Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.

  • 200 Replies
  • 46993 Views
?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3135
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #150 on: May 04, 2010, 09:52:20 AM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lunar_libration_with_phase_Oct_2007.ogv

Hell, that would look mean ass with 3D glasses.

That is the animation several flat guys have dismissed as "computer generated" and thus claiming it doesn't prove libration, which is why I went out and took images which backed it up.
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #151 on: May 04, 2010, 12:20:51 PM »
So the Earth is becoming more and more positive, while the sun and moon are somehow being bombarded with enough electrons to hold them up, grow incredibly negative?  You realize the charge difference would create either sun/moon-to-Earth lightning or (if there's no medium to move through) they'd both act like gigantic magnets and attract each other?

You're forgetting the Earth's magnetic field.

No, you just avoided it.  They'd be pulled closer and closer by magnetism thanks to their increasingly opposing charges until they entered your atmolayer thing, at which point the incredible charge difference would blast earth to hell with the biggest lightning anyone's ever observed.

?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3135
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #152 on: May 04, 2010, 03:05:21 PM »
Still waiting for my answers on the Moon eating itself and the variance in Endymion's position.
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

?

flyingmonkey

  • 728
  • Troll trolling Trolls
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #153 on: May 04, 2010, 07:53:32 PM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lunar_libration_with_phase_Oct_2007.ogv

Hell, that would look mean ass with 3D glasses.

That is the animation several flat guys have dismissed as "computer generated" and thus claiming it doesn't prove libration, which is why I went out and took images which backed it up.


We all know flat guys are stupid, I assumed they did something like that, that lone skywatcher must be part of the conspiracy too!

How big is this conspiracy?
Sure people have the means to do all these things to cover up the shape, but only the conspiracy has the motive, nobody else has reasons to change evidence.
Why should they?

All they are doing is blocking their ears and screaming - they are the only people that they are making look stupid.

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #154 on: May 05, 2010, 09:06:31 AM »
If the moon's surface is made up of bioluminescent material, and that material sometimes falls from the moon to the earth, then it would seem simple to test that material to see if it is indeed bioluminescent and emits light at the specific wavelengths that we see. Has this test ever been performed, or was this just all made up?
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

Skeleton

  • 956
  • Frankly, I have better things to do with my time.
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #155 on: May 05, 2010, 10:48:05 AM »
If the moon's surface is made up of bioluminescent material, and that material sometimes falls from the moon to the earth, then it would seem simple to test that material to see if it is indeed bioluminescent and emits light at the specific wavelengths that we see. Has this test ever been performed, or was this just all made up?

Was all just made up.
If the ultimate objective is to kill Skeleton, we should just do that next.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #156 on: May 05, 2010, 01:46:21 PM »
If the moon's surface is made up of bioluminescent material, and that material sometimes falls from the moon to the earth, then it would seem simple to test that material to see if it is indeed bioluminescent and emits light at the specific wavelengths that we see. Has this test ever been performed, or was this just all made up?

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #157 on: May 05, 2010, 01:53:24 PM »
If the moon's surface is made up of bioluminescent material, and that material sometimes falls from the moon to the earth, then it would seem simple to test that material to see if it is indeed bioluminescent and emits light at the specific wavelengths that we see. Has this test ever been performed, or was this just all made up?

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

How do you know Manna exists if you have not seen it?
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #158 on: May 05, 2010, 01:54:52 PM »
If the moon's surface is made up of bioluminescent material, and that material sometimes falls from the moon to the earth, then it would seem simple to test that material to see if it is indeed bioluminescent and emits light at the specific wavelengths that we see. Has this test ever been performed, or was this just all made up?

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

How do you know Manna exists if you have not seen it?

Did I claim that I hadn't seen it?
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3135
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #159 on: May 05, 2010, 02:07:21 PM »
If the moon's surface is made up of bioluminescent material, and that material sometimes falls from the moon to the earth, then it would seem simple to test that material to see if it is indeed bioluminescent and emits light at the specific wavelengths that we see. Has this test ever been performed, or was this just all made up?

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

How do you know Manna exists if you have not seen it?

Did I claim that I hadn't seen it?

For goodness sake, stop playing riddles and word games James. You know perfectly well what the question means, you are just playing for time because you have no answers.
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #160 on: May 05, 2010, 02:44:03 PM »
I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.


