Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants

  • 145 Replies
  • 38223 Views
*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #60 on: September 26, 2010, 07:07:23 AM »
The evidence, is that otherwise they would be forming a semi-circle, in exactly the way moon shrimp do. The little bulge is because the wildebeest are nervous of getting to close to the lion hiding in the grass!
Again no evidence. Typical.

The hidden lion causing a semi-circle with the wildebeest is evidence.  I compare this to how science defines matter near one of these "black holes" in space even though you can't see it. Oh, science does say it's really there.

What do you mean "how scientists define matter define effects of matter near a black hole"? They define matter differently?
Fixed

?

Thork

Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #61 on: September 26, 2010, 07:49:41 AM »
The evidence, is that otherwise they would be forming a semi-circle, in exactly the way moon shrimp do. The little bulge is because the wildebeest are nervous of getting to close to the lion hiding in the grass!
Again no evidence. Typical.

The hidden lion causing a semi-circle with the wildebeest is evidence.  I compare this to how science defines matter near one of these "black holes" in space even though you can't see it. Oh, science does say it's really there.

What do you mean "how scientists define matter define effects of matter near a black hole"? They define matter differently?
Fixed

Good lad. Round earthers always resort to grammar, spelling and semantics, when there is nowhere left for them to run.  ;D

?

deathsink

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #62 on: September 26, 2010, 11:00:39 AM »
The evidence, is that otherwise they would be forming a semi-circle, in exactly the way moon shrimp do. The little bulge is because the wildebeest are nervous of getting to close to the lion hiding in the grass!
Again no evidence. Typical.

The hidden lion causing a semi-circle with the wildebeest is evidence.  I compare this to how science defines matter near one of these "black holes" in space even though you can't see it. Oh, science does say it's really there.

What do you mean "how scientists define matter define effects of matter near a black hole"? They define matter differently?
Fixed

Good lad. Round earthers always resort to grammar, spelling and semantics, when there is nowhere left for them to run.  ;D

Or maybe I had missed something that had been discussed before, i.e. something having to do with matter around blackholes and I was curious.

?

deathsink

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #63 on: September 26, 2010, 11:02:27 AM »
The evidence, is that otherwise they would be forming a semi-circle, in exactly the way moon shrimp do. The little bulge is because the wildebeest are nervous of getting to close to the lion hiding in the grass!
Again no evidence. Typical.

The hidden lion causing a semi-circle with the wildebeest is evidence.  I compare this to how science defines matter near one of these "black holes" in space even though you can't see it. Oh, science does say it's really there.

COuld you explain preciously what you are referring to right here?

*

Pongo

  • 6752
  • +1/-0
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #64 on: September 26, 2010, 11:03:56 AM »
Very true Thork.  At times I believe a strict following of grammar and spelling actually hinders communication. 
« Last Edit: September 26, 2010, 11:08:12 AM by Pongo »

*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #65 on: September 26, 2010, 11:32:55 AM »
The evidence, is that otherwise they would be forming a semi-circle, in exactly the way moon shrimp do. The little bulge is because the wildebeest are nervous of getting to close to the lion hiding in the grass!
Again no evidence. Typical.

The hidden lion causing a semi-circle with the wildebeest is evidence.  I compare this to how science defines matter near one of these "black holes" in space even though you can't see it. Oh, science does say it's really there.

COuld you explain preciously what you are referring to right here?
Good points Thork and Pongo, Thank you.

To deathsink: You quoted an answer that was fixed but to answer you precisely I will say that for the relevance to science in this example, if the wildebeest can run faster than the lion (et al) it can escape its "event horizon" thus overcoming the threat.   

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #66 on: September 26, 2010, 12:14:58 PM »
The evidence, is that otherwise they would be forming a semi-circle, in exactly the way moon shrimp do. The little bulge is because the wildebeest are nervous of getting to close to the lion hiding in the grass!
Again no evidence. Typical.

The hidden lion causing a semi-circle with the wildebeest is evidence.  I compare this to how science defines matter near one of these "black holes" in space even though you can't see it. Oh, science does say it's really there.

What do you mean "how scientists define matter define effects of matter near a black hole"? They define matter differently?
Fixed
What specifically is your issue with the effects of matter near a black hoe. Just because you don't understand something doesn't make it false.
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #67 on: September 26, 2010, 12:38:33 PM »
The evidence, is that otherwise they would be forming a semi-circle, in exactly the way moon shrimp do. The little bulge is because the wildebeest are nervous of getting to close to the lion hiding in the grass!
Again no evidence. Typical.

