Hello mister and misses satans and the others; :)
Today we see how is rain occurs and why are the clouds occur.
As we know that meteorology knows where is the next rain fall down by looking the clouds. And we think that so the clouds cause the rain. This is not true.
God said us on the various different books that the rain falls down from the sky.
As we surely know that the sky is an ocean that surrounding us. It is reasonable to be in ice to don't fall down . when it melt to water then into rain water .
To understand the mechanism we need to look this image to understand it well.
(https://i.imgsafe.org/6eb33b3.jpg)
Sometimes i's a cloudy day but no rain, sometime a few clouds but raining. Because clouds just a mark shows maybe it's raining. The phrase as "rain laden clouds" completely a lie. It's just an effect.
Good luck. :)
Hello mister and misses satans and the others; :)
Today we see how is rain occurs and why are the clouds occur.
As we know that meteorology knows where is the next rain fall down by looking the clouds. And we think that so the clouds cause the rain. This is not true.
God said us on the various different books that the rain falls down from the sky.
As we surely know that the sky is an ocean that surrounding us. It is reasonable to be in ice to don't fall down . when it melt to water then into rain water .
To understand the mechanism we need to look this image to understand it well.
(https://i.imgsafe.org/6eb33b3.jpg)
Sometimes i's a cloudy day but no rain, sometime a few clouds but raining. Because clouds just a mark shows maybe it's raining. The phrase as "rain laden clouds" completely a lie. It's just an effect.
Good luck. :)
A very good point, and strong evidence of a Flat Earth. However, I believe the Celestial Ocean above the Earth is not frozen - it is liquid, separated from us by the Firmament. It is in this ocean that the stars are, and after all, how could the Great Flood have occurred if all the water was frozen?
This thread needs to be moved to complete nonsense.Why?
This thread needs to be moved to complete nonsense.
Well when you run away from other threads like a coward, not much I can do.This thread needs to be moved to complete nonsense.
Omg, what a great argument! :D
This thread needs to be moved to complete nonsense.Why?
Well when you run away from other threads like a coward, not much I can do.This thread needs to be moved to complete nonsense.
Omg, what a great argument! :D
But anyways, I made a real argument.
Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather?Is it because when they hit the millions of tonnes of water hanging in the cloud at 900kph it smashes them to pieces?
Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather? Why can we see rain falling from clouds?Learn to read.
Why would that happen?Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather?Is it because when they hit the millions of tonnes of water hanging in the cloud at 900kph it smashes them to pieces?
Because of the thin aluminium nose and 900kph is very fast.Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather? Why can we see rain falling from clouds?Learn to read.Why would that happen?Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather?Is it because when they hit the millions of tonnes of water hanging in the cloud at 900kph it smashes them to pieces?
How much does the water hitting the nose in a second, weigh?Because of the thin aluminium nose and 900kph is very fast.Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather? Why can we see rain falling from clouds?Learn to read.Why would that happen?Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather?Is it because when they hit the millions of tonnes of water hanging in the cloud at 900kph it smashes them to pieces?
How much does the cloud weigh.How much does the water hitting the nose in a second, weigh?Because of the thin aluminium nose and 900kph is very fast.Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather? Why can we see rain falling from clouds?Learn to read.Why would that happen?Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather?Is it because when they hit the millions of tonnes of water hanging in the cloud at 900kph it smashes them to pieces?
Answer the question.How much does the cloud weigh.How much does the water hitting the nose in a second, weigh?Because of the thin aluminium nose and 900kph is very fast.Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather? Why can we see rain falling from clouds?Learn to read.Why would that happen?Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather?Is it because when they hit the millions of tonnes of water hanging in the cloud at 900kph it smashes them to pieces?
How much water are you talking about, Rainfall at a rate of 300mm per hour from a cloud?Answer the question.How much does the cloud weigh.How much does the water hitting the nose in a second, weigh?Because of the thin aluminium nose and 900kph is very fast.Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather? Why can we see rain falling from clouds?Learn to read.Why would that happen?Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather?Is it because when they hit the millions of tonnes of water hanging in the cloud at 900kph it smashes them to pieces?
I see I shut you up. Try harder next time.Answer the question.
I'm still waiting.How much does the water hitting the nose in a second, weigh?Because of the thin aluminium nose and 900kph is very fast.Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather? Why can we see rain falling from clouds?Learn to read.Why would that happen?Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather?Is it because when they hit the millions of tonnes of water hanging in the cloud at 900kph it smashes them to pieces?
If it is a liter of water then it would be 1kg.I'm still waiting.How much does the water hitting the nose in a second, weigh?Because of the thin aluminium nose and 900kph is very fast.Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather? Why can we see rain falling from clouds?Learn to read.Why would that happen?Why do planes fly above clouds to fly above weather?Is it because when they hit the millions of tonnes of water hanging in the cloud at 900kph it smashes them to pieces?
Is it because when they hit the millions of tonnes of water hanging in the cloud at 900kph it smashes them to pieces?
He knows what he is claiming is incorrect. He just has nothing else.Is it because when they hit the millions of tonnes of water hanging in the cloud at 900kph it smashes them to pieces?
Just like the billions of tonnes of water in the ocean smash you to pieces when you jump into it.
Then why are you claiming it's a million tons?Sorry you are correct, If you had 300mm of rain per hour its probably more than millions of tonnes hanging in the cloud.
Correct, at 900kph this tends to happen.Is it because when they hit the millions of tonnes of water hanging in the cloud at 900kph it smashes them to pieces?
Just like the billions of tonnes of water in the ocean smash you to pieces when you jump into it.
What does that have to do with the question? I could easily point out 1 liter of water doesn't have a mass of 1 kg but it doesn't really mean anything right now.Then why are you claiming it's a million tons?Sorry you are correct, If you had 300mm of rain per hour its probably more than millions of tonnes hanging in the cloud.
Correct, at 900kph this tends to happen.
If a cloud can drop 2500mm of rain in 48 hours how much does it weigh?Correct, at 900kph this tends to happen.
I don't jump with 900 kph. But since f=m*a, and the ocean is certainly more than a thousand times heavier than a cloud, .9 kph ought to suffice.
If a cloud can drop 2500mm of rain in 48 hours how much does it weigh?
And do try to keep up, nobody is interested in how fast you can jump.
Hello mister and misses satans and the others; :)
Today we see how is rain occurs and why are the clouds occur.
As we know that meteorology knows where is the next rain fall down by looking the clouds. And we think that so the clouds cause the rain. This is not true.
God said us on the various different books that the rain falls down from the sky.
As we surely know that the sky is an ocean that surrounding us. It is reasonable to be in ice to don't fall down . when it melt to water then into rain water .
To understand the mechanism we need to look this image to understand it well.
(https://i.imgsafe.org/6eb33b3.jpg)
Sometimes i's a cloudy day but no rain, sometime a few clouds but raining. Because clouds just a mark shows maybe it's raining. The phrase as "rain laden clouds" completely a lie. It's just an effect.