*

Death-T

  • 504
  • Conspiracy theories are my bread and butter.
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #161 on: May 05, 2010, 03:15:55 PM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lunar_libration_with_phase_Oct_2007.ogv

Hell, that would look mean ass with 3D glasses.

That is the animation several flat guys have dismissed as "computer generated" and thus claiming it doesn't prove libration, which is why I went out and took images which backed it up.


We all know flat guys are stupid, I assumed they did something like that, that lone skywatcher must be part of the conspiracy too!

How big is this conspiracy?
Sure people have the means to do all these things to cover up the shape, but only the conspiracy has the motive, nobody else has reasons to change evidence.
Why should they?

All they are doing is blocking their ears and screaming - they are the only people that they are making look stupid.

The conspiracy having motive is also debatable as I've addressed how the conspiracy itself would be so huge, complex, and all encompassing that the potential for any amount of profit is laughable.
" Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. " - Albert Einstein

" We are imperfect.  We cannot expect perfect government. "  ~William Howard Taft

*

Sliver

  • 557
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #162 on: May 05, 2010, 08:02:21 PM »
If the moon's surface is made up of bioluminescent material, and that material sometimes falls from the moon to the earth, then it would seem simple to test that material to see if it is indeed bioluminescent and emits light at the specific wavelengths that we see. Has this test ever been performed, or was this just all made up?

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.
Have you succeeded?  If so, could you please post some pictures of this substance so we can verify it?

*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9548
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #163 on: May 05, 2010, 08:49:39 PM »
I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

This seems to be the same thing that consists of all your arguments.

"It does exist, it is just too difficult and expensive for me to discover it. That and I would have to be exposed to the moonlight which will harm me. No, really, why else wouldn't sailors sleep on the decks of ships while sailing in wet, cold, and windy conditions? Ya know, besides the fact that sleeping inside the hull would protect them from the elements."

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #164 on: May 06, 2010, 11:46:51 AM »
I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

This seems to be the same thing that consists of all your arguments.

"It does exist, it is just too difficult and expensive for me to discover it. That and I would have to be exposed to the moonlight which will harm me. No, really, why else wouldn't sailors sleep on the decks of ships while sailing in wet, cold, and windy conditions? Ya know, besides the fact that sleeping inside the hull would protect them from the elements."

In my defense, how can you expect completely unfunded scientists (myself, John Davis, Ichimaru Gin) to have access to the same experimental and evidence-gathering facilities as globular scientists who receive thousands of pounds every year to cobble together Round Earth 'evidence'?

We are doing our best!
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #165 on: May 06, 2010, 12:09:37 PM »
I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

This seems to be the same thing that consists of all your arguments.

"It does exist, it is just too difficult and expensive for me to discover it. That and I would have to be exposed to the moonlight which will harm me. No, really, why else wouldn't sailors sleep on the decks of ships while sailing in wet, cold, and windy conditions? Ya know, besides the fact that sleeping inside the hull would protect them from the elements."

In my defense, how can you expect completely unfunded scientists (myself, John Davis, Ichimaru Gin) to have access to the same experimental and evidence-gathering facilities as globular scientists who receive thousands of pounds every year to cobble together Round Earth 'evidence'?

We are doing our best!

Most scientists who are endeavoring to prove a theory are published, so where can I find peer-reviewed articles in scholarly journals documenting the experiments you have managed to perform?
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

Lorddave

  • 18198
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #166 on: May 06, 2010, 12:22:41 PM »
I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

This seems to be the same thing that consists of all your arguments.

"It does exist, it is just too difficult and expensive for me to discover it. That and I would have to be exposed to the moonlight which will harm me. No, really, why else wouldn't sailors sleep on the decks of ships while sailing in wet, cold, and windy conditions? Ya know, besides the fact that sleeping inside the hull would protect them from the elements."

In my defense, how can you expect completely unfunded scientists (myself, John Davis, Ichimaru Gin) to have access to the same experimental and evidence-gathering facilities as globular scientists who receive thousands of pounds every year to cobble together Round Earth 'evidence'?

We are doing our best!

Two pieces of glass and a brass tube.  That's how the guys did it back in the old days.  Why can't you?
You have been ignored for common interest of mankind.

I am a terrible person and I am a typical Blowhard Liberal for being wrong about Bom.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42598
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #167 on: May 06, 2010, 12:24:47 PM »
I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

This seems to be the same thing that consists of all your arguments.

"It does exist, it is just too difficult and expensive for me to discover it. That and I would have to be exposed to the moonlight which will harm me. No, really, why else wouldn't sailors sleep on the decks of ships while sailing in wet, cold, and windy conditions? Ya know, besides the fact that sleeping inside the hull would protect them from the elements."