The hidden lion causing a semi-circle with the wildebeest is evidence.  I compare this to how science defines matter near one of these "black holes" in space even though you can't see it. Oh, science does say it's really there.

What do you mean "how scientists define matter define effects of matter near a black hole"? They define matter differently?
Fixed
What specifically is your issue with the effects of matter near a black hoe. Just because you don't understand something doesn't make it false.

[/quote]
Good points Thork and Pongo, Thank you.

To deathsink: You quoted an answer that was fixed but to answer you precisely I will say that for the relevance to science in this example, if the wildebeest can run faster than the lion (et al) it can escape its "event horizon" thus overcoming the threat.   
[/quote]

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #68 on: September 26, 2010, 12:43:56 PM »

Good points Thork and Pongo, Thank you.

To deathsink: You quoted an answer that was fixed but to answer you precisely I will say that for the relevance to science in this example, if the wildebeest can run faster than the lion (et al) it can escape its "event horizon" thus overcoming the threat.   
Did you mean to make a point?
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #69 on: September 26, 2010, 12:46:52 PM »

Good points Thork and Pongo, Thank you.

To deathsink: You quoted an answer that was fixed but to answer you precisely I will say that for the relevance to science in this example, if the wildebeest can run faster than the lion (et al) it can escape its "event horizon" thus overcoming the threat.   
Did you mean to make a point?
I have answered your question.  I do hope all is well?

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #70 on: September 26, 2010, 12:54:16 PM »

Good points Thork and Pongo, Thank you.

To deathsink: You quoted an answer that was fixed but to answer you precisely I will say that for the relevance to science in this example, if the wildebeest can run faster than the lion (et al) it can escape its "event horizon" thus overcoming the threat.   
Did you mean to make a point?
I have answered your question.  I do hope all is well?
No, you did not. Again, what specifically is your issue with the definition of the effect of matter near a black hole?
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #71 on: September 26, 2010, 12:56:50 PM »

Good points Thork and Pongo, Thank you.

To deathsink: You quoted an answer that was fixed but to answer you precisely I will say that for the relevance to science in this example, if the wildebeest can run faster than the lion (et al) it can escape its "event horizon" thus overcoming the threat.   
Did you mean to make a point?
I have answered your question.  I do hope all is well?
No, you did not. Again, what specifically is your issue with the definition of the effect of matter near a black hole?
I can be no more clear.  Take good care!

?

deathsink

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #72 on: September 26, 2010, 01:32:45 PM »

Good points Thork and Pongo, Thank you.

To deathsink: You quoted an answer that was fixed but to answer you precisely I will say that for the relevance to science in this example, if the wildebeest can run faster than the lion (et al) it can escape its "event horizon" thus overcoming the threat.   
Did you mean to make a point?
I have answered your question.  I do hope all is well?
No, you did not. Again, what specifically is your issue with the definition of the effect of matter near a black hole?
I can be no more clear.  Take good care!

Yes you could be more clear. In fact, quote the science you have a problem with. Don't use an analogy. What is wrong with any of the science near, around, or in a black hole?

*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #73 on: September 26, 2010, 01:46:48 PM »

Good points Thork and Pongo, Thank you.

To deathsink: You quoted an answer that was fixed but to answer you precisely I will say that for the relevance to science in this example, if the wildebeest can run faster than the lion (et al) it can escape its "event horizon" thus overcoming the threat.   
Did you mean to make a point?
I have answered your question.  I do hope all is well?
No, you did not. Again, what specifically is your issue with the definition of the effect of matter near a black hole?
I can be no more clear.  Take good care!

Yes you could be more clear. In fact, quote the science you have a problem with. Don't use an analogy. What is wrong with any of the science near, around, or in a black hole?
The analogy defines the abstraction of the science and must be included here. I can be no more clear. If you need additional clarification, please study the topic and connect the dots that are eluding you. 

?

deathsink

  • 49
  • +0/-0
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #74 on: September 26, 2010, 01:49:16 PM »

Good points Thork and Pongo, Thank you.

To deathsink: You quoted an answer that was fixed but to answer you precisely I will say that for the relevance to science in this example, if the wildebeest can run faster than the lion (et al) it can escape its "event horizon" thus overcoming the threat.   
Did you mean to make a point?
I have answered your question.  I do hope all is well?
No, you did not. Again, what specifically is your issue with the definition of the effect of matter near a black hole?
I can be no more clear.  Take good care!

Yes you could be more clear. In fact, quote the science you have a problem with. Don't use an analogy. What is wrong with any of the science near, around, or in a black hole?
The analogy defines the abstraction of the science and must be included here. I can be no more clear. If you need additional clarification, please study the topic and connect the dots that are eluding you. 
I dwell in the abstractions of science. You are talking to a physics/astronomy major sir.

