If you think that a low density or hollow object displacing more air magically makes it resist less, explain how; otherwise, admit your air nonsense does not explain inertia (i.e. an objects resistance to change in motion).
I didn't say it displaced more air. Pay more attention and try not to twist. All you're doing is winding yourself up, not me.
Yes, you keep avoiding that conclusion, because you want to pretend you aren't wrong, but you have admitted that the amount of water displaced is negligibly different and logic dictates that the exact same applies to the air around the object when you move it, and you have admitted that you need to move the air inside the object when you move it.
So it is a simple fact that you displace more air by moving a hollow object than you do by moving a solid object of the same exterior volume.
So stop twisting it, accept this fact and explain how that causes a lesser resistance.
Because all you are doing is deflecting your complete and utter failure to explain reality.
Another one that can't explain.
The one who can't explain here, is YOU!
Now stop with the pathetic deflection and either explain how displacing less air causes more resistance or admit you have no ability to explain observed inertia.
I have every interest in believing...but to do so, I need proof. I have zero as it stands, from you or any other globalist.
Stop lying. You have no interest in accepting reality.
You have been proven wrong repeatedly and you just ignore that proof so you continue to pretend your rejection of reality and promotion of your delusional fantasy is justified.
If you truly had an interest in believing you would accept that inertia is based upon mass, not the amount of air displaced. You would accept that your denspresure nonsenses is incapable of explaining why things fall, and so on.
But instead you continually reject all that because you do not give a damn about reality at all, as you hate it.