Good luck. :)
Why?
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
Why?
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
Now you are talking about tree's? Next you will be telling me I need tree's to breath!Why?
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
Because it is and has been proved as complete nonsense by not only the picture I have posted, but by the experiences of anyone who has ever seen rain fall from a cloud, which I postulate is around 99.99999% of mankind. It was off to a non-start.
Have you seen rain fall from a cloud? Do you think that rain is independent of clouds and falls from the firmament? If I told you that trees didn't actually grow from the ground, but grew from an invisible substance a metre above the ground would you think that was a sensible suggestion? Or would the fact that you can actually see them growing from the ground make my suggestion "complete nonsense"? Ask yourself these questions Tappet.
Since you brought it up, yes in the long term you need trees (well all vegetation) to breathe! Vegetation generates the oxygen used by people, animals, fires, engines, etc.Now you are talking about tree's? Next you will be telling me I need tree's to breath!Why?
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
Because it is and has been proved as complete nonsense by not only the picture I have posted, but by the experiences of anyone who has ever seen rain fall from a cloud, which I postulate is around 99.99999% of mankind. It was off to a non-start.
Have you seen rain fall from a cloud? Do you think that rain is independent of clouds and falls from the firmament? If I told you that trees didn't actually grow from the ground, but grew from an invisible substance a metre above the ground would you think that was a sensible suggestion? Or would the fact that you can actually see them growing from the ground make my suggestion "complete nonsense"? Ask yourself these questions Tappet.
Now you are talking about tree's? Next you will be telling me I need tree's to breath!Why?
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
Because it is and has been proved as complete nonsense by not only the picture I have posted, but by the experiences of anyone who has ever seen rain fall from a cloud, which I postulate is around 99.99999% of mankind. It was off to a non-start.
Have you seen rain fall from a cloud? Do you think that rain is independent of clouds and falls from the firmament? If I told you that trees didn't actually grow from the ground, but grew from an invisible substance a metre above the ground would you think that was a sensible suggestion? Or would the fact that you can actually see them growing from the ground make my suggestion "complete nonsense"? Ask yourself these questions Tappet.
Since you and many others have said I live in a basement, could you give me the mathematical formula to determine how many tree's I would need to create oxygen in there with the door shut to live. Oh, and do not forget to allow for them to breath oxygen at night.Since you brought it up, yes in the long term you need trees (well all vegetation) to breathe! Vegetation generates the oxygen used by people, animals, fires, engines, etc.Now you are talking about tree's? Next you will be telling me I need tree's to breath!Why?
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
Because it is and has been proved as complete nonsense by not only the picture I have posted, but by the experiences of anyone who has ever seen rain fall from a cloud, which I postulate is around 99.99999% of mankind. It was off to a non-start.
Have you seen rain fall from a cloud? Do you think that rain is independent of clouds and falls from the firmament? If I told you that trees didn't actually grow from the ground, but grew from an invisible substance a metre above the ground would you think that was a sensible suggestion? Or would the fact that you can actually see them growing from the ground make my suggestion "complete nonsense"? Ask yourself these questions Tappet.Mind you this has nothing to do with the case!
Fixed.Now you are talking about tree's? Next you will be telling me I need tree's to breath!Why?
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
Because it is and has been proved as complete nonsense by not only the picture I have posted, but by the experiences of anyone who has ever seen rain fall from a cloud, which I postulate is around 99.99999% of mankind. It was off to a non-start.
Have you seen rain fall from a cloud? Do you think that rain is independent of clouds and falls from the firmament? If I told you that trees didn't actually grow from the ground, but grew from an invisible substance a metre above the ground would you think that was a sensible suggestion? Or would the fact that you can actually see them growing from the ground make my suggestion "complete nonsense"? Ask yourself these questions Tappet.Christtappet this is hard work.
Since you and many others have said I live in a basement, could you give me the mathematical formula to determine how many tree's I would need to create oxygen in there with the door shut to live. Oh, and do not forget to allow for them to breath oxygen at night.
Also, unless that basement is air tight I don't think you will need trees to still have oxygen.Since you and many others have said I live in a basement, could you give me the mathematical formula to determine how many tree's I would need to create oxygen in there with the door shut to live. Oh, and do not forget to allow for them to breath oxygen at night.
Since basements are dark, trees probably won't help you.
Also: http://www.elearnenglishlanguage.com/blog/english-mistakes/apostrophe-s/ (http://www.elearnenglishlanguage.com/blog/english-mistakes/apostrophe-s/)
Hello mister and misses satans and the others; :)
Today we see how is rain occurs and why are the clouds occur.
As we know that meteorology knows where is the next rain fall down by looking the clouds. And we think that so the clouds cause the rain. This is not true.
God said us on the various different books that the rain falls down from the sky.
As we surely know that the sky is an ocean that surrounding us. It is reasonable to be in ice to don't fall down . when it melt to water then into rain water .
To understand the mechanism we need to look this image to understand it well.
(https://i.imgsafe.org/6eb33b3.jpg)
Sometimes i's a cloudy day but no rain, sometime a few clouds but raining. Because clouds just a mark shows maybe it's raining. The phrase as "rain laden clouds" completely a lie. It's just an effect.
Good luck. :)
Once again, the Heroic Īntikam steps in and rewrites all of our scientific knowledge using his incredible intellect!
Have you ever witnessed a storm from a distance? If you have, you will have seen this very familiar scene...
(https://imageshack.com/i/pnFqhXFhj)
You can actually watch the rain falling from the cloud. It's as if the cloud smudges down to the ground. It's so incredibly easy to observe and so common that it really makes me wonder whether you've grown up in a box, or whether you walk around with your head looking down to the ground!
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense. You are really doing nothing to forward the FE agenda!
Hello mister and misses satans and the others; :)
Today we see how is rain occurs and why are the clouds occur.
As we know that meteorology knows where is the next rain fall down by looking the clouds. And we think that so the clouds cause the rain. This is not true.
God said us on the various different books that the rain falls down from the sky.
As we surely know that the sky is an ocean that surrounding us. It is reasonable to be in ice to don't fall down . when it melt to water then into rain water .
To understand the mechanism we need to look this image to understand it well.
(https://i.imgsafe.org/6eb33b3.jpg)
Sometimes i's a cloudy day but no rain, sometime a few clouds but raining. Because clouds just a mark shows maybe it's raining. The phrase as "rain laden clouds" completely a lie. It's just an effect.
Good luck. :)
Once again, the Heroic Īntikam steps in and rewrites all of our scientific knowledge using his incredible intellect!
Have you ever witnessed a storm from a distance? If you have, you will have seen this very familiar scene...
(https://imageshack.com/i/pnFqhXFhj)
You can actually watch the rain falling from the cloud. It's as if the cloud smudges down to the ground. It's so incredibly easy to observe and so common that it really makes me wonder whether you've grown up in a box, or whether you walk around with your head looking down to the ground!
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense. You are really doing nothing to forward the FE agenda!
Your post most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
The rain don't fall down from the clouds.
They are falling down from the sky and passing through the clouds.
Good bye.
Hello mister and misses satans and the others; :)
Today we see how is rain occurs and why are the clouds occur.
As we know that meteorology knows where is the next rain fall down by looking the clouds. And we think that so the clouds cause the rain. This is not true.
God said us on the various different books that the rain falls down from the sky.
As we surely know that the sky is an ocean that surrounding us. It is reasonable to be in ice to don't fall down . when it melt to water then into rain water .
To understand the mechanism we need to look this image to understand it well.
(https://i.imgsafe.org/6eb33b3.jpg)
Sometimes i's a cloudy day but no rain, sometime a few clouds but raining. Because clouds just a mark shows maybe it's raining. The phrase as "rain laden clouds" completely a lie. It's just an effect.
Good luck. :)
Once again, the Heroic Īntikam steps in and rewrites all of our scientific knowledge using his incredible intellect!
Have you ever witnessed a storm from a distance? If you have, you will have seen this very familiar scene...
(https://imageshack.com/i/pnFqhXFhj)
You can actually watch the rain falling from the cloud. It's as if the cloud smudges down to the ground. It's so incredibly easy to observe and so common that it really makes me wonder whether you've grown up in a box, or whether you walk around with your head looking down to the ground!
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense. You are really doing nothing to forward the FE agenda!
Your post most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
The rain don't fall down from the clouds.
They are falling down from the sky and passing through the clouds.
Good bye.
Hello mister and misses satans and the others; :)
Today we see how is rain occurs and why are the clouds occur.
As we know that meteorology knows where is the next rain fall down by looking the clouds. And we think that so the clouds cause the rain. This is not true.
God said us on the various different books that the rain falls down from the sky.
As we surely know that the sky is an ocean that surrounding us. It is reasonable to be in ice to don't fall down . when it melt to water then into rain water .
To understand the mechanism we need to look this image to understand it well.
(https://i.imgsafe.org/6eb33b3.jpg)
Sometimes i's a cloudy day but no rain, sometime a few clouds but raining. Because clouds just a mark shows maybe it's raining. The phrase as "rain laden clouds" completely a lie. It's just an effect.
Good luck. :)
Once again, the Heroic Īntikam steps in and rewrites all of our scientific knowledge using his incredible intellect!
Have you ever witnessed a storm from a distance? If you have, you will have seen this very familiar scene...
(https://imageshack.com/i/pnFqhXFhj)
You can actually watch the rain falling from the cloud. It's as if the cloud smudges down to the ground. It's so incredibly easy to observe and so common that it really makes me wonder whether you've grown up in a box, or whether you walk around with your head looking down to the ground!
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense. You are really doing nothing to forward the FE agenda!
Your post most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
The rain don't fall down from the clouds.
They are falling down from the sky and passing through the clouds.
Good bye.
Isn't your god supposed to do some awful things to you when it catches you lying?
Glad to see you came out as a troll account.
Hello mister and misses satans and the others; :)
Today we see how is rain occurs and why are the clouds occur.
As we know that meteorology knows where is the next rain fall down by looking the clouds. And we think that so the clouds cause the rain. This is not true.
God said us on the various different books that the rain falls down from the sky.
As we surely know that the sky is an ocean that surrounding us. It is reasonable to be in ice to don't fall down . when it melt to water then into rain water .
To understand the mechanism we need to look this image to understand it well.
(https://i.imgsafe.org/6eb33b3.jpg)
Sometimes i's a cloudy day but no rain, sometime a few clouds but raining. Because clouds just a mark shows maybe it's raining. The phrase as "rain laden clouds" completely a lie. It's just an effect.
Good luck. :)
Once again, the Heroic Īntikam steps in and rewrites all of our scientific knowledge using his incredible intellect!
Have you ever witnessed a storm from a distance? If you have, you will have seen this very familiar scene...
(https://imageshack.com/i/pnFqhXFhj)
You can actually watch the rain falling from the cloud. It's as if the cloud smudges down to the ground. It's so incredibly easy to observe and so common that it really makes me wonder whether you've grown up in a box, or whether you walk around with your head looking down to the ground!
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense. You are really doing nothing to forward the FE agenda!
Your post most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
The rain don't fall down from the clouds.
They are falling down from the sky and passing through the clouds.
Good bye.
Look at the image Īntikam! Use your eyes! You can see that the rain isn't above the cloud... It is only below the cloud! I've seen this more times than I can count.
Don't deliberately be idiotic just to try and further your cause...you know that this is a stupid argument but you're too stubborn to admit that you were wrong!
Glad to see you came out as a troll account.
Do you know what is a troll?
Troll means a man like you and the other trolls. Troll don't produce his own ideas and continuously makes copy an past like your partners.
As you see that i'm about %50 producing my own working. So if you are a illiterate that don't know what is troll, or just trying to irritate me as a troll. You worthy of you .
Hello mister and misses satans and the others; :)
Today we see how is rain occurs and why are the clouds occur.
As we know that meteorology knows where is the next rain fall down by looking the clouds. And we think that so the clouds cause the rain. This is not true.
God said us on the various different books that the rain falls down from the sky.
As we surely know that the sky is an ocean that surrounding us. It is reasonable to be in ice to don't fall down . when it melt to water then into rain water .
To understand the mechanism we need to look this image to understand it well.
(https://i.imgsafe.org/6eb33b3.jpg)
Sometimes i's a cloudy day but no rain, sometime a few clouds but raining. Because clouds just a mark shows maybe it's raining. The phrase as "rain laden clouds" completely a lie. It's just an effect.
Good luck. :)
Once again, the Heroic Īntikam steps in and rewrites all of our scientific knowledge using his incredible intellect!
Have you ever witnessed a storm from a distance? If you have, you will have seen this very familiar scene...
(https://imageshack.com/i/pnFqhXFhj)
You can actually watch the rain falling from the cloud. It's as if the cloud smudges down to the ground. It's so incredibly easy to observe and so common that it really makes me wonder whether you've grown up in a box, or whether you walk around with your head looking down to the ground!
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense. You are really doing nothing to forward the FE agenda!
Your post most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
The rain don't fall down from the clouds.
They are falling down from the sky and passing through the clouds.
Good bye.
Look at the image Īntikam! Use your eyes! You can see that the rain isn't above the cloud... It is only below the cloud! I've seen this more times than I can count.
Don't deliberately be idiotic just to try and further your cause...you know that this is a stupid argument but you're too stubborn to admit that you were wrong!
You idiotly image did not open.
I told you can a find picture do defend to NASA but i can a picture defend to rain comes from sky too. These pictures not prove something.
1. "Idiotly" isn't a word.I'm guessing there isn't a lot of rain where he is from so he doesn't get to see it.
