Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly

  • 48 Replies
  • 9337 Views
?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • +0/-0
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #30 on: February 26, 2007, 10:06:30 PM »
Holy fucking shit. You really are pulling at strings, aren't you? Films are put together with frames of pictures. you're joking!!!  :o


You've seen it on shitty reality shows with sunsets and sunrises. what?

What's the difference between this and putting it in wmv form, and the fact that he didn't have to add the unexplained flash in the background?Looks like that flash did it's job to convince you that the movie was real. Congratulations, you are very gullible.

Please walk outside and take your own pictures and then post it.and what would you say if I did submit a photo? what about if it didnt portray what you expect it to?

?

Eisiger

  • 142
  • +0/-0
  • I hope she made lots of spaghetti!
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #31 on: February 26, 2007, 10:18:55 PM »
Holy fucking shit. You really are pulling at strings, aren't you? Films are put together with frames of pictures. you're joking!!!  :o So you seem to be irked by the fact that this is a flash/gif/whathaveyou moshup instead of an actual video.


You've seen it on shitty reality shows with sunsets and sunrises. what? Watch The Real World or something. instead of hanging around flattys, go get some skeez and his girlfriend to watch it so you can throw popcorn and spit at eachother with water bottles and stuff.

What's the difference between this and putting it in wmv form, and the fact that he didn't have to add the unexplained flash in the background?Looks like that flash did it's job to convince you that the movie was real. Congratulations, you are very gullible. So he made it look like it wasn't changed at all and fooled me into believing that he faked it. Cool.

Please walk outside and take your own pictures and then post it.and what would you say if I did submit a photo? what about if it didnt portray what you expect it to? If you did it yourself, you would notice to yourself that the same thing just happened.
~D-Draw

?

Caturday

  • 141
  • +0/-0
  • RE boggles the mindz
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #32 on: February 26, 2007, 10:32:49 PM »
yay flaneteers win this round!
and on the 8th day, God created Caturday
postahol (n) - poh-st-ah-hall. --- a unknown a addiction to posting randomly and meaninglessly with the intention to annoy.

?

Kom Incense

  • 54
  • +0/-0
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #33 on: February 26, 2007, 10:36:19 PM »
Holy fucking shit. You really are pulling at strings, aren't you? Films are put together with frames of pictures. You've seen it on shitty reality shows with sunsets and sunrises. What's the difference between this and putting it in wmv form, and the fact that he didn't have to add the unexplained flash in the background?

Please walk outside and take your own pictures and then post it.

i think the correct term is 'grasping at straws'. All I said was that you could do this yourself, since photos are inadmissable.

also, i don't watch shitty reality shows so no, i'm not sure what you are talking about there.

if you would like i could post one of my own star trail photographs, however i'd rather you do the science so you believe the results. maybe you are not willing to do any real work to come to a conclusion.

i'm still waiting for an explanation. I'm wavering towards this 'spherical earth' theory. but i'm still open minded.
Nah.

*

avaholik

  • 115
  • +0/-0
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #34 on: February 26, 2007, 10:38:50 PM »
I can see what I believe to be Orion's belt, or whoever's belt, and that is it. Oh, plus a few airplanes.

you know what I can see...
I can see Adobe After Effects... nice work!


?

Kom Incense

  • 54
  • +0/-0
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #35 on: February 26, 2007, 10:40:15 PM »
I can see what I believe to be Orion's belt, or whoever's belt, and that is it. Oh, plus a few airplanes.

you know what I can see...
I can see Adobe After Effects... nice work!



it's possible. it would be very hard. it wouldn't be that hard. it's not possible.
Nah.

Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #36 on: February 26, 2007, 10:41:44 PM »
I can see what I believe to be Orion's belt, or whoever's belt, and that is it. Oh, plus a few airplanes.

you know what I can see...
I can see Adobe After Effects... nice work!



it's possible. it would be very hard. it wouldn't be that hard. it's not possible.

i think my headache just got bigger trying to understand what that ment.

?

Kom Incense

  • 54
  • +0/-0
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #37 on: February 26, 2007, 10:43:35 PM »
I can see what I believe to be Orion's belt, or whoever's belt, and that is it. Oh, plus a few airplanes.

you know what I can see...
I can see Adobe After Effects... nice work!



it's possible. it would be very hard. it wouldn't be that hard. it's not possible.

i think my headache just got bigger trying to understand what that ment.

why do you have a headache?
Nah.

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • +0/-0
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #38 on: February 26, 2007, 10:51:46 PM »
Holy fucking shit. You really are pulling at strings, aren't you? Films are put together with frames of pictures. you're joking!!!  :o So you seem to be irked by the fact that this is a flash/gif/whathaveyou moshup instead of an actual video. No, not at all. Both are equally inadmissable.


You've seen it on shitty reality shows with sunsets and sunrises. what? Watch The Real World or something. instead of hanging around flattys, go get some skeez and his girlfriend to watch it so you can throw popcorn and spit at eachother with water bottles and stuff.Again, what?

