Energy.

Sure it would. We only experience 1g at all times. But we are accelerating with the earth as well. Why would you think that as the earth accelerates at 1g, that we would experience 1g on itself exponentially? I don't feel any heavier than I did an hour ago.

Besides, that doesn't have to do with relativity, which you completely ignored.

So you're saying, if i jump out of a plane, then the reason I'm accelerating downwards is cause the earth is moving towards me? If you're on a rollercoaster though, you experience more G's, which you ride. Why wouldn't this work with a planet/flat thing?

You experience more Gs because you body is trying to go in hte direction the roller coaster was going before it turned or did the loop or whatnot.  Its a pseudo force.

You experience more Gs because you body is trying to go in hte direction the roller coaster was going before it turned or did the loop or whatnot.  Its a pseudo force.

Why does paper fold under my pressure of moving it upward when i don't from this planet thing?  Atmosphere isn't constant i thought if gravity didn't exist, unless I am wrong. Wouldn't the planet just move through the gas anyways without gravity?  It still could make sense for gravity to exist but have dark energy prevent it from collapsing on itself.

I saw the thread about atmosphere just now, but it has more holes in it than 10 blowup fun dolls. A universal accelerator  would work in one direction only, it can't have a counter force to specifically keep a atmosphere on our special plain thing, it would cause our FE to stop moving. 

How many threads are there on this now?

Fifty seven eleventeen?

dont worry, a good reliable source told me they will stop in neverary.

Even then, would the G-force not be unbearable by the time it reached maximum velocity?

In our frame of reference, g will always be 9.8m^-1s^-2. In the Earth's frame of reference (observed by a stationary observer), Earth's acceleration decreases as it approaches c.

9.8m^-1s^-2

I don't think those are units of acceleration.

I guess I made a mistake on the -1.

can we get back onto topic as opposed to pointing out other peoples grammatical errorrs.

(the spelling mistake is intentional)

The m^-1 is not a grammatical error, it makes the equation dimensionally incorrect... it's the sort of thing that if not picked up right away will lead to people arguing for 5 pages about... That's why Osama and Jack sorted it that quickly...

fair point. shall we get back on topic?

Sure why not?

Source of energy for FE UA mechanism... same as for RE dark energy?