Just a small question.
Three people all want the same job, to be a lawyer.
On one hand, you've got a guy who went to the absoloute top university in the land, spent four years studying law and graduated with flying colours.
Inbetween both hands you've got somebody who went to your average university, studied law for 4 years and graduated withy flying colours.
Then, on the other hand, you've got the guy who went to some scummy little online university, got his degree in three weeks and again, passed with flying colours.
You are the employer, an average, reasonable man who believs (like the majority of people) that the world is round, science is science and that lady at the bar is hot and you would totally get with her. You have never heard of Zelticism (am i doing it right?) and don't care what it is. Who would you employ?
You'd employ the guy who went to the championship university, or if he got a better offer elsewhere, the guy who went to the other university. Only if he also got a job somewhere else would you even consider the online degree guy.
Most people know this, which is why they fork out big bucks to go to big universities. So why would anyone choose to graduate from your university if they have other options. Also (keeping in mind I mean no offence) employers tend to reject people with online degrees regardless of whether they need employees and also, an online degree will not get you as far up the company ladder as a regular (and, dare I say it,) real degree will.
If no-one responds to this comment, I win. If anyone makes attack on my spelling or grammar without a valid argument as well (I'm looking at you Tom) I win.