Perhaps you are a share stock holder in NASA
I'm insulted; this would be a pretty severe miscalculation on my part.
And er... is NASA actually publicly owned?
Anyway I'm defensive not because I have something to gain from NASA's reputation, but rather because I'm a fan of exploration (despite realizations of its impracticality) and I think the moon landing is one of mankind's great achievements.... I'm *proud* of the moon landing despite having had no role in its fulfillment.
In light of the compelling-to-me nature of the rebuttals to the arguments against the veracity of the moon landing, I wonder why some people want to doubt that it really happened. I admit that my defense is emotional in origin; I expect their attacks are as well.
In any case, none of the objections that occur to me at the moment (the no-stars problem, the shadows problem, the flag-waving problem, the cross-in-foreground problem, and the blast-crater problem) stand up to scrutiny; they are all borne on ignorance of the underlying phenomena or mechanisms.
-Erasmus