I still don't understand what Dark Matter has to do with the shape of the Earth but ok, I'll count it.
And also count it for Flat Earth since gravity exists there too.
I am not discussing the issues I posted with RET. I was under the assumption that you were compiling a list.
Gravitation does not dimension with altitude ( obviously altitude above the earth.) RET claims it does.
I kinda am but so far the list is... well it's vague at best.
Both are gravity based and Dark Matter doesn't seem to apply to the Earth's shape directly. Indirectly perhaps but not directly.
Oh and we have "Why aren't we at Mars" which, again, is Shape independent.
And please explain what you mean by gravitation. Do you mean the force of Gravity on an object doesn't change with altitude? Or that gravity exists?
Whoa, whoa. We need to get two years worth of food/water and working equipment? And find astronauts that like each other?
This is a truly vast expense! Why, NASA would need to save up for a whole hour to get this!
Oh purchasing the supplies aren't the problem. Tell me, how big of a storage area would you need to store all that?
That's why taking 2 years worth of food is a stupid idea. The better solution is to grow most of the food during the mission.
Shh, this is fun.
So the problem is real estate? Can't they knock through a wall and get a fuel tank extension? Since these robots can be powered by sunshine and unicorn farts, surely we can make a similar rocket that can overcome the gravity you understand so well but are yet, as a community, to explain.
EDIT: And this would make more room for this pantry/hydroponic farm, maybe a pool table too.
I'm not understanding your question here. Are you asking why they can't make a space ship the size of a small office building?