Poll

Should engy unlock this thread?

Yes
No
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 28   Go Down

RE floating oceans.

  • 817 Replies
  • 179699 Views
*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #330 on: October 18, 2007, 10:11:05 AM »
If water floats, then water molecules are weightless.  If water molecules are weightless and float, what about the molecules in our body? That's just scary.

I imagine my whole body being separated in all directions, and then just disappears.
Logged
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #331 on: October 18, 2007, 10:14:24 AM »
Let's see how he gets out of this one.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
?

Tom Dipshit

  • 484
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Opponent
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #332 on: October 18, 2007, 10:18:00 AM »
He'll wait until we post more and will come in and say. "Your spelling sucks!" or something that is off topic.
Logged
Tom Bishop: "The earth cuts the universe in half."

Narcberry (smarticus): "Oceans are free from gravity."

Z' Lord of Purple: "yes, superfast jet streams for the win!!!"
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #333 on: October 18, 2007, 12:20:18 PM »
Or he'll contort what we said into some completely incorrect statement and say "FE wins, waheee!"
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #334 on: October 20, 2007, 03:21:19 PM »
Quote from: Brennan on October 18, 2007, 02:59:35 AM
Quote from: Smarticus on October 17, 2007, 03:29:49 PM
Yeah, except we never remove the bottommost supporting layer. The ocean would remain within itself and could remain supporting itself through bouyancy force. The oceans would literally lift themselves into the upper atmosphere, where heat and cosmic decay would take their toll.

Since this is not observed, the earth must, indeed, be flat.
Of course its ******* observed you moron. Blow a bubble underwater, the result is that the water on top no longer feels the buoyancy force as strongly and 'falls' in to the space occupied by the air. The result being that the air bubble rises to the surface as it is forced upwards due to it's lower density.

So you RE'ers observe the oceans to "literally lift themselves into the upper atmosphere, where heat and cosmic decay would take their toll?" I guess if the oceans really are floating overhead, the FE model must be wrong. Does this mean Elvis is still alive too?
Logged
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #335 on: October 20, 2007, 03:24:31 PM »
See. I wonder if he even read our posts, or maybe he likes looking stupid.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10045
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #336 on: October 20, 2007, 03:25:33 PM »
You say that the oceans will float because water is buoyant in itself.

Well, the ocean is in air.  And water is more dense than air.  Therefore, like a weight, the ocean sinks in air.
Logged
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #337 on: October 20, 2007, 03:27:18 PM »
Sorry Trekkie, unless you haven't realised smarticus can't read. He'll just do what he always does, contort what you said.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10045
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #338 on: October 20, 2007, 04:45:25 PM »







Logged
?

Captain Alitus

  • 151
  • +0/-0
  • Lord of the Lizard People
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #339 on: October 20, 2007, 05:06:36 PM »
Quote from: Smarticus on September 18, 2007, 07:59:53 AM
Let us consider the RE model, and please no giggling.

Their oceans. Consider a molecule of water anywhere in the ocean.

How much does this water molecule weigh?
How much volume does this water molecule displace?

What then is its buoyancy force?

Go ahead, figure it out... okay be lazy and I'll explain it. Every molecule in the ocean is perfectly buoyant. That is to say the buoyancy force is exactly opposite to the gravity force on it. This means the oceans are free from gravity.

Perplexed? Of course you are, you have never seen our oceans floating around our world like giant liquid clouds. They fill their container, starting from the lowest possible point. This can only be if the container is pushed into them. The earth MUST be accelerating into our oceans to prevent them from floating away.


Another victory for FE!!!
...are you completely loony?
Logged
Quote from: McDonalds Fan
Why is it when I throw a delicious McNugget up in the air it always comes back down into my eagerly awaiting mouth?
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #340 on: October 20, 2007, 05:21:42 PM »
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 20, 2007, 04:45:25 PM









These experiments only show that the earth is accelerated into the water. Thank you for that.
Logged
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10045
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #341 on: October 20, 2007, 05:22:49 PM »
No they don't read them idiot.  They show how it's possible for the water to not float on an RE.
Logged
?

