Poll

Should engy unlock this thread?

Yes
No
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 28   Go Down

RE floating oceans.

  • 817 Replies
  • 179689 Views
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #360 on: October 22, 2007, 12:48:21 AM »
I think this is officially a stalemate due to lack of an intelligent and logical argument. We should declare this thread officially:

Proof that Smarticus has a level of intelligence rivalled only by garden tools, and that nothing he has said/will ever say can be taken seriously again.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

Misfortune

  • 512
  • +0/-0
  • My name is no longer blank. God damn it.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #361 on: October 22, 2007, 04:42:03 AM »
Quote from: Hypnobishop on October 22, 2007, 12:48:21 AM
I think this is officially a stalemate due to lack of an intelligent and logical argument. We should declare this thread officially:

Proof that Smarticus has a level of intelligence rivalled only by garden tools, and that nothing he has said/will ever say can be taken seriously again.
Amen.
Logged

?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #362 on: October 22, 2007, 04:46:13 AM »
Please Lock This Topic Now Someone.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #363 on: October 22, 2007, 04:55:13 AM »
No dude, we need to keep it open so Smarticus can post a response
Logged
Quote from: eric bloedow on January 08, 2008, 04:03:12 PM
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness
*

Misfortune

  • 512
  • +0/-0
  • My name is no longer blank. God damn it.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #364 on: October 22, 2007, 04:59:03 AM »
Quote from: Z-To-Impress on October 22, 2007, 04:55:13 AM
No dude, we need to keep it open so Smarticus can post a response
Or so we can flame him enough to make him believe that this thread is all BS and his ideas are all wrong.
Logged

?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #365 on: October 22, 2007, 05:56:35 AM »
Quote from: His misfortune on October 22, 2007, 04:59:03 AM
Quote from: Z-To-Impress on October 22, 2007, 04:55:13 AM
No dude, we need to keep it open so Smarticus can post a response
Or so we can flame him enough to make him believe that this thread is all BS and his ideas are all wrong.

We will make him realise his ideas are wrong.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #366 on: October 22, 2007, 07:23:55 AM »
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 21, 2007, 05:41:04 PM
ULTIMATE RE FLOATING OCEANS DISPROVEMENT

CASE 1: FE

The Earth is accelerated upward by the UA.
The Earth is pushed into water.
The water is buoyant relative to itself but not to anything else, and is therefore null and void.

This is absolutely correct.


Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 21, 2007, 05:41:04 PM
CASE 2: RE
Water is accelerated into the Earth by gravity.
Water rests upon a denser medium, the ground.
The water is buoyant relative to itself but not to anything else, and is therefore null and void.

This is absolutely false. The water never needs to rest on the ground. This is since it can rest on itself as it is buoyant within its own medium.

Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 21, 2007, 05:41:04 PM
(NOTE TO THEENGINEER - [/thread])
If only he could save you so easily.


So wait, if the oceans can float in RE but not in FE AND they are not floating...





Quote from: Hypnobishop on October 22, 2007, 05:56:35 AM
We will make him realise his ideas are wrong.

Not with your ideas or funny spellings, do try harder.










It takes like 18 of you ganged up against me and you still lose? Maybe you guys should try another tactic. Might I suggest supporting a true model of the earth?
Logged
*

Misfortune

  • 512
  • +0/-0
  • My name is no longer blank. God damn it.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #367 on: October 22, 2007, 07:31:03 AM »
Quote from: Smarticus on October 22, 2007, 07:23:55 AM
It takes like 18 of you ganged up against me and you still lose? Maybe you guys should try another tactic. Might I suggest supporting a true model of the earth?
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! ..Hahahahhh... Ahah.

I seriously hope you're kidding, or otherwise you're pretty damn pathetic.
Logged

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #368 on: October 22, 2007, 07:35:55 AM »
To expand upon the mental shortcomings of Narcberry, this was my favorite:
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=12866.0
Logged
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.
*

Misfortune

  • 512
  • +0/-0
  • My name is no longer blank. God damn it.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #369 on: October 22, 2007, 07:39:45 AM »
Quote from: L0gic on October 22, 2007, 07:35:55 AM
To expand upon the mental shortcomings of Narcberry, this was my favorite:
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=12866.0
XD that totally cracked me up.

"Are you saying that the circumference of your round earth does not travel an exact 360 degress?", rotfl, what a moron.
Logged

?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #370 on: October 22, 2007, 08:54:58 AM »
Haha, I know you have to be pretending to be so stupid, Smarticus, since if you actually had such a level of intelligence you would be unable to use a keyboard.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10045
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #371 on: October 22, 2007, 09:32:48 AM »
Quote from: Smarticus on October 22, 2007, 07:23:55 AM
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 21, 2007, 05:41:04 PM
CASE 2: RE
Water is accelerated into the Earth by gravity.
Water rests upon a denser medium, the ground.
The water is buoyant relative to itself but not to anything else, and is therefore null and void.

This is absolutely false. The water never needs to rest on the ground. This is since it can rest on itself as it is buoyant within its own medium.

RETARD. 

Q: What is the bottommost layer resting on if the oceans were floating?
A: Air.

Q: Is water denser or less dense than air?
A: Denser.

Q: Therefore, will water sink in air or rise in air?  (HINT: Think rain)
A: Sink.

Q: Therefore, water should not float on RE, no?
A: Correct.

Q: What is Narcberry's IQ?
A: ERROR: 0.000000000000001e-99
Logged
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #372 on: October 22, 2007, 10:08:49 AM »
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 22, 2007, 09:32:48 AM
Quote from: Smarticus on October 22, 2007, 07:23:55 AM
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 21, 2007, 05:41:04 PM
CASE 2: RE
Water is accelerated into the Earth by gravity.
Water rests upon a denser medium, the ground.
The water is buoyant relative to itself but not to anything else, and is therefore null and void.

This is absolutely false. The water never needs to rest on the ground. This is since it can rest on itself as it is buoyant within its own medium.

RETARD. 

Q: What is the bottommost layer resting on if the oceans were floating?
A: Air.

Q: Is water denser or less dense than air?
A: Denser.

Q: Therefore, will water sink in air or rise in air?  (HINT: Think rain)
A: Sink.

Q: Therefore, water should not float on RE, no?
A: Correct.

Q: What is Narcberry's IQ?
A: ERROR: 0.000000000000001e-99

Wrong.
Logged
*

Misfortune

  • 512
  • +0/-0
  • My name is no longer blank. God damn it.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #373 on: October 22, 2007, 10:09:47 AM »
Quote from: Smarticus on October 22, 2007, 10:08:49 AM
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 22, 2007, 09:32:48 AM
Quote from: Smarticus on October 22, 2007, 07:23:55 AM
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 21, 2007, 05:41:04 PM
CASE 2: RE
Water is accelerated into the Earth by gravity.
Water rests upon a denser medium, the ground.
The water is buoyant relative to itself but not to anything else, and is therefore null and void.

This is absolutely false. The water never needs to rest on the ground. This is since it can rest on itself as it is buoyant within its own medium.

RETARD. 

Q: What is the bottommost layer resting on if the oceans were floating?
A: Air.

Q: Is water denser or less dense than air?
A: Denser.

Q: Therefore, will water sink in air or rise in air?  (HINT: Think rain)
A: Sink.

Q: Therefore, water should not float on RE, no?
A: Correct.

Q: What is Narcberry's IQ?
A: ERROR: 0.000000000000001e-99

Wrong.
Prove it, you asstard.
Logged

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #374 on: October 22, 2007, 01:19:28 PM »
I will save my energy while it disproves itself.
Logged
?

Tom Dipshit

  • 484
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Opponent
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #375 on: October 22, 2007, 01:22:02 PM »
Attempting to give a damn..............damn not given.
Logged
Tom Bishop: "The earth cuts the universe in half."

Narcberry (smarticus): "Oceans are free from gravity."

Z' Lord of Purple: "yes, superfast jet streams for the win!!!"
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #376 on: October 22, 2007, 01:38:31 PM »
20 pages, where are the RE'ers now? I guess I'd be hiding too.
Logged
?

Tom Dipshit

  • 484
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Opponent
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #377 on: October 22, 2007, 01:43:17 PM »
We, minus myself, are all in therapy, recovering from ORS, over reading stupidity.
Logged
Tom Bishop: "The earth cuts the universe in half."

Narcberry (smarticus): "Oceans are free from gravity."

Z' Lord of Purple: "yes, superfast jet streams for the win!!!"
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #378 on: October 22, 2007, 01:50:21 PM »
Let me just ask this of you Smarticus, roughly when will your IQ descend to the point where you will start bashing your keybaord with a rock?

It appears it is impossible for you to actually learn anything, since the evidence against your frankly idiotic claim has been posted a thousand times over. So I shall say this:

Quote
So, Smarticus, you agree that:
a) If water was buoyant in itself, and therefore can float into the air, the same logic can be applied to all matter, so it can be assumed all matter would fly appart.
b) On both RE and FE, by your reckoning, water should float in the air because it is weightless in itself.
c) since they do not float in the air, you are a retard.
d) Because you are a retard, the Earth cannot be flat, and so must be round.