What's the difference between this and putting it in wmv form, and the fact that he didn't have to add the unexplained flash in the background?Looks like that flash did it's job to convince you that the movie was real. Congratulations, you are very gullible. So he made it look like it wasn't changed at all and fooled me into believing that he faked it. Cool.NO, he seems to have convinced you he didn't fake it - unless you've changed your position on the matter

Please walk outside and take your own pictures and then post it.and what would you say if I did submit a photo? what about if it didnt portray what you expect it to? If you did it yourself, you would notice to yourself that the same thing just happened.That's what you claim, but what if I posted pictures of a different result? What would you say then?

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • +0/-0
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #39 on: February 26, 2007, 10:53:13 PM »
it's possible. it would be very hard. it wouldn't be that hard. it's not possible.


THE 3RD ONE! THE 3RD ONE!!


(Do I get a prize?)

Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #40 on: February 26, 2007, 10:54:05 PM »
I can see what I believe to be Orion's belt, or whoever's belt, and that is it. Oh, plus a few airplanes.

you know what I can see...
I can see Adobe After Effects... nice work!



it's possible. it would be very hard. it wouldn't be that hard. it's not possible.

i think my headache just got bigger trying to understand what that ment.

why do you have a headache?

well ive had pink eye for the last couple of days, and i didnt get what you said, lol. im thinking too hard.

*

avaholik

  • 115
  • +0/-0
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #41 on: February 26, 2007, 10:58:02 PM »
it's possible. it would be very hard. it wouldn't be that hard. it's not possible.

what the fluk did you just say??



Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #42 on: February 26, 2007, 11:01:17 PM »
it's possible. it would be very hard. it wouldn't be that hard. it's not possible.

what the fluk did you just say??




THAT is exactly what I am wanting to know, hence the headache, haha

?

Kom Incense

  • 54
  • +0/-0
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #43 on: February 26, 2007, 11:39:01 PM »
it's possible. it would be very hard. it wouldn't be that hard. it's not possible.

what the fluk did you just say??




merely stating the truth is not in the best interest of self explanation, of course. i mean that's just Kom Incense.

still waiting.
Nah.

?

Kom Incense

  • 54
  • +0/-0
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #44 on: February 27, 2007, 10:12:42 AM »
still waiting.
Nah.

?

Eisiger

  • 142
  • +0/-0
  • I hope she made lots of spaghetti!
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #45 on: February 27, 2007, 02:23:10 PM »
Holy fucking shit. You really are pulling at strings, aren't you? Films are put together with frames of pictures. You've seen it on shitty reality shows with sunsets and sunrises. What's the difference between this and putting it in wmv form, and the fact that he didn't have to add the unexplained flash in the background?

Please walk outside and take your own pictures and then post it.

i think the correct term is 'grasping at straws'. All I said was that you could do this yourself, since photos are inadmissable.

also, i don't watch shitty reality shows so no, i'm not sure what you are talking about there.

if you would like i could post one of my own star trail photographs, however i'd rather you do the science so you believe the results. maybe you are not willing to do any real work to come to a conclusion.

i'm still waiting for an explanation. I'm wavering towards this 'spherical earth' theory. but i'm still open minded.
I'm going to ignore this, since that wasn't directed at you.
~D-Draw

?

Kom Incense

  • 54
  • +0/-0
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #46 on: February 27, 2007, 11:07:00 PM »
Holy fucking shit. You really are pulling at strings, aren't you? Films are put together with frames of pictures. You've seen it on shitty reality shows with sunsets and sunrises. What's the difference between this and putting it in wmv form, and the fact that he didn't have to add the unexplained flash in the background?

Please walk outside and take your own pictures and then post it.

i think the correct term is 'grasping at straws'. All I said was that you could do this yourself, since photos are inadmissable.

also, i don't watch shitty reality shows so no, i'm not sure what you are talking about there.

if you would like i could post one of my own star trail photographs, however i'd rather you do the science so you believe the results. maybe you are not willing to do any real work to come to a conclusion.

i'm still waiting for an explanation. I'm wavering towards this 'spherical earth' theory. but i'm still open minded.
I'm going to ignore this, since that wasn't directed at you.

oh ok. cool..

still waiting.
Nah.

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • +0/-0
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #47 on: February 27, 2007, 11:10:13 PM »
What are you waiting for? Can I wait with you?

?

Kom Incense

  • 54
  • +0/-0
Re: Didn't see in the FAQ - not 56k friendly
« Reply #48 on: February 28, 2007, 12:07:28 AM »
What are you waiting for? Can I wait with you?

Just waiting for an answer to my original question, rather than the standard "it's fake" scenario. If I am to make a proper decision regarding fe theory I need my questions answered. This star thing's got me confused, because as I've stated I've done the pics myself, so I know the phenomenon exists. Just wondering what the fe explanation is.
Nah.