Gravimeters are devices that measure the acceleration of gravity in a certain place. They are extremely accurate, measuring variations of even 10-12 g. For example by knowing gravity variations somewhere you can know the rock types there are beneath the surface, and find certain minerals or petroleum.In theory every location on the flat earth would have to accelerate perfectly at fixed constant. If not the FE would break up. Now we can measure the gravitation force on the whole earth and map it. Flat earth busted!
If according to FET the Earth has a constant acceleration of 9,81 m/s2, how can this work? Are all geologists in the conspiracy too?
How bout you find out for yourself? Why do you require people to give you explanations? The post isn't about how they work. It's about how can what they show be coincided with a flat earth. ( hint, they can't)It was a questions and answers, so I asked a question. I just thought one of you expert globalites would know how they work. Obviously I was mistaken, as it appears you don't know how they work.
It's amazing stuff this gravity, isn't it. ;DIt says a lot. UA could not work if parts of the FE is acceleration more than other places.
It's amazing stuff this gravity, isn't it. ;DGravity isn't nearly as amazing, or mysterious, as denpresure.
Well denpressure can be explained in a basic way as to what it actually is. Gravity has this magical quality that no one knows what the hell it is and weirdly it cannot be explained.It's amazing stuff this gravity, isn't it. ;DGravity isn't nearly as amazing, or mysterious, as denpresure.
I agree, scepti's denpressure is far better. At least I laughed a lot more when he explained denpressure than when my physics teacher explained gravity to me.It's amazing stuff this gravity, isn't it. ;DGravity isn't nearly as amazing, or mysterious, as denpresure.
But gravimeters work. How is this possible with your denpressure theory?Well denpressure can be explained in a basic way as to what it actually is. Gravity has this magical quality that no one knows what the hell it is and weirdly it cannot be explained.It's amazing stuff this gravity, isn't it. ;DGravity isn't nearly as amazing, or mysterious, as denpresure.
Anyway, I won't harp on about it. I think it's fairly clear.
Because they are actually measuring the amount of denpressure ::) I can see why scepti gets impatient with you lot.But gravimeters work. How is this possible with your denpressure theory?Well denpressure can be explained in a basic way as to what it actually is. Gravity has this magical quality that no one knows what the hell it is and weirdly it cannot be explained.It's amazing stuff this gravity, isn't it. ;DGravity isn't nearly as amazing, or mysterious, as denpresure.
Anyway, I won't harp on about it. I think it's fairly clear.
What if some parts of the Earth are semipermeable and the UA simply makes some things lighter than others?The slight differences over time could be why mountains exist.
What if some parts of the Earth are semipermeable and the UA simply makes some things lighter than others?car
What if some parts of the Earth are semipermeable and the UA simply makes some things lighter than others?If the "Flat Earth" didn't accelerate uniformly, it would break apart.
We are not talking strictly about acceleration variances here. We are talking about perceived acceleration variances.We are talking about measured differences at the same time in different places.
We are not talking strictly about acceleration variances here. We are talking about perceived acceleration variances.The idea is there are definably variances in gravity all over the world and there should be. The same applies to the moon. It has been mapped also. If the earth were flat the acceleration HAS to be constant all over the flat earth. You can't have England accelerate a bit faster or slower than America. The whole earth would break up.
Are you saying that matter is completely un-impermeable?No, I am saying that you are completely incapable of reading, comprehending and replying to straightforward questions.
Would a force be able to reach things on the other side of a solid object? Can forces penetrate through things that otherwise seem solid?Depends. Can a person move their couch by pushing on a wall? No.
As I said earlier, it is possible that the Earth is permeable and that different locations allow different amounts of UA to seep through, giving slightly different g readings in different locations. I am not stating this as a fact; I am only speculating.Sounds like theoretical physics to me.
As I said earlier, it is possible that the Earth is permeable and that different locations allow different amounts of UA to seep through, giving slightly different g readings in different locations. I am not stating this as a fact; I am only speculating.I know you are speculating but you can't seep Acceleration to be faster or slower. It is like having 50 kids on the buss. They will all feel acceleration all at the same time.
