ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist

  • 2289 Replies
  • 201664 Views
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1740 on: April 29, 2021, 04:22:47 AM »
Quote
That does not mean I'll find that truth but it does mean I can counter those that pass off, as truth, something in which they know they cannot verify to prove it.
So what you are really saying is that we are all guilty in our own individual way of only being willing to accept 'the truth' as we believe it to be.

Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1741 on: April 29, 2021, 04:54:19 AM »
Give me some explanations as to what's happening with masses.


they're falling.
if you have a stop watch and ruler, they're falling at a predictable rate.
what part of "predictable rate of falling" confuses you?
What is this predictable rate?

Whata the value?
Whata the cause?
Ask a more specific question and be less of a pos.

*

JackBlack

  • 21900
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1742 on: April 29, 2021, 04:55:45 AM »
But I do have a idea that Earth is not a spinning globe.
As just wild speculation, or do you claim to know that as truth?
Make up your mind.

I'm not lying.
It has been repeatedly explained to you that you are lying.
Lying about lying wont save you.

Again, what magic sustains this pressure gradient in your delusional model?
Why is the pressure gradient based upon the weight of the substance?
Why does the air then push objects down in direct defiance of this pressure gradient?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30061
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1743 on: April 29, 2021, 05:16:24 AM »
Quote
That does not mean I'll find that truth but it does mean I can counter those that pass off, as truth, something in which they know they cannot verify to prove it.
So what you are really saying is that we are all guilty in our own individual way of only being willing to accept 'the truth' as we believe it to be.
Of course we're all guilty of it.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30061
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1744 on: April 29, 2021, 05:17:06 AM »
Give me some explanations as to what's happening with masses.


they're falling.
if you have a stop watch and ruler, they're falling at a predictable rate.
what part of "predictable rate of falling" confuses you?
What is this predictable rate?

Whata the value?
Whata the cause?
Ask a more specific question and be less of a pos.
You said mass falls at a predictable rate, so tell me what the predictable rate is.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30061
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1745 on: April 29, 2021, 05:18:23 AM »
But I do have a idea that Earth is not a spinning globe.
As just wild speculation, or do you claim to know that as truth?
Make up your mind.


The one thing I can say as fact is the Earth model you go with, is nonsense and simple experiments show it to be just that.
No wild speculation required.

Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1746 on: April 29, 2021, 05:23:36 AM »
Give me some explanations as to what's happening with masses.


they're falling.
if you have a stop watch and ruler, they're falling at a predictable rate.
what part of "predictable rate of falling" confuses you?
What is this predictable rate?

Whata the value?
Whata the cause?
Ask a more specific question and be less of a pos.
You said mass falls at a predictable rate, so tell me what the predictable rate is.

Roughly 9.81m/s/s.

*

NotSoSkeptical

  • 8548
  • Flat like a droplet of water.
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1747 on: April 29, 2021, 06:19:52 AM »
Give me some explanations as to what's happening with masses.


they're falling.
if you have a stop watch and ruler, they're falling at a predictable rate.
what part of "predictable rate of falling" confuses you?
What is this predictable rate?

Whata the value?
Whata the cause?
Ask a more specific question and be less of a pos.
You said mass falls at a predictable rate, so tell me what the predictable rate is.

Are you suggesting that mass doesn't fall at a predictable rate?
Rabinoz RIP

That would put you in the same category as pedophile perverts like John Davis, NSS, robots like Stash, Shifter, and victimized kids like Alexey.

*

JackBlack

  • 21900
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1748 on: April 29, 2021, 03:14:47 PM »
The one thing I can say as fact is the Earth model you go with, is nonsense and simple experiments show it to be just that.
No wild speculation required.
And do you know what that means?
You are claiming a truth. The fact that what you claim is truth is a blatant lie has no bearing on that.
So stop acting like you are just presenting your opinion when you claim things as fact.

Now why don't you try to justify this blatant lie of yours?
You are yet to present experiment that shows anything wrong with the globe.

Instead you just continually repeat the same pathetic lies like you do in the other thread.

Just like you can't justify your lie that there is any problem with gravity. Instead you just continually dismiss it as nonsense and blatantly lie about it like claiming that it can't explain the pressure gradient of the atmosphere, when it is exactly what explains it.

So even though you pretend you have facts, while denying that you do, all you actually have is wild speculation and wilful rejection of reality.

