antartica

  • 356 Replies
  • 116202 Views
?

gc

  • 65
antartica
« Reply #210 on: August 12, 2006, 07:04:57 PM »
Quote from: "Dogplatter"

The floatation of the slush is precisely the reason for the formation of the wall.


Please explain.

Quote
And yes, hypothetically, areas of the wall could turn to water - but they'd be instantly frozen by the chilling vacuum of space again.


They wouldn't freeze in exactly the same spot. And it wouldn't be instantaneous, otherwise the water/slush that is next to the ice wall would instantaneously freeze as well.

Quote
Okay, how do explain Antarctica in the RE model? Surely that continent must be touching water, and it is mostly ice.


I never claimed that Antarctica is frozen to the earth miles below the ocean. Read my previous posts and you will see why I brought it up.

Of course antarctica is touching water. It is also on land I believe. And even if it wasn't touching land, it would be floating. Once again read my previous posts and you will see why this is important.

Re: antartica
« Reply #211 on: December 25, 2006, 03:45:58 AM »
Quote from: "Dogplatter"
Penguins were actually created in the 1960's by Russian scientists who combined the DNA of otters and birds.
The presence of penguins around the ice wall is actually a clever means of providing a reliable food source for conspiracy staff stationed there.

Penguins were deliberately engineered to be very easy to catch (hence their lack of flight), but also to be extremely efficient at catching and eating fish. It is economically easier for conspiracy ice-wall guards to have penguins indirectly harvest fish for them, then shoot or trap the fish-filled penguins with ease.

In answer to your other question - yes, March of the Penguins was filmed in a studio. Those penguins were probably animatronic replicas though, because the government can't afford to use large numbers of penguins except for feeding ice-wall guards.


Ok dude. Im not ignorent enough to call you an idiot or a dick. However i will ask for proof. Where is it? If not where is your source?
Cheers
ww.myspace.com/allbetsareoffband

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
Re: antartica
« Reply #212 on: December 25, 2006, 04:47:33 AM »
I'd just like to say that Mr Andy's bumping of this epic thread is a wonderful festive gift for which I am grateful.

Quote from: "Mr Andy"

Ok dude. Im not ignorent enough to call you an idiot or a dick. However i will ask for proof. Where is it? If not where is your source?
Cheers


The penguin is an evolutionary oddity. Excellent at catching fish, yet terrible at escaping predation (due to flightlessness and inadequate walking abilities), it is the perfect nutritional tool for the Ice Wall Guards. The penguins reap the energy of the sea by catching difficult fish, then they can be rounded up almost effortlessly, cooked and eaten.

The evidence comes in the utterly unconvincing fossil record allegedly left by the ancestors of penguins. We can trace human evolution from a common primate ancestor pretty well, filling in the missing links of homo ergaster, neanderthal and so on, but the same cannot be said for penguins. There are pretty much no missing links or fossil evidence of the natural evolution of the penguin.

Also, documentation of penguins actually existing before the mid-20th century is sketchy at best, and we can pretty much discount all records of them as faked. Scott of the Antarctic's journal, allegedly penned in 1912, for example, documents the existence of penguins. But Scott's journal also claims a South Pole conveniently in line with Round Earth Theory - and let's remember - Scott, and HIS ENTIRE PARTY conveniently froze to death before returning to tell their story in person!! Clearly, he was murdered and his journal replaced with a fake, penguin documenting, Round Earth supporting one!

There are a few other bogus penguin reports pre-circa. 1960 which are debunkable on similar precedents.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

Re: antartica
« Reply #213 on: December 25, 2006, 01:10:31 PM »
Quote from: "Dogplatter"
I'd just like to say that Mr Andy's bumping of this epic thread is a wonderful festive gift for which I am grateful.

Quote from: "Mr Andy"

Ok dude. Im not ignorent enough to call you an idiot or a dick. However i will ask for proof. Where is it? If not where is your source?
Cheers


The penguin is an evolutionary oddity. Excellent at catching fish, yet terrible at escaping predation (due to flightlessness and inadequate walking abilities), it is the perfect nutritional tool for the Ice Wall Guards. The penguins reap the energy of the sea by catching difficult fish, then they can be rounded up almost effortlessly, cooked and eaten.

The evidence comes in the utterly unconvincing fossil record allegedly left by the ancestors of penguins. We can trace human evolution from a common primate ancestor pretty well, filling in the missing links of homo ergaster, neanderthal and so on, but the same cannot be said for penguins. There are pretty much no missing links or fossil evidence of the natural evolution of the penguin.

