Proof the Moon is not a flat disc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lunar_libration_with_phase_Oct_2007.ogv

Hell, that would look mean ass with 3D glasses.

Quote from: Ellipsis on May 03, 2010, 04:23:00 AM

So the Earth is becoming more and more positive, while the sun and moon are somehow being bombarded with enough electrons to hold them up, grow incredibly negative?  You realize the charge difference would create either sun/moon-to-Earth lightning or (if there's no medium to move through) they'd both act like gigantic magnets and attract each other?

You're forgetting the Earth's magnetic field.

Still waiting for my answers on the Moon eating itself and the variance in Endymion's position.

Quote from: flyingmonkey on May 04, 2010, 09:24:00 AM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lunar_libration_with_phase_Oct_2007.ogv

Hell, that would look mean ass with 3D glasses.

That is the animation several flat guys have dismissed as "computer generated" and thus claiming it doesn't prove libration, which is why I went out and took images which backed it up.

If the moon's surface is made up of bioluminescent material, and that material sometimes falls from the moon to the earth, then it would seem simple to test that material to see if it is indeed bioluminescent and emits light at the specific wavelengths that we see. Has this test ever been performed, or was this just all made up?

If the moon's surface is made up of bioluminescent material, and that material sometimes falls from the moon to the earth, then it would seem simple to test that material to see if it is indeed bioluminescent and emits light at the specific wavelengths that we see. Has this test ever been performed, or was this just all made up?

Quote from: General Disarray on May 05, 2010, 09:06:31 AM

If the moon's surface is made up of bioluminescent material, and that material sometimes falls from the moon to the earth, then it would seem simple to test that material to see if it is indeed bioluminescent and emits light at the specific wavelengths that we see. Has this test ever been performed, or was this just all made up?

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 01:46:21 PM

Quote from: General Disarray on May 05, 2010, 09:06:31 AM

If the moon's surface is made up of bioluminescent material, and that material sometimes falls from the moon to the earth, then it would seem simple to test that material to see if it is indeed bioluminescent and emits light at the specific wavelengths that we see. Has this test ever been performed, or was this just all made up?

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

How do you know Manna exists if you have not seen it?

Quote from: General Disarray on May 05, 2010, 01:53:24 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 01:46:21 PM

Quote from: General Disarray on May 05, 2010, 09:06:31 AM

If the moon's surface is made up of bioluminescent material, and that material sometimes falls from the moon to the earth, then it would seem simple to test that material to see if it is indeed bioluminescent and emits light at the specific wavelengths that we see. Has this test ever been performed, or was this just all made up?

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

How do you know Manna exists if you have not seen it?

Did I claim that I hadn't seen it?

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on May 04, 2010, 09:52:20 AM

Quote from: flyingmonkey on May 04, 2010, 09:24:00 AM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lunar_libration_with_phase_Oct_2007.ogv

Hell, that would look mean ass with 3D glasses.

That is the animation several flat guys have dismissed as "computer generated" and thus claiming it doesn't prove libration, which is why I went out and took images which backed it up.

We all know flat guys are stupid, I assumed they did something like that, that lone skywatcher must be part of the conspiracy too!

How big is this conspiracy?
Sure people have the means to do all these things to cover up the shape, but only the conspiracy has the motive, nobody else has reasons to change evidence.
Why should they?

All they are doing is blocking their ears and screaming - they are the only people that they are making look stupid.

Quote from: General Disarray on May 05, 2010, 09:06:31 AM

If the moon's surface is made up of bioluminescent material, and that material sometimes falls from the moon to the earth, then it would seem simple to test that material to see if it is indeed bioluminescent and emits light at the specific wavelengths that we see. Has this test ever been performed, or was this just all made up?

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 01:46:21 PM

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

This seems to be the same thing that consists of all your arguments.

"It does exist, it is just too difficult and expensive for me to discover it. That and I would have to be exposed to the moonlight which will harm me. No, really, why else wouldn't sailors sleep on the decks of ships while sailing in wet, cold, and windy conditions? Ya know, besides the fact that sleeping inside the hull would protect them from the elements."

Quote from: EnglshGentleman on May 05, 2010, 08:49:39 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 01:46:21 PM

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

This seems to be the same thing that consists of all your arguments.

"It does exist, it is just too difficult and expensive for me to discover it. That and I would have to be exposed to the moonlight which will harm me. No, really, why else wouldn't sailors sleep on the decks of ships while sailing in wet, cold, and windy conditions? Ya know, besides the fact that sleeping inside the hull would protect them from the elements."

In my defense, how can you expect completely unfunded scientists (myself, John Davis, Ichimaru Gin) to have access to the same experimental and evidence-gathering facilities as globular scientists who receive thousands of pounds every year to cobble together Round Earth 'evidence'?

We are doing our best!

Quote from: EnglshGentleman on May 05, 2010, 08:49:39 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 01:46:21 PM

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

This seems to be the same thing that consists of all your arguments.

"It does exist, it is just too difficult and expensive for me to discover it. That and I would have to be exposed to the moonlight which will harm me. No, really, why else wouldn't sailors sleep on the decks of ships while sailing in wet, cold, and windy conditions? Ya know, besides the fact that sleeping inside the hull would protect them from the elements."

In my defense, how can you expect completely unfunded scientists (myself, John Davis, Ichimaru Gin) to have access to the same experimental and evidence-gathering facilities as globular scientists who receive thousands of pounds every year to cobble together Round Earth 'evidence'?

We are doing our best!

Quote from: EnglshGentleman on May 05, 2010, 08:49:39 PM

Quote from: James on May 05, 2010, 01:46:21 PM

I don't know if you've ever tried, but I'll have you know that accquiring Manna is actually very difficult. I have tried.