Again, can you justify why the pressure exists in the first place and is magically sustained, with no extra force required?
Can you justify why this gradient is based on the weight of the fluid?
Can you justify why the air doesn't remove this gradient by the high pressure air pushing the low pressure air up?
Can you justify how and why the air then magically pushes things down in direct defiance of this pressure gradient?
Can you explain why the high pressure air below doesn't just push objects up towards the low pressure air above?
Can you explain why the air then decides to magically change its mind and push some objects up?
NO!
You have no explanation nor justification. All you have is baseless assertion where you wilfully ignore what air and other fluids have been shown to repeatedly do.
All so you can pretend you have a viable alternative for gravity so you can pretend your irrational attack on the globe isn't just wilful rejection of reality.

Conversely, gravity actually explains it.
Gravity means each object has weight, trying to move it down.
This includes the air (and other fluids), with the air being crushed down by the weight of the air above.
This causes the air (and other fluids) to have a pressure gradient based upon the weight of the fluid.
This causes the air (and other fluids) to push objects up. This is known as buoyancy.

If weight is greater, the object falls.
If buoyancy is greater, the object goes up.
Even if the weight is greater, the apparent weight that is recorded on a scale is reduced by the buoyant force.
This is most easy to see by evacuating a container, causing it to displace more air and thus have a greater buoyant force, reducing its apparent weight.

Again, gravity makes sense, matches what is observed in reality, and can actually explain it.
Your nonsense makes no sense, defies simple logic and experiments, and doesn't match reality at all.

Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1749 on: April 29, 2021, 03:31:57 PM »
Quote
The one thing I can say as fact is the Earth model you go with, is nonsense and simple experiments show it to be just that.
No you can't because the Earth model that we go with is the true one and yours is nonsense. 

Of course your 'simple experiments' prove to you your model is correct because that's exactly what you designed them to do. So in your mind they show you what you want them to.  The fact that no one can verify the results from those experiments themselves because you have never explained them immediately nullifies them as showing anything.

Conspiracy theorists are always harking on about finding 'the truth'. In your mind your experiments are showing you the truth but only the truth that you want to believe.

 

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30061
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1750 on: April 29, 2021, 11:16:10 PM »
Give me some explanations as to what's happening with masses.


they're falling.
if you have a stop watch and ruler, they're falling at a predictable rate.
what part of "predictable rate of falling" confuses you?
What is this predictable rate?

Whata the value?
Whata the cause?
Ask a more specific question and be less of a pos.
You said mass falls at a predictable rate, so tell me what the predictable rate is.

Roughly 9.81m/s/s.
Took your time but you got there.
Soooo, this 9.81m/s/s is thrown out in any set up, whether it's dropped from head height or in a supposed vacuum.
And yet terminal velocity is always argued. Why?

You can't have terminal velocity for 9.81 m/s/s.
You can't have terminal velocity at all but that's another argument.

You see, predictable fall is specific to similar masses of similar shapes, only.
Atmospheric pressure resisting that falling mass changes any predictability.
The only thing you can argue for predictability of all mass, (which I think you are trying to do) is to appeal to a vacuum, which cannot be achieved.


Your next best argument is to appeal to extreme low pressure which also has no validity over elevated distance.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30061
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1751 on: April 29, 2021, 11:17:07 PM »
But I do have a idea that Earth is not a spinning globe.
As just wild speculation, or do you claim to know that as truth?
Make up your mind.


The one thing I can say as fact is the Earth model you go with, is nonsense and simple experiments show it to be just that.
No wild speculation required.
What are these simple experiments?
Looking through a level tube and simply denying that you can see the ground on a downward curve, due to your strawman globe being tiny.
Do you got anything else? or is the rest just wild speculation.
I'll let you know it all after you get to 500 posts.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30061
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1752 on: April 29, 2021, 11:17:42 PM »
Give me some explanations as to what's happening with masses.


they're falling.
if you have a stop watch and ruler, they're falling at a predictable rate.
what part of "predictable rate of falling" confuses you?
What is this predictable rate?

Whata the value?
Whata the cause?
Ask a more specific question and be less of a pos.
You said mass falls at a predictable rate, so tell me what the predictable rate is.

Are you suggesting that mass doesn't fall at a predictable rate?
It depends on the mass.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30061
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1753 on: April 29, 2021, 11:19:37 PM »
The one thing I can say as fact is the Earth model you go with, is nonsense and simple experiments show it to be just that.
No wild speculation required.
And do you know what that means?
You are claiming a truth. The fact that what you claim is truth is a blatant lie has no bearing on that.

I am claiming a truth when telling you a spinning globe is nonsense.
Like I said before, if I claim fact then I have to back them up.
I backed up my facts with simple water level.

So, no....it's not a blatant lie, at all.


BUT......you are free t think what you want .