*

Vindictus

  • 5451
  • +1/-0
  • insightful personal text
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #75 on: September 26, 2010, 01:53:29 PM »
I dwell in the abstractions of science. You are talking to a physics/astronomy major sir.

And you're talking to a troll. Gotham is a horrible troll.


*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #76 on: September 26, 2010, 02:12:05 PM »

Good points Thork and Pongo, Thank you.

To deathsink: You quoted an answer that was fixed but to answer you precisely I will say that for the relevance to science in this example, if the wildebeest can run faster than the lion (et al) it can escape its "event horizon" thus overcoming the threat.   
Did you mean to make a point?
I have answered your question.  I do hope all is well?
No, you did not. Again, what specifically is your issue with the definition of the effect of matter near a black hole?
I can be no more clear.  Take good care!

Yes you could be more clear. In fact, quote the science you have a problem with. Don't use an analogy. What is wrong with any of the science near, around, or in a black hole?
The analogy defines the abstraction of the science and must be included here. I can be no more clear. If you need additional clarification, please study the topic and connect the dots that are eluding you. 
I dwell in the abstractions of science. You are talking to a physics/astronomy major sir.
Fantastic!  Then I need say no more.

?

Thork

Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #77 on: September 26, 2010, 02:39:31 PM »
I dwell in the abstractions of science. You are talking to a physics/astronomy major sir.

And you're talking to a troll. Gotham is a horrible troll.


What an awful thing to say.  >:(

*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #78 on: September 26, 2010, 03:08:09 PM »
I dwell in the abstractions of science. You are talking to a physics/astronomy major sir.

And you're talking to a troll. Gotham is a horrible troll.


What an awful thing to say.  >:(
It's OK. You are a kind soul.  I still must hold ground and stand firm for what's right. Onward and upward... 

?

Thork

Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #79 on: September 26, 2010, 03:10:18 PM »
I dwell in the abstractions of science. You are talking to a physics/astronomy major sir.

And you're talking to a troll. Gotham is a horrible troll.


What an awful thing to say.  >:(
It's OK. You are a kind soul.  I still must hold ground and stand firm for what's right. Onward and upward... 

I just hate to see the brightest and the best, get put down before they have had a chance to shine.

?

seeb49

Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #80 on: September 26, 2010, 03:28:33 PM »
Really, aren't you able to see things 1mm wide with just your eyes? Aren't shrimp bigger than that? What's the problem?

Please disregard ClockTower's posts as he is nothing more than a troll. He thinks that a hydrogen atom is 1mm across.
He has a point. Trolls don't make points. How do you know they are there if you can't see them?

*

Vindictus

  • 5451
  • +1/-0
  • insightful personal text
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #81 on: September 26, 2010, 03:40:44 PM »
'The brightest and the best' don't argue semantics and circular logic on Flat Earth internet forums, Thork. Much less respond to questions with "WELL I NO THE ANSWA U HAV 2 FIND IT THO".

?

seeb49

Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #82 on: September 26, 2010, 03:50:58 PM »
Is this what you Round Earthers do to a thread, when there are no Flat Earthers to pour scorn upon?

There are obviously no lions on the moon. That was ClockTower's trolling.
It does not rain Lions.
Lions don't eat shrimp.
There are no living quarters for lions on the moon.

You guys have the wildest imaginations. You'll be telling us all, the earth is round next!


Is this what you flat earthers do to a thread, when you can't take on a round earthers argument?
Clocktower said that the chances of a biomass of unintelligent life forms migrating in a circular path was highly unlikey. He then recieved a picture of a biomass moving in what, apparently percieved by the sender as a circular path. He then challenged the circularity (real word? idk, doesn't matter) of the path they were moving in. Now here 's where it get's fucked up. You FEers took his challenge as a statement; that it was indeed a cicular path. One of you then pointed out that part of the outline of this path looked roughly like a lions head. You then somehow jumped from that to believing that clocktower was suggesting that lion's live on the moon... wtf?! He challenged the idea that it was a circular path! It was the FEers that suggested it was circular in the first place, so if there's anyone who should be accused of believing in lion's on the moon it is the FEers! The entire process of determing that REers believe in lions on the moon was one of the most heinous crimes I've ever seen commited against the human minds ability to reason.

This had to be said.

?

Thork

Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #83 on: September 26, 2010, 04:03:59 PM »
Quote
Clocktower said

That was as far as I got.

