another question

  • 31 Replies
  • 4274 Views
another question
« on: May 10, 2008, 02:45:21 PM »
How does FET account for satellite imagery?

Google Earth satellite images of the entire earth. None of those images are edited nor could they be.
The images must have been taken at an extremely high altitude by a satellite. You can clearly see how massive the images are by the size and angle of them. No aircraft could have taken those pictures, so where did they come from?

« Last Edit: May 10, 2008, 04:56:31 PM by ickygerm »

Re: another question
« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2008, 02:51:11 PM »
Photoshopped, surely!

Re: another question
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2008, 03:03:22 PM »
yep. they photoshopped about 510 trillion square meters of earth and managed to get every meter of it photorealistic. any more intelligent answers?

Re: another question
« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2008, 03:26:02 PM »
I do not support this flat earth thing 1 bit but Google earth uses planes to capture the images.

It was on the news and the news crew went up into the plane with Google they have a dirty big computer that stores all the photos taken.

I also saw one flying over my house and a few weeks later Google earth by my house was updated.

Re: another question
« Reply #4 on: May 10, 2008, 03:33:10 PM »
there are some solid images in google earth that are about 40 miles across that satellites would have to have been used to take those. but ya i guess they must also use planes for smaller areas

Re: another question
« Reply #5 on: May 10, 2008, 03:51:20 PM »
You are probberly right, don't listen to these guys they have an answer for everything

Re: another question
« Reply #6 on: May 10, 2008, 04:05:20 PM »
ya but arguing is so fun  8)

?

Deist

  • 115
  • Hey! Don't blame /my/ God
Re: another question
« Reply #7 on: May 11, 2008, 03:34:11 AM »
ya but arguing is so fun  8)
Welcome to FES, enjoy your stay.

Make yourself comfortable, it's going to be a loooooong stay ;)

Re: another question
« Reply #8 on: May 12, 2008, 06:02:01 AM »
there are some solid images in google earth that are about 40 miles across that satellites would have to have been used to take those. but ya i guess they must also use planes for smaller areas


and you know they are 40 miles accross, an not made my smaller pictuers, how?

google earth has appeared and been debunked so many times i dobt anyone will bother anymore.
Just remember that google itself aquired the pictures from outside sources, they could have been edited before they even saw them.
Easy as 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679

?

FinalSphere

  • 158
  • Mindless Government Drone! WHUT????
Re: another question
« Reply #9 on: May 12, 2008, 07:50:23 AM »
How does FET account for satellite imagery?

Google Earth satellite images of the entire earth. None of those images are edited nor could they be.
The images must have been taken at an extremely high altitude by a satellite. You can clearly see how massive the images are by the size and angle of them. No aircraft could have taken those pictures, so where did they come from?


It's faked. it's all a conspiracy. remember??? DUHHHHHH
The Earth is Round... a Sphere.  Period.

Re: another question
« Reply #10 on: May 12, 2008, 01:21:06 PM »
This thread has more fail than your application to highschool.
Easy as 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: another question
« Reply #11 on: May 12, 2008, 01:45:46 PM »
How does FET account for satellite imagery?

Google Earth satellite images of the entire earth. None of those images are edited nor could they be.
The images must have been taken at an extremely high altitude by a satellite. You can clearly see how massive the images are by the size and angle of them. No aircraft could have taken those pictures, so where did they come from?



Blood clot, read the FAQ!
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

Re: another question
« Reply #12 on: May 12, 2008, 01:50:20 PM »
i've read the FAQ...multiple times in fact just because the first time I read it I almost died laughing. and i know there are some 40 miles across because there is a nifty measurement tool within google earth. and also, if i here "conspiracy" one more time in this thread...i swear im gonna kill a puppy...JK about the puppy

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: another question
« Reply #13 on: May 12, 2008, 01:51:33 PM »
The FAQ explains it.
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

Re: another question
« Reply #14 on: May 12, 2008, 07:33:06 PM »
The FAQ explains it.

Yea.
Its a conspiracy.


Re: another question
« Reply #15 on: May 13, 2008, 05:21:27 AM »
The FAQ explains it.

Yea.
Its a conspiracy.



either read it or dont bother makeing your retarded comments viewable to the public
Easy as 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679

Re: another question
« Reply #16 on: May 13, 2008, 09:34:35 AM »
The FAQ explains it.

Yea.
Its a conspiracy.



either read it or dont bother makeing your retarded comments viewable to the public


I've read it more then once, each time having a nice laugh at
Quote
Q: "If you're not sure about the motive, why do you say there is a conspiracy?"
and its answer.