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30061
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1754 on: April 30, 2021, 12:15:53 AM »
The one thing I can say as fact is the Earth model you go with, is nonsense and simple experiments show it to be just that.
No wild speculation required.
And do you know what that means?
You are claiming a truth. The fact that what you claim is truth is a blatant lie has no bearing on that.

I am claiming a truth when telling you a spinning globe is nonsense.
Like I said before, if I claim fact then I have to back them up.
I backed up my facts with simple water level.

So, no....it's not a blatant lie, at all.


BUT......you are free t think what you want .
But, do you even believe the earth is flat? I thought your cell shaped earth was like in your avatar, or have you changed your mind yet again?
I'll let you know when you reach 100 posts.

Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1755 on: April 30, 2021, 12:35:02 AM »
Give me some explanations as to what's happening with masses.


they're falling.
if you have a stop watch and ruler, they're falling at a predictable rate.
what part of "predictable rate of falling" confuses you?
What is this predictable rate?

Whata the value?
Whata the cause?

Ask a more specific question and be less of a pos.
You said mass falls at a predictable rate, so tell me what the predictable rate is.

Roughly 9.81m/s/s.
Took your time but you got there.
Soooo, this 9.81m/s/s is thrown out in any set up, whether it's dropped from head height or in a supposed vacuum.
And yet terminal velocity is always argued. Why?

You can't have terminal velocity for 9.81 m/s/s.
You can't have terminal velocity at all but that's another argument.

You see, predictable fall is specific to similar masses of similar shapes, only.
Atmospheric pressure resisting that falling mass changes any predictability.
The only thing you can argue for predictability of all mass, (which I think you are trying to do) is to appeal to a vacuum, which cannot be achieved.


Your next best argument is to appeal to extreme low pressure which also has no validity over elevated distance.


You really are a pos.
You said 9.8 long time ago and i corrected your units.
Keep playing games.
I wasnt sure what you were asking because it was very open ended question - as i specifically asked you to sepcifcially ask.

Yes
Terminal velocity sums up the net forces where the drag effect cancels out the "predictable fall rate" and woohooo - a constant velocity is acheived.

This was already discussed and shows you still havent caught up or "got there yet".
« Last Edit: April 30, 2021, 12:38:14 AM by Themightykabool »

Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1756 on: April 30, 2021, 12:39:27 AM »
the environment being here on earth.
as a thing that falls at a predictable rate.
You say, predictable. I assume you o mean your accepted 9.8 metres per second which you claim is in a vacuum.

Am I right on thinking this is what you are going on?


If you are then there's nothing that offers you that reality.
And if you are using any and all atmosphere from a drop near sea level to mountain high, etc, then there's no predictable rate of fall on all objects.


Unless you can clarify.

Per second per second.

Theres two of them.

Yes

Very real and predictable and measruable.

Denying its existence is insanity as you can literally do this.

Not sure why you think this very real and measurable rhing doesnt exist

It has nothing to do with gravity.

If you drop something, it can be very predictable when it will hit the ground.

Maybe you can clarify what your standloint is because this is new in terms of denp - that things now dont fall in a predictable manner????


Amazing!!!

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30061
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1757 on: April 30, 2021, 02:54:01 AM »
you really are a pos.
You said 9.8 long time ago and i corrected your units.
Keep playing games.
I wasnt sure what you were asking because it was very open ended question - as i specifically asked you to sepcifcially ask.
You're struggling.



Quote from: Themightykabool
Yes
Terminal velocity sums up the net forces where the drag effect cancels out the "predictable fall rate" and woohooo - a constant velocity is acheived.
Constant velocity can never be a thing. It's absolutely impossible.

Quote from: Themightykabool
This was already discussed and shows you still havent caught up or "got there yet".
I'm more than caught up.
Your argument is built from  acceptance without knowing the truth.

Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1758 on: April 30, 2021, 03:24:03 AM »
It was only 3days ago.
Keep failing at basic math and easily observable reality which have no bearing on whether thers an ice dome or not.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30061
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1759 on: April 30, 2021, 03:25:27 AM »
It was only 3days ago.
Keep failing at basic math and easily observable reality which have no bearing on whether thers an ice dome or not.
What are you actually talking about?

*

JackBlack

  • 21900
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1760 on: April 30, 2021, 03:33:23 AM »
I am claiming a truth when telling you a spinning globe is nonsense.
Like I said before, if I claim fact then I have to back them up.
Yet you refuse to provide anything to back up that blatant lie of yours.
Instead you just appeal to things which show you are wrong, like water.
Water level clearly shows that Earth is round, beyond any sane doubt.
The fact that the bottom of distant obscured are obscured by the water, even though both the observer and the object are above the water, shows beyond any sane doubt, that the surface of water is curved.