In my defense, how can you expect completely unfunded scientists (myself, John Davis, Ichimaru Gin) to have access to the same experimental and evidence-gathering facilities as globular scientists who receive thousands of pounds every year to cobble together Round Earth 'evidence'?

We are doing our best!

Apply for a research grant.  Get a job as a research assistant.  Infiltrate the conspiracy.  Do you honestly think that RET scientists fund themselves.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Deceiver

  • 239
  • The grant money made me do it.
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #168 on: May 06, 2010, 03:54:57 PM »
Quote from: James
I think you will come to disagree with this [weather] proposition when you consider similar bioluminescent life on Earth. We find quasi-lunar organisms in the bellies of tropical squid. They do indeed function in predictable patterns, dimming their bioluminescence in response to the squid's command, which itself is influenced by the squid's perception of light. Thus the organisms serve the purpose of the squid's headlights. However, in these instances, the predictability of their behaviour is engendered by their interaction with the squid. Could you posthulate the variable which causes the predictable reaction of the lunar organisms with such precision and on such a sharp semicircular vector?

I do believe that the lunar organisms react intensively when the antimoon eclipse occurs. We see the redness of the whole affair when the two bodies are aligned. Perhaps the Antimoon and Moon are engaged in an intense battle of damaging attacks on eachother, and the Antimoon bleeds on its underside in response to the violence.

Why apply for research grants when you do these kinds of thought experiments in your own comfy living room chair. Even better with friends. Police officers... not so much.
Taken from the Moon Negotiations thread under FE Believers. Brackets added for context. Boldness, for lulz.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2010, 04:01:27 PM by Deceiver »

?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3135
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #169 on: May 06, 2010, 05:29:50 PM »
James theorises the Anti Moon "bleeds" and that causes redness. Does he understand why blood is red? No, he does not. Blood is red because it contains haemoglobin. The function of haemoglobin is to hold oxygen in the blood. There is no oxygen in space, hence there would be no haemoglobin, hence no red blood. Fail.
That is just one for many hundred reasons his theory is silly.
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #170 on: May 06, 2010, 05:32:03 PM »
James theorises the Anti Moon "bleeds" and that causes redness. Does he understand why blood is red? No, he does not. Blood is red because it contains haemoglobin. The function of haemoglobin is to hold oxygen in the blood. There is no oxygen in space, hence there would be no haemoglobin, hence no red blood. Fail.
That is just one for many hundred reasons his theory is silly.

Are roses red because they contain haemoglobin?
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3135
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #171 on: May 06, 2010, 05:43:01 PM »
James theorises the Anti Moon "bleeds" and that causes redness. Does he understand why blood is red? No, he does not. Blood is red because it contains haemoglobin. The function of haemoglobin is to hold oxygen in the blood. There is no oxygen in space, hence there would be no haemoglobin, hence no red blood. Fail.
That is just one for many hundred reasons his theory is silly.

Are roses red because they contain haemoglobin?

Roses don't bleed. They don't have blood. You suggested the Anti Moon bleeds. Bleeding is leaking blood. You suggested the bleeding caused redness, in other words, that the blood was red. Don't try to wriggle out of it by asking trick questions. Your quote is visible for all to see. You're trying to make out that I said "all red lifeforms have haemoglobin in them" - it's clear to everyone that's not what I said. Do you think the other forum users are morons?
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

?

Deceiver

  • 239
  • The grant money made me do it.
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #172 on: May 06, 2010, 05:45:27 PM »
Are roses red because they contain haemoglobin?

You should really read this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_spectrum
Colors are based on the reflective/absorption properties of molecules and atoms.

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #173 on: May 06, 2010, 05:52:58 PM »
James theorises the Anti Moon "bleeds" and that causes redness. Does he understand why blood is red? No, he does not. Blood is red because it contains haemoglobin. The function of haemoglobin is to hold oxygen in the blood. There is no oxygen in space, hence there would be no haemoglobin, hence no red blood. Fail.
That is just one for many hundred reasons his theory is silly.

Are roses red because they contain haemoglobin?

Roses don't bleed. They don't have blood. You suggested the Anti Moon bleeds. Bleeding is leaking blood. You suggested the bleeding caused redness, in other words, that the blood was red. Don't try to wriggle out of it by asking trick questions. Your quote is visible for all to see. You're trying to make out that I said "all red lifeforms have haemoglobin in them" - it's clear to everyone that's not what I said. Do you think the other forum users are morons?