Would a force be able to reach things on the other side of a solid object? Can forces penetrate through things that otherwise seem solid?Are you saying that the flat earth is a solid object? Doesn't the FE have a liquid magma layer?
Would a force be able to reach things on the other side of a solid object? Can forces penetrate through things that otherwise seem solid?Depends. Can a person move their couch by pushing on a wall? No.
Yes, it does.As I said earlier, it is possible that the Earth is permeable and that different locations allow different amounts of UA to seep through, giving slightly different g readings in different locations. I am not stating this as a fact; I am only speculating.Sounds like theoretical physics to me.
As I said earlier, it is possible that the Earth is permeable and that different locations allow different amounts of UA to seep through, giving slightly different g readings in different locations. I am not stating this as a fact; I am only speculating.I know you are speculating but you can't seep Acceleration to be faster or slower. It is like having 50 kids on the buss. They will all feel acceleration all at the same time.
Would a force be able to reach things on the other side of a solid object? Can forces penetrate through things that otherwise seem solid?Are you saying that the flat earth is a solid object? Doesn't the FE have a liquid magma layer?
Are you saying the buss is stretching if it is front wheel drive and the buss is compressing if it is rear wheel drive?As I said earlier, it is possible that the Earth is permeable and that different locations allow different amounts of UA to seep through, giving slightly different g readings in different locations. I am not stating this as a fact; I am only speculating.I know you are speculating but you can't seep Acceleration to be faster or slower. It is like having 50 kids on the buss. They will all feel acceleration all at the same time.
They don't all feel the acceleration at the same time. If it is a front wheel drive buss, the kids at the front of the buss will feel the acceleration a fraction of a second before the kids at the rear do. The acceleration travels at the speed of light.
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
Yes. Special Relativity tells us that.What you are doing is taking the Special Relativity to the extreme. Are you saying people are shorter standing up as if there were laying down on the FE?
Yes. Special Relativity tells us that.By what distance?
There is no such thing as the UA acceleration.Sandokhan, Universal Acceleration is acceleration, not attractive gravity. Please try to keep up, will you?
http://depalma.pair.com/gyrodrop.html (http://depalma.pair.com/gyrodrop.html)
GYRODROP EXPERIMENT: DEFIANCE OF ATTRACTIVE GRAVITY
It is also possible that everything below the crust is magma. Volcanoes only occur when there are openings in the crust (plate boundaries, hot spots, etc.).Would a force be able to reach things on the other side of a solid object? Can forces penetrate through things that otherwise seem solid?Are you saying that the flat earth is a solid object? Doesn't the FE have a liquid magma layer?
It is possible that there are simply pockets of magma and the rest of the Earth is solid. This could be why there are not volcanoes everywhere.
Also, forces can travel through liquids as well as solids.That would depend on what is applying the force, don't you think?
markjo, what force can not pass through a solid or liquid?Magnetism for one and electric is the other one
You are saying that a magnetic field can not pass through a solid?It will pass through most solid but it will not to all.
You are also saying that electricity can not pass through a solid object?
Your are really making yourself look dumb.
Metal is a solid. Wires are solid.You are saying that a magnetic field can not pass through a solid?It will pass through most solid but it will not to all.
You are also saying that electricity can not pass through a solid object?
Your are really making yourself look dumb.
Electric field is a force while electricity is a the glowing of electrons in metal or a vacuum as we know it.
Starman, you are making people think you are not very educated. That is one of the dumbest things you have said.Here is your question. "what force can not pass through a solid or liquid?" You can answer if you like?
Starman, you are making people think you are not very educated. That is one of the dumbest things you have said.Here is your question. "what force can not pass through a solid or liquid?" You can answer if you like?
Magnetism for one and electric is the other oneThat was your answer.
It could. It's only one type of force. You did not specify which force you were talking about.Would a force be able to reach things on the other side of a solid object? Can forces penetrate through things that otherwise seem solid?Depends. Can a person move their couch by pushing on a wall? No.
If my coach has iron in it, could I not move it using a strong enough magnet from the other side of a wall?