Captain Alitus

  • 151
  • +0/-0
  • Lord of the Lizard People
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #342 on: October 20, 2007, 07:28:56 PM »
Quote from: Smarticus on October 20, 2007, 05:21:42 PM
These experiments only show that the earth is accelerated into the water. Thank you for that.

The earth isn't accelerated into the water you loon. Gravity attempts to accelerate water into the earth. Thus it sits there.

And water has mass believe it or not. Water wouldn't float around. Unless it's atop something denser.
Logged
Quote from: McDonalds Fan
Why is it when I throw a delicious McNugget up in the air it always comes back down into my eagerly awaiting mouth?
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #343 on: October 21, 2007, 01:24:33 AM »
Again Smarticus shows his single-digit IQ.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #344 on: October 21, 2007, 02:48:10 AM »
I believe his IQ is officially measured as "Error 34: Insufficient decimal places available"
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

Misfortune

  • 512
  • +0/-0
  • My name is no longer blank. God damn it.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #345 on: October 21, 2007, 02:50:38 AM »
Quote from: Smarticus on October 20, 2007, 03:21:19 PM
the FE model must be wrong.
WELL NOW WE'RE TALKING!
Logged

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #346 on: October 21, 2007, 01:22:58 PM »
You guys agree the oceans shouldn't float
You guys agree the oceans should float in RE, as per your lack of evidence otherwise
You guys agree the oceans do not float in FE

You guys still believe in a model that says the oceans should float when they do not. This makes you angry, hence the personal attacks. This thread has been over for pages. FE has been victorious for awhile now. Thanks for coming, but the show is over.
Logged
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #347 on: October 21, 2007, 01:30:13 PM »
Quote from: Smarticus on October 21, 2007, 01:22:58 PM
You guys agree the oceans shouldn't float
You guys agree the oceans should float in RE, as per your lack of evidence otherwise
You guys agree the oceans do not float in FE

You guys still believe in a model that says the oceans should float when they do not. This makes you angry, hence the personal attacks. This thread has been over for pages. FE has been victorious for awhile now. Thanks for coming, but the show is over.

Smarticus, are you required by law to wear a giant sign on your head that reads "Warning: Close Proximity Will Cause Brain Death."
We do agree the oceans should not float.
We have provided firm evidence that oceans would not float in RE.
We agree that, if by some event of pure madness we were to come to the conclusion that oceans would float in RE, they would also float in FE.

So, we can sum this thread up in one line:

The biggest pile of steaming sh*te we have ever had the misfortune of reading.

Now, turn off your computer, unplug it, throw it out the nearest available window and then shove your fingers in the sockets would you?
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #348 on: October 21, 2007, 01:47:24 PM »
Claiming you've presented a valid argument is much different from presenting a valid argument. FE remains the victor, sorry.
Logged
?

Tom Dipshit

  • 484
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Opponent
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #349 on: October 21, 2007, 01:51:59 PM »
You need to relearn your suffixes.
Logged
Tom Bishop: "The earth cuts the universe in half."

Narcberry (smarticus): "Oceans are free from gravity."

Z' Lord of Purple: "yes, superfast jet streams for the win!!!"
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #350 on: October 21, 2007, 01:56:09 PM »
Really Smarticus, how do you manage to contain such a perfect vacuum in that skull of yours? No evidence?
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 20, 2007, 04:45:25 PM









The reason the oceans don't float in RE, explained for you in very simply terms:
1. GRAVITY PULLS EVERYTHING DOWN
2. WATER IS MORE DENSE THAN AIR
3. GRAVITY PULLS WATER DOWN MORE THAN AIR
4. WATER LIES ON THE SEABED, WITH AIR ABOVE IT
5. WATER IS NOT BUOYANT IN ITSELF, WE COULD EXTEND THAT LOGIC TO EVERY FORM OF MATTER TO SAY EVERYTHING SHOULD FLY APART.
6. THE MECHANICS OF BUOYANCY ARE THE SAME IN RE AND FE

Now, let me theorise something:

You put forward a frankly ridiculous argument, when we shot it down, you became angry so you began contorting what we say and started claiming FE has won, when in fact it has done nothing of the sort.

