Fair enough. Consider my use of you in the broadest sense. My point is still valid that anyone who does have unshakable faith in the bible gets those who believe in reason pissed.
I believe in reason.
I do not get pissed off by all Fundamentalists.
Take VenomFang for example (that youtube Fundamentalist). I think his videos are both pathetic and funny in ways, especially how he open comments to his videos for an hour and gets all of his friends to vote up his video and add nice comments, then closes them forever.
So... point invalidated?
I believe you would be more correct to say that believers in reason get pissed (rightly) when those things that are irrational are being taught to others as factual (such as ID in schools). Just because somone holds a rediculous opinion does not necissarily make me angry at them. Why do you get angered?
I don't believe in crimes of thought, only crimes of action. I don't care what silly superstition or conspiracy theory you believe as long as it doesn't affect my life or anyone else's. When it is confined to an online forum it is incensing because it's an insulting view of the world and of reason. You can argue that in such a trivial forum it shouldn't provoke anger because it doesn't matter, but then why even bother talking about anything. When it comes into the public sphere with laws being founded on irrationality those with a belief in reason become rightly upset.
Well, then why did you not say that in the first place?
Saying that anyone that believes in reason should get pissed off at Fundamentalists is an awfully big generalization.
To be clear, I am in agreement with you about laws and such based from irrational views, but the distinction is that you are angered by the
actions of those Fundamentalists themselves, I really think it is silly to be angry about an idea.