So RE wins!!
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #379 on: October 22, 2007, 02:10:45 PM »
No dude, the oceans are floating on the vacuum of space - bouyant in themselves and weightless.
Logged
Quote from: eric bloedow on January 08, 2008, 04:03:12 PM
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness
?

Rampancy

  • 15
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #380 on: October 22, 2007, 05:05:21 PM »
Smarticus may have a point.  His 200 brain cells have been floating around his head at random for quite a while now.

Oh... wait.  According to his argument, if they're floating like that, the RE model is the true model.

Paradoxes, contradictions, and trolling make the world go flat.

The amount of time we've all wasted our lives for on this is a real shame.
Logged
?

Captain Alitus

  • 151
  • +0/-0
  • Lord of the Lizard People
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #381 on: October 22, 2007, 05:14:23 PM »
Quote from: Smarticus on October 22, 2007, 10:08:49 AM
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 22, 2007, 09:32:48 AM
Quote from: Smarticus on October 22, 2007, 07:23:55 AM
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 21, 2007, 05:41:04 PM
CASE 2: RE
Water is accelerated into the Earth by gravity.
Water rests upon a denser medium, the ground.
The water is buoyant relative to itself but not to anything else, and is therefore null and void.

This is absolutely false. The water never needs to rest on the ground. This is since it can rest on itself as it is buoyant within its own medium.

RETARD. 

Q: What is the bottommost layer resting on if the oceans were floating?
A: Air.

Q: Is water denser or less dense than air?
A: Denser.

Q: Therefore, will water sink in air or rise in air?  (HINT: Think rain)
A: Sink.

Q: Therefore, water should not float on RE, no?
A: Correct.

Q: What is Narcberry's IQ?
A: ERROR: 0.000000000000001e-99

Wrong.
So air is denser and rain falls up? Ha!
Logged
Quote from: McDonalds Fan
Why is it when I throw a delicious McNugget up in the air it always comes back down into my eagerly awaiting mouth?
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10045
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #382 on: October 22, 2007, 05:18:03 PM »
Narc,

Give a reason why water will not sink in air.

Sure, a water particle is buoyant in water, but water ain't buoyant in air.

GIVE UP.
Logged
?

Captain Alitus

  • 151
  • +0/-0
  • Lord of the Lizard People
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #383 on: October 22, 2007, 05:35:00 PM »
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 22, 2007, 05:18:03 PM
Narc,

Give a reason why water will not sink in air.

Sure, a water particle is buoyant in water, but water ain't buoyant in air.

GIVE UP.
Of course it is! That's why rain falls up! The government just wants us to think it falls down.
Logged
Quote from: McDonalds Fan
Why is it when I throw a delicious McNugget up in the air it always comes back down into my eagerly awaiting mouth?
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #384 on: October 22, 2007, 06:56:10 PM »
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 22, 2007, 05:18:03 PM
Sure, a water particle is buoyant in water, but water ain't buoyant in air.

Pff, you don't know that. The Earth is accelerating into the water after all!!
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
?

Tom Dipshit

  • 484
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Opponent
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #385 on: October 22, 2007, 06:58:18 PM »
Quote from: divito the fascist on October 22, 2007, 06:56:10 PM
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 22, 2007, 05:18:03 PM
Sure, a water particle is buoyant in water, but water ain't buoyant in air.

Pff, you don't know that. The Earth is accelerating into the water after all!!
The water is accelerating to earth due to gravity after all. (again screw you Engineer)
Logged
Tom Bishop: "The earth cuts the universe in half."

Narcberry (smarticus): "Oceans are free from gravity."

Z' Lord of Purple: "yes, superfast jet streams for the win!!!"
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #386 on: October 22, 2007, 07:00:41 PM »
All you have to say is gravitation and you solve the incorrectness of your statement.

For a decent explanation: http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=17401.60
« Last Edit: October 22, 2007, 07:02:26 PM by divito the fascist »
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
?

Tom Dipshit

  • 484
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Opponent
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #387 on: October 22, 2007, 07:03:17 PM »
By saying that you provoked me to say it more.

gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity gravity
Logged
Tom Bishop: "The earth cuts the universe in half."

Narcberry (smarticus): "Oceans are free from gravity."

Z' Lord of Purple: "yes, superfast jet streams for the win!!!"
*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #388 on: October 22, 2007, 07:04:29 PM »
Quote from: divito the fascist on October 22, 2007, 07:00:41 PM
All you have to say is gravitation and you solve the incorrectness of your statement.

For a decent explanation: http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=17401.60

GRAVITY
Logged
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #389 on: October 22, 2007, 07:05:52 PM »
What is this, high school? I'm not sure how long people can keep denying evidence but it should be interesting.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 28   Go Up
« previous next »