Might want to refer to your previous thread about how theoretical physics is bad.Yes, it does.As I said earlier, it is possible that the Earth is permeable and that different locations allow different amounts of UA to seep through, giving slightly different g readings in different locations. I am not stating this as a fact; I am only speculating.Sounds like theoretical physics to me.
The speed of push is actually equal to the speed of sound in the material, not the speed of light.As I said earlier, it is possible that the Earth is permeable and that different locations allow different amounts of UA to seep through, giving slightly different g readings in different locations. I am not stating this as a fact; I am only speculating.I know you are speculating but you can't seep Acceleration to be faster or slower. It is like having 50 kids on the buss. They will all feel acceleration all at the same time.
They don't all feel the acceleration at the same time. If it is a front wheel drive buss, the kids at the front of the buss will feel the acceleration a fraction of a second before the kids at the rear do. The acceleration travels at the speed of light.
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
... That is one of the dumbest things you have said.
So then, we are in agreement that a force can penetrate a solid.Except for maybe Starman.
markjo, what force can not pass through a solid or liquid?That depends on what you mean by "force" and "pass through". It would also depend greatly on the physical properties of the solid or liquid. For example, magnetic force can pass through paper, but it can't pass through many metals.
He is being vague on purpose.markjo, what force can not pass through a solid or liquid?That depends on what you mean by "force" and "pass through". It would also depend greatly on the physical properties of the solid or liquid. For example, magnetic force can pass through paper, but it can't pass through many metals.
What metals will stop magnetic force?
What metals will stop magnetic force?Put a compass in a metal can or go inside a steel building. It will not work.
Funny enough, I have a can of soup in front of me, a button compass in my desk, and a fairly strong magnet somewhere (will have to find it). I will post the result soon. I need to eat the soup first.Now you are out of proportion. Put the compass in the middle of a steel ship and try your magnet.
I am currently in a steel building. Will that work?Does your compass work?
It appears to be working. I am still working on the soup, though. I am eating right out of the can.If the magnetic field of your compass would go thought metal the compass would not move if you had a piece of metal close to it.
If the magnetic field of your compass would go thought metal the compass would not move if you had a piece of metal close to it.
What metals will stop magnetic force?(http://www.mobiusengine.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/tin-foil-hat-3.jpg)
Well, I placed the compass in the can and moved the magnet around the outside and the magnet was able to affect the compass inside. Now we know that magnetic force can pass through solid objects.What metal was the can made of? Did you try a steel can? Can you post a video so that we can check your methodology?
Interestingly, the magnet itself is enclosed in metal (apparently steel), yet still affects the compass. I tried placing several different types of material between the compass and magnet: a cup of coffee, my leatherman wave knife, plastic safety glasses, a pad of paper. None of these materials seemed to have any effect on the magnet's ability to move the compass. In fact, the knife actually increased the distance from which the magnet would affect the compass. I could find no material that did not allow the magnetic force to pass through.There's a non-magnetic coat of some type of nickel alloy on the outside of my neodymium magnets. :D
So, it's agreed that the UA is a magnetic force? Now we're making progress.When did I say that? :l
Yeah, nothing hinders free thought like precise language.I can tell you with almost 100% certainty that they are satanist globulites.
Anyway, tell me about these people who control me.
The point is that only a fraction of a percent of those people who believe in globularism need to know the truth. The rest are just sheep.True, and here they are, the bastards:
This is similar to what the astronauts wore on the moon set, minus the eye protection visor. The suits look like they're pressurised to 4 psi.The point is that only a fraction of a percent of those people who believe in globularism need to know the truth. The rest are just sheep.True, and here they are, the bastards:
(http://sheepnomoreblog.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/sheeple-1b.jpg)
This is similar to what the astronauts wore on the moon set, minus the eye protection visor. The suits look like they're pressurised to 4 psi.The point is that only a fraction of a percent of those people who believe in globularism need to know the truth. The rest are just sheep.True, and here they are, the bastards:
(http://sheepnomoreblog.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/sheeple-1b.jpg)
markjo, you are aware that other forces exist besides magnetic forces, are you not?Of course there are. So why don't you tell me which of those other forces can both push and permeate the earth at the same time all while flowing around it and reforming to push and rotate the sun, moon and rest of the universe all in clockwork fashion?