Still, cannot find Google Earth or any other sattelite based mapping system explained in the FAQ. It only says that sattelites cannot exists, therefore Google Earth is part of conspiracy, QED.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: another question
« Reply #17 on: May 13, 2008, 11:38:04 AM »
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

?

okay

Re: another question
« Reply #18 on: May 14, 2008, 12:54:08 AM »
It's so fun to debate . :-*

Re: another question
« Reply #19 on: May 14, 2008, 01:48:17 AM »
In the same way religious people use the cop out "God works in mysterious ways", FE'ers use "It's a conspiracy".  I'm afraid that isn't a good enough answer.  It makes FE'ers look like complete fools.  If you ask a question, FE'ers tend to answer something else, much like a politician, or use the standard cop out.

Huge Fail to the FE'ers, until someone intelligent can actually join the debate.  Until then, the EARTH IS ROUND, spherical you might say, but most definately not flat.

How about, all you FE'ers storm the "Ice Wall", if you are correct, you will either all be shot, or fall off the edge of the Earth.  If we never hear from you again, we will take it as conclusive proof that yo were right, and we were wrong.

Wow! I'm good.

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65104
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: another question
« Reply #20 on: May 14, 2008, 07:08:49 AM »
so good no one cares
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: another question
« Reply #21 on: May 14, 2008, 09:16:58 AM »
In the same way religious people use the cop out "God works in mysterious ways", FE'ers use "It's a conspiracy".  I'm afraid that isn't a good enough answer.  It makes FE'ers look like complete fools.  If you ask a question, FE'ers tend to answer something else, much like a politician, or use the standard cop out.

Huge Fail to the FE'ers, until someone intelligent can actually join the debate.  Until then, the EARTH IS ROUND, spherical you might say, but most definately not flat.
The RE'ers do the same thing.  "It just is" is a often used phrase of theirs.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

Re: another question
« Reply #22 on: May 14, 2008, 09:36:48 AM »
In the same way religious people use the cop out "God works in mysterious ways", FE'ers use "It's a conspiracy".  I'm afraid that isn't a good enough answer.  It makes FE'ers look like complete fools.  If you ask a question, FE'ers tend to answer something else, much like a politician, or use the standard cop out.

Huge Fail to the FE'ers, until someone intelligent can actually join the debate.  Until then, the EARTH IS ROUND, spherical you might say, but most definately not flat.
The RE'ers do the same thing.  "It just is" is a often used phrase of theirs.

There are though some things that are better explained by RE then FE. There is no, or i never heard of one, thing that would be better explained by FE then RE, and if there is, please point it out. Therefore, we can take the RE model as more usefull, and base our knowlegde on it.

Physicians never say their teories are the truth, they say their teories describe the world well.

?

FinalSphere

  • 158
  • Mindless Government Drone! WHUT????
Re: another question
« Reply #23 on: May 14, 2008, 10:08:55 AM »
In the same way religious people use the cop out "God works in mysterious ways", FE'ers use "It's a conspiracy".  I'm afraid that isn't a good enough answer.  It makes FE'ers look like complete fools.  If you ask a question, FE'ers tend to answer something else, much like a politician, or use the standard cop out.

Huge Fail to the FE'ers, until someone intelligent can actually join the debate.  Until then, the EARTH IS ROUND, spherical you might say, but most definately not flat.
The RE'ers do the same thing.  "It just is" is a often used phrase of theirs.
it's not he 'RE'ers do this' or 'FE'ers do that' it's that both groups have idiots and screw up the real aguments/debates for everyone else.
The Earth is Round... a Sphere.  Period.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17837
Re: another question
« Reply #24 on: May 14, 2008, 10:39:30 AM »
Quote
There are though some things that are better explained by RE then FE. There is no, or i never heard of one, thing that would be better explained by FE then RE, and if there is, please point it out.

Have you looked out your window recently?

Re: another question
« Reply #25 on: May 14, 2008, 10:44:41 AM »
Tom you never fail to warm my cockles.

Re: another question
« Reply #26 on: May 14, 2008, 10:55:09 AM »
Quote
There are though some things that are better explained by RE then FE. There is no, or i never heard of one, thing that would be better explained by FE then RE, and if there is, please point it out.

Have you looked out your window recently?


Yes i have, ergo?

*

lindelof

  • 422
  • DADA IS NOT DEAD. WATCH YOUR OVERCOAT.
Re: another question
« Reply #27 on: May 14, 2008, 10:57:14 AM »
Quote
There are though some things that are better explained by RE then FE. There is no, or i never heard of one, thing that would be better explained by FE then RE, and if there is, please point it out.

Have you looked out your window recently?


Yes i have, ergo?

The earth is flat!!!

Re: another question
« Reply #28 on: May 14, 2008, 10:58:39 AM »
Eureka!

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: another question
« Reply #29 on: May 14, 2008, 11:48:20 AM »
it's not he 'RE'ers do this' or 'FE'ers do that' it's that both groups have idiots and screw up the real aguments/debates for everyone else.
I was not talking about the 'idiots'.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson