« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14   Go Down

A Discussion of Bendy Light

  • 395 Replies
  • 102123 Views
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #330 on: June 11, 2010, 01:03:24 PM »
The problem seems to be that FE'ers (more specifically zeteticists) have a different version of facts and how to arrive at them. This is why most RE'ers see them as delusional.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

Catchpa

  • 1018
  • +0/-0
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #331 on: June 11, 2010, 01:30:09 PM »
Quote from: General Disarray on June 11, 2010, 01:03:24 PM
The problem seems to be that FE'ers (more specifically zeteticists) have a different version of facts and how to arrive at them. This is why most RE'ers see them as delusional.

FE'ers are not zeteticists.
Logged
Quote from: James on May 07, 2010, 06:19:35 AM
The conspiracy do train attack-birds
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #332 on: June 11, 2010, 01:33:25 PM »
Quote from: Catchpa on June 11, 2010, 01:30:09 PM
Quote from: General Disarray on June 11, 2010, 01:03:24 PM
The problem seems to be that FE'ers (more specifically zeteticists) have a different version of facts and how to arrive at them. This is why most RE'ers see them as delusional.

FE'ers are not zeteticists.

True enough, but many of them claim to be.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
?

the flying russian

  • 24
  • +0/-0
Re: A discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #333 on: June 11, 2010, 01:58:49 PM »
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on June 11, 2010, 12:49:55 PM
Since you seem so interested in arguing semantics would it help if I said that for all intents and purposes, so far as the issue applies to the question at hand, FEers know that FE has been proven?  You and I just frame it as belief because we disagree with them; FEers don't see it as a belief, but as the truth, period.

I only argue semantics because, in this case, it makes a significant difference... am I right?

Rather than framing FET as a belief because I disagree with it, if FErs feel that it is not even necessary to objectively view their own truths, I think it would be safe to classify flat earth theory as a belief system rather than a scientific theory... No?
Logged
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: A discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #334 on: June 11, 2010, 02:27:14 PM »
Quote from: the flying russian on June 11, 2010, 01:58:49 PM
Rather than framing FET as a belief because I disagree with it, if FErs feel that it is not even necessary to objectively view their own truths, I think it would be safe to classify flat earth theory as a belief system rather than a scientific theory... No?

Of course, but the same applies to RET.
Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: A discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #335 on: June 11, 2010, 02:53:14 PM »
Quote from: Parsifal on June 11, 2010, 02:27:14 PM
Quote from: the flying russian on June 11, 2010, 01:58:49 PM
Rather than framing FET as a belief because I disagree with it, if FErs feel that it is not even necessary to objectively view their own truths, I think it would be safe to classify flat earth theory as a belief system rather than a scientific theory... No?

Of course, but the same applies to RET.

I disagree, the fact that the earth is round has been proven countless times by scientific standards. Whereas FET does not even meet FE'ers own definitions of 'fact'.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: A discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #336 on: June 11, 2010, 02:56:28 PM »
Quote from: General Disarray on June 11, 2010, 02:53:14 PM
I disagree, the fact that the earth is round has been proven countless times by scientific standards.

Please provide one example of this.
Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
*

Catchpa

  • 1018
  • +0/-0
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #337 on: June 11, 2010, 03:00:51 PM »
Ichi's plant experiment.
Logged
Quote from: James on May 07, 2010, 06:19:35 AM
The conspiracy do train attack-birds
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #338 on: June 11, 2010, 03:02:07 PM »
Quote from: Catchpa on June 11, 2010, 03:00:51 PM
Ichi's plant experiment.

What are you smoking?  ???
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
*

Catchpa

  • 1018
  • +0/-0
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #339 on: June 11, 2010, 03:04:30 PM »
Collenchyma
Logged
Quote from: James on May 07, 2010, 06:19:35 AM
The conspiracy do train attack-birds
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: A discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #340 on: June 11, 2010, 03:43:50 PM »
Quote from: Parsifal on June 11, 2010, 02:56:28 PM
Quote from: General Disarray on June 11, 2010, 02:53:14 PM
I disagree, the fact that the earth is round has been proven countless times by scientific standards.

Please provide one example of this.

Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

Ichimaru Gin :]

  • Undefeated FEer
  • Planar Moderator
  • 8880
  • +3/-3
  • Semper vigilans
Re: A discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #341 on: June 11, 2010, 05:58:50 PM »
Quote from: General Disarray on June 11, 2010, 03:43:50 PM
Quote from: Parsifal on June 11, 2010, 02:56:28 PM
Quote from: General Disarray on June 11, 2010, 02:53:14 PM
I disagree, the fact that the earth is round has been proven countless times by scientific standards.

Please provide one example of this.


You should know better.
Logged
Quote from: James on August 26, 2011, 05:40:53 AM
I saw a slight haze in the hotel bathroom this morning after I took a shower, have I discovered a new planet?
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #342 on: June 11, 2010, 06:05:52 PM »
I provided an example, just like he requested.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #343 on: June 11, 2010, 06:31:02 PM »
Quote from: General Disarray on June 11, 2010, 06:05:52 PM
I provided an example, just like he requested.

You provided an example of something different to what I asked for an example of.
Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #344 on: June 11, 2010, 07:10:42 PM »
That picture (and millions similar to it) was taken by a spacecraft in orbit around earth and clearly shows that it is round. Proof enough for the rest of the world.

A simple search turns up many more such proofs, such as these:
http://www.physlink.com/education/askexperts/ae535.cfm
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/415/you-say-the-earth-is-round-prove-it

The search function on this site will also turn up many examples of round earth which meet scientific scrutiny, I suggest you try it.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2010, 07:15:39 PM by General Disarray »
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3125
  • +0/-0
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #345 on: June 12, 2010, 07:23:52 AM »
Quote from: Parsifal on June 11, 2010, 06:31:02 PM
Quote from: General Disarray on June 11, 2010, 06:05:52 PM
I provided an example, just like he requested.

You provided an example of something different to what I asked for an example of.

Be more specific, and quit baawwwing about being judged by your own standards.
Logged
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: A discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #346 on: June 14, 2010, 05:15:38 PM »
Quote from: General Disarray on June 11, 2010, 03:43:50 PM
Quote from: Parsifal on June 11, 2010, 02:56:28 PM
Quote from: General Disarray on June 11, 2010, 02:53:14 PM
I disagree, the fact that the earth is round has been proven countless times by scientific standards.

Please provide one example of this.



How does a picture constitute as a scientific standard?
Logged
?

EireEngineer

  • 1204
  • +0/-0
  • Woo Nemesis
Re: A discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #347 on: June 23, 2010, 06:43:15 PM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on June 14, 2010, 05:15:38 PM

How does a picture constitute as a scientific standard?
How about the preponderance of evidence?
Logged
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the precipitate.
?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: A discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #348 on: June 23, 2010, 11:00:32 PM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on June 14, 2010, 05:15:38 PM
Quote from: General Disarray on June 11, 2010, 03:43:50 PM
Quote from: Parsifal on June 11, 2010, 02:56:28 PM
Quote from: General Disarray on June 11, 2010, 02:53:14 PM
I disagree, the fact that the earth is round has been proven countless times by scientific standards.

Please provide one example of this.



How does a picture constitute as a scientific standard?
how about the fact that it is a photograph of earth. Generally when you take photo's its of something that exists. Call me silly for that assumption. ever heard of the phrase pix or it didn't happen? what do you want a time stamp from NASA? also what about the live footage from the ISS. explain that
Logged
?

Sean

  • Official Member
  • 10716
  • +0/-0
  • ...
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #349 on: June 23, 2010, 11:05:14 PM »
Pictures can be easily faked by skilled shoopers. Saying it's live footage doesn't actually make it live footage.
Logged
Quote from: sokarul
Better bring a better augment, something not so stupid.
?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #350 on: June 23, 2010, 11:18:03 PM »
Quote from: Sean on June 23, 2010, 11:05:14 PM
Pictures can be easily faked by skilled shoopers. Saying it's live footage doesn't actually make it live footage.

It could be fake. You haven't shown that it is. By that logic anything could be fake. The existence of atoms could have been faked.  and what about the conversations between people on earth, and the cosmonauts. GL with that one
Logged
?

Roivas

Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #351 on: June 23, 2010, 11:45:58 PM »
How many folks are familiar with Eratosthenes and his theory of light angles? Why is this not even mentioned in the "science" section of the main site?