UA.That is not force. By the way what type of force is pushing the FE?
UA. I am not sure what you are confused about.What is the force or energy that is acceleration the flat earth. Don't be stupid.
There are many mysteries on this world. What causes the UA is one of them. I can speculate on the subject, if you would like?I bet you could not come up with something reasonable to what it is.
I bet I could. I could come up with some bull crap like Big Bang or Dark Energy or something. At least I had the decency to inform you that I was going to speculate, unlike your RE scientists.Well do come up with something. Don't invent something by using buzz words that you know nothing about. It is a force that is pushing. It at least must make sense.
Yeah, it is energy pushing against something. What is hard to understand about that?Yes but what is it? Nuclear? Magnetism? Magical force? alien?
Is it possible that it is a force that does not exist on the Earth? It can not be recreated, only observed.I doubt it. There could be some unknown force or there could be are none. In the end it is your UA and there has to have some foundation for the theory. Like scepti once said: "I just need to prove one thing to be wrong to make it all wrong." There is a bit of logic to it but it works both ways. This UA force is by most part the key to the FET. If that force is not solid in the theory all the FET falls apart. A magical force theory simple is not good enough to convince anybody the earth is flat.
We can observe the celestial objects.But you are telling us it reflections. Does that make sense?
Is it possible that it is a force that does not exist on the Earth? It can not be recreated, only observed.I doubt it. There could be some unknown force or there could be are none. In the end it is your UA and there has to have some foundation for the theory. Like scepti once said: "I just need to prove one thing to be wrong to make it all wrong." There is a bit of logic to it but it works both ways. This UA force is by most part the key to the FET. If that force is not solid in the theory all the FET falls apart. A magical force theory simple is not good enough to convince anybody the earth is flat.
We can observe the celestial objects.But you are telling us it reflections. Does that make sense?
I bet I could. I could come up with some bull crap like Big Bang or Dark Energy or something. At least I had the decency to inform you that I was going to speculate, unlike your RE scientists.No scientist has confirmed the Big Bang theory or the existance of dark energy. It is speculation, but unlike yours, it is based on certain evidence. You can't see dark energy, but you can see its effect. So scientists say there is a hypothetical form of energy called dark energy that causes that.
It is not about what we can do on earth it is about the US of your FE. Don't divert the question.Is it possible that it is a force that does not exist on the Earth? It can not be recreated, only observed.I doubt it. There could be some unknown force or there could be are none. In the end it is your UA and there has to have some foundation for the theory. Like scepti once said: "I just need to prove one thing to be wrong to make it all wrong." There is a bit of logic to it but it works both ways. This UA force is by most part the key to the FET. If that force is not solid in the theory all the FET falls apart. A magical force theory simple is not good enough to convince anybody the earth is flat.
Can you reproduce the Big Bang on Earth? If no, then it must be wrong, correct?We can observe the celestial objects.But you are telling us it reflections. Does that make sense?
For the last time, stop attributing anything, absolutely anything, that sceptimatic claims to me. Just stop it already.
scepti and crew have postulated that sun, moon, and other celestial objects are a reflection of the Earth or from some sort of natural laser. I never said this. Please don't put his theories into my mouth.So why does it appear to be perfectly round and have ice caps not to mention it has a very predictable orbit?
As far as Mars goes, it is likely some form of wandering phlogiston caught in the eddy of the UA as it passes by the Earth.
The lenses on your scope are round giving it a round appearance. ;DIf I used a square lens would it be square. How far is it?
Seriously, it is a burning ball of phlogiston. That is why it appears round.
If your head was square, would it be more full of intelligence? :)Well that is a reasonable answer. Is that your opinion or the official version.
Mars is likely around 100 miles or so higher than the sun and moon.
That is my opinion. There is no official version.Is there going to be an official version. How can you accept a version of your world when it is not defined and everybody has their own version.