2. The picture displays just fine for me and everyone else - check your web browser.
3. The image is just an example. You can witness this easily with your own eyes. I'm surprised that you haven't already! It's quite a common thing to see (well it is here in England where it rains all the time)
4. If you claim to have photographs of rain falling from a blue sky down through the clouds then present them!
Clouds are not reason. Clouds are result. Usually clouds occur when it's raining, but sometimes they aren't occurs.
Cloudless rain possible with flat earth but it is impossible with the globe earth.
Cloudless rain:
(http://)
This one is better cloudless rain:
(http://)
Are clouds necessary for rain? No. Let’s imagine it is 100% humidity outside. And like a NJ summer there is not a cloud in the sky, the water is still all gaseous. If there is a small decrease in temp, pressure, or both the relative humidity will rise to over 100% and the water must condense out. You will get rain without a cloud in the sky.
Clouds are not reason. Clouds are result. Usually clouds occur when it's raining, but sometimes they aren't occurs.
Cloudless rain possible with flat earth but it is impossible with the globe earth.
Cloudless rain:
(http://)
This one is better cloudless rain:
(http://)Are clouds necessary for rain? No. Let’s imagine it is 100% humidity outside. And like a NJ summer there is not a cloud in the sky, the water is still all gaseous. If there is a small decrease in temp, pressure, or both the relative humidity will rise to over 100% and the water must condense out. You will get rain without a cloud in the sky.
Clouds are not reason. Clouds are result. Usually clouds occur when it's raining, but sometimes they aren't occurs.
Cloudless rain possible with flat earth but it is impossible with the globe earth.
Cloudless rain:
(http://)
This one is better cloudless rain:
(http://)Are clouds necessary for rain? No. Let’s imagine it is 100% humidity outside. And like a NJ summer there is not a cloud in the sky, the water is still all gaseous. If there is a small decrease in temp, pressure, or both the relative humidity will rise to over 100% and the water must condense out. You will get rain without a cloud in the sky.
.... is blabla :)
Clouds are not reason. Clouds are result. Usually clouds occur when it's raining, but sometimes they aren't occurs.
Cloudless rain possible with flat earth but it is impossible with the globe earth.
Cloudless rain:
(http://)
This one is better cloudless rain:
(http://)Are clouds necessary for rain? No. Let’s imagine it is 100% humidity outside. And like a NJ summer there is not a cloud in the sky, the water is still all gaseous. If there is a small decrease in temp, pressure, or both the relative humidity will rise to over 100% and the water must condense out. You will get rain without a cloud in the sky.
.... is blabla :)
Very intelligent response Īntikam. I guess this is you conceding in the most humble way you know.
If the mods did start to crack down on trolls you would be the first to go. You were presented with an image that clearly shows your argument is not correct but then claim you cannot load the image and therefore we have not proved anything. BUT, you have said in other threads that you can use your home computer to access what was blocked before so we know you would have the ability to see it eventually if you were not being dishonest about it before. If that isn't the definition of a troll I don't know what is so you are definitely a player.Clouds are not reason. Clouds are result. Usually clouds occur when it's raining, but sometimes they aren't occurs.
Cloudless rain possible with flat earth but it is impossible with the globe earth.
Cloudless rain:
(http://)
This one is better cloudless rain:
(http://)Are clouds necessary for rain? No. Let’s imagine it is 100% humidity outside. And like a NJ summer there is not a cloud in the sky, the water is still all gaseous. If there is a small decrease in temp, pressure, or both the relative humidity will rise to over 100% and the water must condense out. You will get rain without a cloud in the sky.
.... is blabla :)
Very intelligent response Īntikam. I guess this is you conceding in the most humble way you know.
I do not get addressed to trolls so much. I'm waiting the forum management solve this problem. There is so much trolls here about %86 is over all of the internet sites. This is not a troll working this is an attack.
So;
I don't need to attrition myself dealing with trolls. This is the language that you understand . I will continue my own work about different issues. Who post an objection abot it or not. I can not waste time for empty . Because you trolls are empty and just working for distraction .
This is not my game, because i'm not a player like you.
If the mods did start to crack down on trolls you would be the first to go. You were presented with an image that clearly shows your argument is not correct but then claim you cannot load the image and therefore we have not proved anything. BUT, you have said in other threads that you can use your home computer to access what was blocked before so we know you would have the ability to see it eventually if you were not being dishonest about it before. If that isn't the definition of a troll I don't know what is so you are definitely a player.Clouds are not reason. Clouds are result. Usually clouds occur when it's raining, but sometimes they aren't occurs.
Cloudless rain possible with flat earth but it is impossible with the globe earth.
Cloudless rain:
(http://)
This one is better cloudless rain:
(http://)Are clouds necessary for rain? No. Let’s imagine it is 100% humidity outside. And like a NJ summer there is not a cloud in the sky, the water is still all gaseous. If there is a small decrease in temp, pressure, or both the relative humidity will rise to over 100% and the water must condense out. You will get rain without a cloud in the sky.
.... is blabla :)
Very intelligent response Īntikam. I guess this is you conceding in the most humble way you know.
I do not get addressed to trolls so much. I'm waiting the forum management solve this problem. There is so much trolls here about %86 is over all of the internet sites. This is not a troll working this is an attack.
So;
I don't need to attrition myself dealing with trolls. This is the language that you understand . I will continue my own work about different issues. Who post an objection abot it or not. I can not waste time for empty . Because you trolls are empty and just working for distraction .
This is not my game, because i'm not a player like you.
First off, your definition of a troll is wholly inaccurate. What your describing is a shill.If the mods did start to crack down on trolls you would be the first to go. You were presented with an image that clearly shows your argument is not correct but then claim you cannot load the image and therefore we have not proved anything. BUT, you have said in other threads that you can use your home computer to access what was blocked before so we know you would have the ability to see it eventually if you were not being dishonest about it before. If that isn't the definition of a troll I don't know what is so you are definitely a player.Clouds are not reason. Clouds are result. Usually clouds occur when it's raining, but sometimes they aren't occurs.
Cloudless rain possible with flat earth but it is impossible with the globe earth.
Cloudless rain:
(http://)
This one is better cloudless rain:
(http://)Are clouds necessary for rain? No. Let’s imagine it is 100% humidity outside. And like a NJ summer there is not a cloud in the sky, the water is still all gaseous. If there is a small decrease in temp, pressure, or both the relative humidity will rise to over 100% and the water must condense out. You will get rain without a cloud in the sky.
.... is blabla :)
Very intelligent response Īntikam. I guess this is you conceding in the most humble way you know.
I do not get addressed to trolls so much. I'm waiting the forum management solve this problem. There is so much trolls here about %86 is over all of the internet sites. This is not a troll working this is an attack.
So;
I don't need to attrition myself dealing with trolls. This is the language that you understand . I will continue my own work about different issues. Who post an objection abot it or not. I can not waste time for empty . Because you trolls are empty and just working for distraction .