Watch the video and try it yourself.
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Then keep in mind that this man did the experiment in 200 BCE using sticks. You can perform the same experiment with a friend who lives a few hundred or even thousand miles north of you via the internet today.
Logged
*

Pseudointellect

  • 376
  • +0/-0
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #352 on: June 24, 2010, 12:31:47 AM »
There is no reason to think that every single one of NASA's pictures is fake except out of the desperation of clinging to belief in a flat earth. When your theory involves denying evidence from vast realms of science, you know it's pretty screwed up.
Logged
?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #353 on: June 24, 2010, 04:00:46 AM »
Quote from: Pseudointellect on June 24, 2010, 12:31:47 AM
There is no reason to think that every single one of NASA's pictures is fake except out of the desperation of clinging to belief in a flat earth. When your theory involves denying evidence from vast realms of science, you know it's pretty screwed up.
don't worry within our lifetime hopefully lower orbit space travel will become for frequent. maybe not casual, but if people not in the government do what NASA has done, this theory will cave in.
Logged
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #354 on: June 24, 2010, 09:03:48 AM »
Quote from: Thevoiceofreason on June 24, 2010, 04:00:46 AM
Quote from: Pseudointellect on June 24, 2010, 12:31:47 AM
There is no reason to think that every single one of NASA's pictures is fake except out of the desperation of clinging to belief in a flat earth. When your theory involves denying evidence from vast realms of science, you know it's pretty screwed up.
don't worry within our lifetime hopefully lower orbit space travel will become for frequent. maybe not casual, but if people not in the government do what NASA has done, this theory will cave in.
Sadly I don't think that will do any good. No doubtably Tom Bishop will go up in the first launch and then come back claiming they tried to bribe him into saying he went to space.
Logged
?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #355 on: June 24, 2010, 09:09:49 AM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on June 24, 2010, 09:03:48 AM
Sadly I don't think that will do any good. No doubtably Tom Bishop will go up in the first launch and then come back claiming they tried to bribe him into saying he went to space.

Or more likely he's say he saw the spotlight sun.
Logged
*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #356 on: June 24, 2010, 09:20:28 AM »
Quote from: Crustinator on June 24, 2010, 09:09:49 AM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on June 24, 2010, 09:03:48 AM
Sadly I don't think that will do any good. No doubtably Tom Bishop will go up in the first launch and then come back claiming they tried to bribe him into saying he went to space.

Or more likely he's say he saw the spotlight sun.

Or he'll simply say that the windows were high-def television screens and they actually never launched.
Logged
?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #357 on: June 24, 2010, 02:20:11 PM »
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on June 24, 2010, 09:20:28 AM
Quote from: Crustinator on June 24, 2010, 09:09:49 AM
Quote from: EnglshGentleman on June 24, 2010, 09:03:48 AM
Sadly I don't think that will do any good. No doubtably Tom Bishop will go up in the first launch and then come back claiming they tried to bribe him into saying he went to space.

Or more likely he's say he saw the spotlight sun.

Or he'll simply say that the windows were high-def television screens and they actually never launched.
what if they put him in a suit, and opened the cover? sure it would end his life, but he'd get his evidence for one way or another
Logged
?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #358 on: June 25, 2010, 03:35:39 AM »
Quote from: Thevoiceofreason on June 24, 2010, 02:20:11 PM
what if they put him in a suit, and opened the cover? sure it would end his life, but he'd get his evidence for one way or another

 :o Tom Bishop was murdered by the Consiracy!!!
Logged
?

Thevoiceofreason

  • 1792
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Truth specialist
Re: A Discussion of Bendy Light
« Reply #359 on: June 25, 2010, 04:15:29 PM »
Quote from: Crustinator on June 25, 2010, 03:35:39 AM
Quote from: Thevoiceofreason on June 24, 2010, 02:20:11 PM
what if they put him in a suit, and opened the cover? sure it would end his life, but he'd get his evidence for one way or another

 :o Tom Bishop was murdered by the Consiracy!!!

well he should be fine if NASA is fake.
he would still live if they were at high altitude long enough for him to put his helmet back on
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14   Go Up
« previous next »