How can you accept science when every scientist has his own version?You can have scientist that may have theories but the real mission is to prove it. That may not be easy or possible but there is a point where other scientist will test his theory for it to be valid. For example Einstein predicted the faster you go toward the speed of light time will slow down. This was all done mathematically. It was not just a idea from a dream. It was proven to be true.
Einstein never said that time slowed down locally. It only appears to slow down for someone outside of your frame of reference.How close is locally?
Locally is the things that are moving with you.Got to go. I will show you how it was proven. later..
Einstein never said that time slowed down locally. It only appears to slow down for someone outside of your frame of reference.It does slow down for the moving FOR, not just appear to slow down.
ROFLMAO!
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
ROFLMAO!
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
I just have hear more about this concept.
Can you explain please?
What's to explain? This is exactly how it works under Relativity. Nothing can go faster than the speed of light, so technically if you were able to make a length of steel say from here to a point 1 light year away, any way you moved the rod here wouldn't be seen on the other end for a year as the change moved the length of the rod.ROFLMAO!
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
I just have hear more about this concept.
Can you explain please?
That's just compression... But a cue stick would break under it's own weight... Duh...Yes the materials are unlikely to handle the strain, but that doesn't make the thought experiment less valid as far as it goes.
Bad analogy...
What's to explain? This is exactly how it works under Relativity. Nothing can go faster than the speed of light, so technically if you were able to make a length of steel say from here to a point 1 light year away, any way you moved the rod here wouldn't be seen on the other end for a year as the change moved the length of the rod.ROFLMAO!
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
I just have hear more about this concept.
Can you explain please?
Either that or you just made something move faster than the speed of light and broke the universe as we know it in half. So take your pick.
ROFLMAO!
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
I just have hear more about this concept.
Can you explain please?
What's to explain? This is exactly how it works under Relativity. Nothing can go faster than the speed of light, so technically if you were able to make a length of steel say from here to a point 1 light year away, any way you moved the rod here wouldn't be seen on the other end for a year as the change moved the length of the rod.ROFLMAO!
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
I just have hear more about this concept.
Can you explain please?
Either that or you just made something move faster than the speed of light and broke the universe as we know it in half. So take your pick.
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
What's to explain? This is exactly how it works under Relativity. Nothing can go faster than the speed of light, so technically if you were able to make a length of steel say from here to a point 1 light year away, any way you moved the rod here wouldn't be seen on the other end for a year as the change moved the length of the rod.If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.ROFLMAO!
I just have hear more about this concept.
Can you explain please?
Either that or you just made something move faster than the speed of light and broke the universe as we know it in half. So take your pick.
Wouldn't be seen of course, but why would it not move instantly end to end?
You are moving it say 6" not the length +6"QuoteIf you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
Nothing about seeing it move.
Just curious if jroa invented yet another magical force or just forgot to say see it move instead of it moves.
Interesting aspect that I've never cosidered.
Welcome to relativity.What's to explain? This is exactly how it works under Relativity. Nothing can go faster than the speed of light, so technically if you were able to make a length of steel say from here to a point 1 light year away, any way you moved the rod here wouldn't be seen on the other end for a year as the change moved the length of the rod.ROFLMAO!
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
I just have hear more about this concept.
Can you explain please?
Either that or you just made something move faster than the speed of light and broke the universe as we know it in half. So take your pick.
Give me your logic again... If I have a physical object that is 1 light year in length, and one end is moved, lets say 1 meter at 1 meter a second....
The electrons within would transfer the information and repel from each other at the speed of whatever, they would compress and then repel at the speed of whatever and the other end would eventually move... nothing faster than light.... If You had an electrically conductive material that was 1 light year long and you sent an electric current down it, that would move at the speed of light as well...
btw, nothing on this site has ever gotten me to "ROTFLMAO"
We are being a bit dramatic, aren't we?
No, he is not! That would be you trashing science.Why are you calling Einstein and all of physics liars?If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.ROFLMAO!
I just have hear more about this concept.
Can you explain please?