So yes, it IS a blatant lie.
No matter how much you want to pretend that blatant lie of yours is the truth, it will remain a blatant lie.

You have NOTHING to justify your blatant lie that Earth is not round.
Just like you have NOTHING to justify your blatant lie that gravity is a fantasy.
Just like you have NOTHING to justify your blatant lie that air is a viable alternative for gravity.

Again, the simple questions you continue to avoid show that your alternative is not viable at all. Instead it is DOA.

Again, by what magic does your magical air magically maintain a magical pressure gradient?
By what magic does this magical air of yours magically make the pressure gradient proportional to weight of the fluid?
By what magic does this magical air magically stop the magical high pressure region from decompressing and pushing up the low pressure region above?
By what magic does the magical low pressure air above magically push down an object into a much greater force/resistance of the magical high pressure below?
By what magic does this magical air then magically decide to magically push up some objects instead of magically pushing them down?

Again, all of these wild claims of your defy simple logic and experimental evidence of how air works.

You're struggling.
Says the one who still can't address simple questions and still can't provide anything to justify their lies.
It is quite clear that you are the one struggling here.

Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1761 on: April 30, 2021, 05:47:46 AM »
the environment being here on earth.
as a thing that falls at a predictable rate.
You say, predictable. I assume you o mean your accepted 9.8 metres per second which you claim is in a vacuum.

Am I right on thinking this is what you are going on?


If you are then there's nothing that offers you that reality.
And if you are using any and all atmosphere from a drop near sea level to mountain high, etc, then there's no predictable rate of fall on all objects.


Unless you can clarify.

Per second per second.

Theres two of them.

Yes

Very real and predictable and measruable.

Denying its existence is insanity as you can literally do this.

Not sure why you think this very real and measurable rhing doesnt exist

It has nothing to do with gravity.

If you drop something, it can be very predictable when it will hit the ground.

Maybe you can clarify what your standloint is because this is new in terms of denp - that things now dont fall in a predictable manner????


Amazing!!!


This the, date april27, was three days ago when 9.81 was brought up.
No one is struggling but you and your gall to talk down to me while missing this is what im pointing out.

Youve yet to drawn a simple circle and triangle.
Lets go.

*

NotSoSkeptical

  • 8548
  • Flat like a droplet of water.
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1762 on: April 30, 2021, 08:24:32 AM »
Give me some explanations as to what's happening with masses.

they're falling.
if you have a stop watch and ruler, they're falling at a predictable rate.
what part of "predictable rate of falling" confuses you?
What is this predictable rate?

Whata the value?
Whata the cause?
Ask a more specific question and be less of a pos.
You said mass falls at a predictable rate, so tell me what the predictable rate is.

Are you suggesting that mass doesn't fall at a predictable rate?
It depends on the mass.

So different mass falls at different rates?
Rabinoz RIP

That would put you in the same category as pedophile perverts like John Davis, NSS, robots like Stash, Shifter, and victimized kids like Alexey.

Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1763 on: April 30, 2021, 01:13:58 PM »
Give me some explanations as to what's happening with masses.

they're falling.
if you have a stop watch and ruler, they're falling at a predictable rate.
what part of "predictable rate of falling" confuses you?
What is this predictable rate?

Whata the value?
Whata the cause?
Ask a more specific question and be less of a pos.
You said mass falls at a predictable rate, so tell me what the predictable rate is.

Are you suggesting that mass doesn't fall at a predictable rate?
It depends on the mass.

So different mass falls at different rates?

i'll jump the gun here and go to, yes, a bowling ball vs a balloon of similar SIZE (in measured diameter - no games playing) will fall faster because of AIR DRAG.
drag can be accounted for.
drag can be isolated in a wind tunnel test or even removed in a vaccuum chamber (he'll say it doesn't exist because vaccuums don't exist) so we'l call it an "extremely low pressure, small sponges" chamber.

don't give sceppy any outs.
he will string it along playing his stupid games.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2021, 01:15:40 PM by Themightykabool »

*

NotSoSkeptical

  • 8548
  • Flat like a droplet of water.
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1764 on: April 30, 2021, 01:23:46 PM »
Give me some explanations as to what's happening with masses.

they're falling.
if you have a stop watch and ruler, they're falling at a predictable rate.
what part of "predictable rate of falling" confuses you?
What is this predictable rate?

Whata the value?
Whata the cause?
Ask a more specific question and be less of a pos.
You said mass falls at a predictable rate, so tell me what the predictable rate is.

Are you suggesting that mass doesn't fall at a predictable rate?
It depends on the mass.