This is not my game, because i'm not a player like you.
You are making perception study to veer the meaning of the troll. Aw all we know that troll is meaning of working on a institution and defend something which his institution support. Here is the institution is NASA and ESA. Here almost all RE's are troll. I'm or nobody of FES can't be troll because the FES management do not give us wages and they know this. but you are messing their minds. all they need to ban you all. Except this, i don't see another solve.
Clouds are not reason. Clouds are result. Usually clouds occur when it's raining, but sometimes they aren't occurs.
Cloudless rain possible with flat earth but it is impossible with the globe earth.
Cloudless rain:
(http://)
This one is better cloudless rain:
(http://)Are clouds necessary for rain? No. Let’s imagine it is 100% humidity outside. And like a NJ summer there is not a cloud in the sky, the water is still all gaseous. If there is a small decrease in temp, pressure, or both the relative humidity will rise to over 100% and the water must condense out. You will get rain without a cloud in the sky.
.... is blabla :)
Very intelligent response Īntikam. I guess this is you conceding in the most humble way you know.
I do not get addressed to trolls so much. I'm waiting the forum management solve this problem. There is so much trolls here about %86 is over all of the internet sites. This is not a troll working this is an attack.
So;
I don't need to attrition myself dealing with trolls. This is the language that you understand . I will continue my own work about different issues. Who post an objection abot it or not. I can not waste time for empty . Because you trolls are empty and just working for distraction .
This is not my game, because i'm not a player like you.
Nice "proof" mate. ::) When was the definition of proof changed? I must have missed that memo.
You have missed addressing my issue with you and you being a troll and possibly a liar.Nice "proof" mate. ::) When was the definition of proof changed? I must have missed that memo.
You have missed the life.
Clouds are not reason. Clouds are result. Usually clouds occur when it's raining, but sometimes they aren't occurs.
Cloudless rain possible with flat earth but it is impossible with the globe earth.
Cloudless rain:
(http://)
This one is better cloudless rain:
(http://)Are clouds necessary for rain? No. Let’s imagine it is 100% humidity outside. And like a NJ summer there is not a cloud in the sky, the water is still all gaseous. If there is a small decrease in temp, pressure, or both the relative humidity will rise to over 100% and the water must condense out. You will get rain without a cloud in the sky.
.... is blabla :)
(https://imageshack.com/i/plJ3R4H6j)
Just took this picture looking over the river Mersey. Guess what that is Īntikam? It's a cloud with rain pouring down from it. It approached over the river and soaked everyone on this side!
Do you see the rain above the cloud? No.
Do you see the rain below the cloud? Yes.
Therefore, the rain does not come through the cloud as you state... It comes from the cloud.
(https://imageshack.com/i/plJ3R4H6j)
Just took this picture looking over the river Mersey. Guess what that is Īntikam? It's a cloud with rain pouring down from it. It approached over the river and soaked everyone on this side!
Do you see the rain above the cloud? No.
Do you see the rain below the cloud? Yes.
Therefore, the rain does not come through the cloud as you state... It comes from the cloud.
Side note: Don't try and fly a light plane through that rain. The air current is dropping faster than you can climb
(https://imageshack.com/i/plJ3R4H6j)
Just took this picture looking over the river Mersey. Guess what that is Īntikam? It's a cloud with rain pouring down from it. It approached over the river and soaked everyone on this side!
Do you see the rain above the cloud? No.
Do you see the rain below the cloud? Yes.
Therefore, the rain does not come through the cloud as you state... It comes from the cloud.
Side note: Don't try and fly a light plane through that rain. The air current is dropping faster than you can climb
Note taken... Will pack down my single engine now then.
Damn that's my ride home fucked.
If a cloud can drop 2500mm of rain in 48 hours how much does it weigh?Correct, at 900kph this tends to happen.
I don't jump with 900 kph. But since f=m*a, and the ocean is certainly more than a thousand times heavier than a cloud, .9 kph ought to suffice.
And do try to keep up, nobody is interested in how fast you can jump.
(https://imageshack.com/i/plJ3R4H6j)
Just took this picture looking over the river Mersey. Guess what that is Īntikam? It's a cloud with rain pouring down from it. It approached over the river and soaked everyone on this side!
Do you see the rain above the cloud? No.
Do you see the rain below the cloud? Yes.
Therefore, the rain does not come through the cloud as you state... It comes from the cloud.
Side note: Don't try and fly a light plane through that rain. The air current is dropping faster than you can climb
Note taken... Will pack down my single engine now then.
Damn that's my ride home fucked.
I miss flying. But with cost of fuel and my diabetes and now some significant hearing loss...
Don't forget to mention your mental handycaps.What are those? Hats for your hand that you invented? Gloves already work so well though and I feel like they keep you warmer.
Don't forget to mention your mental handycaps.What are those? Hats for your hand that you invented? Gloves already work so well though and I feel like they keep you warmer.
(Read entire thread thus far.)Now you are talking about tree's? Next you will be telling me I need tree's to breath!Why?
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
Because it is and has been proved as complete nonsense by not only the picture I have posted, but by the experiences of anyone who has ever seen rain fall from a cloud, which I postulate is around 99.99999% of mankind. It was off to a non-start.
Have you seen rain fall from a cloud? Do you think that rain is independent of clouds and falls from the firmament? If I told you that trees didn't actually grow from the ground, but grew from an invisible substance a metre above the ground would you think that was a sensible suggestion? Or would the fact that you can actually see them growing from the ground make my suggestion "complete nonsense"? Ask yourself these questions Tappet.
Since you and many others have said I live in a basement, could you give me the mathematical formula to determine how many tree's I would need to create oxygen in there with the door shut to live. Oh, and do not forget to allow for them to breath oxygen at night.Since you brought it up, yes in the long term you need trees (well all vegetation) to breathe! Vegetation generates the oxygen used by people, animals, fires, engines, etc.Now you are talking about tree's? Next you will be telling me I need tree's to breath!Why?
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
Because it is and has been proved as complete nonsense by not only the picture I have posted, but by the experiences of anyone who has ever seen rain fall from a cloud, which I postulate is around 99.99999% of mankind. It was off to a non-start.
Have you seen rain fall from a cloud? Do you think that rain is independent of clouds and falls from the firmament? If I told you that trees didn't actually grow from the ground, but grew from an invisible substance a metre above the ground would you think that was a sensible suggestion? Or would the fact that you can actually see them growing from the ground make my suggestion "complete nonsense"? Ask yourself these questions Tappet.Mind you this has nothing to do with the case!
If the mods did start to crack down on trolls you would be the first to go. You were presented with an image that clearly shows your argument is not correct but then claim you cannot load the image and therefore we have not proved anything. BUT, you have said in other threads that you can use your home computer to access what was blocked before so we know you would have the ability to see it eventually if you were not being dishonest about it before. If that isn't the definition of a troll I don't know what is so you are definitely a player.Clouds are not reason. Clouds are result. Usually clouds occur when it's raining, but sometimes they aren't occurs.
