Dun dun duuuuuuuuuuunnnnnnnnnnnn!!! The conspiracy strikes again
Wouldn't the burden of proof be on someone to explain the theory that the funding was cut on account of a global conspiracy? Occam's razor would state that the lack of funding would be caused by the simplest and most common explanation... politics as usual. Someone else wants government funding for
their project, funding has been cut, project leaders are wrangling with one another... etc. These things crop up anytime large sums of money are spent.
To say that zomg the governments must be cutting the funding on account of a conspiracy that only a fringe minority believes in, and then to say that the burden of proof is on everyone else to discount that conspiracy, works contrary to the standard operation of logical discourse.
For once, would you please show us proof of the conspiracy instead of simply replying with the challenge: "show us proof of
your theory"? It's impossible to prove your theory in this manner. Every time someone attempts to explain Round earth, it's simply met with an upturned nose and a point to the FAQ, or a self-satisfied claim that the proof provided is simply erroneous and part of the conspiracy.