The Flat Earth Society

Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Debate => Topic started by: ickygerm on May 10, 2008, 02:45:21 PM

Title: another question
Post by: ickygerm on May 10, 2008, 02:45:21 PM
How does FET account for satellite imagery?

Google Earth satellite images of the entire earth. None of those images are edited nor could they be.
The images must have been taken at an extremely high altitude by a satellite. You can clearly see how massive the images are by the size and angle of them. No aircraft could have taken those pictures, so where did they come from?

Title: Re: another question
Post by: Androkles on May 10, 2008, 02:51:11 PM
Photoshopped, surely!
Title: Re: another question
Post by: ickygerm on May 10, 2008, 03:03:22 PM
yep. they photoshopped about 510 trillion square meters of earth and managed to get every meter of it photorealistic. any more intelligent answers?
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Evil Cyborg 10 on May 10, 2008, 03:26:02 PM
I do not support this flat earth thing 1 bit but Google earth uses planes to capture the images.

It was on the news and the news crew went up into the plane with Google they have a dirty big computer that stores all the photos taken.

I also saw one flying over my house and a few weeks later Google earth by my house was updated.
Title: Re: another question
Post by: ickygerm on May 10, 2008, 03:33:10 PM
there are some solid images in google earth that are about 40 miles across that satellites would have to have been used to take those. but ya i guess they must also use planes for smaller areas
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Evil Cyborg 10 on May 10, 2008, 03:51:20 PM
You are probberly right, don't listen to these guys they have an answer for everything
Title: Re: another question
Post by: ickygerm on May 10, 2008, 04:05:20 PM
ya but arguing is so fun  8)
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Deist on May 11, 2008, 03:34:11 AM
ya but arguing is so fun  8)
Welcome to FES, enjoy your stay.

Make yourself comfortable, it's going to be a loooooong stay ;)
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Beeper on May 12, 2008, 06:02:01 AM
there are some solid images in google earth that are about 40 miles across that satellites would have to have been used to take those. but ya i guess they must also use planes for smaller areas


and you know they are 40 miles accross, an not made my smaller pictuers, how?

google earth has appeared and been debunked so many times i dobt anyone will bother anymore.
Just remember that google itself aquired the pictures from outside sources, they could have been edited before they even saw them.
Title: Re: another question
Post by: FinalSphere on May 12, 2008, 07:50:23 AM
How does FET account for satellite imagery?

Google Earth satellite images of the entire earth. None of those images are edited nor could they be.
The images must have been taken at an extremely high altitude by a satellite. You can clearly see how massive the images are by the size and angle of them. No aircraft could have taken those pictures, so where did they come from?


It's faked. it's all a conspiracy. remember??? DUHHHHHH
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Beeper on May 12, 2008, 01:21:06 PM
This thread has more fail than your application to highschool.
Title: Re: another question
Post by: General Douchebag on May 12, 2008, 01:45:46 PM
How does FET account for satellite imagery?

Google Earth satellite images of the entire earth. None of those images are edited nor could they be.
The images must have been taken at an extremely high altitude by a satellite. You can clearly see how massive the images are by the size and angle of them. No aircraft could have taken those pictures, so where did they come from?



Blood clot, read the FAQ!
Title: Re: another question
Post by: ickygerm on May 12, 2008, 01:50:20 PM
i've read the FAQ...multiple times in fact just because the first time I read it I almost died laughing. and i know there are some 40 miles across because there is a nifty measurement tool within google earth. and also, if i here "conspiracy" one more time in this thread...i swear im gonna kill a puppy...JK about the puppy
Title: Re: another question
Post by: General Douchebag on May 12, 2008, 01:51:33 PM
The FAQ explains it.
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Anderkent on May 12, 2008, 07:33:06 PM
The FAQ explains it.

Yea.
Its a conspiracy.

Title: Re: another question
Post by: Beeper on May 13, 2008, 05:21:27 AM
The FAQ explains it.

Yea.
Its a conspiracy.



either read it or dont bother makeing your retarded comments viewable to the public
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Anderkent on May 13, 2008, 09:34:35 AM
The FAQ explains it.

Yea.
Its a conspiracy.



either read it or dont bother makeing your retarded comments viewable to the public


I've read it more then once, each time having a nice laugh at
Quote
Q: "If you're not sure about the motive, why do you say there is a conspiracy?"
and its answer.


Still, cannot find Google Earth or any other sattelite based mapping system explained in the FAQ. It only says that sattelites cannot exists, therefore Google Earth is part of conspiracy, QED.
Title: Re: another question
Post by: General Douchebag on May 13, 2008, 11:38:04 AM
(http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/b/bf/NO_U.jpg)
Title: Re: another question
Post by: okay on May 14, 2008, 12:54:08 AM
It's so fun to debate . :-*
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Gresh on May 14, 2008, 01:48:17 AM
In the same way religious people use the cop out "God works in mysterious ways", FE'ers use "It's a conspiracy".  I'm afraid that isn't a good enough answer.  It makes FE'ers look like complete fools.  If you ask a question, FE'ers tend to answer something else, much like a politician, or use the standard cop out.

Huge Fail to the FE'ers, until someone intelligent can actually join the debate.  Until then, the EARTH IS ROUND, spherical you might say, but most definately not flat.

How about, all you FE'ers storm the "Ice Wall", if you are correct, you will either all be shot, or fall off the edge of the Earth.  If we never hear from you again, we will take it as conclusive proof that yo were right, and we were wrong.

Wow! I'm good.
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Colonel Gaydafi on May 14, 2008, 07:08:49 AM
so good no one cares
Title: Re: another question
Post by: TheEngineer on May 14, 2008, 09:16:58 AM
In the same way religious people use the cop out "God works in mysterious ways", FE'ers use "It's a conspiracy".  I'm afraid that isn't a good enough answer.  It makes FE'ers look like complete fools.  If you ask a question, FE'ers tend to answer something else, much like a politician, or use the standard cop out.

Huge Fail to the FE'ers, until someone intelligent can actually join the debate.  Until then, the EARTH IS ROUND, spherical you might say, but most definately not flat.
The RE'ers do the same thing.  "It just is" is a often used phrase of theirs.
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Anderkent on May 14, 2008, 09:36:48 AM
In the same way religious people use the cop out "God works in mysterious ways", FE'ers use "It's a conspiracy".  I'm afraid that isn't a good enough answer.  It makes FE'ers look like complete fools.  If you ask a question, FE'ers tend to answer something else, much like a politician, or use the standard cop out.

Huge Fail to the FE'ers, until someone intelligent can actually join the debate.  Until then, the EARTH IS ROUND, spherical you might say, but most definately not flat.
The RE'ers do the same thing.  "It just is" is a often used phrase of theirs.

There are though some things that are better explained by RE then FE. There is no, or i never heard of one, thing that would be better explained by FE then RE, and if there is, please point it out. Therefore, we can take the RE model as more usefull, and base our knowlegde on it.

Physicians never say their teories are the truth, they say their teories describe the world well.
Title: Re: another question
Post by: FinalSphere on May 14, 2008, 10:08:55 AM
In the same way religious people use the cop out "God works in mysterious ways", FE'ers use "It's a conspiracy".  I'm afraid that isn't a good enough answer.  It makes FE'ers look like complete fools.  If you ask a question, FE'ers tend to answer something else, much like a politician, or use the standard cop out.

Huge Fail to the FE'ers, until someone intelligent can actually join the debate.  Until then, the EARTH IS ROUND, spherical you might say, but most definately not flat.
The RE'ers do the same thing.  "It just is" is a often used phrase of theirs.
it's not he 'RE'ers do this' or 'FE'ers do that' it's that both groups have idiots and screw up the real aguments/debates for everyone else.
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Tom Bishop on May 14, 2008, 10:39:30 AM
Quote
There are though some things that are better explained by RE then FE. There is no, or i never heard of one, thing that would be better explained by FE then RE, and if there is, please point it out.

Have you looked out your window recently?
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Kasroa Is Gone on May 14, 2008, 10:44:41 AM
Tom you never fail to warm my cockles.
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Anderkent on May 14, 2008, 10:55:09 AM
Quote
There are though some things that are better explained by RE then FE. There is no, or i never heard of one, thing that would be better explained by FE then RE, and if there is, please point it out.

Have you looked out your window recently?


Yes i have, ergo?
Title: Re: another question
Post by: lindelof on May 14, 2008, 10:57:14 AM
Quote
There are though some things that are better explained by RE then FE. There is no, or i never heard of one, thing that would be better explained by FE then RE, and if there is, please point it out.

Have you looked out your window recently?


Yes i have, ergo?

The earth is flat!!!
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Kasroa Is Gone on May 14, 2008, 10:58:39 AM
Eureka!
Title: Re: another question
Post by: TheEngineer on May 14, 2008, 11:48:20 AM
it's not he 'RE'ers do this' or 'FE'ers do that' it's that both groups have idiots and screw up the real aguments/debates for everyone else.
I was not talking about the 'idiots'.
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Ski on May 14, 2008, 11:51:50 AM
Yeah; leave us out of this...
Title: Re: another question
Post by: Kasroa Is Gone on May 14, 2008, 11:57:39 AM
Wait...there are people who aren't idiots on here? Link please.