Also, documentation of penguins actually existing before the mid-20th century is sketchy at best, and we can pretty much discount all records of them as faked. Scott of the Antarctic's journal, allegedly penned in 1912, for example, documents the existence of penguins. But Scott's journal also claims a South Pole conveniently in line with Round Earth Theory - and let's remember - Scott, and HIS ENTIRE PARTY conveniently froze to death before returning to tell their story in person!! Clearly, he was murdered and his journal replaced with a fake, penguin documenting, Round Earth supporting one!

There are a few other bogus penguin reports pre-circa. 1960 which are debunkable on similar precedents.


Ah, touche. However I was more concerned with the evidence about the Russian's creating the Penguin. Is there any credible evidence? As you seem to trust only very reliable evidence, i dear sir, hope for the same.
ww.myspace.com/allbetsareoffband

Re: antartica
« Reply #214 on: December 25, 2006, 03:16:04 PM »
Quote from: "Dogplatter"
I'd just like to say that Mr Andy's bumping of this epic thread is a wonderful festive gift for which I am grateful.

Quote from: "Mr Andy"

Ok dude. Im not ignorent enough to call you an idiot or a dick. However i will ask for proof. Where is it? If not where is your source?
Cheers


The penguin is an evolutionary oddity. Excellent at catching fish, yet terrible at escaping predation (due to flightlessness and inadequate walking abilities), it is the perfect nutritional tool for the Ice Wall Guards. The penguins reap the energy of the sea by catching difficult fish, then they can be rounded up almost effortlessly, cooked and eaten.

The evidence comes in the utterly unconvincing fossil record allegedly left by the ancestors of penguins. We can trace human evolution from a common primate ancestor pretty well, filling in the missing links of homo ergaster, neanderthal and so on, but the same cannot be said for penguins. There are pretty much no missing links or fossil evidence of the natural evolution of the penguin.

Also, documentation of penguins actually existing before the mid-20th century is sketchy at best, and we can pretty much discount all records of them as faked. Scott of the Antarctic's journal, allegedly penned in 1912, for example, documents the existence of penguins. But Scott's journal also claims a South Pole conveniently in line with Round Earth Theory - and let's remember - Scott, and HIS ENTIRE PARTY conveniently froze to death before returning to tell their story in person!! Clearly, he was murdered and his journal replaced with a fake, penguin documenting, Round Earth supporting one!

There are a few other bogus penguin reports pre-circa. 1960 which are debunkable on similar precedents.


I think someone needs a hug.
very thing's a conspiracy, every thing's kept hidden from you... waiting to be uncovered.
Your so retarted, even if you went to space and saw the earth was round, you would completely deny it.

antartica
« Reply #215 on: December 25, 2006, 04:46:39 PM »
Quote
The evidence comes in the utterly unconvincing fossil record allegedly left by the ancestors of penguins. We can trace human evolution from a common primate ancestor pretty well, filling in the missing links of homo ergaster, neanderthal and so on, but the same cannot be said for penguins. There are pretty much no missing links or fossil evidence of the natural evolution of the penguin.


Wait... couldn't we just 'fill in' those missing links like we 'fill in' the missing links in human ancestry...?


Since we can't find Neanderthal or Ergaster, couldn't we assume that we were created?  Or not?

I say that penguins are actually normal animals that live around the outer regions of the earth.  Why do they not come to where it is warm?  I think they like to eat chilled fish, and where else can you find such cool fish?
quot;Pleasure for man, is not a luxury, but a profound psychological need."
-Nathaniel Branden

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
antartica
« Reply #216 on: December 26, 2006, 06:18:25 AM »
Quote from: "Astantia"

Since we can't find Neanderthal or Ergaster, couldn't we assume that we were created?  Or not?


We find multitudes of fossils testifying to their existence.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

Re: antartica
« Reply #217 on: December 26, 2006, 06:30:57 AM »
Quote from: "Dogplatter"
I'd just like to say that Mr Andy's bumping of this epic thread is a wonderful festive gift for which I am grateful.

Quote from: "Mr Andy"

Ok dude. Im not ignorent enough to call you an idiot or a dick. However i will ask for proof. Where is it? If not where is your source?
Cheers


The penguin is an evolutionary oddity. Excellent at catching fish, yet terrible at escaping predation (due to flightlessness and inadequate walking abilities), it is the perfect nutritional tool for the Ice Wall Guards. The penguins reap the energy of the sea by catching difficult fish, then they can be rounded up almost effortlessly, cooked and eaten.

The evidence comes in the utterly unconvincing fossil record allegedly left by the ancestors of penguins. We can trace human evolution from a common primate ancestor pretty well, filling in the missing links of homo ergaster, neanderthal and so on, but the same cannot be said for penguins. There are pretty much no missing links or fossil evidence of the natural evolution of the penguin.

Also, documentation of penguins actually existing before the mid-20th century is sketchy at best, and we can pretty much discount all records of them as faked. Scott of the Antarctic's journal, allegedly penned in 1912, for example, documents the existence of penguins. But Scott's journal also claims a South Pole conveniently in line with Round Earth Theory - and let's remember - Scott, and HIS ENTIRE PARTY conveniently froze to death before returning to tell their story in person!! Clearly, he was murdered and his journal replaced with a fake, penguin documenting, Round Earth supporting one!

There are a few other bogus penguin reports pre-circa. 1960 which are debunkable on similar precedents.


Youre inventive, I'll give you that. But until you give me evidence then I will assume you are talking out of your ass.
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
Re: antartica
« Reply #218 on: December 26, 2006, 08:42:13 AM »
Just examining R F Scott's assassination-by-freezing in any detail should give you a pretty strong conviction that something fishy is going on at the South pole.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

antartica
« Reply #219 on: December 27, 2006, 06:56:20 PM »
assasination by freezing?? Holy crap batman, that theory is much easier to swallow than they were frozen because they were unprepared.

Re: antartica
« Reply #220 on: December 28, 2006, 09:48:34 AM »
Quote from: "Dogplatter"
Just examining R F Scott's assassination-by-freezing in any detail should give you a pretty strong conviction that something fishy is going on at the South pole.


Either come up with proof or STFU.
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
antartica
« Reply #221 on: December 28, 2006, 09:49:09 AM »
Quote from: "Cdesign"
assasination by freezing?? Holy crap batman, that theory is much easier to swallow than they were frozen because they were unprepared.


They were going to the Antarctic, and not for the first time either! Why would they have been unprepared?

And why was Scott's corpse found frozen in a position trying to claw its way out of the tent? Surely if he'd died naturally of the cold he would have been huddled in the tent attempting to stay warm!
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

antartica
« Reply #222 on: December 28, 2006, 09:57:32 AM »
Quote from: "Dogplatter"
Quote from: "Cdesign"
assasination by freezing?? Holy crap batman, that theory is much easier to swallow than they were frozen because they were unprepared.


They were going to the Antarctic, and not for the first time either! Why would they have been unprepared?

And why was Scott's corpse found frozen in a position trying to claw its way out of the tent? Surely if he'd died naturally of the cold he would have been huddled in the tent attempting to stay warm!


Proove he was assasinated.
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

antartica
« Reply #223 on: December 29, 2006, 03:57:47 AM »
No replies eh? :lol:
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
antartica
« Reply #224 on: December 29, 2006, 04:33:27 AM »
Quote from: "dantheman40k"

Proove he was assasinated.


The fact of his journal (the one that was found) supporting

A) the roundness of the Earth, and
B) the existence of penguins prior to the mid 20th century

may not show that he was assassinated. It is possible that he did indeed die naturally and that his journal was merely switched when he was found. This complicates matters by implying that either the Atkinson party was part of the Conspiracy, or that the Conspiracy found him dead (and clawing at the tent), went in and switched the journal. Assassination seems the most likely, least complicated explanation which is why I assume it during this argument (I know this is theoretic science not zetetic science, I hope any diehard zetetecists on the forum will forgive me).
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
antartica
« Reply #225 on: December 29, 2006, 04:34:50 AM »
Quote from: "dantheman40k"
No replies eh? :lol:


I lead a pretty busy non-internet life, don't expect me to post everyday.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

antartica
« Reply #226 on: December 29, 2006, 04:54:10 AM »
Quote from: "Dogplatter"
Quote from: "dantheman40k"

Proove he was assasinated.


The fact of his journal (the one that was found) supporting

A) the roundness of the Earth, and
B) the existence of penguins prior to the mid 20th century

may not show that he was assassinated. It is possible that he did indeed die naturally and that his journal was merely switched when he was found. This complicates matters by implying that either the Atkinson party was part of the Conspiracy, or that the Conspiracy found him dead (and clawing at the tent), went in and switched the journal. Assassination seems the most likely, least complicated explanation which is why I assume it during this argument (I know this is theoretic science not zetetic science, I hope any diehard zetetecists on the forum will forgive me).


So, in other words, you have no proof that:

a) He was assassinated
b) Penguins were created in the 60's

Either put up or shut up.
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

antartica
« Reply #227 on: December 29, 2006, 04:55:34 AM »
Quote from: "Dogplatter"
Quote from: "dantheman40k"
No replies eh? :lol:


I lead a pretty busy non-internet life, don't expect me to post everyday.


I suppose your right, FES leaflets dont hand themselves out on street corners!
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

antartica
« Reply #228 on: December 29, 2006, 04:59:05 AM »
lol (I can imagine it soooo clear...)
eel free to correct my language, thanks.

But if there aren't arguments there is ... THE CONSPIRACY! That's a practical little thing...

"In the grand scheme of things, those with the prettiest pictures will win." (Seriously)

*

midgard

  • 1300
antartica
« Reply #229 on: December 29, 2006, 05:01:06 AM »
Quote from: "dantheman40k"
I suppose your right, FES leaflets dont hand themselves out on street corners!


 :lol:

It's sooo true!  :D

...you did forget to mention the orange jumpsuits.

antartica
« Reply #230 on: December 29, 2006, 05:08:37 AM »
Quote from: "midgard"

...you did forget to mention the orange jumpsuits.


Don't faze my imagination - I was thinking about green-blue ones.
eel free to correct my language, thanks.

But if there aren't arguments there is ... THE CONSPIRACY! That's a practical little thing...

"In the grand scheme of things, those with the prettiest pictures will win." (Seriously)

*

midgard

  • 1300
antartica
« Reply #231 on: December 29, 2006, 05:09:41 AM »
The orange ones stand out more.

antartica
« Reply #232 on: December 29, 2006, 05:12:11 AM »
That's somehow right, but I imagined something old and grubby. Hm...probably that works with the orange ones, too.
eel free to correct my language, thanks.

But if there aren't arguments there is ... THE CONSPIRACY! That's a practical little thing...

"In the grand scheme of things, those with the prettiest pictures will win." (Seriously)

antartica
« Reply #233 on: December 29, 2006, 03:23:47 PM »
I notice Dogplatter has not replied. I guess he has conceded. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

antartica
« Reply #234 on: December 29, 2006, 03:34:42 PM »
Quote from: "Dogplatter"
Quote from: "dantheman40k"
No replies eh? :lol:


I lead a pretty busy non-internet life, don't expect me to post everyday.


Maybe thats why dan? Yanno... He has like... A life? Something you could probably use.
Quote from: BOGWarrior89

I'm giving you five points for that one


*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
antartica
« Reply #235 on: December 30, 2006, 02:11:23 PM »
Yeah again you'll notice I didn't reply right away.

What Wolfwood said was pretty much spot on.

While I hate to blow my own trumpet, I'd like to point out that while you were sitting alone, insulting me over the internet, I was out enjoying a drink with friends after a hard day at (paid, non-Flat-Earth related) work.

Quote
So, in other words, you have no proof that:

a) He was assassinated
b) Penguins were created in the 60's

Either put up or shut up.


Did you actually read the paragraph you quoted? There's no concrete proof that he didn't die of natural causes, it's just by far the most reasonable explanation given the circumstances surrounding his death.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

antartica
« Reply #236 on: December 30, 2006, 02:18:35 PM »
How about answering the op in the thread of my sig instead of wasting time in threads like these?  :?
quot;Earth is flat because there is a conspiracy, and there is a conspiracy because the Earth is flat" - Makes sense, duh.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=2955.0

?

GeoGuy

antartica
« Reply #237 on: December 30, 2006, 02:20:37 PM »
Because there is a grand total of one question posed in his post that isn't answered on a daily basis elsewhere.

antartica
« Reply #238 on: December 30, 2006, 02:26:15 PM »
You're unable to answer his questions because they're too many?..
quot;Earth is flat because there is a conspiracy, and there is a conspiracy because the Earth is flat" - Makes sense, duh.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=2955.0

?

GeoGuy

antartica
« Reply #239 on: December 30, 2006, 02:29:53 PM »
What part of "There is a grand total of one question posed that is not answered elsewhere on a daily basis" could be possibly be taken to mean "I won't answer his questions because there are too many of them"?