Cloudless rain possible with flat earth but it is impossible with the globe earth.
Cloudless rain:
(http://)
This one is better cloudless rain:
(http://)Are clouds necessary for rain? No. Let’s imagine it is 100% humidity outside. And like a NJ summer there is not a cloud in the sky, the water is still all gaseous. If there is a small decrease in temp, pressure, or both the relative humidity will rise to over 100% and the water must condense out. You will get rain without a cloud in the sky.
.... is blabla :)
Very intelligent response Īntikam. I guess this is you conceding in the most humble way you know.
I do not get addressed to trolls so much. I'm waiting the forum management solve this problem. There is so much trolls here about %86 is over all of the internet sites. This is not a troll working this is an attack.
So;
I don't need to attrition myself dealing with trolls. This is the language that you understand . I will continue my own work about different issues. Who post an objection abot it or not. I can not waste time for empty . Because you trolls are empty and just working for distraction .
This is not my game, because i'm not a player like you.
You are making perception study to veer the meaning of the troll. Aw all we know that troll is meaning of working on a institution and defend something which his institution support. Here is the institution is NASA and ESA. Here almost all RE's are troll. I'm or nobody of FES can't be troll because the FES management do not give us wages and they know this. but you are messing their minds. all they need to ban you all. Except this, i don't see another solve.
I asked your mom about your mental handicaps. She said she will let me know when she is done with me.Don't forget to mention your mental handycaps.What are those? Hats for your hand that you invented? Gloves already work so well though and I feel like they keep you warmer.
And the trees breath oxygen at night, but just a little bit. They are considerate enough to leave a little for us.(Read entire thread thus far.)Now you are talking about tree's? Next you will be telling me I need tree's to breath!Why?
This thread should most definitely be moved to Complete Nonsense.
Because it is and has been proved as complete nonsense by not only the picture I have posted, but by the experiences of anyone who has ever seen rain fall from a cloud, which I postulate is around 99.99999% of mankind. It was off to a non-start.
Have you seen rain fall from a cloud? Do you think that rain is independent of clouds and falls from the firmament? If I told you that trees didn't actually grow from the ground, but grew from an invisible substance a metre above the ground would you think that was a sensible suggestion? Or would the fact that you can actually see them growing from the ground make my suggestion "complete nonsense"? Ask yourself these questions Tappet.
0.0 But you do need trees to breath.
This thread needs to be moved to complete nonsense.
And the trees breath oxygen at night, but just a little bit. They are considerate enough to leave a little for us.Plant something in a sealed container with no oxygen but normal levels of carbon dioxide and another with no carbon dioxide but normal levels of oxygen. The one with CO2 but no oxygen will survive and the other won't. Why? Because science has proven that plants survive by photosynthesis which requires CO2 and gives off oxygen as a waste product.
There must be a formula to work out how many trees are needed per human, sounds to me like a great university research project for the budding young scientist.
FYI, I believe that >50% and upwards of 80% of the oxygen is produced in the oceans/water by algae. Just saying.most of Earth's oxygen is created by organisms in the oceans, but it's plankton not algae. This Wikipedia article has two sources for a range of estimates from 50% to 85% of the world's oxygen production.
You do if you are going to tell everybody how the universe works.
Do I necessarily need to know everything about the universe to know something about a limited part of it?
Um FYI, phytoplankton are microalgae.FYI, I believe that >50% and upwards of 80% of the oxygen is produced in the oceans/water by algae. Just saying.most of Earth's oxygen is created by organisms in the oceans, but it's plankton not algae. This Wikipedia article has two sources for a range of estimates from 50% to 85% of the world's oxygen production.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phytoplankton#Oxygen_production (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phytoplankton#Oxygen_production)
1. No I don't. I don't need to know absolutely everything, including the fact that trees don't take in oxygen or exude CO2, the tell you that one thing. I know that one thing, and thats all I need to say it. If everyone had to be omniscient to explain anything about their immediate surroundings, science would not exist whatsoever.You do if you are going to tell everybody how the universe works.
Do I necessarily need to know everything about the universe to know something about a limited part of it?
Trees apparently breath out co2 at night and breath out oxygen through the day. So a tree should live in a sealed container.
It produces its own oxygen and its own co2. ???
Oh, didn't know that. Tbh I didn't check that, had to go to work. I knew basically any green plant photosynthesizes but didn't know the taxonomy of phytoplankton and algae, thought those were separate things. Thanks for the info.Um FYI, phytoplankton are microalgae.FYI, I believe that >50% and upwards of 80% of the oxygen is produced in the oceans/water by algae. Just saying.most of Earth's oxygen is created by organisms in the oceans, but it's plankton not algae. This Wikipedia article has two sources for a range of estimates from 50% to 85% of the world's oxygen production.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phytoplankton#Oxygen_production (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phytoplankton#Oxygen_production)
(http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/phyto.html (http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/phyto.html))
Algae is a general term of photosynthetic organisms, that includes phytoplankton:
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algae (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algae))
From your quote "Phytoplankton are photosynthesizing microscopic organisms". But these are not the ONLY things in the oceans producing O2. Basically all "green" algae do - including seaweed.
(http://www.ecology.com/2011/09/12/important-organism/ (http://www.ecology.com/2011/09/12/important-organism/))
Wot?
1. No I don't. I don't need to know absolutely everything, including the fact that trees don't take in oxygen or exude CO2, the tell you that one thing. I know that one thing, and thats all I need to say it. If everyone had to be omniscient to explain anything about their immediate surroundings, science would not exist whatsoever.
2. No they don't. They don't have an internal clock that reverses everything about how they work. CO2 in, O2 out. Always.
Need I repeat?Wot?
1. No I don't. I don't need to know absolutely everything, including the fact that trees don't take in oxygen or exude CO2, the tell you that one thing. I know that one thing, and thats all I need to say it. If everyone had to be omniscient to explain anything about their immediate surroundings, science would not exist whatsoever.
2. No they don't. They don't have an internal clock that reverses everything about how they work. CO2 in, O2 out. Always.
Sorry, last time I checked trees breathed, used, through respiration or whatever else you wanted call it take in oxygen of a night. But then, you did say you dont need to know your stuff to educate people.Need I repeat?Wot?
1. No I don't. I don't need to know absolutely everything, including the fact that trees don't take in oxygen or exude CO2, the tell you that one thing. I know that one thing, and thats all I need to say it. If everyone had to be omniscient to explain anything about their immediate surroundings, science would not exist whatsoever.
2. No they don't. They don't have an internal clock that reverses everything about how they work. CO2 in, O2 out. Always.
1. If people have to know everything about everything that exists to say something about how and why something exists, then nobody would ever be able to say anything about anything. People don't have to be able to see the entirety of the universe to be able to know what's right in front of their face.