So different mass falls at different rates?

i'll jump the gun here and go to, yes, a bowling ball vs a balloon of similar SIZE (in measured diameter - no games playing) will fall faster because of AIR DRAG.
drag can be accounted for.
drag can be isolated in a wind tunnel test or even removed in a vaccuum chamber (he'll say it doesn't exist because vaccuums don't exist) so we'l call it an "extremely low pressure, small sponges" chamber.

don't give sceppy any outs.
he will string it along playing his stupid games.

I know how scepti operates.

This isn't my first rodeo.
Rabinoz RIP

That would put you in the same category as pedophile perverts like John Davis, NSS, robots like Stash, Shifter, and victimized kids like Alexey.

Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1765 on: April 30, 2021, 08:59:28 PM »
Take it how you like but this is the reality of the gravity you go with. Something that's not proved and has not been done as any experiment to show what this force is.
No, that is your denp nonsense.
Gravity has been proven beyond any sane doubt.


No, it hasn't.
<snip>
Why?  Because you say so?  It is a stone-cold fact that there are literally tens of millions of pages of peer reviewed data that has never been refuted.  Your inability to comprehend it doesn't make it fake.

Mike
Name one.
I could provide you a dozen if you'd like.  I start with just a few. 

This first one is titled "Experimental Tests of Gravitational Theory".  It provides a description of each experiment, the analytical solution, and citations to the peer reviewed, published source.  All the equipment, methodologies, test procedures, results, and conclusions are there for your review and verification.

https://pdg.lbl.gov/2019/reviews/rpp2018-rev-gravity-tests.pdf

Here are a few more.  All peer reviewed.  When you're done with they I have more for you.  Or, you can learn to do your own research because data like this is easily available.

Infrasound and gravity waves over the Andes observed by a pressure sensor on board a stratospheric balloon
https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1605726

Black Holes and Other Clues to the Quantum Structure of Gravity
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4434/9/1/16

General approach to the Lagrangian ambiguity in f(R, T) gravity
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08920-4.pdf

Topics in soft collinear effective theory for gravity
https://journals.aps.org/prd/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.066019

Probing gravity and growth of structure with gravitational waves and galaxies’ peculiar velocity
https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2020/pub/fermilab-pub-20-185-ae.pdf

Convectively Forced Diurnal Gravity Waves in the Maritime Continent
https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/77/3/jas-d-19-0236.1.xml
Since it costs 1.82¢ to produce a penny, putting in your 2¢ if really worth 3.64¢.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30061
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1766 on: May 01, 2021, 01:01:37 AM »
I am claiming a truth when telling you a spinning globe is nonsense.
Like I said before, if I claim fact then I have to back them up.
Yet you refuse to provide anything to back up that blatant lie of yours.

I did but you decided water wasn't level and could curve around a ball.
I can't help you with that if that's what you want to believe.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30061
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1767 on: May 01, 2021, 01:03:06 AM »
the environment being here on earth.
as a thing that falls at a predictable rate.
You say, predictable. I assume you o mean your accepted 9.8 metres per second which you claim is in a vacuum.

Am I right on thinking this is what you are going on?


If you are then there's nothing that offers you that reality.
And if you are using any and all atmosphere from a drop near sea level to mountain high, etc, then there's no predictable rate of fall on all objects.


Unless you can clarify.

Per second per second.

Theres two of them.

Yes

Very real and predictable and measruable.

Denying its existence is insanity as you can literally do this.

Not sure why you think this very real and measurable rhing doesnt exist

It has nothing to do with gravity.

If you drop something, it can be very predictable when it will hit the ground.

Maybe you can clarify what your standloint is because this is new in terms of denp - that things now dont fall in a predictable manner????


Amazing!!!


This the, date april27, was three days ago when 9.81 was brought up.
No one is struggling but you and your gall to talk down to me while missing this is what im pointing out.

Youve yet to drawn a simple circle and triangle.
Lets go.
It's easy to draw a circle or a triangle. I don't see what it's going to prove to you other than seeing a circle and a triangle.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30061
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1768 on: May 01, 2021, 01:03:49 AM »


So different mass falls at different rates?
Of course.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: ANOTHER EXPERIMENT: Gravity Doesn't Exist
« Reply #1769 on: May 01, 2021, 01:11:16 AM »
I am claiming a truth when telling you a spinning globe is nonsense.
Like I said before, if I claim fact then I have to back them up.
Yet you refuse to provide anything to back up that blatant lie of yours.

I did but you decided water wasn't level and could curve around a ball.
I can't help you with that if that's what you want to believe.

Level doesn’t mean flat.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.