south pole

  • 52 Replies
  • 10750 Views
Re: south pole
« Reply #30 on: May 16, 2009, 08:36:16 AM »
Serious question for the FE's: How does it feel that you have been lied to your whole life, about the shape entire frigging planet? How does it feel, knowing that 7 billion people is getting lied to every single day about something so huge as this? How does it feel that greedy people is making billions without offering anything at all to the world? How does it feel the world can be so corrupt?
And then how does it feel to just sit on your flat ass and do nothing at all about it, because you're a lazy SOB who don't even believe what your telling yourself?
Meh,it's kinda like when you find out Santa wasn't real when you were 5 or 6 or 19.... It makes me feel like I should do something,but then I realize that there is no realistic way I could make a bigger difference (without dying) then sitting here saying me theory.
Nah... You could conduct verifiable, objective experiments to validate your theory and publish them anonymously. If the Conspiracy hasn't killed you for post here by now, I'm sure some REAL work won't kill you.

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: south pole
« Reply #31 on: May 16, 2009, 08:53:36 AM »
I don't have the resources to do most flat earth proving experiments. Also,you think NASA couldn't track me no matter how "anonymously" I published my findings?

Re: south pole
« Reply #32 on: May 16, 2009, 09:04:03 AM »
I don't have the resources to do most flat earth proving experiments. Also,you think NASA couldn't track me no matter how "anonymously" I published my findings?
Who said that you should do "most" of the flat-earth-proving experiments. Just one well done would be great. If you're scared that NASA will track you down, then why are you even posting here your defense of the FE?

You don't need ANY resources for many realistic and useful experiments. How about watching the Sun set? Which theory predicts its time and location? Which theory says that you won't be able to see the silhouette of distant continents against the setting Sun? Which theory predicts the rising twilight (the shadow of the Earth against the opposite sky climbing from the horizon)? Which theory predicts that clouds and planes will still be illuminated by the Sun while where you stand will not be? Which theory predicts that the apparent size of the Sun will remain the same throughout the day? Which theory is more predictive and more useful? Which model is better?

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: south pole
« Reply #33 on: May 16, 2009, 09:06:59 AM »
I don't have the resources to do most flat earth proving experiments. Also,you think NASA couldn't track me no matter how "anonymously" I published my findings?
Who said that you should do "most" of the flat-earth-proving experiments. Just one well done would be great. If you're scared that NASA will track you down, then why are you even posting here your defense of the FE?
Samuel Rowbothom already did experiments to prove the earth is flat. Read "Earth Not a Globe".

?

dr.spock

  • 88
  • +0/-0
Re: south pole
« Reply #34 on: May 16, 2009, 09:08:33 AM »
I don't have the resources to do most flat earth proving experiments. Also,you think NASA couldn't track me no matter how "anonymously" I published my findings?

Well if its only the four men that know about the conspiracy... yes I think NASA couldn't track you.

Re: south pole
« Reply #35 on: May 16, 2009, 09:09:34 AM »
I don't have the resources to do most flat earth proving experiments. Also,you think NASA couldn't track me no matter how "anonymously" I published my findings?
Who said that you should do "most" of the flat-earth-proving experiments. Just one well done would be great. If you're scared that NASA will track you down, then why are you even posting here your defense of the FE?
Samuel Rowbothom already did experiments to prove the earth is flat. Read "Earth Not a Globe".
I have, and all of the "experiments" are flawed and unverifiable.

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: south pole
« Reply #36 on: May 16, 2009, 09:15:26 AM »
I don't have the resources to do most flat earth proving experiments. Also,you think NASA couldn't track me no matter how "anonymously" I published my findings?

Well if its only the four men that know about the conspiracy... yes I think NASA couldn't track you.
It's most likely more than four.

I don't have the resources to do most flat earth proving experiments. Also,you think NASA couldn't track me no matter how "anonymously" I published my findings?
Who said that you should do "most" of the flat-earth-proving experiments. Just one well done would be great. If you're scared that NASA will track you down, then why are you even posting here your defense of the FE?
Samuel Rowbothom already did experiments to prove the earth is flat. Read "Earth Not a Globe".
I have, and all of the "experiments" are flawed and unverifiable.
And NASA would then claim my experiments were the same. Who would the scientific community be more likely to agree with?

?

dr.spock

  • 88
  • +0/-0
Re: south pole
« Reply #37 on: May 16, 2009, 09:18:03 AM »
Well if its only the four men that know about the conspiracy... yes I think NASA couldn't track you.
It's most likely more than four.

Do you have any evidence for this outlandish claim?

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: south pole
« Reply #38 on: May 16, 2009, 09:21:33 AM »
Well if its only the four men that know about the conspiracy... yes I think NASA couldn't track you.
It's most likely more than four.

Do you have any evidence for this outlandish claim?
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=6308.0
It shows how the conspiracy would need about 25.

?

dr.spock

  • 88
  • +0/-0
Re: south pole
« Reply #39 on: May 16, 2009, 09:27:05 AM »
It shows how the conspiracy would need about 25.