2. That's right. There's nothing in a tree that reverses everything about them. Biologists have checked.
Not that complicated. [/list]
HAAAAAAAAAAAA. Honestly when did you ever actually check to see whether a plant was BREATHING?Sorry, last time I checked trees breathed, used, through respiration or whatever else you wanted call it take in oxygen of a night. But then, you did say you dont need to know your stuff to educate people.If people have to know everything about everything that exists to say something about how and why something exists, then nobody would ever be able to say anything about anything. People don't have to be able to see the entirety of the universe to be able to know what's right in front of their face.No I don't. I don't need to know absolutely everything, including the fact that trees don't take in oxygen or exude CO2, the tell you that one thing. I know that one thing, and thats all I need to say it. If everyone had to be omniscient to explain anything about their immediate surroundings, science would not exist whatsoever.Wot?
"HAAAAAAAAAAAA. Honestly when did you ever actually check to see whether a plant was BREATHING?"That's ordinary metabolism? Still not breathing? They do that constantly, including during the day. Again, nothing about them really changes at night. No forward/reverse switch.
https://www.google.com.au/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=p0FwU53DLKqN8Qee4IDAAw#q=trees+breathe+oxygen+at+night (https://www.google.com.au/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=p0FwU53DLKqN8Qee4IDAAw#q=trees+breathe+oxygen+at+night)
???
Look at you weasel your way out of your error!"HAAAAAAAAAAAA. Honestly when did you ever actually check to see whether a plant was BREATHING?"That's ordinary metabolism? Still not breathing? They do that constantly, including during the day. Again, nothing about them really changes at night. No forward/reverse switch.
https://www.google.com.au/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=p0FwU53DLKqN8Qee4IDAAw#q=trees+breathe+oxygen+at+night (https://www.google.com.au/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=p0FwU53DLKqN8Qee4IDAAw#q=trees+breathe+oxygen+at+night)
???
CO2 in, O2 out. Always.
Alright, yes, I honestly did make a mistake there. Nobody likes being wrong and I did try to stretch it too much. I don't mean to justify my lapse of memory, as it really was a simple thing that I forgot, this is only why it happened. Part of it is that nobody's perfect. Also, my frustration I entirely forgot cellular metabolism when you made your flippant remark ofLook at you weasel your way out of your error!"HAAAAAAAAAAAA. Honestly when did you ever actually check to see whether a plant was BREATHING?"That's ordinary metabolism? Still not breathing? They do that constantly, including during the day. Again, nothing about them really changes at night. No forward/reverse switch.
https://www.google.com.au/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=p0FwU53DLKqN8Qee4IDAAw#q=trees+breathe+oxygen+at+night (https://www.google.com.au/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=p0FwU53DLKqN8Qee4IDAAw#q=trees+breathe+oxygen+at+night)
???
And you are here to educate people on how the universe works.
On the tree thing alone Donald would have to give you a fail.
Now you are talking about tree's? Next you will be telling me I need tree's to breath!to deflect attention from your obviously false belief that rain falls above clouds and lack of trust in human observation in a visually verifiable situation and after you actually claimed that people have to know everything about the universe to know anything at all. Your complete lack of skill in putting together a basic sentence, as evidenced in those following posts, only added to my frustration.
the tree thing alone
I accept your apology, but back to the tree thing. Firstly a REer brought trees into the debate,
Because it is and has been proved as complete nonsense by not only the picture I have posted, but by the experiences of anyone who has ever seen rain fall from a cloud, which I postulate is around 99.99999% of mankind. It was off to a non-start.
Have you seen rain fall from a cloud? Do you think that rain is independent of clouds and falls from the firmament? If I told you that trees didn't actually grow from the ground, but grew from an invisible substance a metre above the ground would you think that was a sensible suggestion? Or would the fact that you can actually see them growing from the ground make my suggestion "complete nonsense"? Ask yourself these questions Tappet.
then I questioned whether we really need them to breathe.
Another REer confirmed my beliefs saying 80% of oxygen comes from algae, but then you arrived babbling all sorts of nonsense.
Now I am going to question why we need to carry on with this world wide tree planting charade (1) and you are going to tell me why I am not as intelligent as you (2) and that we all have to plant trees. (3)(1) Because the trees are important for more than just some of our oxygen production. Do you have any idea how many of the world's ecosystems are reliant on trees? If there were no trees anymore there would be a mass extinction event
I look forward to your next reply, good luck. (4)
I accept your apology, but back to the tree thing. Firstly a REer brought trees into the debate, then I questioned whether we really need them to breathe. Another REer confirmed my beliefs saying 80% of oxygen comes from algae, but then you arrived babbling all sorts of nonsense. Now I am going to question why we need to carry on with this world wide tree planting charade and you are going to tell me why I am not as intelligent as you and that we all have to plant trees.My cut on this is safety. We now have the capacity to destroy life on a global scale. The Japanese Fukushima atomic accident polluted most of the Pacific ocean to a lesser or greater degree.
I look forward to your next reply, good luck.
[1) Because the trees are important for more than just some of our oxygen production. Do you have any idea how many of the world's ecosystems are reliant on trees? If there were no trees anymore there would be a mass extinction eventThats cute, we will be fine. There are more trees on earth now than ever.
I don't know about about Mongolia in detail so I won't go into that.[1) Because the trees are important for more than just some of our oxygen production. Do you have any idea how many of the world's ecosystems are reliant on trees? If there were no trees anymore there would be a mass extinction eventThats cute, we will be fine. There are more trees on earth now than ever.
Although, you probably still think Mongolia and the Great Plains need replanting.
Tell me who deforested the Great Plains? I looked in a book but found nothing.
In virtually every deforested region there's strong motives for reforestation. Maybe before you call others stupid and unreasonable, you could pick up a book.
1) I am sick and tired of people that do stupid things and say "I'm sorry" or "help me! because I am an idiot". You don't care about these NOW because you don't have to. If only YOU die, big deal - no big loss. If EVERYONE on the planet dies, that IS a big deal.[1) Because the trees are important for more than just some of our oxygen production. Do you have any idea how many of the world's ecosystems are reliant on trees? If there were no trees anymore there would be a mass extinction eventThat's cute, we will be fine. There are more trees on earth now than ever.
Although, you probably still think Mongolia and the Great Plains need replanting.
Oops, mixed Great Plains with Midwest. Where I live there actually has been significant deforestation, and even in the actual Great Plains some farmers do still plant trees at field borders even though there were formerly no trees there. The reason they do this isn't because they deforested it but because they've stripped the land of grasses so they can farm it, so they need to block out some of the wind to keep the soil from blowing away when the field isn't planted. If you've never heard of this, try "Dust Bowl". So there's still reasons to reforest even without deforestation.In virtually every deforested region there's strong motives for reforestation. Maybe before you call others stupid and unreasonable, you could pick up a book.Tell me who deforested the Great Plains? I looked in a book but found nothing.
