Proove the NASA photos are fake

Show me proof that the NASA photos are fake.

Show me proof that the NASA photos are fake.

The only proof they have that the NASA photos are fake is this arguement: "The earth is flat, therefore, photos that would depict anything other than this (such as the ones NASA has provided from the Apollo missions) are fakes and mockeries of our sacred and blind belief in the earth's flatness." I wouldn't be surprised if this is the only response you get either.

I guess I should be mor specific then:

Give me proof that the NASA picks are fake. And I dont want any 'the earth is flat there fore round earth pics are fake' bullshit give me real proof.

If no FEers reply in 24 hours then I will assume you have conceded.

Prove they're not.

And stop with this idiotic "If nobody responds then I win woohoo" crap.  It's infantile.

Sorry Skippy that wont wash proove the |NASA photos are fake. You must have some evidence that supports this othertwise I suggest you remove the answer from your FAQ.

And stop with this idiotic "If nobody responds then I win woohoo" crap.  It's infantile.

No.

They're photos proclaiming the Earth to be round - it's up to you to prove that they're REAL.

To the extent you are unprejudiced and objective, you might find this interesting (not the Buzz Aldrin comment, but the vintage NASA video filmed in Goldstone, California, which is separate from and much older than the documentary Sibrel recently produced):
http://www.aulis.com/nasa7.htm

- Dionysios

Prove they're not.

And stop with this idiotic "If nobody responds then I win woohoo" crap.  It's infantile.

Why shouldn't the burden of proof be on you, since your belief goes against the majority?

To the extent you are unprejudiced and objective, you might find this interesting (not the Buzz Aldrin comment, but the vintage NASA video filmed in Goldstone, California, which is separate from and much older than the documentary Sibrel recently produced):
http://www.aulis.com/nasa7.htm

- Dionysios

OK I stopped reading that garbage when they compared the success rate of landing on the moon to the success rate of landing on mars, my guess is a high school student would have found that to be RETARDED as well.

Could it be the case that NASA publicly stated that it was doing things one way, when in fact plans were in place to proceed in a very different manner?

The return of our favorite FE transition!

Why shouldn't the burden of proof be on you, since your belief goes against the majority?

Our belief goes against the majority, but your believe goes against the apparent truth. The Earth looks flat - if you want to show that it's not, it's up to you to prove something which is not obviously true.

So you judge what something is just by how it looks at first glance?

Why shouldn't the burden of proof be on you, since your belief goes against the majority?

Burden of proof has nothing to do with popular opinion.

Noone has yet prooved the NASA photos are fake.

Proof plz.

Very well, if you cannot proove it, I suggest you remove the referance to NASA's being part of the conspiracy from the FAQ and I think you should issue an apology to NASA for slandering them.

which NASA photos? everything they have ever come up with? or just the ones from space?

this is fucking pathetic. I assume it goes for other space organisations like ESA (european space agency, who i am going to work for soon). i know tens of people from NASA - most from JPL. they do solid science and tech. you people are so blissfully ignorant.

I would say that "blissfully ignorant" would be what FErs would use to describe RErs.  That being said, if they were in a conspiracy, I'm sure they would not tell you.

Oh and congratulations on being accepted to ESA, I heard it was excedingly difficult

I would say that "blissfully ignorant" would be what FErs would use to describe RErs.  That being said, if they were in a conspiracy, I'm sure they would not tell you.

Oh and congratulations on being accepted to ESA, I heard it was excedingly difficult

i'm sure, yeah. some of the guys i know at JPL are on the Opportunity mars rover team. they are just everyday geologists. what would their motive be to lie to me?




the guy who tries to sell you a computer at a shop will probably tell you all the computer's specifications, but you are unlikely to understand what he means. maybe he is part of a conspiracy! maybe none of that stuff inside the computer is real, maybe they are run by a cold-fusion-powered human brain? and the brain cells are arranged to look like normal circuitry?

To protect their government and way of life.  What would happen if they did tell you one night.

1) you might believe they are crazy and have them commited
2) the word would get out, and the gov't would need to silence him
3)the word might get out, and the people would be pissed off to know theyve been lied to their entire life

I think you see my point

To protect their government and way of life.  What would happen if they did tell you one night.

1) you might believe they are crazy and have them commited
2) the word would get out, and the gov't would need to silence him
3)the word might get out, and the people would be pissed off to know theyve been lied to their entire life

I think you see my point

no, i don't.

and considering my contacts, i should probably be in on this Conspiracy by now. but suprisingly, i'm not.

As if you would tell us if you were

yep. i am part of the conspiracy. seriously. and i know the reasons for it, but i'm not going to tell you.

Oh well would you explain it to me at least

nah


i say again, which images, or sets of images, in particular, are deemed fake?

Just look at the database next time you are at the center that has to do with the conspiracy, I'm sure youll find plenty

proof?

You need to prove that someone tells you something is fake?

thats the problem with this world today, you just assume something someone tells you is the truth, when it could be far from the truth. If i hand you a picture with me standing next to hitler, would you believe that too?

You should have to prove us that they are not fake, not the other way around.

i doubt it. they are quite transpareant, being so keen for funding as they are at ESA as well as NASA.

with JPL, are these from the Conspiracy?

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/home/index.cfm
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/home/index.html

Well since they are from JPL i would wager yes, but I dont know

does that mean there are floating bones everywhere? nope