San Jose to Modesto: 36 minutes for 86 km. OSCAR for You ~

What about South Bend to Chicago? Flight time is around 50 minutes.

https://www.tripadvisor.com/CheapFlightsSearchResults?geo=35805&cos=0&nonstop=no&pax0=a&travelers=1&airport0=SBN&airport1=ORD&nearby0=no&nearby1=no&date0=20180213&date1=20180220

Is it true the distance is 117 km?

Speed of 140 kph by an airplane? No way

That time is gate to gate.
It includes time spent taxxing before and after landing, and it includes the slow period after takeoff and before landing.

The actual flight times (according to https://flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL5371/history/20180130/1632Z/KSBN/KORD ) is much shorter, as an example, this one was 21 minutes. Again, that is with slow take off and landing.
As the runways don't align, that also means they aren't flying in a straight line.
Again, using the above, the actual distance was 141 km. That puts it closer to 400 km/hr.

More than 100 miles, right? Even if it's just 100 miles for 1.26°, that means 15° at that position EXCEEDS Equator's size for the same 15°. Phew FE map is right.

No it doesn't.
Where are you pulling the 1.26 degrees from?
His path also likely takes him along the road, not on a straight line.

The problem is the informations based on globe is wrong. Everything will be done to support things contraditcting reality.

Except you are yet to show a single problem with the globe.

Quote from: frenat on January 30, 2018, 04:55:38 PM

Quote from: Danang on January 30, 2018, 04:37:59 PM

Quote from: Badxtoss on January 29, 2018, 01:08:08 PM

Quote from: Danang on January 26, 2018, 11:18:38 PM

https://www.trippy.com/distance/Modesto-to-San-Jose-CA#airportflights

Everybody shall play Feet Ball n become Phew-Earther! 

Not sure what your point is.  It's about a 90 mile drive.  This is easily tested, I've done it, in fact.

What about South Bend to Chicago? Flight time is around 50 minutes.

https://www.tripadvisor.com/CheapFlightsSearchResults?geo=35805&cos=0&nonstop=no&pax0=a&travelers=1&airport0=SBN&airport1=ORD&nearby0=no&nearby1=no&date0=20180213&date1=20180220

Is it true the distance is 117 km?

Speed of 140 kph by an airplane? No way

A very short distance that wouldn't likely be flown with a jet but rather with a turboprop aircraft. That never gets up to speed or even likely above 10,000 feet (you did know there is a speed limit imposed by the FAA below 10,000 feet, right?). Flying into a heavy traffic area where they are likely to have hold time before landing.  And do we know if the time is flight time only or includes taxi time on both ends (more likely).  So where's the problem?

The problem is the informations based on globe is wrong. Everything will be done to support things contraditcting reality.

You still haven't proven that.  All you've shown is that aircraft on shorter routes go slower. 

Jack...
140 km within 1.26° is ACTUALLY the rate for *equator*. For 42°N RE it should be around 102 km.
Even though I don't hold this number, this 38 km gap is questionable for globe model. Not to mention for oblate spheroid shape which has lesser circumference than spherical one.
Which one is true for RE theory?

Lesser distance has lower speed.

It does, but not too low.

Lesser distance has lower speed.

It does, but not too low.

When you consider taxi time on both ends, hold time before landing at one of the busiest airports in the world and the fact they never get to full cruise speed or altitude then it isn't too low.  But you'll just keep ignoring all that.

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on January 30, 2018, 11:27:52 AM

Quote from: Danang on January 26, 2018, 11:18:38 PM

https://www.trippy.com/distance/Modesto-to-San-Jose-CA#airportflights

Everybody shall play Feet Ball n become Phew-Earther! 

Perhaps Andromeda getten closer and it pulled some cities. We call it as Andromeda effect.

We have a lot of lies for idiots.