This seems to be the same thing that consists of all your arguments.

"It does exist, it is just too difficult and expensive for me to discover it. That and I would have to be exposed to the moonlight which will harm me. No, really, why else wouldn't sailors sleep on the decks of ships while sailing in wet, cold, and windy conditions? Ya know, besides the fact that sleeping inside the hull would protect them from the elements."

In my defense, how can you expect completely unfunded scientists (myself, John Davis, Ichimaru Gin) to have access to the same experimental and evidence-gathering facilities as globular scientists who receive thousands of pounds every year to cobble together Round Earth 'evidence'?

We are doing our best!

I think you will come to disagree with this [weather] proposition when you consider similar bioluminescent life on Earth. We find quasi-lunar organisms in the bellies of tropical squid. They do indeed function in predictable patterns, dimming their bioluminescence in response to the squid's command, which itself is influenced by the squid's perception of light. Thus the organisms serve the purpose of the squid's headlights. However, in these instances, the predictability of their behaviour is engendered by their interaction with the squid. Could you posthulate the variable which causes the predictable reaction of the lunar organisms with such precision and on such a sharp semicircular vector?

I do believe that the lunar organisms react intensively when the antimoon eclipse occurs. We see the redness of the whole affair when the two bodies are aligned. Perhaps the Antimoon and Moon are engaged in an intense battle of damaging attacks on eachother, and the Antimoon bleeds on its underside in response to the violence.

James theorises the Anti Moon "bleeds" and that causes redness. Does he understand why blood is red? No, he does not. Blood is red because it contains haemoglobin. The function of haemoglobin is to hold oxygen in the blood. There is no oxygen in space, hence there would be no haemoglobin, hence no red blood. Fail.
That is just one for many hundred reasons his theory is silly.

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on May 06, 2010, 05:29:50 PM

James theorises the Anti Moon "bleeds" and that causes redness. Does he understand why blood is red? No, he does not. Blood is red because it contains haemoglobin. The function of haemoglobin is to hold oxygen in the blood. There is no oxygen in space, hence there would be no haemoglobin, hence no red blood. Fail.
That is just one for many hundred reasons his theory is silly.

Are roses red because they contain haemoglobin?

Are roses red because they contain haemoglobin?

Quote from: James on May 06, 2010, 05:32:03 PM

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on May 06, 2010, 05:29:50 PM

James theorises the Anti Moon "bleeds" and that causes redness. Does he understand why blood is red? No, he does not. Blood is red because it contains haemoglobin. The function of haemoglobin is to hold oxygen in the blood. There is no oxygen in space, hence there would be no haemoglobin, hence no red blood. Fail.
That is just one for many hundred reasons his theory is silly.

Are roses red because they contain haemoglobin?

Roses don't bleed. They don't have blood. You suggested the Anti Moon bleeds. Bleeding is leaking blood. You suggested the bleeding caused redness, in other words, that the blood was red. Don't try to wriggle out of it by asking trick questions. Your quote is visible for all to see. You're trying to make out that I said "all red lifeforms have haemoglobin in them" - it's clear to everyone that's not what I said. Do you think the other forum users are morons?

I missed the part where james quantified Mana,blood rain,and life forms on the moon.

Quote from: The Question1 on May 06, 2010, 05:58:53 PM

I missed the part where james quantified Mana,blood rain,and life forms on the moon.

The need to back prediction with quantitative data, calculations, models or any of that sort of mess never occurred. I think it boiled down to something along the lines of "rocks can't emit light, but luminescent organisms can, so it must be them." I've argued with about half of the active FE'rs about the moon being composed of varieties of basaltic rock... most of them play the "you're making this crap up" or just ignore it, so the first comment about rocks emitting light might be giving them too much credit. James also commented that it is known from ancient wisdom that the moon is alive. So the blood thing has to do with the 'antimoon' attacking the real moon... possibly with Chuck Norris-like roundhouse kicks.

Quote from: Deceiver on May 06, 2010, 06:43:59 PM

Quote from: The Question1 on May 06, 2010, 05:58:53 PM

I missed the part where james quantified Mana,blood rain,and life forms on the moon.

The need to back prediction with quantitative data, calculations, models or any of that sort of mess never occurred. I think it boiled down to something along the lines of "rocks can't emit light, but luminescent organisms can, so it must be them." I've argued with about half of the active FE'rs about the moon being composed of varieties of basaltic rock... most of them play the "you're making this crap up" or just ignore it, so the first comment about rocks emitting light might be giving them too much credit. James also commented that it is known from ancient wisdom that the moon is alive. So the blood thing has to do with the 'antimoon' attacking the real moon... possibly with Chuck Norris-like roundhouse kicks.

I suppose it is hard to debate when someone throws away a third party source,on the basis that they think its false.Which its self is based on a worldwide conspiracy.

Quote from: James on May 06, 2010, 05:32:03 PM

Quote from: Thermal Detonator on May 06, 2010, 05:29:50 PM

James theorises the Anti Moon "bleeds" and that causes redness. Does he understand why blood is red? No, he does not. Blood is red because it contains haemoglobin. The function of haemoglobin is to hold oxygen in the blood. There is no oxygen in space, hence there would be no haemoglobin, hence no red blood. Fail.
That is just one for many hundred reasons his theory is silly.

Are roses red because they contain haemoglobin?

Roses don't bleed. They don't have blood. You suggested the Anti Moon bleeds. Bleeding is leaking blood. You suggested the bleeding caused redness, in other words, that the blood was red. Don't try to wriggle out of it by asking trick questions. Your quote is visible for all to see. You're trying to make out that I said "all red lifeforms have haemoglobin in them" - it's clear to everyone that's not what I said. Do you think the other forum users are morons?