Either we all are, or he is. Wonder which it is?
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

The Question1

  • 390
  • Your logic is inferior to my logic.
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #174 on: May 06, 2010, 05:58:53 PM »
I missed the part where james quantified Mana,blood rain,and life forms on the moon.

?

Deceiver

  • 239
  • The grant money made me do it.
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #175 on: May 06, 2010, 06:43:59 PM »
I missed the part where james quantified Mana,blood rain,and life forms on the moon.

The need to back prediction with quantitative data, calculations, models or any of that sort of mess never occurred. I think it boiled down to something along the lines of "rocks can't emit light, but luminescent organisms can, so it must be them." I've argued with about half of the active FE'rs about the moon being composed of varieties of basaltic rock... most of them play the "you're making this crap up" or just ignore it, so the first comment about rocks emitting light might be giving them too much credit. James also commented that it is known from ancient wisdom that the moon is alive. So the blood thing has to do with the 'antimoon' attacking the real moon... possibly with Chuck Norris-like roundhouse kicks.

*

The Question1

  • 390
  • Your logic is inferior to my logic.
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #176 on: May 06, 2010, 06:46:18 PM »
I missed the part where james quantified Mana,blood rain,and life forms on the moon.

The need to back prediction with quantitative data, calculations, models or any of that sort of mess never occurred. I think it boiled down to something along the lines of "rocks can't emit light, but luminescent organisms can, so it must be them." I've argued with about half of the active FE'rs about the moon being composed of varieties of basaltic rock... most of them play the "you're making this crap up" or just ignore it, so the first comment about rocks emitting light might be giving them too much credit. James also commented that it is known from ancient wisdom that the moon is alive. So the blood thing has to do with the 'antimoon' attacking the real moon... possibly with Chuck Norris-like roundhouse kicks.
I suppose it is hard to debate when someone throws away a third party source,on the basis that they think its false.Which its self is based on a worldwide conspiracy.

*

Lorddave

  • 18198
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #177 on: May 06, 2010, 07:49:35 PM »
I missed the part where james quantified Mana,blood rain,and life forms on the moon.

The need to back prediction with quantitative data, calculations, models or any of that sort of mess never occurred. I think it boiled down to something along the lines of "rocks can't emit light, but luminescent organisms can, so it must be them." I've argued with about half of the active FE'rs about the moon being composed of varieties of basaltic rock... most of them play the "you're making this crap up" or just ignore it, so the first comment about rocks emitting light might be giving them too much credit. James also commented that it is known from ancient wisdom that the moon is alive. So the blood thing has to do with the 'antimoon' attacking the real moon... possibly with Chuck Norris-like roundhouse kicks.
I suppose it is hard to debate when someone throws away a third party source,on the basis that they think its false.Which its self is based on a worldwide conspiracy.

It's hard to debate with someone who is delusional. 
You have been ignored for common interest of mankind.

I am a terrible person and I am a typical Blowhard Liberal for being wrong about Bom.

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17693
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #178 on: May 09, 2010, 09:39:55 PM »
James theorises the Anti Moon "bleeds" and that causes redness. Does he understand why blood is red? No, he does not. Blood is red because it contains haemoglobin. The function of haemoglobin is to hold oxygen in the blood. There is no oxygen in space, hence there would be no haemoglobin, hence no red blood. Fail.
That is just one for many hundred reasons his theory is silly.

Are roses red because they contain haemoglobin?

Roses don't bleed. They don't have blood. You suggested the Anti Moon bleeds. Bleeding is leaking blood. You suggested the bleeding caused redness, in other words, that the blood was red. Don't try to wriggle out of it by asking trick questions. Your quote is visible for all to see. You're trying to make out that I said "all red lifeforms have haemoglobin in them" - it's clear to everyone that's not what I said. Do you think the other forum users are morons?
Just because human blood is red due to haemoglobin, what cause do you have to say that in all life forms blood whose blood is red this redness is caused by haemoglobin? Or will you back out for another obvious rhetorical trick ?
« Last Edit: May 09, 2010, 09:43:47 PM by John Davis »
The illusion is shattered if we ask what goes on behind the scenes.

Re: Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.
« Reply #179 on: May 09, 2010, 09:43:33 PM »
What reason do you have to believe that the moon and antimoon are fighting each other and that the red color is from blood?