Wow Andromeda effect! If going to Chicago takes 50 minutes, the distance is only "117 km", the speed is "140 kph" and the departure is from South Bend, so this will be called BEND EFFECT  

You know, winds can affect the aircrafts very much. Hmm. In this respect, my 900kgs car is more safe than a 170 tons aircraft.  Because winds can't slow down my car. But I'm not sure if Luis Hamilton considered the wind speed while he racing to win or not. Because he was driwing as fast as a slow boeing. 

Quote from: Badxtoss on January 30, 2018, 06:31:49 PM

Quote from: Danang on January 30, 2018, 04:37:59 PM

Quote from: Badxtoss on January 29, 2018, 01:08:08 PM

Quote from: Danang on January 26, 2018, 11:18:38 PM

https://www.trippy.com/distance/Modesto-to-San-Jose-CA#airportflights

Everybody shall play Feet Ball n become Phew-Earther! 

Not sure what your point is.  It's about a 90 mile drive.  This is easily tested, I've done it, in fact.

What about South Bend to Chicago? Flight time is around 50 minutes.

https://www.tripadvisor.com/CheapFlightsSearchResults?geo=35805&cos=0&nonstop=no&pax0=a&travelers=1&airport0=SBN&airport1=ORD&nearby0=no&nearby1=no&date0=20180213&date1=20180220

Is it true the distance is 117 km?

Speed of 140 kph by an airplane? No way

About 100 miles.  Again I've driven this.  The time varies wildly depending on traffic, but yeah, about 100 miles.
What is your point?

More than 100 miles, right? Even if it's just 100 miles for 1.26°, that means 15° at that position EXCEEDS Equator's size for the same 15°. Phew FE map is right.

No actually it's just under 100 and that's by roads.  A lot less as the crow flies.

Jack...
140 km within 1.26° is ACTUALLY the rate for *equator*. For 42°N RE it should be around 102 km.

Yes, for the equator, 1.26 degrees equates to ~ 140 km.
At 42N, 1.26 degrees around a great circle of Earth is still ~ 140 km.
However, travelling due east/west, it is only ~104 km. But this requires a purely due east/west route.
Travelling N/S it is still ~ 140 km.

You can't ignore changes in latitude, nor winding routes.

Even though I don't hold this number, this 38 km gap is questionable for globe model.

No it isn't.
Why would it be questionable?

You know, winds can affect the aircrafts very much. Hmm. In this respect, my 900kgs car is more safe than a 170 tons aircraft.  Because winds can't slow down my car. But I'm not sure if Luis Hamilton considered the wind speed while he racing to win or not. Because he was driwing as fast as a slow boeing. 

Nope. Wind can slow down your car, you just dont drive your car at the most efficient speed nor at the fastest speed, such that you can easily compensate for minor wind.
Planes fly a lot higher than your car drives which can expose them to harsher wind, and they fly for efficiency.

The car undergoes "hiking" all the time due to Universal Acceleration.
That's why a constant gas will accelerate the car for a while till it reach constant velocity.

The air medium is another case. The acceleration moment will be longer. To reach big velocity is a piece of cake as long as the airplane design can bear such big velocity (etc).

Many people think air flight n land trip are the same, as if a constant gas applied for both vehicles equally.

I guess there's been a drama, either in navigation or 'design' ~

The car undergoes "hiking" all the time due to Universal Acceleration.

And what is "hiking" meant to be?

That's why a constant gas will accelerate the car for a while till it reach constant velocity.

No, your UA BS has nothing to do with it.
It will accelerate the car for a while because it is applying a force.
Eventually you reach a point where friction (including drag) provides a counter force which balances it. This means no more acceleration (at least relative to Earth).

The air medium is another case. The acceleration moment will be longer. To reach big velocity is a piece of cake as long as the airplane design can bear such big velocity (etc).

Nope, pure BS.
If this was the case car designers would not be spending any effort on making cars aerodynamic.
The simple fact is aerodynamic drag is a major limiting factor for speed for both cars and planes.
It is only easy to achieve high velocity if you have enough thrust to overcome the drag and you have the structural integrity to withstand those forces.

I guess there's been a drama, either in navigation or 'design' ~

Nope, you are the drama here.

Lunch time ...