Wow. Even with 25 people I doubt they could do it.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45089
  • +87/-120
Re: south pole
« Reply #40 on: May 16, 2009, 05:14:53 PM »
Well if its only the four men that know about the conspiracy... yes I think NASA couldn't track you.
It's most likely more than four.

Do you have any evidence for this outlandish claim?
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=6308.0
It shows how the conspiracy would need about 25.
He asked for evidence, not unsupported speculation.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: south pole
« Reply #41 on: May 16, 2009, 08:58:44 PM »
Well if its only the four men that know about the conspiracy... yes I think NASA couldn't track you.
It's most likely more than four.

Do you have any evidence for this outlandish claim?
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=6308.0
It shows how the conspiracy would need about 25.
He asked for evidence, not unsupported speculation.
Ok fine. You're right. Only four people know of the conspiracy.

Re: south pole
« Reply #42 on: May 24, 2009, 11:03:24 AM »
Here's and experiment to try. Get your self a dip needle magnet. A magnet that freely rotates in three dimensions to align with the earths magnetic field. Make sure you are certain which end is north and which is south. Take several readings around the world and record the angle in respect to the ground. Also be sure to make detailed recordings of your travel times and speeds.

Here's my hypothesis of expected results. I would say that in either FE or RE approaching the north pole there would be a point where, experimentally or mathematically, there would be a convergence point. However south you should find that distance between longitudinal angles will increase as compared to north. Or north and south will give similar results.

Good luck!

Let me know how you went when you get back.
Because I have enough money to travel the world to take magnet measurements.
why do you believe in something so strongly if you aren't 100% on it?
this is like a religion only it makes no sense because the fact is the earth is round

*

Guessed

  • 5376
  • +0/-0
Re: south pole
« Reply #43 on: May 24, 2009, 11:21:14 AM »
How do you know 100% that the earth is round? Have you been to space and seen it yourself? My guess is you haven't, and without that you don't know the truth anymore than FE proponents.
Is Dino open source?

Quote from: grogberries


Re: south pole
« Reply #44 on: May 24, 2009, 11:52:35 AM »
How do you know 100% that the earth is round? Have you been to space and seen it yourself? My guess is you haven't, and without that you don't know the truth anymore than FE proponents.
well...maybe because im not from 15th century spain is probably why im 100% on this

there is no need for a conspiracy that the earth is flat instead of round at an time in any country
you people are just crazy

*

Guessed

  • 5376
  • +0/-0
Re: south pole
« Reply #45 on: May 24, 2009, 11:55:39 AM »
How do you know 100% that the earth is round? Have you been to space and seen it yourself? My guess is you haven't, and without that you don't know the truth anymore than FE proponents.
well...maybe because im not from 15th century spain is probably why im 100% on this

there is no need for a conspiracy that the earth is flat instead of round at an time in any country
you people are just crazy

So you don't have facts, just ad-hominids? Got it. /your credibility.
Is Dino open source?

Quote from: grogberries


Re: south pole
« Reply #46 on: May 24, 2009, 11:58:11 AM »
How do you know 100% that the earth is round? Have you been to space and seen it yourself? My guess is you haven't, and without that you don't know the truth anymore than FE proponents.
well...maybe because im not from 15th century spain is probably why im 100% on this

there is no need for a conspiracy that the earth is flat instead of round at an time in any country
you people are just crazy

So you don't have facts, just ad-hominids? Got it. /your credibility.
you obviously don't believe in facts so any i provide will be false to you

*

Guessed

  • 5376
  • +0/-0
Re: south pole
« Reply #47 on: May 24, 2009, 12:06:10 PM »
Insults and cop-outs are all you have then?
Is Dino open source?

Quote from: grogberries


Re: south pole
« Reply #48 on: May 24, 2009, 12:11:34 PM »
Insults and cop-outs are all you have then?
heres a fact: tides cannot be possible on a flat earth without the moon in constant rotation of the earth.

*

Guessed

  • 5376
  • +0/-0
Re: south pole
« Reply #49 on: May 24, 2009, 12:15:19 PM »
And...
Is Dino open source?

Quote from: grogberries


Re: south pole
« Reply #50 on: May 24, 2009, 12:22:14 PM »
And...
so the fucking moon has to be in rotation of the earth and please don't bring up the anti-moon because when i read the FAQ you referred to it as "some believe" informing everyone that you have no idea what you guys are talking about and are just making shit up

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: south pole
« Reply #51 on: May 24, 2009, 01:29:35 PM »
All you do is spew random shit and poorly insult people. In ten years,when you enter the high school,join a debate team. Trust me,you will dominate.

Re: south pole
« Reply #52 on: May 24, 2009, 01:46:10 PM »
All you do is spew random shit and poorly insult people. In ten years,when you enter the high school,join a debate team. Trust me,you will dominate.
all you guys do is blatantly insult anyone that challenges your believes(even if they are this ridiculous)most of the time you dont even provide information proving your point which i have yet to see