6) Anyways, IMO, who cares what you think. Obviously, you are in the group of people that don't care about humanity (its survival). I had another link about "killer asteroids" that FEers don't believe in because, hey, the sky is only a couple thousand miles up. Someone one else had the same total disregard for protection from them as you do about trees. Oh, well.I'm going to leave this discussion because it's getting ridiculous and I'm simply tired of arguing about why we need trees.
Probably best you did leave, for the tree discussion is related to the OP and FE. We had not gotten there yet.
Given that OP's been authoritatively disproven already, that this is completely unrelated to the OP or flat earth in general, and6) Anyways, IMO, who cares what you think. Obviously, you are in the group of people that don't care about humanity (its survival). I had another link about "killer asteroids" that FEers don't believe in because, hey, the sky is only a couple thousand miles up. Someone one else had the same total disregard for protection from them as you do about trees. Oh, well.I'm going to leave this discussion because it's getting ridiculous and I'm simply tired of arguing about why we need trees.
On a leaving note, quick question. How did they dig up the millions of tree stumps after the deforestation for the millions of acres of farms in the 1800's?I presume a more efficient method, like tilling because they'd have to anyway [nb]Tilling is an agricultural method of preparing soil by overturning.[/nb] and to prevent grasses from lighting much, [nb]Neither grass nor soil are present in tree stumps, so tilling a tree stump will not be very efficient, especially if targeting brush fire risks, as stated.[/nb] then setting the stumps on fire. They wouldn't have had to tend to the stumps much afterwards, the field is already tilled, and there's free fertilizer in the hole.
Was it done like this?
(http://)
You can not till tree stumps.On a leaving note, quick question. How did they dig up the millions of tree stumps after the deforestation for the millions of acres of farms in the 1800's?I presume a more efficient method, like tilling because they'd have to anyway and to prevent grasses from lighting much, then setting the stumps on fire. They wouldn't have had to tend to the stumps much afterwards, the field is already tilled, and there's free fertilizer in the hole.
Was it done like this?
(http://)
Goodbye.
Lacking proper agriculture and farming knowledge does not equate to knowing about the world around you. Nice try though.You can not till tree stumps.On a leaving note, quick question. How did they dig up the millions of tree stumps after the deforestation for the millions of acres of farms in the 1800's?I presume a more efficient method, like tilling because they'd have to anyway and to prevent grasses from lighting much, then setting the stumps on fire. They wouldn't have had to tend to the stumps much afterwards, the field is already tilled, and there's free fertilizer in the hole.
Was it done like this?
(http://)
Goodbye.
Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about.
But feel free to tell me about destruction of the "planet" again. It is very entertaining.
Of coase it does! You need to have solid foundations if you are going to educate people.Lacking proper agriculture and farming knowledge does not equate to knowing about the world around you. Nice try though.You can not till tree stumps.On a leaving note, quick question. How did they dig up the millions of tree stumps after the deforestation for the millions of acres of farms in the 1800's?I presume a more efficient method, like tilling because they'd have to anyway and to prevent grasses from lighting much, then setting the stumps on fire. They wouldn't have had to tend to the stumps much afterwards, the field is already tilled, and there's free fertilizer in the hole.
Was it done like this?
(http://)
Goodbye.
Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about.
But feel free to tell me about destruction of the "planet" again. It is very entertaining.
Of coase it does! You need to have solid foundations if you are going to educate people.Lacking proper agriculture and farming knowledge does not equate to knowing about the world around you. Nice try though.You can not till tree stumps.On a leaving note, quick question. How did they dig up the millions of tree stumps after the deforestation for the millions of acres of farms in the 1800's?I presume a more efficient method, like tilling because they'd have to anyway and to prevent grasses from lighting much, then setting the stumps on fire. They wouldn't have had to tend to the stumps much afterwards, the field is already tilled, and there's free fertilizer in the hole.
Was it done like this?
(http://)
Goodbye.
Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about.
But feel free to tell me about destruction of the "planet" again. It is very entertaining.
If you live on a planet you need deforestation. Who pulled the stumps out?
You can not till tree stumps.On a leaving note, quick question. How did they dig up the millions of tree stumps after the deforestation for the millions of acres of farms in the 1800's?I presume a more efficient method, like tilling because they'd have to anyway and to prevent grasses from lighting much, then setting the stumps on fire. They wouldn't have had to tend to the stumps much afterwards, the field is already tilled, and there's free fertilizer in the hole.
Was it done like this?
(http://)
Goodbye.
Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about.
But feel free to tell me about destruction of the "planet" again. It is very entertaining.
While on the topic, did anyone ask Intikam how come we get rain at night.. If rain is caused by the sun melting the firmament, it couldn't ever rain at night. :)
OP's explanation would have us believe that the sky has a firmament of ice, and the presence of the sun melts the ice to create rain. This would naturally make the following true:
1. Either clouds or rain or both are always forming during the day.
2. Neither clouds nor rain are ever forming at night.
Well said, but seriously you gotta stop putting Rayzor and Rabinoz in the same thread
Maybe some people can't see the "forest for the trees"?
I wasn't really directing my post you. At least Rayzor and NewtSmooth have some on-topic posts.Well said, but seriously you gotta stop putting Rayzor and Rabinoz in the same thread
Maybe some people can't see the "forest for the trees"?
You can not till tree stumps.On a leaving note, quick question. How did they dig up the millions of tree stumps after the deforestation for the millions of acres of farms in the 1800's?I presume a more efficient method, like tilling because they'd have to anyway and to prevent grasses from lighting much, then setting the stumps on fire. They wouldn't have had to tend to the stumps much afterwards, the field is already tilled, and there's free fertilizer in the hole.
Was it done like this?
(http://)
Goodbye.
Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about.
But feel free to tell me about destruction of the "planet" again. It is very entertaining.
You forgot about the "Stump Jump Plough" a famous Australian invention. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stump-jump_plough (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stump-jump_plough)
While on the topic, did anyone ask Intikam how come we get rain at night.. If rain is caused by the sun melting the firmament, it couldn't ever rain at night. :)
You can not till tree stumps.On a leaving note, quick question. How did they dig up the millions of tree stumps after the deforestation for the millions of acres of farms in the 1800's?I presume a more efficient method, like tilling because they'd have to anyway and to prevent grasses from lighting much, then setting the stumps on fire. They wouldn't have had to tend to the stumps much afterwards, the field is already tilled, and there's free fertilizer in the hole.
Was it done like this?
(http://)
Goodbye.
Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about.
But feel free to tell me about destruction of the "planet" again. It is very entertaining.
You forgot about the "Stump Jump Plough" a famous Australian invention. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stump-jump_plough (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stump-jump_plough)
While on the topic, did anyone ask Intikam how come we get rain at night.. If rain is caused by the sun melting the firmament, it couldn't ever rain at night. :)
I think Intikam got mad because he received a short ban. After all of his research, study, and analysis, us ungrateful fellow FE'ers banned him for his antisemitic ramblings, so he took his ball and went home.