Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
.
We can overcome all these drawbacks with duct tape and WD-40.
>WD-40
> Electronics
ITT: Mrs. Peach doesn't understand federal law and thinks people can just ignore the US immigration policy.
Mrs. Peach is right, assuming that Lorddave's fiancee would enjoy the fate of an illegal immigrant working on a farm.
Also, Tom is right. Underground economy is a very important, albeit unofficial, part of the US economy.
They changed the thing.
This is an accusation. It is unsupported. Support it, or don't make it.
NASA put out the poster and people said "ooooh, look at that!" After people pointed out that a couple of cloud swirls were identical, those totally transparent people in Houston became a little more so.
This is an accusation. It is unsupported. Support it, or don't make it.
The composition is not deceptive. The swirls are not identical. Read more carefully.
Do you have any evidence to support that attack on NASA?
You'll have to actually provide some references to that renaming to get me to investigate your outlandish questions. Please do your own homework.
And that is why I included the reference link to exactly that point. Yes, reasonable people do trust NASA's transparent manipulation of photographs.
consist: to be composed or made up —usually used with of <breakfast consisted of cereal, milk, and fruit>
I'll ask again, does not posting several photographs consist of posting a photograph?
That is, in fact, several photographs in one. Did you check the reference?
Did you check the meaning of ''a?"
Does not posting several photographs consist of posting a photograph?
That is, in fact, several photographs in one. Did you check the reference?
A rule of thumb I've always found useful is to never mod someone who asks for it or seems to want it too much.
That said, the issue isn't the mods. We thought it was last time as well, but that turned out exactly the same. And the time before that. And the time before that.
In the end, what we need to do is stop pussyfooting about the rules and run this place TheEngineer style and ban based off what more or less is our judgement. Obviously, this works better with less more active mods than more less active mods (or even more active mods).
Its a matter of trolls being inherently attracted to this place and constantly trying to test their limits, like children.
If Tom is making claims that defy the laws of optics (being able to see a beach ball at 30+ miles) then what possibilities should we consider?
I thought all this time it was a frisbee game. Anyway, back to the preconcluded conclusion, I start out to determine if Markjo is a liar. I have compiled this list of possibilities:
He is either (1.)telling a whopper or he is (2.) a perjurer. Ergo he is a liar.
Oh my, what is wrong with that?
What is wrong is that you have provided no evidence that I have told a whopper or am a perjurer. On the other hand, evidence has been provided that suggests that Tom's "first hand testimony" seems to defy the laws of optics in that even good quality telescopes can not resolve beach ball (or frisbee) sized objects at a distance of 30+ miles.
...
What is your point?
...
...
...There is not a weather condition other than sunny (assuming sunny is default) that actually improves your visible range.
...
If Tom is making claims that defy the laws of optics (being able to see a beach ball at 30+ miles) then what possibilities should we consider?
Really, if you start out with that list of possibilities disregarding 'true,' it's fatally flawed from the get-go as you're preconcluding the conclusion.