Final Comment on the Grand Unified Flat Earth Theory

It is impossible.  I've concluded that the reason why there are so many conflicting aspects of FET is that no one model could possibly explain everything FET lacks compared to RET.  And there is simply too much that RET explains perfectly that FET has to strain to explain (and often in a completely illogical manner).

I've decided that the search for such a concept is entirely vain, and I don't want to go down the route of Ponce de Leon, searching my whole life for something that in all likelihood does not exist.  So it is with great sadness and exhaustion that I give up.

I've also come to the conclusion that much of the "evidence" purportedly backing up FET is taken as dogma by the FEers on this site, which ironically is what they were claiming to rail against in the first place.  A round earth has tons of evidence backing it up.  A flat earth has only appearances and the flawed experiments of an irrelevant "scientist" 150 years ago backing it up.

I am an REer once again, and will be until an FEer (any FEer, including Tom) can provide something conclusive that disproves RET.  For the time being, though, RET is elegant, it explains a lot that FET can't explain, and it makes perfect sense.  Unless that changes I can't in good conscience call myself an FEer.

I will still mess with the noobs.   

Do what you feel is right, but never stop looking at everything, proven or not. And never, ever, stop messing with noobs. The deserve it for being noobs.

It is impossible.  I've concluded that the reason why there are so many conflicting aspects of FET is that no one model could possibly explain everything FET lacks compared to RET.  And there is simply too much that RET explains perfectly that FET has to strain to explain (and often in a completely illogical manner).

I've decided that the search for such a concept is entirely vain, and I don't want to go down the route of Ponce de Leon, searching my whole life for something that in all likelihood does not exist.  So it is with great sadness and exhaustion that I give up.

I've also come to the conclusion that much of the "evidence" purportedly backing up FET is taken as dogma by the FEers on this site, which ironically is what they were claiming to rail against in the first place.  A round earth has tons of evidence backing it up.  A flat earth has only appearances and the flawed experiments of an irrelevant "scientist" 150 years ago backing it up.

I am an REer once again, and will be until an FEer (any FEer, including Tom) can provide something conclusive that disproves RET.  For the time being, though, RET is elegant, it explains a lot that FET can't explain, and it makes perfect sense.  Unless that changes I can't in good conscience call myself an FEer.

I will still mess with the noobs.   

I congratulate you. You must be a person of great integrity to post such a declaration publicly.

I've had one motto which I've always lived by: Dignity. Always dignity.

It is impossible.

Well, that was obvious.

Nothing is obvious.

Other than the obvious

Even the obvious... is not obvious.

Even the obvious... is not obvious.

... to the oblivious.

Nothing is oblivious.   

Other than the oblivious

Even the oblivious... is not oblivious. 

Even the oblivious... is not oblivious. 

...to the obvious (?)

Nothing is obvious.












I can do this all night.

I'll stop it then.  You lose

Best. Thread. Ever.

Is there an archive for best threads?
If so, this belongs there.
If not, make one and put this in it.

Roundy I'm very disappointed in you