make a fortune having this special knowledge.
I understand that falling is the only way that the shrimp get here. It is their primary method of space travel.
As for when, they fall shortly after the bioluminescent bloom. This is the point at which they die and lose their glow. They also lose their grip on the moon (being dead) and fall to earth, freshly dead for the shrimp collectors.

Quote from: markjo on January 16, 2011, 12:20:46 PM
What sort of environment do they live in?  
They live on the moon.

I think that just about covers all the questions. 8)

Logged
?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • +0/-0
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #118 on: January 16, 2011, 02:17:34 PM »
No reports on specifically Moon Shrimps falling from the sky.

Only thing I can find related to the follow up of the moon is this site:
http://www.fao.org/docrep/field/003/AC018E/AC018e00.htm
Where it says:

"The tide and phase of the moon are the two influencing factors affecting the presence or absence of fish fry. Natural spawning of fishes are likewise influenced by the phase of the moon. It has been observed that fish fry of different species can be found in greater abundance along the shoreline five days before the onset of the new moon. As observed in the past, peak occurrence of fish fry can be felt three days after the lapse of the new moon. The presence in abundance of fish fry may also be felt during the period three days before to three days after full moon.

Although fry may be present in the collecting grounds at the different phases of the tide, their capture is much more convenient during the incoming high tide. The spring tides during the new and full moon phases appear to be the most suitable period for the catching of fish fry.

The phase of the moon, therefore, which influences the rise and fall of the tides has been observed to have some bearing on the natural spawning of fishes. Spawned eggs which in turn develop into hatchlings in the sea are then carried to the shoreline by the incoming tide either to seek sanctuary for their survival or to feed, It is at this time that they are caught or collected for culture use."

No mention to shrimps, and the influence of the moon is not related to any kind of rain. If you can provide a better link that explains what you say, please do. Meanwhile, I'm considering your argument on this irrelevant.

It's a tie, unless you can explain me better about the following of the moon by Filipinos.
Logged
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences
?

Thork

Re: Empirical evidence for moon shrimp
« Reply #119 on: January 16, 2011, 02:28:59 PM »
Does it seem logical if frogs and fish fall from the sky, so might Shrimp?

Of course the shrimp falling is played down. The powerful Filipino Cartel want to protect their industry. This link may interest you below.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Filipino-Mafia/157416086856

Below is a small group, off out to collect more shrimp.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 20   Go Up
« previous next »