I'm surprised nobody's discussing this.
OP's explanation would have us believe that the sky has a firmament of ice, and the presence of the sun melts the ice to create rain. This would naturally make the following true:
1. Either clouds or rain or both are
always forming during the day.
2. Neither clouds nor rain are
ever forming at night.
And everybody knows that neither of these things are true. In any if-then statement, if the -then statement is false, then by the very nature of conditionals the if- statement cannot be true.
OP also claimed that the water cycle does not exist. Neat. Tell me more. Any sources on that?
How come you can see clouds rising up from evaporating lakes on a hot day?
Where does dew come from? Dew normally doesn't occur in areas of low pressure (updrafts pull moisture away from the ground), and we can clearly see a lack of any clouds. You can go outside at night and know it's not raining but find dew in the morning. Meteorology's proven humidity is a thing, and overnight cooling causes it to condense. What's your theory on that? Where does dew come from?
Same question with fog. That's a cloud at the surface. Where did it come from?
RET states that gravity holds gases to the surface, which also quite easily explains why there's a gradient of decreasing air pressure as one climbs higher above Earth which decreases the effect of its gravity. There's not exactly any "boundary" between atmosphere and outer space, the atmosphere thins out to virtual nonexistence.
FET, on the other hand, says there's a firmament holding in the atmosphere. And now OP is claiming that firmament is made of ice. If what is known in RET as outer space lies beyond the firmament, then the hard vacuum would simply boil off the ice. There's no atmospheric pressure against the ice's surface from the infinite empty region outside, so it naturally sublimates until the water vapor fills that void. So by now that ice layer would be entirely gone, as would the atmosphere because gravity isn't real, and we would all be dead. Thus, OP's claim cannot possibly even fit the Flat Earth Theory. An ad hoc claim that the ice is infinitely thick would mean that, seeing as ice is not perfectly transparent, we wouldn't be able to see the stars, and we know that's not true. Again, in an if-then statement where the -then is false, so is the if- by default.
If you're going to invoke Occam's Razor and say that because we don't entirely understand the nature of gravity yet it can't possibly be true, I'm going to invoke Occam's Razor and challenge you to prove that Universal Acceleration can explain decreasing air pressure, that aetheric shielding is a thing, and that the Shadow Object exists, or else because you can't explain these things FET as a whole is debunked.
Another thing: Your diagram says this. "Forming the clouds decreases temperature caused by Evaporation so other waters continue to fall down." Scientific evidence has proven that when water evaporates, it draws in energy from its surroundings, and actually has a cooling effect. Sweat is evidence of this, that's how sweat works. The sweat on your body evaporates and carries thermal energy away with it. This is also why many outdoor workers dip the handles of their (non-electric) tools in water, if it's available, to cool them off if the tool has been lying in the sun and has gotten hot. Condensation works the opposite way and has the opposite effect. So if that's supposed to be one of the driving forces acting between clouds and rain, tadaaa~, your lack of understanding of easily demonstrable fact has just wrecked your theory.
So now I've done my part, I've cited reasons why I have absolutely no reason to believe you. You've created this "exposition of truth" but have given absolutely no real evidence for it. All you have is a diagram, again, with no evidence to support it. Go ahead and actually prove your idea. Until such time as an FEer actually proves this instead of cowardly shifting the burden of proof, or saying a cloud's mist can shred an airplane, or saying that everything else is a NASA-funded cover-up so only this could be the truth, I'm going to leave you with this.
This thread needs to be moved to complete nonsense.