*

Vindictus

  • 5451
  • +1/-0
  • insightful personal text
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #84 on: September 26, 2010, 04:05:48 PM »
Quote
Clocktower said

That was as far as I got.

Why are you trying to debate if you won't even read a post?

?

Thork

Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #85 on: September 26, 2010, 04:15:21 PM »
Quote
Clocktower said

That was as far as I got.

Why are you trying to debate if you won't even read a post?

For once I agree. It is well past my bedtime and I have to go to work tomorrow. I have to test an autopilot in the morning, that I am quite sure is still broken. Human guinea pig if you like? So I bid you a good night and hope this whole nasty shrimp business is cleared up by you guys.
I still maintain there is a lion hiding in that photo though.  :P

*

Vindictus

  • 5451
  • +1/-0
  • insightful personal text
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #86 on: September 26, 2010, 04:41:53 PM »
Thork, is scares me that you are considered qualified enough to fly planes. Interpret that as you will, it just does.

*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #87 on: September 26, 2010, 04:57:27 PM »
Is this what you Round Earthers do to a thread, when there are no Flat Earthers to pour scorn upon?

There are obviously no lions on the moon. That was ClockTower's trolling.
It does not rain Lions.
Lions don't eat shrimp.
There are no living quarters for lions on the moon.

You guys have the wildest imaginations. You'll be telling us all, the earth is round next!


Is this what you flat earthers do to a thread, when you can't take on a round earthers argument?
Clocktower said that the chances of a biomass of unintelligent life forms migrating in a circular path was highly unlikey. He then recieved a picture of a biomass moving in what, apparently percieved by the sender as a circular path. He then challenged the circularity (real word? idk, doesn't matter) of the path they were moving in. Now here 's where it get's fucked up. You FEers took his challenge as a statement; that it was indeed a cicular path. One of you then pointed out that part of the outline of this path looked roughly like a lions head. You then somehow jumped from that to believing that clocktower was suggesting that lion's live on the moon... wtf?! He challenged the idea that it was a circular path! It was the FEers that suggested it was circular in the first place, so if there's anyone who should be accused of believing in lion's on the moon it is the FEers! The entire process of determing that REers believe in lions on the moon was one of the most heinous crimes I've ever seen commited against the human minds ability to reason.

This had to be said.
With hope that the inclusion of your comments will not create need to move the thread, I will try to assist.

ITT: a logical advantage for FET relating to the shrimp/lion argument.  It's all in there. There was migration of terms prompted by the RE perspective that was merely responded to by the FE perspective. Then, FET produced a constructive and convincing case relative to that argument.       

*

Vindictus

  • 5451
  • +1/-0
  • insightful personal text
Re: Sonoluminescence and Ichi's Plants
« Reply #88 on: September 26, 2010, 06:20:14 PM »
Is this what you Round Earthers do to a thread, when there are no Flat Earthers to pour scorn upon?

There are obviously no lions on the moon. That was ClockTower's trolling.
It does not rain Lions.
Lions don't eat shrimp.
There are no living quarters for lions on the moon.

You guys have the wildest imaginations. You'll be telling us all, the earth is round next!


Is this what you flat earthers do to a thread, when you can't take on a round earthers argument?
Clocktower said that the chances of a biomass of unintelligent life forms migrating in a circular path was highly unlikey. He then recieved a picture of a biomass moving in what, apparently percieved by the sender as a circular path. He then challenged the circularity (real word? idk, doesn't matter) of the path they were moving in. Now here 's where it get's fucked up. You FEers took his challenge as a statement; that it was indeed a cicular path. One of you then pointed out that part of the outline of this path looked roughly like a lions head. You then somehow jumped from that to believing that clocktower was suggesting that lion's live on the moon... wtf?! He challenged the idea that it was a circular path! It was the FEers that suggested it was circular in the first place, so if there's anyone who should be accused of believing in lion's on the moon it is the FEers! The entire process of determing that REers believe in lions on the moon was one of the most heinous crimes I've ever seen commited against the human minds ability to reason.

This had to be said.
With hope that the inclusion of your comments will not create need to move the thread, I will try to assist.

ITT: a logical advantage for FET relating to the shrimp/lion argument.  It's all in there. There was migration of terms prompted by the RE perspective that was merely responded to by the FE perspective. Then, FET produced a constructive and convincing case relative to that argument.       

Flat Earth theory has never had an argument involving the words 'constructive' and 'convincing' backing it up. Point me to one such case and I will happily eat my words.

You claim there's logic in an argument revolving around lion's hidden within Biomass, that apparently dwell on the moon? What the hell?