A typical two piece cue for pocket billiards is usually made mostly of hard or rock maple
Thanks for the link, I may have a new favorite Relativity thought experiment. Akin to the "if the sun disappears would the planets orbit change instantly " one but even more unintuitive if that's possible.Welcome to relativity.What's to explain? This is exactly how it works under Relativity. Nothing can go faster than the speed of light, so technically if you were able to make a length of steel say from here to a point 1 light year away, any way you moved the rod here wouldn't be seen on the other end for a year as the change moved the length of the rod.ROFLMAO!
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
I just have hear more about this concept.
Can you explain please?
Either that or you just made something move faster than the speed of light and broke the universe as we know it in half. So take your pick.
Give me your logic again... If I have a physical object that is 1 light year in length, and one end is moved, lets say 1 meter at 1 meter a second....
The electrons within would transfer the information and repel from each other at the speed of whatever, they would compress and then repel at the speed of whatever and the other end would eventually move... nothing faster than light.... If You had an electrically conductive material that was 1 light year long and you sent an electric current down it, that would move at the speed of light as well...
btw, nothing on this site has ever gotten me to "ROTFLMAO"
We are being a bit dramatic, aren't we?
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/21122/if-i-move-a-long-solid-stick-can-i-send-message-fastest-than-light
https://www.spaceanswers.com/deep-space/whats-the-nearest-solar-system-to-our-own/
https://www.quora.com/If-you-pull-a-stick-that-is-2-light-years-long-would-the-other-end-move-at-the-exact-time-you-pulled-it
Few other areas involved in this, but Copper Knickers has the right end of it as well. It would likely propagate at the speed of sound within that material. Likely tearing the stick apart if made with just about anything we know of today that's rigid enough to call a 'stick' but that's why it's more of a mental exercise.
So, yeah, back to the topic. Gravimeters, how do they work in the FE with UA?I have yet to see any answers the make any sense at all of the variation of gravity with latitude, altitude or east-west motion.
ROFLMAO!
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
I just have hear more about this concept.
Can you explain please?
I think the 'push' would propagate at the speed of sound for whatever material the cue is made of. So for all materials known this would actually take a lot longer than a 'couple of seconds' to get to the moon.
You do understand that sound is a mechanical pressure wave propagating through a medium, don't you?ROFLMAO!
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.
I just have hear more about this concept.
Can you explain please?
I think the 'push' would propagate at the speed of sound for whatever material the cue is made of. So for all materials known this would actually take a lot longer than a 'couple of seconds' to get to the moon.
speed of sound?
If you had a cue stick that reached from the Earth to the RE moon and you were somehow able to push it, the rear part of the stick would move a couple of seconds before the tip end of the stick moves.ROFLMAO!
I just have hear more about this concept.
Can you explain please?
I think the 'push' would propagate at the speed of sound for whatever material the cue is made of. So for all materials known this would actually take a lot longer than a 'couple of seconds' to get to the moon.
speed of sound?
I'm sure we are just communicating differently, so are saying that a material if pushed from the back....... cannot be accelerated faster than the speed of sound?Important piece: The speed of sound varies depending upon the medium.
For instance.... Instead of a 1 light year long object, lets go down to.... A cast Iron Rod, 3 feet long 1 inch in diameter... you pick the shape...
If I apply an accelerator to the rear of the Iron Rod that is greater than the speed of sound.... The opposite end of this cast Iron Rod.... does what again?
Because I immediately think of ballistics... That goes from 0 to fast as hell and the ballistic doesn't loose shape due to being shot...
I'm sure we are just communicating differently, so are saying that a material if pushed from the back....... cannot be accelerated faster than the speed of sound?
For instance.... Instead of a 1 light year long object, lets go down to.... A cast Iron Rod, 3 feet long 1 inch in diameter... you pick the shape...
If I apply an accelerator to the rear of the Iron Rod that is greater than the speed of sound.... The opposite end of this cast Iron Rod.... does what again?
Because I immediately think of ballistics... That goes from 0 to fast as hell and the ballistic doesn't loose shape due to being shot...