Energy.

  • 72 Replies
  • 12651 Views
?

fearfulone

  • 27
  • +0/-0
Energy.
« on: August 30, 2008, 07:32:49 PM »
Seperate misunderstanding. Where does FE find the energy for its constant acceleration?

?

FETftw

  • 307
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2008, 07:40:43 PM »
they havent constructed a theory yet. youre gonna have to wait till the "global" mods of a flat earth come up with a good one.
« Last Edit: August 30, 2008, 07:45:42 PM by RETftw »
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Energy.
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2008, 07:43:01 PM »
Where does the ever expanding universe in RET find the energy for its constant expansion?

?

fearfulone

  • 27
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2008, 07:45:34 PM »
We're not talking about an expanding universe. We're talking about a linear acceleration. A so far unfueled linear acceleration.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Energy.
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2008, 07:46:39 PM »
Same difference.  You tell me whats fueling the ever expanding RET universe and I will tell you whats fueling the FET acceleration.

?

FETftw

  • 307
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2008, 07:48:30 PM »
Same difference.  You tell me whats fueling the ever expanding RET universe and I will tell you whats fueling the FET acceleration.
you cant do that. his question came first. if you have no answer - just say you have no answer - dont be scared.
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Energy.
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2008, 07:51:20 PM »
I have a answer I swear.  If I don't may I serve a 6 month ban from FES.

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13115
  • +0/-0
  • swiggity swooty
Re: Energy.
« Reply #7 on: August 30, 2008, 07:52:29 PM »
I have a answer I swear.  If I don't may I serve a 6 month ban from FES.
* Hara Taiki grins...

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Energy.
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2008, 07:54:21 PM »
There you go.  Now the mods are involved.

?

fearfulone

  • 27
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #9 on: August 30, 2008, 07:54:31 PM »
May I hear the answer?

?

FETftw

  • 307
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #10 on: August 30, 2008, 07:55:40 PM »
I have a answer I swear.  If I don't may I serve a 6 month ban from FES.
well lets hear it, yo! im all ears, um, i mean eyes.
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Energy.
« Reply #11 on: August 30, 2008, 07:57:11 PM »
You first.

?

fearfulone

  • 27
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #12 on: August 30, 2008, 08:03:15 PM »
The energy expelled from the Big Bang. But the universe moves at a constant rate, or may even be slowing down, showing a finite quantity. A constant acceleration requires a constant supply of energy. From where?

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Energy.
« Reply #13 on: August 30, 2008, 08:05:51 PM »
The energy expelled from the Big Bang, we just haven't run out yet, and probably won't for a long time to come.  And whose to say when it does run out the FE wont flip over and begin accelerating back to its starting point?





?

FETftw

  • 307
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #14 on: August 30, 2008, 08:09:05 PM »
if we weve been accelerating upwards for so long - why havent we run into anything yet?
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Energy.
« Reply #15 on: August 30, 2008, 08:09:53 PM »
We are accelerating into a void.  There is nothing to run into.

?

fearfulone

  • 27
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #16 on: August 30, 2008, 08:11:09 PM »
Flipping over... But that either wouldn't happen, or would result in destruction, because if FE is infinite, eventually part of it would have to have a linear speed of over c. If anything, it would fall back the way it is, and we'd all fly off. But that's a different matter.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Energy.
« Reply #17 on: August 30, 2008, 08:11:29 PM »
if we weve been accelerating upwards for so long - why havent we run into anything yet?

How is it possible for people to be this stupid? Questions like this don't deserve an answer.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

FETftw

  • 307
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #18 on: August 30, 2008, 08:12:41 PM »
We are accelerating into a void.  There is nothing to run into.
stars are stupid? or wait, they dont exist?
have to run into something at some point. your idea of running into nothing is just as stupid as we think a flat earth is.
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

?

fearfulone

  • 27
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #19 on: August 30, 2008, 08:13:38 PM »
I never said a flat earth was stupid. I just disagree with some of their implementations.

?

fearfulone

  • 27
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #20 on: August 30, 2008, 08:23:03 PM »
Well, I can only only thank Wardogg for his patience with me, and show my dissappointment in our elusive friend Mr. Bin Laden for his unfounded aggression, and distasteful choice of username.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Energy.
« Reply #21 on: August 30, 2008, 08:24:47 PM »
The mechanism that causes the acceleration is as yet unknown, but is given the placeholder name of Dark Energy.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Energy.
« Reply #22 on: August 30, 2008, 08:25:11 PM »
Well, I can only only thank Wardogg for his patience with me, and show my dissappointment in our elusive friend Mr. Bin Laden for his unfounded aggression, and distasteful choice of username.

What is wrong with my username? I am Osama bin Laden, and I have the right to be known as such.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Energy.
« Reply #23 on: August 30, 2008, 08:25:31 PM »
Well, I can only only thank Wardogg for his patience with me, and show my dissappointment in our elusive friend Mr. Bin Laden for his unfounded aggression, and distasteful choice of username.


BTW dude Im with you.  The earth is round these guys are nutz

You havent met Saddam yet.  Im numb to the offensiveness.

?

fearfulone

  • 27
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #24 on: August 30, 2008, 08:26:33 PM »

What is wrong with my username? I am Osama bin Laden, and I have the right to be known as such.

Don't make me prove the contrary...

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13115
  • +0/-0
  • swiggity swooty
Re: Energy.
« Reply #25 on: August 30, 2008, 08:28:39 PM »

What is wrong with my username? I am Osama bin Laden, and I have the right to be known as such.

Don't make me prove the contrary...

Stop spamming the thread and post some decent content or I am moving the thread and giving a 2 day ban.

?

fearfulone

  • 27
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #26 on: August 30, 2008, 08:33:29 PM »
So...*nervous laugh*

Wouldn't the exchange from "Dark" into kinetic energy cause some sort of detectable trail? e.g heat, sound, light, EM...

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Energy.
« Reply #27 on: August 30, 2008, 08:34:38 PM »
Obviously not.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

fearfulone

  • 27
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #28 on: August 30, 2008, 08:35:41 PM »
But the laws of thermodynamics say "obviously so," do they not?

?

Iruleuall4

  • 15
  • +0/-0
Re: Energy.
« Reply #29 on: August 30, 2008, 08:38:02 PM »
It's hard to post decent content on a forum this ridiculous. There is no such thing as perpetual energy, and that is what would be required to keep the Earth accelerating upwards constantly. Another thing is, if the earth were accelerating, isn't that saying that the first second the Earth existed, it was going 9.8m/s. The second second the Earth would be going 19.6m/s. By this time, the Earth would be going so incredibly fast, it's not even fathomable.