Unfortunately for you, we don't buy your shit so you are going to have to own up and state that this proves nothing for FE or RE, because it's just a stupid excuse for a theory.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2007, 01:57:59 PM by Hypnobishop »
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

Misfortune

  • 512
  • +0/-0
  • My name is no longer blank. God damn it.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #351 on: October 21, 2007, 01:58:39 PM »
Quote from: Smarticus on October 21, 2007, 01:22:58 PM
You guys agree the oceans should float in RE, as per your lack of evidence otherwise
I think you have misunderstood something, or you haven't paid attention to anything that's said on this topic. Or then you're just plain stupid.  :-\
Logged

?

Captain Alitus

  • 151
  • +0/-0
  • Lord of the Lizard People
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #352 on: October 21, 2007, 02:11:30 PM »
Quote from: Smarticus on October 21, 2007, 01:22:58 PM
You guys agree the oceans shouldn't float
You guys agree the oceans should float in RE, as per your lack of evidence otherwise
You guys agree the oceans do not float in FE

You guys still believe in a model that says the oceans should float when they do not. This makes you angry, hence the personal attacks. This thread has been over for pages. FE has been victorious for awhile now. Thanks for coming, but the show is over.
You crazy fool. Oceans don't float in the REal model.

Why?

Gravity. Look it up.
Logged
Quote from: McDonalds Fan
Why is it when I throw a delicious McNugget up in the air it always comes back down into my eagerly awaiting mouth?
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #353 on: October 21, 2007, 02:16:05 PM »
Quote from: His misfortune on October 21, 2007, 01:58:39 PM
Quote from: Smarticus on October 21, 2007, 01:22:58 PM
You guys agree the oceans should float in RE, as per your lack of evidence otherwise
I think you have misunderstood something, or you haven't paid attention to anything that's said on this topic. Or then you're just plain stupid.  :-\

Look at the entire thread, the evidence for Smarticus' stupidity is considerable. Being stupid encompasses both the first two options. I think we can say with some cretainty that Smarticus is incredibly stupid. I wonder if he's ever done any physics.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10045
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #354 on: October 21, 2007, 02:35:10 PM »
18 F*CKING PAGES!!!  HOLY SH*T!!!
Logged
*

Misfortune

  • 512
  • +0/-0
  • My name is no longer blank. God damn it.
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #355 on: October 21, 2007, 02:36:55 PM »
Quote from: Trekky0623 on October 21, 2007, 02:35:10 PM
18 F*CKING PAGES!!!  HOLY SH*T!!!
18 pages of complete BS, having atleast twenty times Smarticus saying "Another victory for FE!"

'Tis fun.
Logged

?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #356 on: October 21, 2007, 02:37:14 PM »
That is how monumentally stupid he is. 18 pages and we still cn't get anything through the intelligence gap.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
?

Tom Dipshit

  • 484
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Opponent
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #357 on: October 21, 2007, 02:40:52 PM »
Now its 19 of RE awesomeness and Narc's stupidity.
Logged
Tom Bishop: "The earth cuts the universe in half."

Narcberry (smarticus): "Oceans are free from gravity."

Z' Lord of Purple: "yes, superfast jet streams for the win!!!"
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10045
  • +0/-0
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #358 on: October 21, 2007, 05:41:04 PM »
ULTIMATE RE FLOATING OCEANS DISPROVEMENT

CASE 1: FE

The Earth is accelerated upward by the UA.
The Earth is pushed into water.
The water is buoyant relative to itself but not to anything else, and is therefore null and void.

CASE 2: RE
Water is accelerated into the Earth by gravity.
Water rests upon a denser medium, the ground.
The water is buoyant relative to itself but not to anything else, and is therefore null and void.

(NOTE TO THEENGINEER - [/thread])
Logged
?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: RE floating oceans.
« Reply #359 on: October 21, 2007, 08:05:36 PM »
ANOTHER WIN FOR FE!!!

Oh wait...
Logged
Quote from: eric bloedow on January 08, 2008, 04:03:12 PM
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 28   Go Up
« previous next »